Answer:
Explanation:
The answer is between A or B. We can't assess A. We do not know what took place during the direct examination. So you have to look at B.
B means that if the question is allowed, it has some value in answering it, but the question's answer is far outweighed by the fact that it is misleading. What difference does it make that the witness served on a jury that acquitted someone. So did 11 other people. Not every case is based on 12 angry men. What is implied in the question is that the witness will always go for acquittal where this defendant is concerned.
If your driver license and license plates were suspended for not having insurance under the Florida No-Fault Law, you must (A) Get the required insurance and attend a Driver Improvement course. (B) Pay $150 for a first offense and show proof of current insurance to get them back.(C) Retake the Florida Class(D) Road Rules test and show proof of insurance.
Answer:
option B is correct.
Explanation:
under Florida no fault law, if driver license is suspended
due to not having insurance then
for first offence - driver have to pay $150 and have to show current insurance also to get previous license back.
for second offence - will have to pay $250
for third offence - will have to pay $500
Police officer can seize the vehicle if driving license is under supervision for more than 30 days
A defendant is on trial for manslaughter after he hit a victim in a bar, causing the victim to fall and hit his head on the marble bar top. The defendant claims that he hit the victim in self-defense after the victim lunged at him with a knife. During the prosecution's case, a witness testifies that she heard the victim's friend shout at the defendant, "You just killed a helpless man!" A defense witness is called to testify that he was there and does not remember hearing the victim's friend say anything.Should the defense witness's testimony be admitted?A No, it is irrelevant to any issue in the case.B Yes, it is proper impeachment of the prosecution's witness.C No, it is improper impeachment of the prosecution's witness because it relates to a collateral matter.D No, it is improper impeachment because it does not positively controvert the prosecution witness's testimony, as the defense witness merely says he does not remember.
Answer: the correct answer is B. Yes, it is proper impeachment of the prosecution's witness.
Explanation:
Impeachment is the statement of an adverse reflection on the veracity of a witness. A witness may be impeached by either cross-examination or extrinsic evidence, such as by putting other witnesses on the stand who contradict the witness's declaration.
Answer: D No, it is improper impeachment because it does not positively controvert the prosecution witness's testimony, as the defense witness merely says he does not remember.
Explanation: The defense witness can easily deny the event but that doesn't mean that it never happened.
The real purpose of adding garnishes to a dish is to A. meet nutrition standards. B. use up leftovers in the kitchen. C. make it visually stimulating. D. enhance flavor with a contrasting taste.
Answer:
C. make it visually stimulating
Explanation:
You can make a dish more attractive as a meal when they also have an interesting look. Many dishes might be rejected by people because they might look gross. Similarly, dishes that have an interesting, nicer look might make people desire them more.
Behaviorists and cognitivists tend to focus on different aspects of learning. Which one of the following statements best describes this difference?
A) Behaviorism focuses on temporary changes; cognitivism focuses on relatively permanent changes.
B) Behaviorism focuses on relatively permanent changes; cognitivism focuses on temporary changes.
C) Behaviorism focuses on internal mental changes; cognitivism focuses on external behavioral changes.
D) Behaviorism focuses on external behavioral changes; cognitivism focuses on internal mental changes
Answer:
While behaviorism is about describing and clarifying observable things from people's outward behaviour, cognitivism is more about mental processes of understanding and obtenining knowledge through the senses and other internal processes such as memory or decision making. Thereby the correct one is (D)
Explanation:
Behaviorism focuses on external behavioral changes; cognitivism focuses on internal mental changes.
Explanation:The correct statement that describes the difference between behaviorism and cognitivism is option D), Behaviorism focuses on external behavioral changes; cognitivism focuses on internal mental changes.
Behaviorism is a psychological approach that focuses on observable behaviors and external stimuli that shape those behaviors. It emphasizes the role of reinforcement and punishment in learning and believes that behavior can be conditioned and changed through conditioning.
Cognitivism, on the other hand, focuses on internal mental processes such as perception, thinking, memory, and problem-solving. It emphasizes the role of cognitive structures and processes in learning and believes that learning involves the active participation of the learner's mind.
Learn more about Behaviorism and Cognitivism here:https://brainly.com/question/37007309
#SPJ6
AIDS, a disease of the immune system, is directly affected by stress. Stress may then promote the deadly progression of the disease. These two statements are an example of ________ factors influencing ________ processes.
Answer:
These two statements are an example of psychological factors influencing biological processes
Explanation:
Attitudes or behavior, as well as psychological factors such as stress and depression, can negatively affect some illness (such as diabetes mellitus, heart disease, AIDS or migraines) or symptom (such as pain). Psychological factors may aggravate the disease or symptoms, sometimes resulting in hospitalization or a visit to the emergency room. For example, severe stress may promote the deadly progression of AIDS and temporarily weaken the heart, or chronic work-related stress may increase the risk of high blood pressure. There may be an increased risk of suffering, death or disability due to the disease.
The statements about AIDS and stress are examples of psychophysiological factors influencing immunological processes. This is studied in psychoneuroimmunology, which explores how psychological factors like stress can affect immune functioning. Managing stress through effective coping mechanisms and social support can mitigate the negative impact on immunological processes.
Explanation:The two statements you mention about AIDS and stress are examples of psychophysiological factors influencing immunological processes. Psychophysiological refers to the interaction between the mind (psycho) and the body (physiological). In this case, the mind's response to stress can have a physical effect on the body, specifically on the immune system. This can accelerate the progression of immune-related diseases such as AIDS because stress can weaken the immune system, making it less able to fight off disease.
In fact, this is studied in the field of psychoneuroimmunology. It explores how psychological factors, such as stress, can influence the immune system and immune functioning. Stress plays a significant role in our body's natural defence mechanism. Under stress, the body prepares to either fight or flee the stressful situation - an evolutionary response that was vital for survival. However, nowadays, many stressors (e.g., emotional upheaval, work pressures) are not easily resolved through these physical actions, which can lead to chronic stress and, in turn, immune suppression.
One key to managing stress is fostering good coping mechanisms, such as problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping, while maintaining a perception of control over stressors and nurturing social support systems, all of which can help mitigate the negative impact of psychophysiological factors on immunological processes.
Learn more about Psychophysiological factors and Immunological processes here:https://brainly.com/question/29494616
#SPJ3
A valid treaty between the United States and a foreign country provides for the elimination of all tariff barriers between the two countries. It authorizes the president of either country to issue a proclamation nullifying any state or local laws in that country that have the effect of impeding imports from the other country. The foreign country uses the metric system of measurement, and thus all goods produced there and exported to the United States are packaged in metric sizes, such as liters and kilograms. A law of a state in the United States requires all goods sold in that state to be packaged in traditional American sizes, such as quarts or pounds. Because the state law substantially impedes imports from the foreign country, the President of the United States has issued a proclamation nullifying the state law pursuant to the treaty. Is the President’s proclamation valid?
Answer:
Yes, it is valid.
Explanation:
Article VI of the U.S. Constitution establishes that the Constitution, federal laws and treaties made should be considered "the supreme law of the land" (the highest law), and therefore, all states should be bound by them and no state law can take precedence over the most supreme authority.
Therefore, a valid treaty, that is to say, a constitutional treaty, is superior to any law that states may create, and since the state law substantially impedes imports from the foreign country that was agreed in the treaty, the President's proclamation nullifying the state law pursuant to the treaty is completely valid.
Mika, who is 85 years old, believes that his future time is limited. He has started to spend more time thinking about the meaning of life and how to show his family and friends that he truly appreciates them. Mika is demonstrating the _____ theory.
socioemotional selectivity theory
Explanation:Mika, who is 85 years old, believes that his future time is limited. He has started to spend more time thinking about the meaning of life and how to show his family and friends that he truly appreciates them. Mika is demonstrating the socioemotional selectivity theory.
The reason why "socioemotional selectivity" would be the correct answer because Mika is trying to build motivation to do more things before his life comes to an end.
In the socioemotional selectivity theory, people that are at a time ofd getting closer to deaths starts thinking about the meaningful stuff that they can do before they pass away, and all those meaningful stuff to do starts rushing through their mind because of their limited future. More so the people's motivation "shifts" into doing more stuff that they never did before and is motivated to do waht they never did before they pass away.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!Jacquie and Karen are both interested in the topic of divorce. Jacquie is a social psychologist and Karen is a sociologist. Compared to Karen, which of the following questions is Jacquie most likely to ask? (A) Do different divorce laws influence divorce rates?(B) Are divorce rates higher among people who are more educated?(C) Why does infidelity lead to divorce?(D) Is divorce more prevalent in northern states relatives to southern states?
Answer:
(C) Why does infidelity lead to divorce?
Explanation:
Jacquie is most likely to ask questions that have a more personal approach instead of going for a societal approach regarding this matter. Infidelity is a personal subject and it is more related to behavior and couple's dynamics than major societal issues such as laws, local culture, and so on.
A city's water board election laws provide that, although members of the board are elected at large, one member of the board is required to live within each of the five designated water districts within the city. The city's population was more or less evenly distributed among the districts when this election law was enacted. A resident and registered voter of the city investigated the district residency requirement and discovered that most of the city's newer residents had moved into the same two water districts, so that the city's population was no longer evenly distributed among the five water districts. Instead, 80% of the city's residents lived within its central and eastern water districts, while the other 20% of the city's residents were scattered among its three other, more rural, districts.If the resident files suit in federal court challenging the constitutionality of the residency requirement, how will the court most likely rule?A The residency requirement is unconstitutional because it impairs the voters' equal protection rights, in that it gives the voters in the less populous districts more effective representation on the water board.B The residency requirement is unconstitutional because it violates the candidates' equal protection rights.C The residency requirement is constitutionally permissible because the water board members do not exercise legislative power.D The residency requirement is constitutionally permissible because the water board members are elected at large.
Answer: the correct answer is D The residency requirement is constitutionally permissible because the water board members are elected at large.
Explanation:
The Equal Protection Clause prohibits state dilution of the right to vote, so that when a governmental body establishes voting districts for the election of representatives, the number of persons in each district may not vary significantly. This is the principle of "one person, one vote." This principle is used to almost every election where a person is being elected to perform normal governmental functions (e.g., an election for trustees for a junior college district). However, the principle of one person, one vote generally is not applicable where there is an at-large system of election. Here, the water board members are elected by all of the qualified voters in the city in an at-large system, and no discriminatory intent is evident. So, the statutory provision requiring board members to reside in each of the five districts does not come out in an imbalance or a dilution of the voting rights of the citizens of the city.
After losing the client's father in a car accident, a client has started practicing effective coping strategies. According to Horowitz’s stages of loss and adaptation, which stage is this indicative of?
Working Through. Psychiatrist Mardi Horowitz divides the process of normal grief into "stages of loss and adaptation". During the "working through", people think about and feel their loss, but also start to figure out new ways to manage it (new ways of managing might include making preparations), engaging in new projects for example. As time goes by, the movement between not thinking about the loss and thinking about the loss tends to slow down (becomes less pronounced).
"The correct stage, according to Horowitz™s stages of loss and adaptation, that this behavior indicative of is the ""Restitution"" stage.
Horowitzâ stages of loss and adaptation describe the process individuals go through after experiencing a loss. These stages include:
1. Outcry: This is the initial stage where the individual reacts with intense emotions such as shock, disbelief, or denial.
2. Denial: The individual minimizes the significance of the loss or refuses to accept its reality.
3. Intrusive: During this stage, the individual experiences intrusive thoughts, memories, or dreams related to the loss.
4. Working through: The individual begins to process the loss, experiencing a range of emotions and gradually coming to terms with it.
5. Completion: The individual accepts the reality of the loss and starts to find ways to move forward.
The stage of ""Restitution"" is not originally part of Horowitz’s model, but it is sometimes added to describe the phase where individuals start to rebuild their lives and engage in effective coping strategies after a loss.
This stage is characterized by the individual taking active steps to restore their life, seeking new relationships, and developing new interests or routines. It is indicative of adaptation and growth following the loss.
In the given scenario, the client has started practicing effective coping strategies after the loss of their father, which suggests they are in the process of restoring their life and adapting to the new reality, hence in the ""Restitution"" stage."
When actual GDP is below potential GDP the budget deficit increases because of: A. a decrease in transfer payments and a decrease in tax revenues. B. an decrease in transfer payments and an increase in tax revenues. C. an increase in transfer payments and a decrease in tax revenues. D. an increase in transfer payments and an increase in tax revenues.
Answer:
option c)
Explanation:
the correct answer will be option c)
tax revenue is the revenue which is gained through tax imposition on different items.
where transfer payments is the payments made or income received.
when actual GDP is below potential GDP the budget deficit increase because of the transfer value payment increases and the tax revenue is decreases.
A federally funded research study involving children 8 to 12 years old involves collecting a single voided urine sample to assess the frequency of asymptomatic proteinuria (higher amounts of protein the urine without any signs or symptoms of illness or infection). Your IRB has determined that assent of children age 8 and older is required for the study. A 10 year old does not assent to participate in the study described above. Which of the following procedures best describes the action to be taken by the investigator?A. Honor the child's decisionB. Consent both of the child's parents insteadC. Consent one of the child's parents insteadD. Request the child reconsider assenting to the study
Answer:
A
Explanation:
you can't use the child with out their cooperation or the consent of a parent or legal guardian. But I would say honor their decision and find a different child that meets requirements.
The procedure best describes the action to be taken by the investigator is to Honor the child's decision. Thus the correct option is A.
What is Research?Research refers to deep investigations of the data and information available to provide credentials with facts and figures to provide results that will utilize for the new research.
In the given case, it is explained in research there is taking a single sample of voiding urine from children aged 8 to 12 to determine the frequency of asymptomatic proteinuria in which one Kid denied participation.
In the given case, when an individual is denied to participate his decsion should be honored by the investigator as no one can be forced to perform any work out of their interest in a democracy.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about research, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18723483
#SPJ6
In Joe and Paulette’s marriage, Paulette does most of the housework and participates very little in major decision making. She perceives the relationship as fair and equitable. Joe makes most of the important decisions and does relatively little housework, but feels the relationship is unfair. This example illustrates what?
Answer: this example illustrates subjective measure of fairness
Explanation:
In this case, each person has a different point of view of what is fair or equitable in a relationship.
According to John Holland's personality type theory, people who are down-to-earth, practical problem solvers, and physically strong, but have mediocre social skills, are best described as
(A) conventional
(B) enterprising
(C) realistic
(D) intellectual
Answer:
The correct option is : (C) realistic
Explanation:
The John Holland's personality type theory, is a theory of career and vocational choices. The six categories were Realistic , Investigative , Artistic , Social , Enterprising and Conventional. This is the hexagonal or the RIASEC model.
One of the six categories described by Holland was Realistic or doers.
The realistic are the down-to-earth people who work with things. They are competitive, assertive and like being engaged in activities that require strength, skills and motor coordination. They are practical problem solvers and have mediocre social skills.
A defendant is on trial for murder. The only evidence linking the defendant to the crime is some blood found at the scene. The lead detective testifies that an officer took a vial containing a blood sample that had been retrieved by a crime scene technician and drove off with it. The officer is now dead. Next, the prosecution presents as a witness a crime lab chemist. The chemist will testify that he took a vial of blood that contained a label identifying it as having been retrieved from the subject crime scene, and that he performed tests that established a match between that blood and a blood sample taken from the defendant.Is the testimony of the chemist admissible?A Yes, because there has been proper authentication.B Yes, because the chemist qualifies as an expert witness.C No, because there is insufficient evidence of chain of custody.D No, because he did not take the original blood sample at the scene of the crime.
Answer:
I think its B. Hope you pass!
Explanation:
When Ernesto sees his mommy roll the thick ball of dough into a thin circle for a pie crust, he says, “Now there is more dough, because it's bigger.” His sister Lara tells Ernesto, “No, it's the same amount because Mommy could just roll it back again and it would look the same.” According to Piaget's framework, Ernesto can't conserve and Lara can _____.
Answer:
Conserve.
Explanation:
According to Piaget's framework, Ernesto can't conserve and Lara can conserve. According to Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development conservation of matter is a process. Ernesto has seen the changes in the dough but he thinks there is more matter. On the other hand, Lara has seen the changes too, but she realized that the amount of dough is the same before and after the changes. No dough was added or taken from the original amount. This is called reversibility and is a necessary condition to acquire conservation.
Rajiv works as a junior engineer in a firm. His friends Luke and Layla, who work in a different firm, earn more salary than he does. Rajiv considers quitting his job and joining his friends’ firm as he believes that everyone in that firm earns more salary than him. What type of reasoning is Rajiv using in his decision making?
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Inductive Reasoning.
Explanation:
In simple words, Inductive Reasoning is the reasoning in which the circumstances are generalized based on some evidence. For example, if you find a penny in your purse, you think that all the coins in your purse would be penny.
So in the given question, Rajiv is generalizing that every person in the other company gets more salary than him, based on the information about the salary which he got from his friends. No doubt the salary of his friends is more than his, but it does not mean that the salary of every person would be higher than him. So in this case, he is using Inductive Reasoning.
Which of the following best defines a family? a. Two unrelated adults who have chosen to share each other's lives in a relationship of mutual caring b. A married couple and their unmarried children living together c. A set of people related by blood, marriage or some other agreed-upon relationship, or adoption, who share the responsibility for reproducing and caring for members of society d. None of these answers is correct.
A family can be best defined as per option C. that is:
A family is considered or said as a set of people who are related by blood, or related through marriage or due to some other agreed-upon relationships, that includes adoption, and other relationships.
The people of family agree for sharing the responsibilities of each other for reproducing another family member and caring for all other members of the society.
A family can be related by blood or either by non-blood relations.
To know more about family, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2284676
Empathy __________. (A) serves as a motivator of prosocial behavior. (B) always yields acts of kindness and helpfulness.(C) leads to feelings of sorrow for another’s plight.(D) is more often expressed in toddlerhood than in the preschool years
Answer:
(A) serves as a motivator of prosocial
Explanation:
Empathy is a feeling that most people have in compassion for others. It is a way of analyzing one's suffering from your own perspective, as if you were suffering. Empathy is a noble feeling that motivates people to help each other, that is, it is a motivating factor for prosocial behavior.
Mark signed up for piano lessons to prove to himself that he could successfully master the challenge of learning to play the piano. What type of motivation is Mark displaying in this situation?
Answer: Competence motivation
Explanation: Based on the theory of competence motivation, motivation for achievement is the need to succeed, self-prove, achieve excellence, and is based on the personal sense of competence that people have. Each challenge is a motivation to master certain skills, to achieve success, and after each overcoming of the challenge increases a person's competence. Such mastery of a task, a challenge, can be an incentive to overcome a number of challenges and tasks that a person believes to be competent or able to overcome, and thus realize achievement, success.
What is a leading cause of death for paddlers in small crafts such as canoes
Answer:
leakage in the vessel, capsizing, Improper vessel
An artistic movement at its height from about 1790 to the 1840s that was in part a revolt against classicism and the Enlightenment, characterized by a belief in emotional exuberance, unrestrained imagination, and spontaneity in both art and personal life.
Answer: Romanticism
Explanation: Romanticism is a movement in art, that is, literary writing, painting, music, but also in everyday life. It appeared at the end of the 18th and lasted roughly until the mid-19th century. It expressed a rebellion against classicism and the Enlightenment, emphasizing the emotion, subjectivity, and inspiration, imagination. Also romanticists were passionate towards nature, the primacy of an individual, heroism, sensitivity, were more important above realistic, enlightening collectivism, classicism.
Polls show that americans want __________ while also supporting __________. more government; major cuts to military spending more government; major cuts to social spending less government; major cuts to social security less government; major cuts to military spending less government; almost every specific government program
Answer:
Polls show that americans want less government; almost every while also supporting specific government program.
What belief system was the basis for both christianity and islam?
Answer:
Judaism
Explanation:
Judaism believe in one God who will reveal His true Form and bring final judgement. Both Christianity and Islam believe in the same prophecy, but they have a differing opinion on who that one God is. Beside that difference, both Muslim and Christian teaching has a lot of similarities (especially with the old testament of the Bible).
Steve was excited when he finally landed the lead role in one of the community theater productions. He has been rehearsing his part for the past two months, but on the day that the play is scheduled to open, Steve awakens with a bad case of laryngitis and is unable to perform. At this point, Steve is MOST likely experiencingA. frustrationB. conflictC. pressureD. burnout
Answer:
Option: A. Frustration
Explanation:
Steve is experiencing frustration because he will not able to take part in the community theater productions on the very day of the opening of the play. He feels annoyed because he is having inflammation in the voice box which is preventing him from reaching his goal. He has done rehearsing for the past two months in a leading role and now it seems that will go in vain.
Which of the following experimental designs have the least explanatory power compared to the others?
a. Classical experimental design
b. All experimental designs have equal explanatory power
c. Solomon four-group design
d. One-shot case study
e. Posttest-only control group design
d. One-shot case study
Explanation:The reason why answer choice "d. One-shot case study" would be the correct answer because this would be a experimental design that has the least, or fewest, explanatory power compared to the other experimental designs.
A one-shot case stud is a study where students do not use any controlling factors and use only a single test group. Only one measurement would be taken after the study. The only thing that a one-shot case study would be measuring is the post-test results.
A "explanatory power" is pretty much a theory or hypothesis that one could make about a given subject and explain the subject very well and what causes it.
A one-shot case study doesn't have many factors that would help support a theory or hypothesis, due to the lack of evidence it would provide. This is why a one-shot case study would have the least explanatory power.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!One-shot case study is experimental designs have the least explanatory power compared to the others. Hence, option D is correct.
What is a One-shot case study?In a one-shot case study, there is just one test group and no controlling factors used in the research endeavor. Only one measurement would be performed after the trial. A single-case study would only assess the post-test results.
A theory or hypothesis that explains the topic and its causes in considerable detail is what is meant by the term "explanatory power."
A one-shot case study does not have many elements that could help support a theory or hypothesis due to the limited amount of evidence it would present. Consequently, the explanatory power of a single case study would be the lowest.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about One-shot case study, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14719091
#SPJ2
Statement: In advance of severe flooding, there is a need to get generators and communications equipment to the Staging Areas to equip advance response teams. It’s my responsibility to make sure the needed equipment arrives at the Staging Areas
(A) Logistics
(B) Planning
(C) Operation
(D) Finance
Answer:
Logistics
Explanation:
The logistics is defined as the necessary method or means for the movement of resources (including equipment, workforce, materials, products, supplies, etc.). logistics involves the security processes, transportation, times of arrival and departure, product or material conditions and the analysis of the process to achieve the delivery of the goods. in this specific case, if there is flooding condition, the logistics responsible organizes the resources and strategies for the success of the delivery, including properly packaging and protection of the generators and communications equipment.
Which of these is a feature of audible pedestrian crosswalk signals?A. Pedestrian trackingB. Directional beaconsC. Emergency instructionsD. Responses to voice commands
Answer:
Directional Beacons
Explanation:
Directional Beacons are a feature of audible pedestrian crosswalk signalsDirectional Beacons are efficient and help the blind cross the street since flashing lights aren't seen by them.
Mordancy.
Answer:
Directional beacons
Explanation:
a-p-e-x
What is the primary function of Dynamic Study Modules?
Assess what a student already knows, and where he or she may want to focus additional study
Normalize student learning so the teacher knows what to focus on in lecture
Give students real-life applications of the concepts they are currently learning in class
Allow students to collaborate with each other on assignments in Mastering
Answer:
Assess what a student already knows, and where he or she may want to focus additional study.
Explanation:
I had this on My Lab and Mastering and got a 100 on the assignment!
The primary function of Dynamic Study Modules is to Assess what a student already knows, and where he or she may want to focus additional study.
Dynamic Study Modules can be regarded as a module that continuously assess student performance as well as activity, and this helps to reinforce concepts that will bring improvement.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about Dynamic Study Modules at:
https://brainly.com/question/13171394
Is it fair that the security of an important elected official such as the President of the United States take precedence over the travel plans of thousands of his/her constituents?
Explanation:
Though it does not seem appropriate but taking precedence over the travel plans of thousands of constituents by the highly important elected official like President of the United States is the necessity of time. The elected official like United States President is a highly important person, and is the one who may have threats of life, or whose time is more important than anyone else, so to give him security and give him precedence over several travel plans of his or her constituents is far more important and necessary. We must realize that the security of this person is extremely important. So it is totally fair to give him precedence.