Answer:
The Seminole Wars (also known as the Florida Wars) were three related military conflicts in Florida between the United States Army and the Seminole, a Native American group which had coalesced in Spanish Florida during the early 1700s. The fighting occurred between about 1816 and 1858, with two periods of uneasy truce between active conflict. Both in human and monetary terms, the Seminole Wars were the longest and most expensive of the Indian Wars in United States history.
The First Seminole War (c. 1816–1819) began with General Andrew Jackson's excursions into West Florida and East Florida against the Seminoles after the conclusion of the War of 1812. The governments of Great Britain and Spain both expressed outrage over the "invasion". However, Spain was unable to defend or control the territory, as several local uprisings and rebellions made clear. The Spanish Crown agreed to cede Florida to the United States per the Adams–Onís Treaty of 1819, and the transfer took place in 1821.[9] According to the Treaty of Moultrie Creek of 1823, the Seminoles were required to leave northern Florida and were confined to a large reservation in the center of the Florida peninsula. The U.S. government enforced the treaty by building a series of forts and trading posts in the territory, mainly along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts.[2]
The Second Seminole War (1835–1842) was the result of the United States government attempting to force the Seminoles to leave Florida altogether and move to Indian Territory per the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Fighting began with the Dade Massacre in December 1835, and raids, skirmishes, and a handful of larger battles raged throughout the Florida peninsula over the next few years. At first, the outgunned and outnumbered Seminoles effectively used guerrilla warfare to frustrate the ever more numerous American military forces.[10] In October 1836, General Thomas Sidney Jesup was sent to Florida to take command of the campaign. After futilely chasing bands of Seminole warriors through the wilderness, Jesup changed tactics and began seeking out and destroying Seminole farms and villages, a strategy which eventually changed the course of the war. Jesup also authorized the controversial captures of Seminole leaders Osceola and Micanopy under signs of truce.[11] By the early 1840s, most of the Seminole population in Florida had been killed in battle, ravaged by starvation and disease, or relocated to Indian Territory. Several hundred Seminoles were allowed to remain in an unofficial reservation in southwest Florida.
The Third Seminole War (1855–1858) was again the result of Seminoles responding to settlers and U.S. Army scouting parties encroaching on their lands, perhaps deliberately to provoke a violent response that would result in the removal of the last of the Seminoles from Florida. After an army surveying crew found and destroyed a Seminole plantation west of the Everglades in December 1855, Chief Billy Bowlegs led a raid near Fort Myers, setting off a conflict which consisted mainly of raids and reprisals, with no large battles fought. Once again, the American strategy was to destroy the Seminoles' food supply, and by 1858, most of the remaining Seminoles, weary of war and facing starvation, agreed to be sent to Oklahoma in exchange for promises of safe passage and cash payments. An estimated 500 Seminole still refused to leave and retreated deep into the Everglades and the Big Cypress Swamp to live on land that was unwanted by white settlers.
Explanation:
hope this helps you find out what you need and mark as brainiest
Plz help it's fur today and I hav no clue I feel dum
Answer:Spanish???????
Explanation:
All of the following are true about the Populist Party EXCEPT:
a. It was the only third party ever to have a presidential candidate elected.
b. lt influenced state politics in Texas.
It eventually faded from the national scene.
d. It supported a popular candidate for president in the 1896 elections.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
It was the only third party ever to have a presidential candidate elected ( A )
Explanation:
The populist party did not produce a presidential candidate that was elected but in 1896 the populist leaders gave their support to William Jennings Bryan a democratic party candidate and this eventually led to the populist party fading away from national politics. the main goal of the populist party was to ensure government involvement in big businesses and also promote public ownership of railroads which would make access to crops cheaper for farmers, and also to restore democracy in its proper form.
The Populist Party was not the only third party to have a presidential candidate elected. It had influence in state politics, particularly in Texas, but eventually faded from the national scene. It supported William Jennings Bryan in the 1896 elections. Option A is correct.
Explanation:The correct answer is a. It was the only third party ever to have a presidential candidate elected. This statement is false because the Populist Party never had a candidate elected as president. While it did have some success at the state level, especially in Texas, it eventually faded from the national scene. The Populist Party did support a popular candidate, William Jennings Bryan, in the 1896 elections.
Learn more about Populist Party here:https://brainly.com/question/31619670
#SPJ3
what had originally been used to bleach clothing before the industrial revolution?why did this change?
Answer:
Stale urine was used pre-industrial revolution to bleach clothing, this changed probably because bleach was just a better alternative (sorry I don't have your full answer but there is the first part if you want it)
Explanation:
Final answer:
Before the industrial revolution, clothes were bleached using sunlight or a
mixture of lye and sour milk.
The industrial revolution introduced synthetic bleaching agents which were faster, more efficient, and gave more consistent results. This switch was propelled by the invention of textile mills and advancements in chemical technology.
Explanation:
Before the industrial revolution, bleaching of clothes was predominantly accomplished using sunlight or a process involving lye and sour milk.
The clothes would be soaked in the lye and sour milk solution and then laid out in sunlight to bleach. However, during the industrial revolution, advancements in chemistry led to the development of synthetic bleaching agents. These were much quicker, more efficient, and consistent compared to bleaching in sunlight.
A primary player in this changeover was the mass production of textiles in factories sparked by the invention of
textile mills
, and later, the evolution of chemical science which made possible the creation of synthetic bleaching agents
.
The industrial revolution was a period marked by significant technological changes, and these advancements in textile manufacturing and chemical technology were just part of the widespread transformation that took place in various crafts and industries during this period.
Learn more about Bleaching Clothes here:
https://brainly.com/question/35870138
#SPJ3
en que direcciones van a centrar los monarcas su politica internacional? Que rumbo va a tomar la politica de la monarquia despues de descubrimienro de america
La respuesta correcta a este pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Después del descubrimiento de América, la dirección en la que van a centrar los monarcas su política internacional es la de un imperialismo voraz en la que las monarquías Europeas como España, Portugal y luego Gran Bretaña van a mandar gente para explorar los nuevos territorios, habitarlos, explotar los recursos naturales y en le caso de los Españoles, a evangelizar a los indios para convertirlos a la religión católica. En el caso de Inglaterra, los colonizadores de Norte América llegaron a Jamestown, Virginia, en 1607, respaldados por la Virginia-London Company para habitar esos territorios y explotar los recursos naturales y generar una ganancia. Otros ingleses como los Puritanos, eran gente muy apegada a su religión que tuvo que salir de Inglaterra porque tenían diferencias con la Iglesia de Inglaterra. Ellos llegaron a Cape Code, Massachusets en 1620.
“Now, suppose that all the English and the whole English army were to leave India, taking with them all their cannon and their splendid weapons and everything, then who would be rulers of India? Is it possible that under these circumstances two nations—the Muslims and the Hindus—could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power? Most certainly not.
The aims and objects of the Indian National Congress are based upon an ignorance of history and present-day realities; they do not take into consideration that India is inhabited by different nationalities; they presuppose that the various religions, castes, and ethnic groups of India can all be treated alike and all of them belong to the same nation. For the successful running of a democratic government, it is essential that the majority should have the ability to govern not only themselves but also unwilling minorities. I consider the experiment that the Indian National Congress wants to make fraught with dangers and suffering for all the nationalities of India, but especially for the Muslims. The Congress cannot rationally prove its claim to represent the opinions, ideals, and aspirations of the Muslims.”
Syed Ahmad Khan, Indian Muslim educator and political reformer, speech given before the Muslim community of Meerut in northern India, 1888
a) Explain ONE way that the passage illustrates a response to European colonialism.
b) Explain ONE way in which the circumstances of the speech might have affected the author's argument in the passage.
c) Explain ONE way in which the author’s point of view is significant for illustrating how European ideologies influenced the development of Indian society in the nineteenth century.
Answer:
Check Explanation
Explanation:
In Question one. The passage illustrates a response to European colonialism when Syed Ahmad Khan mention that the European occupation of India has brought peace between the Muslims and the Hindus. In his speech to the Muslim community in Meeerut, he said “Now, suppose that all the English and the whole English army were to leave India, taking with them all their cannon and their splendid weapons and everything, then who would be rulers of India? Is it possible that under these circumstances two nations—the Muslims and the Hindus—could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power? Most certainly not". In the passage, he illustrates that the Muslims and the Hindus will not tolerate each other in the aspect of Government and that the English occupation has brought peace between the two religion
ONE way in which the circumstances of the speech might have affected the author's argument in the passage are the words he said about the ropes of Government. He said that "For the successful running of a democratic government, it is essential that the majority should have the ability to govern not only themselves but also unwilling minorities". This words affected his argument. He was speaking on the possibility that if the Europeans were to leave India, it Hindus and the Muslims can't formed a peaceful goverment together, while again saying that a democratic goverment has the Ability to control not only the majority but also the minority. In is speech, he stated that both were of different Nationality and therefore both can not formed a goverment together but he fail to realize that he was also against his point when he laid down the attributes of a Democratic goverment
In his Author' views, the European ideologies influenced the development of Indian society in the nineteenth century through the new ideologies made by the aims and objectives of the Indian National Congress which they presuppose that the various religions, castes, and ethnic groups of India can all be treated alike and all of them belong to the same nation. It can also be seen in the general acceptable goverment of democracy which which was being enforce in India by European.
Syed Ahmad Khan's speech illustrates the response to British colonialism in India, expressing concerns over the domination of Hindus in a post-colonial Indian society. The context of British rule and Hindu-led Indian National Congress shaped his argument for the need for Muslim-specific governance. His viewpoint demonstrates European colonial ideologies' lasting impacts on India's societal development.
Explanation:Syed Ahmad Khan's speech exemplifies a critical response to European colonialism, specifically British rule in India. He recognized the complex tapestry of religious and ethnic identities within the Indian subcontinent and expressed concerns that a withdrawal of British forces and administrative systems would lead to Hindu dominance to the detriment of Muslim interests. This foresight ultimately fed into calls for separate Muslim representation, as realized in the formation of the Muslim League in 1906 and the later demand for a distinct Muslim state of Pakistan, showcasing a divide-and-rule legacy left by British colonialism.
Given the context of the speech in 1888, Syed Ahmad Khan was responding to the contemporary social and political climate, where British rule still loomed over India and the Indian National Congress was advocating for Indian self-rule. As a member of the Muslim minority, his perspective was shaped by the observation that Congress was primarily Hindu-led, which he feared would result in Muslim marginalization in a post-colonial India. This influenced his argument for separate governance and protection for Muslims.
The significance of Syed Ahmad Khan's point of view lies in the broader narrative of European ideologies influencing Indian society. During the 19th century, British colonial practices nurtured division within Indian society, promulgating the idea that different religious and ethnic groups should govern themselves separately. This had long-term effects on Indian political evolution and the eventual partition at independence. The author's perspective reflects the complexities that continued to challenge the unfolding vision of India's identity and political structure, shaped in part by European colonial principles of governance and social hierarchy.
The European Renaissance contributed to the Protestant Reformation by: denying the existence of God. encouraging a questioning attitude. supporting democratic governments. All of these choices are correct.
Answer:
All of these choices are correct.
Explanation:
Without the Renaissance, it is difficult to imagine that the Protestant Reformation could have succeeded in Europe. The Renaissance placed human beings at the center of life and had shown that this world was not just a ‘vale of tears’ but was something that could be meaningful and it was possible for people to live without reference to the divine. The Renaissance or ‘rebirth’ was influenced by the ideas of the ancient past and it drew from Roman and Greek civilization in order to provide a solution to current problems.
The Renaissance was a Pan-European phenomenon and changed the mental worldview of the elites in Europe and indeed the emerging middle class across the continent. The cultural movement was to have a profound impression on people’s worldview. The Renaissance produced the Humanists who were a movement of educationalists and scholars; they sought truth and knowledge by re-examining classical texts and the Bible. The Humanists ideas, the growth in textual analysis, and the Northern Renaissance changed the intellectual landscape and encouraged many Church reformers, such as Martin Luther, and they later broke with Rome and divided Europe into two confessional camps, Protestantism and Catholicism.
Outside of the Lowell mills, what were the workers lives like?
Outside of the Lowell Mills, the worker's lives were severe as they have to work for an average of 73 hours per week.
What do you mean by the worker?A worker refers to a person who does a specified type of work and in return gets paid for it.
The conditions in the Lowell mills were severe by modern American standards. Employees work almost an average of 73 hours per week.
The major challenges that workers faced at the mills in Lowell is the job insecurity and dangerous working conditions.
Learn more about workers here:
https://brainly.com/question/3360710
#SPJ2
Drag each phrase below the type of freshwater wetland it describes.
shallow water pr stream
Marsh
Swamp
Bog
found in northern climates
many grasses
found in warmer climates
acidic water
looks like flooded forest
Answer:
marsh -
shallow water or stream
many grasses
swamp-
looks like flooded forest
found in warmer climates
bog-
acidic water
found in northern climates
Explanation:
it was correct on edge !
Wetlands are areas where standing water covers the ground or where the ground is very moist. Unlike estuaries, freshwater wetlands are not connected to the sea.
The type of freshwater wetland are :
1) Marsh -
Shallow water or stream. Many grasses.
2) Swamp-
Looks like flooded forest. Found in warmer climates.
3) Bog-
Acidic water Found in northern climates.Learn more about "freshwater wetlands":
https://brainly.com/question/16506413?referrer=searchResults
The War on Poverty was an attempt by President Lyndon B. Johnson to
The War on Poverty was an attempt by President Lyndon B. Johnson to end hunger and economic hardship in the United States.
The forty programs established by the Act were all intended at eradicating poverty by improving living conditions in low-income neighborhoods and assisting the disadvantaged in accessing economic possibilities that had previously been denied to them.
Congress was urged by President Lyndon B. Johnson to declare "unconditional war on poverty" with the goal of "not only alleviating the symptom of poverty, but curing it and, above all, preventing it."
Therefore, President Lyndon B. Johnson launched the War on Poverty in an attempt to alleviate hunger and economic misery in the United States.
To know more about the War on Poverty, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13110811
#SPJ2
3what influence have slavic cultures had in eastern Europe?
Answer:Slavs are subdivided into East Slavs, West Slavs, and South Slavs. ... of peoples in Europe, residing chiefly in eastern and southeastern Europe but extending
Explanation:
Answer: What Kearneys said, I couldn't have said it better and give him brainliest, only reason why I'm answering right now tbh is so he can be marked brainliest.
List four levels of party organization.
Rosie the Riveter represented:
O
A. a symbol of Communism in America.
O
B. a call for women to join labor unions.
O
c. women staying in their traditional role.
O
D. women's involvement in the war effort.
Rosie the Riveter represented women's involvement in the war effort. It stood as the symbol of women's involvement in the war effort.
What is Rosie the Riveter?Rosie the riveter refers to an iconic poster of a female factory worker.
Rosie the Riveter stood as a symbol for women in the workforce and women's independence. Rosie the Riveter was created to entice these women to join the workforce.
Therefore, D is the correct option.
Learn more about Rosie the Riveter here:
https://brainly.com/question/1154933
#SPJ2
Final answer:
Rosie the Riveter was a cultural icon representing women's involvement in the war effort during World War II, as they took on traditionally male-dominated industrial roles.
Explanation:
Rosie the Riveter was an iconic symbol of the American homefront during World War II. She represented the entrance of women into the workforce, particularly in traditionally male roles which became essential due to the wartime necessity. Rosie the Riveter was depicted in propaganda and helped encourage women to fill the industrial workforce void left by men who went to fight in the war.
The correct answer to the question 'Rosie the Riveter represented:' is D. women's involvement in the war effort. Rosie the Riveter became a cultural icon, inspiring many women to take on jobs in factories, shipyards, and other areas essential to the war effort, which had previously been dominated by men. After the war, these experiences contributed to the changing perceptions and roles of women in American society.
How did people earn money in rural areas? Write at least 2. *
*URGENT*
What were the terms of the Paris Peace accord?
Answer:
Explanation:
The settlement included a cease-fire throughout Vietnam. It addition, the United States agreed to the withdrawal of all U.S. troops and advisors (totalling about 23,700) and the dismantling of all U.S. bases within 60 days. In return, the North Vietnamese agreed to release all U.S. and other prisoners of war.
Answer: The agreement called for: The withdrawal of all U.S. and allied forces within sixty days. The return of prisoners of war parallel to the above. The clearing of mines from North Vietnamese ports by the U.S.
Explanation: :)
After Robert E.Lee’s surrender in 1865, the Texas government collapsed, and the governor and other state officials fled to Mexico and South America.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
true
Explanation:
i got it right
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Why was it difficult for freed people to get out of
poverty?
Answer:
What time period? In the 1800s, after the dred scott decision was passed, many free blacks started taking up sharecropping jobs, which was simply put, slavery. They "borrowed" money and land in return for their crops, but the people they owed money to were corrupt and did not let them get out of the constant cycle of borrowing and giving.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. As sharecroppers, it was difficult for them to earn money.
Explanation:
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
a. Dry farming methods replaced the need for windmills.
b. The development of the windmill provided new water sources for West Texas farmers.
c. Many early farms in West Texas failed due to drought.
d. As irrigation methods improved,more land in Texas became profitable for farming.
Answer:
The Answer is A
Explanation: In the Video, the teacher explains that windmills came after the dry farming method. The dry farming method was still in use when windmills were established in West Texas. :)
P.S: I see you're a Klein Student! I'm in Klein too. I go to Hildebrandt Intermediate.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Regarding public education, in 1922, oregon became the first state to:
Answer:
Require that all students attend public school.
Explanation:
The Oregon School Law made in 1922 in the United States state of Oregon the requirements of the law is that children of school age are to attend only public schools. The law was later struck by the United States Supreme Court as unconstitutional. The primary purpose of the law was to shut down Catholic schools in the state it affected other private schools too till it was struck down by the supreme Court.
Oregon enacted a compulsory public school law in 1922, which was later ruled unconstitutional, protecting the right to choose private education.
In 1922, Oregon became the first state to enact a compulsory public school law. However, this law was found to be unconstitutional, as per the landmark case of Pierce vs. Society of Sisters in 1925 by both the Oregon Supreme Court and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. The ruling stated that private schools are protected by the Constitution, thereby upholding parents' rights to freedom of choice in their children's education. This decision came after various religious groups such as Lutherans, Seventh Day Adventists, Episcopalians, and the American Jewish Committee opposed the measure and provided legal support to have the law overruled, claiming it was an attack on religious freedoms.
1. In 1802, the Louisiana Territory was transferred from Spain to France.
O
A. TRUE
OB. FALSE
Answer:
I believe the answer is false..of I am.wrong please feel free to tell me.
Which of the following is not true about Serbia during World War I?
A
The Serbians were able to hold back the initial Austrian invasion in 1914
B
The Central Powers were able to successfully invade and occupy Serbia in 1915
C
The Serbian Army was badly equipped relative to the Austrians
D
Some Serbian forces were able to escape the Central Power invasion and regroup with other Allied forces in Salonica
E
The Central Powers were able to control Serbia until the end of World War I in November 1918
The answer is E
The Central Powers were able to control Serbia until the end of World War I in November 1918
Explain how settlers influence the final border between the united states and britain in the pacific northwest
Answer: In 1846 Britain and the United States signed the Oregon Treaty, extending the international border between the U.S. and what would become Canada along the border of present day Canada under.
Explanation:
Answer:
In 1846 Britain and the United States signed the Oregon Treaty, extending the international border between the U.S. and what would become Canada along the border of present day Canada under.
100% Promise.
Use the following list to answer the question.
-Publication of the "Pentagon Papers"
-News reports of the My Lai Massacre
-Increased bombing of North Vietnam
-Shootings at Kent State, Ohio
What was the impact of these events?
Your answer:
decline of the antiwar movement
resignation of President Richard Nixon
greater public opposition to the Vietnam War
division among Nixon's Republican supporters
Answer: A
Explanation:jrn;kqjkjnq;kltjbwnlktejnrkljbtnihwtlnrkvnlkehn
What similarities and differences were there in the way the sultans and shotguns controlled government officials
The Delhi Sultans controlled government officials with authoritarian policies such as surveillance and economic controls, while Safavid shahs managed power struggles by strategically displacing influential groups. Both aimed to prevent internal conflicts and maintain authority.
Explanation:Control of Government Officials by Sultans and ShogunsWhen assessing the control of government officials by sultans and shoguns, a comparison between the Delhi Sultanate and the Safavid Dynasty showcases distinct approaches. The Delhi Sultanate, particularly during its later period, used authoritative measures to maintain control. This included the establishment of a secret police to keep watch over civilian administrators and military officials, the prohibition of gatherings amongst elites, and official outlawing of alcohol in administrative areas. The state also exercised control over the economy, by confiscating lands from soldiers and war widows, imposing price controls, and levying high taxes to prevent wealth accumulation among the private citizens.
In contrast, the Safavid shahs dealt with power struggles among groups by displacing the Qizilbash from positions of power within the palace administration, military, and bureaucracy due to their collective influence. The Safavid dynasty was wary of any group exerting excessive influence over the government and took measures to curtail such power.
Both systems aimed to prevent internal conflicts and rebellions by closely regulating and sometimes suppressing the powers of potential rivals. However, while the Delhi Sultans applied strict control and surveillance to maintain power, the Safavid shahs strategically managed elite groups to prevent any one faction from becoming too powerful.
How have the ideas of Greek philosophers influence our world today?
In which year was Nelson Mandela released from prison? need help
Answer:
1990.
Explanation:
Hope I helped ya.
I know I'm late.
< Sarah >
Answer:
Mandela served 27 years in prison, split between Robben Island, Pollsmoor Prison and Victor Verster Prison. Amid growing domestic and international pressure, and with fears of a racial civil war, President F. W. de Klerk released him in 1990.
Born: Rolihlahla Mandela; 18 July 1918; Mvezo, ...
Awards: Sakharov Prize (1988); Bharat Ratna ...
Resting place: Mandela Graveyard; Qunu, Eas...
Explanation:
which was an effect of the united states supreme court ruling in brown v. board of education
Answer:
Public schools that separated students based on race had to make changes
Explanation:
Answer:
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education marked a turning point in the history of race relations in the United States. On May 17, 1954, the Court stripped away constitutional sanctions for segregation by race, and made equal opportunity in education the law of the land.
Explanation:
What achievement of Caesar Augustus does this statement reference?
Answer:
"Caesar Augustus. Caesar Augustus was one of ancient Rome's most successful leaders who led the transformation of Rome from a republic to an empire. During his reign, Augustus restored peace and prosperity to the Roman state and changed nearly every aspect of Roman life."
Explanation:
Final answer:
Caesar Augustus' achievement referenced in the statement is his role in ushering in the Pax Romana, a period of peace in Rome. He tackled various problems, reduced the standing army, provided land for veterans, created taxes, and advanced Roman culture across the empire.
Explanation:
The achievement of Caesar Augustus referenced in this statement is his role in ushering in a period of peace called the Pax Romana.
Augustus successfully tackled problems that had plagued Rome for at least a century, such as reducing the standing army, providing land for discharged veterans, creating new taxes, and advancing Roman culture across the empire.
The dedication to peace and the transformation of Rome's urban landscape were key aspects of Augustus' achievement, which is highlighted in the statement.
(15points) Explain Why did the election of 1824 have to be decided by
the House of Representatives?
Answer:
In the 1824 election, without an absolute majority in the Electoral College, the 12th Amendment dictated that the Presidential election be sent to the House of Representatives, whose Speaker and candidate in his own right, Henry Clay, gave his support to John Quincy Adams, and was then selected to be his Secretary of State. In the 1876 election, accusations of corruption stemmed from officials involved in counting the necessary and hotly contested electoral votes of both sides, in which Rutherford B. Hayes was elected by a congressional commission.
Explanation:
Which of the following best describes federalism?
The ability of state and local governments to override the federal government
The existence of a federal government
The division of political power between the state and federal governments
The ability of federal government to override state and local governments
Answer:
the division of political power between the state and federal governments
Explanation:
Many Asian Americans fought for the United States in World War I. The United States recognized their efforts by
awarding them naturalization.
funding their college tuitions.
paying for their return to Asia.
giving them free houses and cars.
Answer:
Uh either A or C most likely .
Explanation:
because they need to award them but if their giving way free cars that'll be way to expensive to give them. and also funding their college tuitions would be unreasonable
Answer:
a) awarding them naturalization
Explanation: