Answer:
a
Explanation:
basic tenant of Christianity
Why do you think the Germans found Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles so objectionable (offensive)? (3-4 sentences)
Answer:
The main reasons why the Germans hated the Treaty of Versailles was because they thought it was unfair. Germany had not taken part in the Conference. They hated clause 231 – the 'War Guilt' clause – which stated that Germany had caused 'all the loss and damage' of the war.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Germans hated Clause 231 (which blamed Germany for causing the war), because it was the excuse for all the harsh clauses of the Treaty, and because they thought Russia was to blame for starting the war. Germany's military power was reduced, and it was not allowed any troops in the Rhineland
Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles, known as the War Guilt Clause, was a statement that Germany was responsible for beginning World War I. The War Guilt Clause was added in order to get the French and Belgians to agree to reduce the sum of money that Germany would have to pay to compensate for war damage.
Explanation:
hope this helps
"In adopting some form of prohibition legislation during World War I, the United States was far from unique. Partial liquor control measures . . . had been enacted by many countries during the war, and some of the new drink regulations lasted permanently. But in its effort to totally eradicate the use of intoxicating liquor, the United States stood alone among major industrialized nations. The moral fervor of evangelical Protestants had intersected with the Progressive reform wave and the institutional openings provided by the war. Combined with political representation weighted heavily to rural districts and the limited political power of the law’s targets, the antiliquor crusaders were able to rewrite the Constitution and federal law." Lisa McGirr, historian, The War on Alcohol: Prohibition and the Rise of the American State, 2016 Using the excerpt, answer (a), (b), and (c). Briefly describe ONE piece of evidence used in the excerpt to support the argument made in the excerpt. Briefly explain how ONE piece of evidence not mentioned in the excerpt could be used to support, modify, or refute the argument in the excerpt. Briefly explain ONE way the process discussed in the excerpt compares with the earlier reform movements at the time of the Second Great Awakening.
The intersection of evangelical fervor and progressive reform during World War I is evidence used to explain the unique success of prohibition in the U.S. Women’s activism in driving the temperance movement not stated in the excerpt could further support or modify this argument. Likewise, comparison of the prohibition movement to the reforms of the Second Great Awakening shows a shared influence of religiously-driven moral crusades.
Explanation:(a) One piece of evidence Lisa McGirr uses to support her argument in the excerpt is the interaction between the moral fervor of evangelical Protestants, the wave of Progressive reform, and institutional changes brought about by World War I. All of these factors, she argues, combined to create a unique political climate in the United States that allowed for the successful push for prohibition.
(b) An additional piece of evidence that isn't mentioned in the extract could include the role of women's activism in promoting temperance. Women's groups, like the Women's Christian Temperance Union, played a significant role in pushing for prohibition. This could both support and modify McGirr's argument by suggesting that gender dynamics, in addition to the factors she cites, played a crucial role in the prohibition movement.
(c) The process of prohibition, as described in the excerpt, compares to earlier reform movements such as those during the Second Great Awakening in that both were heavily influenced by religiously-motivated moral crusades. The Second Great Awakening, like the prohibition movement, saw evangelicalism intersect with sociopolitical reforms.
Learn more about Prohibition Movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/29795269
#SPJ12
The U.S.'s attempt to totally eradicate the use of intoxicating liquors during prohibition was unique, supported by evangelical Protestants and the Progressive movement. Organizations like the WCTU and Anti-Saloon League, not mentioned in the excerpt, also influenced prohibition, echoing the religious and moral reforms of the Second Great Awakening.
(a) One piece of evidence used in the excerpt to support the argument is the assertion that the United States was unique in its effort to totally eradicate the use of intoxicating liquor during World War I. This uniqueness is attributed to the convergence of moral fervor among evangelical Protestants, the Progressive reform wave, and the institutional opportunities presented by the war. The excerpt highlights the influence of these factors in rewriting the Constitution and federal law to enact prohibition legislation.
(b) One piece of evidence not mentioned in the excerpt that could support the argument is the widespread support for prohibition among various segments of American society. Prohibition enjoyed broad support from women's suffrage groups, temperance organizations, and rural communities, contributing to its eventual enactment. This evidence underscores the societal momentum behind the prohibition movement and further emphasizes the influential role of evangelical Protestants and Progressive reformers in shaping alcohol policy during World War I.
(c) The process discussed in the excerpt differs from earlier reform movements at the time of the Second Great Awakening in several ways. While both movements were characterized by moral fervor and sought to enact social change, the prohibition movement during World War I had distinct features. Unlike earlier reform movements that primarily focused on individual morality and religious revivalism, the prohibition movement of the early 20th century intersected with broader social and political currents, including Progressive reform efforts and the mobilization of women's suffrage groups. Additionally, the prohibition movement of this period leveraged wartime conditions and political dynamics to achieve sweeping changes at the national level, culminating in the enactment of constitutional amendments and federal legislation. In contrast, earlier reform movements often operated at the grassroots level and relied on religious revivalism and voluntary associations to promote moral reform within communities. Therefore, the prohibition movement during World War I represents a distinct evolution of reform efforts compared to the earlier reform movements associated with the Second Great Awakening.
hey sweeties need a answer like right now please :)
Which correctly identifies the purpose of Operation Nemesis?
a. secret assassinations of Turkish officials responsible for the Armenian genocide
b. trials for accused Turkish officials held responsible for the Armenian genocide
c. atrocities committed by Turks against Armenian prisoners of war during World War I
d. plan by the Allies to rescue Armenian civilians from Turkish concentration camps
The answer is A because Operation Nemesis was a covert operation and an assassination campaign.
Which of the following countries is the only country that can establish political independence if it is granted autonomy from China?
Answer:
I think they want you to say Tibet but it's not so clear; I think that from a legal point of view Tibet remains an independent state under illegal occupation.
What do you think Roosevelt meant when he said the only thing we have to do fear is fear itself
Which map represents the boundaries of the Roman Empire when it was at its largest?
Answer:
The Roman Empire was the post-Republican period of ancient Rome. As a polity it included large territorial holdings around the Mediterranean Sea in Europe, North Africa and West Asia ruled by emperors. From the accession of Caesar Augustus to the military
Explanation:
Answer:
Its the middle picture
Explanation:
The form of government that helped Galveston recover from the Hurricane of 1900 was a
a. mayor and council
b. commission
city manager
d. union
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
sooo
Asap I need help
Answer: B
Explanation: i put B and got the answer correct
Answer:b
Explanation:
A major consequence of the french and indian war of 1754–1763 was the
Answer:
Colonial disaffection and disputes which eventually resulted to the American Revolution.
Explanation:
The French and Indian war was a seven years war which started in 1954, and ended in 1963. The war resulted from the fact that colonist of French and British descent, wanted to expand their territories. Great Britain was able to acquire a large land mass in North America during the war.
The war began with the British trying to overthrow the French forces who had control of the Upper Ohio River Valley. They were defeated by the French forces on two occasions. The British forces eventually gained victory, but the resultant effect was taxing colonists heavily because of the high cost of the war.This caused disaffection between the colonists and the government.
What are 3 things you learned about Charlemagne? Thanks, will give brainliest
Answer:
also known as Karl and Charles the Great, was a medieval emperor who ruled much of Western Europe from 768 to 814. In 771, Charlemagne became king of the Franks, a Germanic tribe in present-day Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and western Germany.
Explanation:
Answer:His father was born a king . His brother died soon after becoming co-king. HE IS CONSIDERED THE FATHER OF EUROPE
Explanation:
Analyzing the Cold War
Using what you leared in the lesson and the documents
you read in the assignment, answer this question:
How did the Cold War lead to conflict?
Explanation:
It created tension between the Soviet Union and the US.It was really close to creating a nuclear war.
The Cold War led to conflicts through proxy wars, ideological battles, covert operations, nuclear arms races, and the division of Europe. These strategies allowed the US and the USSR to exert influence without direct military confrontation.
The Cold War, occurring after World War II, was characterized by ideological, political, and economic rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union, without direct military confrontation between the two superpowers. This led to various conflicts in several ways:
Proxy Wars: The United States and the Soviet Union supported opposing sides in conflicts such as the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Soviet-Afghanistan War. This allowed superpowers to combat each other indirectly.Ideological Battles: The Cold War pitted capitalism and democracy against communism and socialism, leading to political and social conflicts worldwide.Political Assassinations and Covert Operations: Secret agents and political assassinations were rampant in places like Cuba, Nicaragua, and Chile, often fueled by Cold War animosities.Nuclear Arms Race: Both superpowers amassed vast stores of nuclear weapons, leading to a state of mutual deterrence and fear.Division of Europe: The Soviet Union established communist regimes in Eastern Europe, leading to physical and ideological barriers such as the Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall, further fueling geopolitical tensions.In summary, the Cold War led to conflicts through proxy wars, ideological battles, covert operations, nuclear arms races, and division of Europe, significantly shaping global politics for over four decades.
Complete Question:
How did the Cold War lead to conflict?
Please help which one is it
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Looking at the image, it looks like there is some kind of spider-like insect suspended in what is probably some kind of hardened sap or amber. We cannot tell how long the insect has been captured in this substance, but we can note that it looks remarkably well-preserved. Therefore, it must be D.
Just a note that usually, any type of fossil that looks similar to this (where an organism is locked inside amber or hardened resin) is considered a "preserved remains" fossil.
Hope this helps!
Name the June 1929 economic indicator that foreshadowed a slowing economy.
Which of these BEST describes plebeians in the Roman Empire?
A) They were people banned from holding office.
B) They were powerful, "aristocratic" families.
C) They were the "middle class" of society.
D) They were the soldiers in the military.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It is c the last one was not right it is c'
What actions did Roosevelt take during the hundred days to try help the nations collapsing economy
Answer:
The New Deal was a series of programs and projects instituted during the ... shortly thereafter as a way to continue the country's economic recovery. ... a man who was not afraid to take bold steps to solve the nation's problems. ... banking bill) and the Home Owners' Loan Act, in his first 100 days in office.
Explanation:
which conclusion can be drawn about the second punic war from the information in the map
Answer:
The Second Punic War was fought between the Romans and the Carthaginians between 218 and 201 BC. The Romans then went on to a several-year war of wear and tear, gradually destroying or neutralizing the allies and main colonies of Carthage, and finally, under the leadership of Publius Cornelius Scipionus Africano, they won the Battle of Zama. This war definitely decided the struggle of both cities for dominance in the Mediterranean in favor of Rome.
Due to the complete destruction of Carthage in the Third Punic War in 146 BC and the long-term hegemony of the Roman Empire in the Mediterranean, no historical sources have been preserved describing the course of the war and its background from a Carthaginian or truly neutral point of view. Historians can therefore rely only on the works of Greek and Roman ancient authors and must therefore interpret them very carefully.
Which feature of the U.S. Government was considered
radical in 1776?
Led by a powerful leader
Decisions made by elected representatives
Authority granted over a large population
Citizenship limited to white men
Answer:decisions made by elected representatives
Explanation:i did it so i know its right
The correct option is decisions made by elected representatives.
What happened in 1776 with the government?By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain.
What was the government that was established in 1776?The Articles of Confederation served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain.
Learn more about U.S. Government here https://brainly.com/question/12486518
#SPJ2
During the U.S. civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the Black Panthers, and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee were all working toward the goal of ending racial discrimination. But ______ "prevented" them from working together toward that goal.
Answer:
their respective ideological differences and rigid bureaucratisation
Explanation:
The civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s achieved the breakthrough in equal-rights legislation for African Americans by breaking the pattern of public facilities' being segregated by “race” in the South.
This movement was a struggle for justice and equality for African Americans. It was led by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the Black Panthers, and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee but their respective ideological differences and rigid bureaucratisation "prevented" them from working together toward that goal
how did mussolini and hitler secure their positions as dictators once they had risen to power
Answer: they created secret polices for their armys and told everyone that they were doing it for the better of their countrys
Explanation:
If you’re convicting a murder would your case be state or federal?
Answer:
It really depend on the state but if you did a certain crime in that state the state get to charge you on there terms.
Explanation:also it a sate jurisdiction. So it most likely state. Im sure federal has to do with law and that kind of stuff.
Answer:
The Answer would be state
why does the British Parliament blame Benjamin Franklin for the Boston Tea party?
Answer: He defended the Boston Tea Party.
Explanation:
The British Parliament didn't blame Benjamin Franklin directly for the Boston Tea Party; instead, they held the colonists in general responsible. Franklin was an important figure in representing the colonies to the British, and was heavily scrutinized during this time.
Explanation:It is not entirely correct to say that the British Parliament directly blamed Benjamin Franklin for the Boston Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party was a protest initiated by the American colonists, including the Sons of Liberty group, against the Tea Act enacted by the British Parliament in 1773, where they dumped chests of tea into Boston Harbor.
The reason Benjamin Franklin is often implicated in narratives of this event is due to his significant role as a mediator and diplomat between the colonies and the British authorities during that period.
Franklin was seen as an integral figure in presenting the views of the colonies to the British authorities and pushing for the repeal of the unjust laws such as the Intolerable Acts that came after the Tea Party. However, the British Parliament blamed the colonists in general for the Boston Tea Party and not Franklin directly.
In response to the Boston Tea Party, the British Parliament enacted the Coercive Acts or Intolerable Acts in 1774, taking punitive measures like closing Boston harbor, and dismissing town assemblies, meant to punish Massachusetts until the destroyed tea was paid for.
Learn more about Boston Tea Party here:https://brainly.com/question/34721543
#SPJ2
During the 1990, genocide occurred in?
How did the arts in the United States reflect changes in society in the 1920s?
In 1939, British and French leaders realized they could no longer ignore Axis aggressions. What is one of the first actions taken by Prime minister Chamberlain in preparation for war? a. He brings together all members of the League of Nations to decide what steps should be taken to stop the Axis powers from further aggressive actions. b. He places troops along the borders of all free nations in Europe bordering Germany. c. He rushes a law through Parliament drafting men into the military. d. He calls together Parliament to gain approval for an increase of 200 percent in military.
The correct answer is C) He rushes a law through Parliament drafting men into the military.
In 1939, British and French leaders realized they could no longer ignore Axis aggressions. One of the first actions taken by Prime minister Chamberlain in preparation for war "He rushes a law through Parliament drafting men into the military."
At that time, tensions between Great Britain and Germany were high. The situation was difficult, the "winds of war" started to blow over Europe. Neville Chamberlain, Primer Minister of Great Britain, had decided to apply the foreign policy of containment to appease Nazi leader Adolph Hitler. Chamberlain tried at all costs to avoid another war. But everything changed in 1939 when Hitler's troops invaded Poland.
Answer:
C. He rushes a law through Parliament drafting men into the military
Explanation:
Between 1937 to 1940 Neville Chamberlain, the then United Kingdom Prime Minister was committed to ensure peace for United Kingdom and Europe at large, hence the European foreign policy termed as "peace for our time".
From this policy, Chamberlain was pursuing a policy of appeasement and containment towards Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler, the German Chancellor, however, he was preparing for the alternative or plan B, which is increasing the strength of Britain's armed forces, by rushing a law through Parliament drafting men into the military, after he realized together with French leaders, that they could no longer ingore the Axis aggressions (mainly Germany, Italy and Japan )
He eventually in September 1939 delivered an ultimatum over the invasion of Poland followed by a declaration of war against Germany.
Explain the role of slavery in the Texas economy.
Slavery led to the growth of economy of Texas getting more land under cultivation and leading to more cultivation of cotton.
Explanation:
Slavery led to the growth and development of the economy of Texas. People who were enslaved worked very hard and as a result of this, there was flourishment of the cotton industries in the economy of Texas.
With the slavery, the settlements grew and flourished in Texas, leading to more cultivation of cotton and many other commodities in Texas. More land came under cultivation.
Answer:
Slavery contributed to the growth and creation of Texas' economy.
Explanation:
Slavery contributed to the growth and creation of Texas' economy. People who were slaves worked very hard and the cotton industry flourished in the Texas economy as a result of this.
The settlements in Texas expanded and flourished with slavery, leading to further production in Texas of cotton and many other commodities. More land has been cultivated.
Hope this helps!
Based on what you have read, from what ancient greek word
do you think the word politics originates
Answer:
politiká
Explanation:
Answer:
late Middle English: from Old French politique ‘political’, via Latin from Greek politikos, from politēs ‘citizen’, from polis ‘city’.
Explanation:
That’s from the Oxford Dictionary so that won’t be wrong
African Wild Dogs: Ultimate Predators?
African wild dogs, also known as African painted dogs or Cape hunting dogs (scientific name: Lycaon pictus), are highly skilled predators and can be considered apex predators within their ecosystems.
Characteristics of African Wild Dogs
African wild dogs hunt together and they are very good at it. They live and hunt together in groups of about 10 to 20 animals. By working together as a team, they can defeat and kill much bigger prey.
Wild dogs can run really far and really fast without getting tired. They can run really fast, up to 60km/h (37mph), so they can chase and catch their food.
African wild dogs hunt together as a team using a technique called "pack hunting. " They work together to find, chase, and trap their prey by using strategies and communicating with each other through sounds. Working together helps them have a better chance of finding and catching their prey.
How have personal computers affected modern life? Select all that apply.
They have replaced most weather satellites as well as many space probes. They have made unauthorized access to personal information impossible. They have made exchanging detailed information much easier and faster. They have helped make models for understanding environmental changes.
Answer:
-They have made exchanging detailed information much easier and faster.
- They have helped make models for understanding environmental changes.
Explanation: They have made it easier for us to communicate and easier for us to do many of the everyday things that we must do to keep our lives in order. For example, computers have made it so much easier to pay bills than it used to be. You can set it up so that your bank automatically pays your mortgage every month.
What two skills did some slaveowners oppose being taught to slaves?
Answer:
Reading and Writing
Explanation:
Slaveowners would beat slaves learning that because they wanted to feel superior
Answer:
Reading and writing
Explanation: Because the slaves would then be educated.
Why did the united states declare war on japan? japan disregarded the treaty of versailles. japan refused to leave the axis powers. the japenese attack on pearl harbor. japan attempted to unite allies against the united states.?
Answer:
C. "The Japanese attach on pearl harbor."
Explanation:
The Lend-Lease Act of 1941 allowed the United States to provide war supplies to countries that were judged to be "vital to the defense of the United States." Which event in Europe most directly led to this change from neutrality? A. the Battle of Britain B. Adolf Hitler's rise to power C. Germany's invasion of Poland D. the Soviet Union's attack of Finland