If The States Population Has Increased.
A fee simple owner of a restaurant provided in his will that the property should go on his death "in fee simple to my friend, but if during my friend's lifetime my son has children and those children are alive when my friend dies, then to said living children." When the owner died, the friend took over the restaurant.If the son has children and one or more of them are alive when the friend dies, who will take title to the restaurant at that time?A The friend's heirs, because the attempted gift to the son's children is invalid under the Rule Against Perpetuities.B The son's children, because their interest is not contingent, being a possibility of reverter.C The son's children, because their interest is vested, subject to defeasance.D The son's children, because their interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being + 21 years.
Answer: the correct answer is D. the son's children, because their interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being + 21 years.
Explanation:
In the USA, up until the age of majority you are considered a minor. Generally speaking, the age of majority is considered sometime between age 18 and 21 in the USA.
In this case, the simple owner will is clear about the reach of the legal instrument.
In the given legal scenario, the testator's friend initially receives the property in fee simple. The son's children, because their interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being + 21 years. The option (D) is correct.
According to the provided scenario, the title to the property (in this case, a restaurant) would pass in fee simple to the friend, with a subsequent condition that if the testator's son has children and they are alive when the friend dies, the property would then go to the son's living children.
This can be construed as a remainder interest which is contingent upon the friend's death during the lifetime of the testator's son's children. Since this contingency could potentially be satisfied within 21 years after the death of a life in being at the time the interest was created (in this scenario, the friend), it does not violate the Rule Against Perpetuities.
Piaget believed that infants and toddlers __________. “think” with their eyes, ears, and hands are incapable of constructing schemes carry out many activities inside their heads assimilate more than they accommodate
Answer:
“think” with their eyes, ears, and hands
Explanation:
Piaget believed that infants and toddlers “think” with their eyes, ears, and hands.
Piaget believed that infants and toddlers “think” with their eyes, ears, and hands.
The answer is option A.
What does Piaget accept as true with approximate toddlers?Piaget believed that newborn babies have a small variety of innate schemas - even earlier than they have got had many opportunities to experience the sector. These neonatal schemas are the cognitive structures underlying innate reflexes. These reflexes are genetically programmed into us.
Piaget proposed 4 primary ranges of cognitive development and referred to as them sensorimotor intelligence, preoperational wondering, concrete operational wondering, and formal operational wondering. Each degree is correlated with an age length of early life, however simplest approximately.
Learn more about Piaget here: https://brainly.com/question/26516037
#SPJ2
Professor Shapiro is your life-span development instructor. One day in class, he discusses his belief that many older people withdraw from others because of their past stratification and that, if they were to engage in activities with others, it would make life more gratifying and promote the positivity effect. Professor Shapiro is supporting _____ theory.
Answer:
Professor Shapiro is supporting the Activity Theory
Explanation:
The Activity theory was developed by Robert Havingrust in 1961. It was also known as the Normal Theory of Ageing. It was developed in response to the disengagement theory. It emphasizes on the direct relation between life and Activity in old age.
Further Explanation:
Activity theory state that as people age, they should maintain social interactions and stay active to delay the aging process and to enhance the quality of life. It challenged the disengagement theory developed by Commings and Henry in 1961. The disengagement theory claimed that it was normal for older people to withdraw from society. It is a part of the aging process.
On the other hand, Havinghurst argued that there is a positive relationship between activity and life satisfaction. He called it " Busy Ethic". The level of social activity directly affected his positive views about himself.
This theory provides the key to age well. The key is to be an active member, meet people, go to long walks and behave as if we are still not old, Having an active lifestyle keeps the loneliness and sense of aloofness away. The more one does the better they age.
The critics of this theory consider the financial issues and unwillingness to socialize are a big hindrance for people to engage in various activities and the activity theory doesn't consider these. The critics say that old people cannot just keep repeating the same activity day in and day out.
Learn more:
disengagement theory: https://brainly.com/question/7597403
Keywords:
Older people withdraw, Activities, Older People
The belief of professor Shapiro that older people would live a gratifying life if they were to engage in more social activities is supported by activity theory.
Further explanation:
Activity theory is a theory of aging applicable especially to late adulthood which suggests that people who engage in activities and social interactions age gracefully compared to those who don’t. This theory suggests that there is a strong correlation between activity and quality of life and life satisfaction in late-adulthood.
The activity is a directly opposing theory to ‘disengagement theory’. Disengagement theory is an older theory which suggests that disengagement from activities is inevitable as one reaches old age. Disengagement theory proposes that disengagement is functional to successfully adapt to old age.
Another theory that was added on later was ‘continuity theory’, which proposes that people were active before remain active while those who were sedentary remain sedentary.
Professor Shapiro’s belief that ‘if old age adults engaged in activities with others, then their life would be more gratifying' supports activity theory of aging.
Learn more:
Explain three possible feelings or thoughts that a person who has been subjected to violent crime may have . https://brainly.com/question/1609123 Name and explain two personal values and two skills that can assist you in overcoming barriers regarding risky behavior. https://brainly.com/question/4924229Answer Details:
Grade: College Psychology
Subject: Psychology
Chapter: Life span development
Keywords:
Life span development, development psychology, activity theory, old-age, late adulthood, inactivity, activity, aging , adults, interaction.
Who opened the 23rd canadian parliament the first monarch of canada to open a parliamentary session
Answer:
Queen Elizabeth II
Explanation:
It was the only parliament formally opened by Queen Elizabeth II herself, rather than her formal representative, the Governor General. It was controlled by a Progressive Conservative Party minority under Prime Minister John Diefenbaker and the 18th Canadian Ministry.
Answer:
It was opened by Queen Elizabeth the second
Explanation:
PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST
Tammy witnessed a hit-and-run accident. She saw the license plate of the car that fled the scene. She tried to keep it in memory by repeating the sequence of digits and letters to herself until she could find a pen and paper to write it down. Tammy relied on which kind of memory?
Answer: Short-term memory
Explanation:
Short-term memory is referred to as a type of memory which keeps brief or short information temporarily. Information which an individual is presently thinking of can be remembered for a short period of time and it is always limited. Furthermore, information kept in short term memory can also be recalled through subvocal repetition. It is also called active memory. Thus, its time span is in seconds.
Tammy relied on short term memory.
Recklessness in the case of an audit is present if the auditor knew an adequate audit was not done but still issued an opinion, even though there was no intent to deceive financial statement users. This description is the legal term for:
(A) fraud.
(B) gross negligence.
(C) ordinary negligence.
(D) constructive fraud.
Answer: the correct answer is D. constructive fraud
Explanation:
Constructive fraud is a legal term describing a situation where a person or entity gained an unfair position over another by deceitful or unfair methods.
Sean has tried repeatedly to find a job. After each unsuccessful attempt, he concludes that there is just something about him that will always get in the way of success in his life. Sean is displaying a ____________ explanatory style.
Answer:
pessimistic
Explanation:
Generally speaking, when people blame themselves for negative events, no matter how responsible they were for what happened, they might be showing aspects of pessimistic explanatory style. This is specially the case if they believe that things like that will just continue and will let this thought to affect many aspects of their lives and decision making.
You are trying to decide if your brother's obsession with neatness is a problem. You consider whether the behavior is atypical, dysfunctional, distressful, and/or deviant in order to assess whether it truly is:
Answer:
You consider whether the behavior is atypical, dysfunctional, distressful, and/or deviant in order to assess whether it truly is a psychological disorder, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Explanation:
Psychological disorders refer to a combination of beliefs, thought patterns and behaviors that are clinically significant, and recurrently affect a person's social, emotional and occupational functioning. In this instance, if your brother's obsession with neatness is a problem and you are considering whether the behavior is atypical, dysfunctional, distressful, and/or deviant, you are likely checking if he has obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a type of anxiety disorder when a person has chronically intrusive and uncontrollable thoughts (obsessions), that lead to compulsive behaviors such as obsession with neatness, cleaning one's room, etc.
Thus, if you are trying to decide if your brother's obsession with neatness is a problem, you are assessing whether it truly is a psychological disorder, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Expression must have integral or unscoped enum type. TRUE OR FALSE
Answer:
true
Explanation:
The statement 'Expression must have integral or unscoped enum type' is TRUE. Programming languages like C++ require many expressions to be of integral or unscoped enum types due to memory management and operation execution reasons.
Integral type: This includes basic types like int, char, and other arithmetic types.Unscoped enum type: Enums that are not within a namespace, typically used to represent named integral constants.Type requirement: Many programming constructs and operators require their operands to be of integral or unscoped enum types, mainly due to how they manage memory and perform operations at the machine level.If the expression is not an integral or unscoped enum type, a compiler error may occur, indicating the strict type requirements.A recent news story reported that when a newly engaged woman gave some change to a homeless man, her ring fell into his coin jar. After he proceeded to return it. he received a large sum of money in donations from people touched by the story. This is an example of
Answer:
Just-world hypothesis
Explanation:
Just-world hypothesis is an assumption that belie that everything that happen in people's live is a direct consequences of their own action (If that people is doing good, those people will somehow be rewarded. If that people is doing bad, those people will somehow punished). This assumption is what probably influence the people to donate to the homeless man.
Chad is a senior a Small Town Public High School. His classmates have chosen him to read The Lord's Prayer at graduation. Sid Grinch, a member of the graduating class, is an atheist. Sid's family files a lawsuit to prevent anyone giving a prayer at the graduation. This is an example of a case that involves the ________ clause of the Constitution's First Amendment. a. free exercise b. free association c. establishment d. independence
Answer:
This is an example of a case that involves the c. establishment clause of the Constitution's First Amendment.
Explanation:
The establishment clause refers to the First Amendment's clause that states the following: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. This clause prohibits the U.S. government from establishing an official religion, from giving preference to one religion or promoting one religion over others and from forcing citizens to believe in a religion.
In the example of the case, this clause in involved because schools or public institutions should not be allowed to promote one religion over others, and to give a religious prayer at a school's graduation would be a form of giving preference to one religion over others.
The scenario presented pertains to the establishment clause of the First Amendment, as it involves potential government endorsement of religion.
Explanation:The situation described involves a conflict between individuals' religious rights and the public, non-religious nature of a school event. The constitutional clause in question here is the establishment clause of the First Amendment. This clause prohibits the government (or a public school, in this case) from declaring and financially supporting a religion, thus preventing any government endorsement of religion. By having a student read The Lord's Prayer, the school could be perceived to be endorsing a specific religious practice. Sid's family may contend that this violates the establishment clause, hence their legal action.
Learn more about Establishment Clause here:https://brainly.com/question/29618695
#SPJ12
Behavior therapy assumes that psychological disorders are caused by
Answer:
Past conditioning
Explanation:
Answer:
past conditioning
Explanation:
PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST
A similarity between the separation of powers, the system of checks and balances, and federalism is that theyA) are all related exclusively to the federal government.B) are all ways that the Constitution limits government power.C) each illustrate the idea of popular sovereignty.D) each serve to increase the power of the federal government.
Answer:
B) are all ways that the Constitution limits government power
Explanation:
A similarity between the separation of powers, the system of checks and balances, and federalism are that they are all ways that the Constitution limits government power. The correct option is B.
What does the separation of power do to the government?Separation of powers thus refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches in order to prevent one branch from performing the core functions of another. The goal is to prevent power concentration and to provide for checks and balances.
Federalism constrains government by establishing two sovereign powers—the national government and state governments—and thus limits the influence of both. Separation of powers imposes internal limits on government by dividing it against itself, assigning separate functions to different branches, and forcing them to share power.
Thus, the ideal selection is option B.
Learn more about the separation of power here:
https://brainly.com/question/1153314
#SPJ5
Krystal's boss in the accounting department initially rejected her proposal for a new budgeting process. So Krystal spoke to and received support from the heads of two other departments that would benefit from the proposed budgeting process. She also found support from several co-workers in the accounting department because they believed the new budgeting process would be simpler and fairer. When Krystal's boss realized that several key people supported the new budgeting system, he agreed to test it in a pilot project. What form of influence is Krystal mainly using here?
A. Silent authority
B.Coalition formation
C. Assertiveness
D. Impression management
E. Ingratiation
Answer:
The correct answer would be option B, Coalition Formation.
Explanation:
Coalition formation is simply the actions exerted by the group of people which put influence or pressure over someone or some decision.
So in this example, Krystal proposed a budgeting process to her boss which he rejected, but Krystal thinks that her proposal was simpler and fairer, so she presented the proposal to the heads of other departments who could get benefit from her new budgeting process proposal. They liked her proposal very much. Also some co workers liked her simple and fair budgeting process proposal. So here a group of people arose which was in favor of the new proposed process. When her boss came to know about it, he agreed to test her proposal in a pilot project. So this act of likeness by the key personnel of the company influence the behavior of the boss. Key personnel here act as the coalition. So Krystal used the Coalition formation of influence here.
Krystal used coalition formation to influence her boss by gaining support from other department heads and colleagues, persuading her boss to reconsider her proposal. So, option B is correct.
In the scenario described, Krystal is using coalition formation as her main form of influence. This tactic involves building a support base and using the collective power of the group to persuade someone to think, feel, or do something. Krystal did this by getting the support of other department heads and her colleagues before approaching her boss again, which eventually led to the acceptance of her proposal.
Josiane has found an online test that claims to measure IQ. It consists of choosing the correct definitions for a series of words. She is concerned that it doesn’t include any tests of other things that are part of IQ such as problem solving or visual-spatial ability. What type of validity is she questioning?
Answer:
Content Validity
Explanation:
Content validity, which can also be referred to as "logical validity" refers to concept found in In psychometrics regarding the extent to which a measure represents all facets of a given construct. In this case, Josiane doesn't feel like the test represents someone's intelligence since it doesn't seem to test more than your vocabulary knowledge and intelligence is much more than vocabulary.
Josiane is questioning the construct validity of the online IQ test, which is the extent to which the test measures intelligence, as it only focuses on verbal competencies and not other aspects such as problem-solving or visual-spatial abilities.
Josiane is questioning the construct validity of the online IQ test she found. Construct validity pertains to whether a test measures the concept it claims to measure, in this case, intelligence. Concerns about IQ tests often revolve around whether they encompass all components of intelligence, including problem-solving, verbal, quantitative, and visual-spatial abilities. Since the test Josiane found only measures verbal competencies through the definitions of words, it may not fully capture other important aspects such as problem-solving or visual-spatial abilities, thus affecting its construct validity.
Furthermore, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) is an example of an intelligence test that attempts to provide a more holistic measure by assessing a range of abilities, recognizing that intelligence comprises a pool of specific abilities. This multifaceted approach to intelligence testing highlights the complexity of delivering a single measure of an individual's intelligence and the importance of construct validity.
Dianne feels overwhelmed. She helps her adult daughter regularly with finances and caring for her grandchildren. She is also the primary caregiver of both her aging mother and her father-in-law. She feels like she never has a minute to herself. Dianne can be referred to as being in the _____ generation.
Answer:
Sandwich generation
Explanation:
The sandwich generation are individuals that care for their (often adult) children and their aging parents.
They care for both simultaneously, which puts often an enormous amount of pressure (mental and economical) on them.
The sandwich generation represents 47% of the adult population in the USA. The trend is on the rise due to aging population and financial instability, which makes starting an independent life difficult for many adults.
Suppose that you and a friend are playing cards and you decide to make a friendly wager. The bet is that you will draw two cards without replacement from a standard deck. If both cards are clubs, your friend will pay you $531. Otherwise, you have to pay your friend $32. How much would you expect to win or lose?
Answer: I will expect to win $1.1156 for the bet.
Explanation:
probability 2 cards are clubs (13/52)*(12/51) = (0.25) * (0.2352)= 0.05882
other 1-0.05882= 0.94118
Expected value= $531 * 0.05882 - $32 (0.94118) = 31.2334- 30.1178
Expected value = $ 1,1156. Making this bet 100 times you will make $111.56
Which of the following are core capabilities for response? A. Identity verification; interdiction and disruption; and long-term vulnerability reduction B. Fire management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety C. Supply chain integrity and security; risk and disaster resilience assessment; and infrastructure systems D. Housing; forensics and attribution; and screening, search, and detection
Answering the question, the core capabilities for response are Fire Management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety. This implies the correct answer is B
Further ExplanationFire management and suppression ensure structural and viable firefighting capabilities to control any types of fire accidents and also to ensure that the lives and properties of the public including the environment are well protected.
The mission area of fire management and suppression is response and they are meant to deal with fires of all types and complexities and also to provide adequate protection for the people in the community where the incident occurred.
The fatality management services are meant to provide help in the area of identifying victims and also to work with government such as state, local and federal to provide mortuary processes and are also meant to share information about any victim with the mass care services.
Sharing victim information with the mass care services is very vital as it will help to unify the family of the victims. Part of their core responsibilities is also to provide adequate counseling to the family of the victims. The mission area of the fatality management services is response
The core responsibilities of the Environmental response/health and safety are to conduct proper measure and ensure the lives and safety of other people in the affected communities is well protected.
The mission area of the Environmental response/health and safety is also Response
LEARN MORE:
Which of the following are core capabilities for response? https://brainly.com/question/11679917Which of the following are core capabilities for response? https://brainly.com/question/13177166KEYWORDS:
core capabilitiesfire managementenvironmental responsesafetyfatality managementAmong the options provided, fire management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety are recognized as core response capabilities according to FEMA guidelines. These ensure effective protection and response to emergencies.
Explanation:The core capabilities for response usually refer to the abilities that organizations or systems have to effectively respond to emergencies, disasters, or crisis conditions. Among the options given, option B: 'Fire management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety' are recognized as core response capabilities. These are elements within the National Preparedness Goal's Core Capabilities for Response as outlined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). These capacities ensure that a community or system can adequately protect itself and respond effectively to reduce the loss of life and quickly stabilize the incident.
Learn more about Core Response Capabilities here:https://brainly.com/question/30165933
#SPJ6
After a painful experience at one dentist’s office, Teresa’s mother takes Teresa to a different dentist, who takes great care to make her visits painless. Teresa is anxious at first, but after a few visits, Teresa gradually becomes less resistant about going to the new dentist. Teresa’s change in behavior can probably best be explained in terms of _____. But, Teresa doesn’t go to see the dentist again until three years later. On her first visit to the painless dentist after that time interval, she is anxious once again, even though she had not been anxious in her previous visits. The return of this response after it had previously disappeared is known as _____.
Sophia is planning her activities for a hot summer day. She would like to go to the local swimming pool and see the latest blockbuster movie, but because she can only get tickets to the movie for the same time that the pool is open she can only choose one activity. This illustrates the basic principle that…
a) people face tradeoffs.
b) rational people think at the margin.
c) people respond to incentives.
d) improvements in efficiency sometimes come at expense of equality.
Answer: A) People face tradeoffs
Explanation: Since Sophia can get tickets for a movie that is at the same time as the pool is open, she faces objective circumstances, which is why she will have to choose one of two options. This means that she will have to compromise between two equally desired activities that are incompatible, since she can not affect the objective circumstances, due to which she has to choose one of two activities.This compromise is tradeoffs.
In other words, tradeoffs can be described as a giving up of one thing or activity in exchange for the other one we want equally as the first.
A defendant is on trial for the crime of menacing due to allegedly making threatening phone calls to a woman living in his apartment building. The prosecution called a female witness who lived in the defendant’s last apartment building to testify that she also received a number of identical threatening phone calls while the defendant lived in her building. The defense objected to the testimony on the grounds of relevance. The prosecution responded by explaining that it plans to introduce further evidence establishing that the calls received by this witness were made by the defendant.Is the witness’s testimony admissible?No, because calls by an unidentified caller are not relevant to the case.No, because the witness’s statement cannot be admitted prior to the production of evidence establishing that the defendant made the calls to the witness.Yes, on the condition that evidence is introduced later that would permit the jury to reasonably find by a preponderance of the evidence that the caller was the defendant.Yes, on the condition that the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the caller was the defendant.
If a witness who lived in the defendant’s last apartment building to testify that she also received a number of identical threatening phone calls while the defendant lived in her building, would be relevent in the case. On the condition that the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the caller was the defendant.
Read the scenario. Samira is a freshman basketball player who hopes to go to college on a basketball scholarship. She is offered the chance to play on her school’s varsity basketball team, which plays in tournaments during holiday breaks. Samira usually spends her breaks working at the local hardware store. After careful consideration, Samira decides to stay on the freshman basketball team and keep working over breaks. The fact that Samira may miss out on a scholarship opportunity by staying on the freshman team illustrates
a. a cause.
b. minor consequences.
c. a tradeoff.
d. unexpected risk.
Answer:
The answer is C.
Jake is sympathetic and considerate of his friends' moods. he really identifies with their feelings and readily understands their point of view. he is well-known around campus, and he has great relationships with his classmates and professors. which area of intelligence does this exemplify? A. interpersonalB. intrapersonalC. linguisticD. naturalist
The correct answer is A. Interpersonal
Explanation:
According to Howard Gardner who was an important development psychologist, human intelligence does not focus into one ability or aspect but instead has different modalities or types. This includes the naturalist or naturalistic intelligence that focuses on the ability of understanding one's surroundings and elements from nature; the linguistic that focuses on communication and includes the ability to use texts, speeches, etc.; the intrapersonal that focus on understating the self or who we are and the interpersonal that different from the intrapersonal focuses on understanding others' feelings, emotions, moods and being empathetic. This implies, Jake mostly exemplifies the Interpersonal intelligence because he has a natural ability to identify and understand others' experiences, feelings, etc. and also he can be on the position of others and be empathetic.
Jake exemplifies interpersonal intelligence, which is the ability to understand the feelings, motivations, and needs of others, according to Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences.
Explanation:Based on the description, Jake exemplifies A. interpersonal intelligence. Interpersonal intelligence refers to one's ability to understand and recognize the feelings, motivations, and needs of others, which includes empathy, the ability to recognize the mood, temperament, motivations, and intentions of others. Jake's ability to understand his friends' feelings, identify with their point of view, and maintain great relationships with his classmates and professors indicates strong interpersonal intelligence.
Interpersonal Intelligence is part of Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. It covers the sensitivity to others, including skills in social situations, cooperation with team activities, and empathy, which is the capacity to understand other people's feelings and perspectives.
Learn more about Interpersonal Intelligence here:https://brainly.com/question/31388708
#SPJ6
A company operated a small amusement park on property it owned near a residential neighborhood. On a day when the park was closed, a 10-year-old girl snuck into the park with some friends by climbing over a chain link fence. While climbing on one of the carnival rides, the girl slipped and cut her leg on an exposed gear assembly, sustaining serious injuries.Through her guardian ad litem, the girl brought suit against the company to recover damages for her injuries. At trial, she presented evidence of the accident and her injuries. In defense, the company established that the girl read and understood the "No Trespassing" signs that were attached to the fence. The company also established that it had not had any previous reports of children sneaking into the park when it was closed. Before submission of the case to the jury, the company moved for summary judgment.Is the court likely to grant the company's motion?A Yes, because the girl was a trespasser who the company had no reason to anticipate would be on the property.B Yes, because the girl knew she was trespassing and was old enough to recognize the danger.C No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park.D No, because the appeal of the carnival rides attracted the girl into the park.
Answer: the correct answer is C. No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park.
Explanation:
In this case, the company has the obligation to forsee possible threats and has no excuse for not having taken action in doing that.
Congress enacted a statute that purported to ban all discrimination against African-Americans in any commercial transaction taking place within the United States.Would the statute most likely be held constitutional?A Yes, under Thirteenth Amendment provisions barring badges or incidents of slavery.B Yes, because the federal government has an important interest in furthering the equal protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment.C No, because Congress's powers under the Commerce Clause do not extend so far as the statute would require.D No, because commercial transactions are not among the privileges or immunities of national citizenship.
Answer:
B. Yes, because the federal government has an important interest in furthering the equal protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment gives U.S. citizenship to people born or naturalized in the U.S, protects their privileges or immunities and guarantees due process of law and the equal protection of the laws with the purpose to make it illegal to discriminate against a person because of race.
Therefore, if Congress enacts a statute that purports to ban all discrimination against African-Americans in any commercial transaction within the United States, it does so to further the equal protection provision of the Fourteenth Amendment that prohibits racial discrimination especially discrimination against African Americans which is a group that was widely discriminated for decades.
Which of the following is not true about the alternative hypothesis? Select one: A. It is sometimes called the research hypothesis. B. It is usually a statement that the researcher hopes to demonstrate is true. C. Like the null hypothesis, it is always a statement about a population parameter. D. It is assumed to be true.
Answer:
B. It is usually a statement that the researcher hopes to demonstrate is true.
Explanation:
Alternative hypothesis is an assumption that there is inequality present between the means of the values of a population being compared, ie, it is an assumption that the alternative hypothesis is true. In other words, an alternative hypothesis is considered as any hypothesis that reflects the doubt that caused the researcher to perform the test. It is always represented by an inequality. This inequality represents the possible values of the evaluated parameter.
The alternative hypothesis is not assumed to be true. It is a statement of what a researcher thinks will occur if the null hypothesis is disproved, and it usually represents the claim that the researcher is seeking to substantiate through research. Therefore the option that is not true is Option D- It is assumed to be true.
Explanation:The correct answer to the question is: D. It is assumed to be true. This statement is not valid regarding the alternative hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is not assumed to be true; instead, it's a statement of what a researcher thinks may detract from the null hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is observed if the results of the study provide enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
In general, the alternative hypothesis is the researcher's claim about the population parameter, often one encoding the effects the research is seeking to detect (this might be a difference in population means or a nonzero correlation).It's called the alternative hypothesis because it's viewed as an alternative to the null hypothesis, which posits the absence of such effects.
Learn more about alternative hypothesis here:https://brainly.com/question/30899146
#SPJ3
In a speech to the neighborhood watch group, Mr. Simmons made the following statement:"If you see someone running down the sidewalk in our neighborhood and you don't recognize that person, you can assume that person has committed some type of crime. You must act immediately. Do not hesitate for a second. Call 911." Some members of the audience recognized this statement as an example ofa. a causal fallacy.b. causal reasoning.c. deductive reasoning.d. a bandwagon fallacy.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option A, Casual Fallacy.
Explanation:
In simple words, Fallacy is a mistaken belief. When someone makes a belief about something over an unsound argument, this is called Fallacy.
Casual Fallacy is the type of fallacy in which it is believed that there is a simple cause of an outcome, whereas in reality, the outcome could have caused by number of other factors.
Like in this example, Mr. Simmons tells audience in the neighborhood speech that if they see a person in their town whom they don't recognize, then at once call 911 and report that person. This is the casual fallacy in which the seeing of an unknown person is considered a person who can commit a crime. Whereas there could be a lot other reasons for which that person visited that area.
Sarah, a stay-at-home mother of four, describes one of her learning patterns. I love to find new ways to complete tasks at home. It is okay to fail and make mistakes as long as you learn from them. With four children, it feels like I am always cooking. I have many recipes and while many follow the directions, I enjoy adding or substituting ingredients. I love to think outside of the box and find ways to make a recipe healthier! What Learning Pattern best fits Sarahâs description above?
Answer
The learning pattern which is described in the behavior of Sarah known as Confluence pattern of learning. It applies to the pattern which outlines the process in which we utilize our intelligence, take initiative, opportunities and brainstorming techniques of advancing things in a unique manner.
Explanation
Learning patterns are a easy approach to document an essential lesson. They demonstrate how to generate a strong approach for administering or assessing an action, such as operating an edit-a-thon, or the way to conduct survey. A learning pattern is imagined as a consistent combination of learning actions that individuals ordinarily employ their beliefs about knowledge and their learning motivation, as a complex that is representative of them for a specific duration. Confluence learning pattern enables the scholar to combine diverse pieces of knowledge into the “big picture.”
Further explanation
Learning is a demonstration of various elements of individual anatomy and human nature. Data obtained through the five sensations which are known as vision, sound, flavor, touching, and smell is electronically concocted, classified, and deposited in the mind. In any furnished moment, those five senses are presenting the brain with millions of unique bits of knowledge that can produce both intentional and oblivious responses.
The key to deliberate knowledge is a memory. Memory is a substantial phenomenon that is influenced by physiological factors such as anxiety and working of chemical receptors. In simplistic terms, we can contemplate the mind as the hard-drive of human existence. The Interactive Learning Model accommodates both a structure for learning explicit barriers to individual learning and a logical explanation for why this program has significance.
The Interactive Learning Model symbolizes that at the point when data is processed utilizing varying levels it develops the four interactive forms of growth and learning: sequence, accuracy, scientific reasoning, and confluence. These four noticeable patterns substantiate themselves not only in our thinking but our feelings and conation actions as well.
The individual who applies the Confluent pattern on a First basis conduces to circumvent traditional procedures, explores alternative methods to accomplish responsibilities, usually starts before learning all the directions, and extemporizes.
Keywords
Confluence pattern , brainstorm techniques, circumvent traditional procedures
Learn More
Confluence learning https://brainly.com/question/1362549
The learning pattern displayed by Sarah in the above example is confluence learning.
Further explanation:
Confluence learning patterns is a type of learning pattern of four types of learning patterns i.e,
Sequential learning Precision learningTechnical reasoningConfluent learning.Sequential learning pattern is characterized by following a step by step process to obtain an outcome and having defined directions or instructions
Precision learning pattern is characterized by gaining accurate information by questioning in order to avoid mistakes and playing it safe
Technical learning pattern is characterized by individual and independent reasoning and real world problem solving that is aimed at finding appropriate solutions for a problem.
Confluent learning is characterized by risk taking, a need to include a personal touch and relying on creativity. A person with confluent learning pattern tries to avoid using conventional methods or ways to do things. He or she always seeks out alternative ways to do things and learn them.
Sarah, here demonstrates confluential learning pattern by being ready to make mistakes, trying different methods and thinking creatively to obtain results.
Learn more:
Name and explain two personal values and two skills that can assist you in overcoming barriers regarding risky behavior. https://brainly.com/question/4924229Explain three possible feelings or thoughts that a person who has been subjected to violent crime may have . https://brainly.com/question/1609123Answer Details:
Grade: College Psychology
Subject: Psychology
Chapter: Learning patterns
Keywords: learning, learning pattern, confluent learning, out-of-the box thinking, risk taking, creativity, values, precision, reasoning, word problem.
There is a fundamental ambiguity at the heart of psychological egoism.
A) This ambiguity involves the question of whether We are our brothers' keepers
B) We act selfishly or in our own self-interest
C) We have a right to government support when we fall on hard times
D) All of the above
Answer:
The right answer is option B “We act selfishly or in our own self-interest”
Explanation:
Psychological egoism is a theory that explains motivation with the focus of why or for what we do the actions. It says we always act selfishly. The problem in here is define if we actually act selfishly, or we just act in our own self-interest. The first one is based on that we only do things that are in our sincere self-interest, because people are unconsciously selfish and naturally we always tend to do things that benefits us. The second one is based on our intentions, instead of asking why we do it, we should as to whom, in fact the answer will be always ourselves, acting selfishly.
Answer:
The correct answer is Option B
Explanation:
The theory of psychological egoism suggests that all our actions are results of our own interest.
However the haziness prevails between two behavioral aspects. They are the activities which we perform is mainly of being selfish or to satisfy our own self-interest.
Sometimes we may get positive output for our actions. Does it mean that we have performed the action in order to get a positive outcome? Hence motives and consequences differ even though we perform an action out of self-interest. So, Psychological egoism is known to be partially true.
Rita Reporter works for a major news network and has been assigned to investigate a story about a woman's death in a small town. She interviews police and other public officials, and the investigation is pointing to the woman's ex-husband. When Rita reports live on the air, she states that the investigation is ongoing and that the ex-husband is the prime suspect. In fact, the police have just ruled out the ex-husband, but Rita has not yet been informed of that fact. The next day, the ex-husband is fired, his new wife moves out, and friends are now refusing to talk with him.
A) Rita is not guilty of defamation due to an absolute privilege.
B) Rita is not guilty of defamation due to a qualified privilege.
C) Rita is guilty of slander for telling a lie that caused injury to the ex-husband.
D) Rita is guilty of libel for telling a lie that caused injury to the ex-husband.
Answer:
The Answer Is B
:)
In the given case, Rita is not guilty of defamation due to a qualified privilege. Thus the correct option is B.
What is Defamation?A person, place, or thing is defamed when incorrect information about them is conveyed to a third party, harming their reputation. It includes a comment that harms the standing of a third party.
In the given case A reporter named Rita is investigating a story where she comes to know from officials and investigating that in a murder of a woman the ex-husband is the prime suspect .
In reality, Rita hasn't yet been told that their ex-husband has been cleared out by the police. The ex-husband loses his job the following day, his new wife moves out, and his friends no longer want to speak with him.
According to the definition of absolute privilege, the speaker has the full authority to say whatever they choose, at any time, even if it is defamatory. A similar thing is done by a reporter.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about defamation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14233605
#SPJ2