Answer:
it's 2 on edge
Explanation:
What is the correct formula for finding the frequency of an electromagnetic wave
A. F=c-A
B. F=A/c
C. F=A+c
D. F=c/A
is bread mold chemical or physical
A boat initially traveling at 10. meters per second accelerates uniformly at the rate of 5.0 meters per second2 for 10. seconds. How far does the boat travel during this time?
The boat would travel 350 meters during the given time period, assuming uniform acceleration. This is calculated using the equation of motion for distance.
Explanation:The distance traveled by the boat can be calculated using the equation of motion: S = ut + 0.5at², where S is the distance traveled, u is the initial velocity, a is acceleration and t is time. In this case, u = 10 m/s, a = 5 m/s² and t = 10 s.
Substituting these values into the equation we get: S = 10*10 + 0.5*5*10². So, the total distance travelled by the boat = 100 m + 250 m = 350 m. Therefore, the boat travels 350 meters during this time.
Learn more about the Physics equation of motion here:https://brainly.com/question/34615504
#SPJ12
How does paving parking lots and roads with concrete or asphalt affect surface water and groundwater?
I need help
Describe what happens to the energy of a wave if the frequency decreases. Enter your answer in the space provided.
The energy of the wave will decrease.
The energy of a wave is given as
E = h f
where E = energy of waver
h = plank's constant
f = frequency of the wave.
From the formula , we see that the energy of the wave is directly proportional to the frequency of the wave. hence as the frequency of the wave decrease, the energy of the wave will decrease.
What is the amount of displacement of a runner who runs exactly 2 laps around a 400 meter track?
A) 400 meters
B)0 meters
C)800 meters
The displacement is zero.
Hence, the correct option is B.
The displacement of an object is the change in its position.
In this case, the runner starts and ends at the same point, so the displacement is zero.
Even though the runner runs 800 meters (2 laps x 400 meters/lap), the runner does not change position.
The runner ends up where they started, so the displacement is zero.
Therefore, The displacement is zero.
Hence, the correct option is B.
To know more about displacement here
https://brainly.com/question/11934397
#SPJ3
If a car is traveling on the highway at a constant velocity, the force that pushes the car forward must be A. equal to the weight of the car. B. greater than the force of friction exerted upon the car. C. equal to the force of friction exerted upon the car. D. greater than the weight of the car.
Answer:
C. equal to the force of friction exerted upon the car.
Explanation:
We know according to Newton's First Law Of Motion , an object in rest or in uniform motion will be in same state unless or until an external force is not provided.
In other words , When no force apply on the body it being in the state of uniform motion or in rest.
In the case given, the car is travelling in the highway at a constant velocity. Therefore net force acting on car in horizontal direction is equal to zero.
It means all the forces acting on horizontal direction cancelling each other which cause net force equals to zero.
Here, to cancel force of friction the force that pushes the car in forward direction must be equals to it.
Therefore, C. option is correct.
A cable capable of pulling 4,500 N snapped while trying to drag a 20,000 N compressor across the street. What is the coefficient of static friction for this scenario?
Note: the 4500 N cable is used as Fs and is calculated the same as Fk
0.225
> 0.225
4,500 N
> 4,500 N
4.44
> 4.44
Please explain to me how you get your answer.
Answer:
[tex]\mu > 0.225[/tex]
Explanation:
The cable snapped because the frictional force [tex]f_s[/tex] was greater than the tension in the rope:
[tex]f_s > 4,500N[/tex]
Now,
[tex]f_s =\mu N[/tex]
where [tex]\mu[/tex] is the coefficient of static friction, and [tex]N[/tex] is the normal force. In our case, the normal force on the compressor is 20,000 N; therefore,
[tex]f_s =\mu (20,000N )[/tex].
Putting this into the condition [tex]f_s > 4,500N[/tex], we get:
[tex]\mu (20,000N )> 4,500N[/tex]
[tex]$\mu > \frac{4,500N}{20,000N} $[/tex]
[tex]\boxed{\mu > 0.225.}[/tex]
Answer:
>0.225 is correct if its not please let me know I'm willing to help!