I would recommend forming a corporation to Laverne and Shirley because it offers limited liability and allows for attracting investors and managers.
Explanation:The form of organization that I would recommend to Laverne and Shirley is a corporation.
A corporation provides limited liability, meaning that the personal assets of the owners are protected in the event of a lawsuit or financial loss. If the consulting firm were to give bad advice and be sued, Laverne and Shirley's personal assets would not be at risk to satisfy judgments against the firm.
Moreover, a corporation can attract investors and managers with the skills and resources needed for growth, which can be vital for a consulting firm to expand and succeed.
Learn more about Business Structures here:https://brainly.com/question/38795744
#SPJ3
The cost (in dollars) of producing x units of a certain commodity is C(x) = 9000 + 6x + 0.05x2. (a) Find the average rate of change of C with respect to x when the production level is changed from x = 100 to the given value. (Round your answers to the nearest cent.) (i) x = 102
Answer: 16
Explanation: Average rate of change of C with respect to X is given as
= [tex]\frac{\Delta C}{\Delta X}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{(C(102)-C(100))}{(X(102)-X(100))}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{ 10132.2-10100}{102-100}[/tex]
= 32/2
= 16
Final answer:
The average rate of change of the cost function C(x) from x = 100 to x = 102 is $16.10.
Explanation:
The average rate of change of the cost function C(x) from x = 100 to x = 102 is the change in C divided by the change in x. We can calculate this by finding the values of C(102) and C(100) and then computing the difference between them.
To find C(102):
C(102) = [tex]9000 + 6(102) + 0.05(102)^2[/tex] = 9000 + 612 + 520.2 = 10132.2
To find C(100):
C(100) = [tex]9000 + 6(100) + 0.05(100)^2[/tex] = 9000 + 600 + 500 = 10100
Now, find the average rate of change:
Average rate of change = [tex]\frac{(C(102)-C(100))}{(102 - 100)}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{(10132.2 - 10100)}{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{32.2}{2}[/tex] = 16.1
Therefore, the average rate of change of C with respect to x when the production level is changed from x = 100 to x = 102 is $16.10.
Case A. Kapono Farms exchanged an old tractor for a newer model. The old tractor had a book value of $13,500 (original cost of $31,000 less accumulated depreciation of $17,500) and a fair value of $9,300. Kapono paid $23,000 cash to complete the exchange. The exchange has commercial substance. Required: 1. What is the amount of gain or loss that Kapono would recognize on the exchange? What is the initial value of the new tractor? 2. Assume the fair value of the old tractor is $17,000 instead of $9,300. What is the amount of gain or loss that Kapono would recognize on the exchange? What is the initial value of the new tractor?
Answer:
1. Gain or loss on exchange = $4,200 (Loss)
Initial value of the new tractor = $32,300
2. In case the fair value of old tractor = $17,000
Gain or loss on exchange = $3,500 Gain
Initial value of the new tractor = $40,000
Explanation:
Note: When a transaction has commercial substance, it means it is marketable and can be sold at fair value provided, in that case book value of old asset to be sold is not considered for calculating initial cost of new asset.
Since the transaction has commercial substance
Fair value of the old tractor will be considered.
Cost of new tractor = Cash paid + Fair value of old tractor
= $23,000 + $9,300 = $32,300
1. Gain or loss on exchange = Exchange value of old tractor - Book value of old tractor
Exchange value of old tractor = Fair value of old tractor as transaction had commercial substance = $9,300
Gain or loss on exchange = $9,300 - $13,500 = -$4,200 (Loss)
Initial value of the new tractor = Cost of new tractor as computed above = $32,300
2. In case the fair value of old tractor = $17,000
Then
Gain or loss on exchange = Exchange value of old tractor - Book value of old tractor = $17,000 - $13,500 = $3,500 Gain
because exchange value of old tractor = Fair value of old tractor as transaction had commercial substance
Initial value of the new tractor = Cost of new tractor = $23,000 + $17,000 = $40,000
Final Answer is as follows:
1. Gain or loss on exchange = $4,200 (Loss)
Initial value of the new tractor = $32,300
2. In case the fair value of old tractor = $17,000
Gain or loss on exchange = $3,500 Gain
Initial value of the new tractor = $40,000
Kapono Farms would recognize a loss of $4,200 with the new tractor valued at $32,300 in the first scenario and a gain of $3,500 with the new tractor valued at $40,000 in the second scenario.
Explanation:1. For the first scenario, Kapono Farms would recognize a loss on the exchange since the fair value of the old tractor ($9,300) is less than its book value ($13,500). The loss would be $4,200 ($13,500 - $9,300). The initial value of the new tractor would be the sum of the fair value of the old tractor and the additional cash paid, i.e. $9,300 + $23,000 = $32,300.
2. For the second scenario, where the fair value of the old tractor is deemed to be $17,000, Kapono Farms would recognize a gain on the exchange as the fair value exceeds the book value. The gain would be $3,500 ($17,000 - $13,500). The initial value of the new tractor would be the sum of the fair value of the old tractor and the additional cash paid, i.e. $17,000 + $23,000 = $40,000.
Learn more about Asset Exchange Accounting here:https://brainly.com/question/31986659
#SPJ3
Nash's Trading Post, LLC on July 15 sells merchandise on account to Tayler Co. for $2800, terms 1/10, n/30. On July 20 Tayler Co. returns merchandise worth $1000 to Nash's Trading Post, LLC. On July 24 payment is received from Tayler Co. for the balance due. What is the amount of cash received?
Answer:
Cash received 1,782
Explanation:
Sales Revenue 2,800
Return Goods 1,000 (customer return goods for this amount)
Sales after return 1,800 (original value less returns)
payment is due within discount period.
The terms are 1% discount within the first 10 days The payment is done at July 24th. Which is the nineth day.
1% discount of 1,800 = 18
Cash receipts 1,800 sale - 18 discounts = 1,782
The basic WACC equation The calculation of WACC involves calculating the weighted average of the required rates of return on debt, preferred stock, and common equity, where the weights equal the percentage of each type of financing in the firm’s overall capital structure. _______ is the symbol that represents the cost of raising capital through retained earnings in the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) equation. Wyle Co. has $3.9 million of debt, $3 million of preferred stock, and $3.3 million of common equity. What would be its weight on common equity? a. 0.29 b. 0.26 c. 0.32 d. 0.23
Answer:
[tex]R{_s}[/tex] is the symbol of cost of raising capital from retained earnings.
Weight of common equity = c) 0.32
Explanation:
[tex]R{_s}[/tex] is the symbol that represents the cost of raising capital through retained earnings in weighted average cost of capital.
Wyle Co.
Total of capital structure = Debt + Preferred Stock + Common Equity
= $3.9 million + $3 million + $3.3 million = $10.2 million
Weight on common equity = Equity/Capital structure
= [tex]\frac{3.3 million}{10.2million}[/tex] = 0.32
As weight is share of common equity out of total capital. It can be stated in percentage or decimal value.
[tex]R{_s}[/tex]
C) 0.32
Answer:
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) formula calculates a company's cost of borrowing money, taking both debt and equity into consideration. Investors and analysts use the WACC to evaluate an investor's return on an investment (ROI) in a company.
Explanation:
Option C is the correct answer.
[tex]\text{GIVEN}:\\ \text{Debt} = 3.9 \text{ million}\\ \\\text{Preferred Stock} = 3 \text{ million}\\ \\\text{Common Equity} = 3.3 \text{ million} \\[/tex]
[tex]\\\text{Total value of capital structure}: \\ = 3.9 + 3 + 3.3\\ = 10.2\\\\\text{Weight of common equity}:\\= \text {Common equity / Total value of Capital structure}\\ \text{Weight of common equity} = 0.32[/tex]
Therefore, the weight on common equity will 0.32.
For more information, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/10768875?referrer=searchResults
Kopa Company manufactures CH-21 through two processes: Mixing and Packaging. In July, the following costs were incurred. Mixing Packaging Raw materials used $10,000 $28,000 Factory labor costs 8,000 36,000 Manufacturing overhead costs 12,000 54,000 Units completed at a cost of $21,000 in the Mixing Department are transferred to the Packaging Department. Units completed at a cost of $106,000 in the Packaging Department are transferred to Finished Goods. Journalize the assignment of these costs to the two processes and the transfer of units as appropriate
Answer:
mixing WIP 10,000
packaging WIP 28,000
raw materials inventory 38,000
mixing WIP 8,000
packaging WIP 36,000
wages payable 44,000
mixing WIP 12,000
packaging WIP 54,000
Factory overhead 66,000
packaging WIP 21,000
mixing WIP 21,000
FInished Goods 106,000
packaging WIP 106,000
Explanation:
the cost for each department are assignet
then we transfer from mising to packing
and finally from packaging to finished goods.
Final answer:
To account for costs and transfers within Kopa Company's manufacturing processes, journal entries meticulously itemize raw materials, factory labor, and overhead by department, leading to a clear, account-based representation of costs throughout production stages.
Explanation:
To journalize the assignment of costs to the Mixing and Packaging processes and to account for the transfer of units in Kopa Company, we need to create journal entries that reflect the movement of costs through the manufacturing processes. The incurred costs include raw materials, factory labor, and manufacturing overhead for both the Mixing and Packaging departments.
Raw materials used: Mixing - $10,000; Packaging - $28,000Factory labor costs: Mixing - $8,000; Packaging - $36,000Manufacturing overhead costs: Mixing - $12,000; Packaging - $54,000The journal entries would be as follows:
Debit Work in Process (Mixing) $30,000 (sum of raw materials, labor, and overhead for Mixing) and credit Raw Materials Inventory $10,000, Factory Labor $8,000, and Manufacturing Overhead $12,000.Debit Work in Process (Packaging) $118,000 (sum of transferred cost from Mixing and costs incurred in Packaging) and credit Work in Process (Mixing) $21,000, Raw Materials Inventory $28,000, Factory Labor $36,000, and Manufacturing Overhead $54,000.Debit Finished Goods $106,000 and credit Work in Process (Packaging) $106,000 for the cost of units completed in the Packaging Department and transferred to Finished Goods.These entries ensure that costs are properly assigned to each process and that the cost of completed units is transferred to Finished Goods, ready for sale.
Suppose the amounts presented here are basic financial information (in millions) from the 2019 annual reports of Nike and Adidas. Nike Adidas Sales revenue $19,887.0 $10,584.0 Allowance for doubtful accounts, beginning 80 120 Allowance for doubtful accounts, ending 110 126 Accounts receivable balance (gross), beginning 2,924 1,736 Accounts receivable balance (gross), ending 2,948 1,534 Calculate the accounts receivable turnover for both companies. (Round answers to 1 decimal place, e.g. 12.5.) Nike Adidas Accounts receivable turnover times times
Answer:
Both Companies have an Account Receivable turnover of 7.00 (seven)
Explanation:
(for future question it would be better if you upload an image with the table this is quite confusing)
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-&Nike&Adidas\\sales&19887&10584\\B AR&2924&1736\\B all&80&120\\Net AR&2844&1616\\E AR&2948&1534\\E all&110&126\\Net AR&2838&1408\\\end{array}\right][/tex]
Account Receivable TurnOver Formula
[tex]\frac{net \: credit \: sales}{average \: account \: receivable} = AR \: TurnOver[/tex]
Where:
[tex]average \: AR = (beginning \: AR + ending \: AR) \div 2[/tex]
Nike:(2844+2838)/2 = 2841 Average Inventory
[tex]\frac{19887}{2841} = 7.00 \: AR \: turnOver[/tex]
Adidas(1616+1408)/2 = 1512 Average Inventory
[tex]\frac{10584}{1512} = 7.00 \: AR \: turnOver[/tex]
Thirty-six percent of sales at supermarkets in the United Kingdom carry the stores' own brand names. Eighteen percent of all supermarket sales in France and Germany carry the stores' own brand names. And in the United States, 14 percent carry the stores' own brand names. These stores use a ________ strategy to sell other manufacturers' products with their own brand names.
Answer:
The correct answer is generic branding strategy.
Explanation:
A generic brand is a kind of consumer product that doesn't have a widely recognized name.
Pettifog Partnership distributes cash of $20,000, hot assets worth $5,000, and a parcel of land in a liquidating distribution to Li, a partner. The hot assets have a basis of $0 to the partnership. The land has a fair market value of $80,000 and an inside basis of $55,000. Li’s outside basis in Pettifog just prior to the distribution is $85,000. What amount of gain or loss, if any, must Li recognize and what is Li’s resulting basis in the land?
Answer:
The amount of gain that Li will have is $0 and the resulting basis of land is $60,000.
Explanation:
To take out the resulting basis of land and gain or loss , we need to know what happens in this situation of liquidating distribution. Under this liquidating distribution , the gain will only be recognized when the cash receipts that Li will receive are more than than the outside basis.
Here Li is also receiving other assets along with the cash , so the remaining balance ( which we will get by subtracting cash receipts from the Li outside basis before distribution ) will be adjusted against these assets.
Li outside basis = $85,000
(-) cash received = $20,000
(-) hot assets = $5,000
Balance left to be adjusted against assets = $60,000
Here there is no gain for Li since cash receipts are not more than than outside basis and the resulting basis in land is $60,000.
The following lots of a particular commodity were available for sale during the year Beginning inventory 10 units at $52.00 First purchase 19 units at $50.00 Second purchase 55 units at $59.00 Third purchase 14 units at $63.00 The firm uses the periodic system, and there are 27 units of the commodity on hand at the end of the year. What is the amount of inventory at the end of the year according to the LIFO method? Select the correct answer.
Answer:
Ending Inventory $1,523
COGS $4,227
Explanation:
PURCHASES
DATE QUANTY PRICE SUBTOTAL
Beginning 10 $52 $520.00
1st 19 $50 $950.00
2nd 55 $59 $3,245.00
3rd 14 $63 $882.00
Because we sold at LIFO we record the latest units as COGS and the first untis at ending invenotry.
So we start from the first line until reach the 27 units
27 - 10 beginning = 17
we are short, so we move to next line
19 - 17 = 2 with this unit we cover the ending inventory, the diference is part of COGS and all the lines below are also COGS
COGS
2 units at $50
55 units at $59
14 units at $63
Total 4,227
Ending Inventory
10 units at $52
17 units at $59
Total $1,523
If U.S. auto manufacturers cut the prices of their vehicles to sell a greater quantity, buyers may assume that the lower price implies _____________ compared to foreign manufactured vehicles.
Answer: Lower quality
Explanation: U.S auto industry comes under the oligopoly market structure with small number of sellers operating at very large scale. In an oligopoly market structure, the firms in the industry compete on the basis of advertising, product differentiation etc. and not on price.
If US auto manufacturers do so, buyers will surely assume that the quality of product offered is lower than others.
If the inflation rate was 3.40% and the nominal interest rate was 5.60% over the last year, what was the real rate of interest over the last year? Disregard cross-product terms; that is, if averaging is required, use the arithmetic average. Round intermediate calculations to four decimal places.
Answer:
2.1276%
Explanation:
[tex]\ $Real Rate$ = \frac{1+nominal}{1+inflation} - 1 [/tex]
1.056/1.034 -1 = 0,021276595744681 rounding to 4 decimal places:
2.1277%
The reasoning behind this formula is the following:
there is a rate that generate the combine effect of the nominal and the inflation rate
Principal (1+real rate) = Principal x (1+nominal) / (1+ inflation)
removing the principal for clearence:
1+real rate =(1+nominal) x (1+ inflation)
real rate = (1+nominal) x (1+ inflation) - 1
Final answer:
To calculate the real interest rate, subtract the inflation rate of 3.40% from the nominal interest rate of 5.60%. The resultant real interest rate is approximately 2.20% for the last year.
Explanation:
The question asks us to calculate the real interest rate given a nominal interest rate of 5.60% and an inflation rate of 3.40% over the last year. According to the Fisher equation, the real interest rate can be approximated by subtracting the inflation rate from the nominal interest rate. This formula does not require cross-product terms, so we use a simple arithmetic subtraction for this calculation.
To find the real interest rate, we follow this basic formula:
Start with the nominal interest rate: 5.60%
Subtract the inflation rate: 3.40%
The result is the real interest rate
Therefore, the calculation would be:
Real Interest Rate ≈ Nominal Interest Rate – Inflation Rate
Real Interest Rate ≈ 5.60% – 3.40% = 2.20%
Hence, the real rate of interest over the last year was approximately 2.20%.
Selected financial information for Feemster Company for 2012 follows. Sales $ 2,000,000 Cost of goods sold 1,400,000 Merchandise inventory Beginning of year 155,000 End of year 195,000. Required: Assuming that the merchandise inventory buildup was relatively constant, how many times did the merchandise inventory turnover during 2012?
The merchandise inventory turnover for Feemster Company in 2012 was 8 times; this was calculated by dividing the cost of goods sold, which was $1,400,000, by the average inventory amount of $175,000.
Explanation:To calculate the merchandise inventory turnover rate for Feemster Company in 2012, we need to use the formula:
Inventory Turnover = Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory
First, we find the average inventory for the year:
Average Inventory = (Beginning Inventory + End Inventory) / 2
Average Inventory = ($155,000 + $195,000) / 2
Average Inventory = $175,000
Then, we use the Cost of Goods Sold and Average Inventory to calculate the inventory turnover:
Inventory Turnover = $1,400,000 / $175,000
Inventory Turnover = 8 times
Thus, the inventory turned over 8 times during the year 2012.
According to the Gordon growth model, what is an investor's valuation of a stock whose last dividend was $1.00 per year if dividends are expected to grow at a constant rate of 10 percent over a long period of time and the investor's required return is 16 percent?
Answer:
The investor valuation of a stock is $18.33
Explanation:
Gordon Growth model : The formula to compute investor valuation of stock is shown below:
= Dividend of year 1 ÷ (Required rate - growth rate)
where,
year 1 dividend = year 0 dividend × (1 + growth rate)
= $1 × (1 + 0.10)
=$1.10
Required rate of return = 16%
And, growth rate = 10%
Now apply the above formula which is equals to
= $1.10 ÷ (16% - 10%)
= $18.33
Hence, The investor valuation of a stock is $18.33
Final answer:
Using the Gordon growth model and given a last dividend of $1.00 with a 10% growth rate and a 16% required return, an investor would value the stock at $18.33.
Explanation:
According to the Gordon growth model (also known as the Dividend Discount Model), the value of a stock is calculated by dividing the next year's expected dividend by the difference between the investor's required rate of return and the dividend growth rate. In this case, since the last dividend was $1.00 and the dividends are expected to grow at a constant rate of 10 percent, the next expected dividend will be $1.00 multiplied by (1 + 10%), which equals $1.10. Given an investor's required return of 16 percent, the formula for the stock valuation would be:
Stock Value = Next Year's Dividend / (Required Return - Dividend Growth Rate) = $1.10 / (0.16 - 0.10) = $1.10 / 0.06 = $18.33.
Therefore, based on the Gordon growth model, an investor would value the stock at $18.33.
The marketing manager of Griffin Corporation has determined that a market exists for a telephone with a sales price of $36 per unit. The production manager estimates the annual fixed costs of producing between 40,000 and 80,000 telephones would be $450,000. Required Assume that Griffin desires to earn a $150,000 profit from the phone sales. How much can Griffin afford to spend on variable cost per unit if production and sales equal 50,000 phones?
Griffin Corporation can spend up to $24 per phone unit on variable costs to meet its projected profit goal of $150,000, considering fixed costs and the sales price of each unit.
Explanation:To calculate how much Griffin Corporation can afford to spend on variable cost per unit, we need to determine the total available budget for production. Firstly, the total profit goal, including fixed costs, is $600,000 ($450,000 fixed costs + $150,000 desired profit). The sales revenue from 50,000 phones at $36 each would be $1,800,000. So, the difference between sales revenue and the total profit goal gives us the total budget available for variable costs, which is $1,200,000 ($1,800,000-$600,000). Finally, dividing the total variable cost budget by the total number of phones produced provides the maximum amount that can be spent on variable costs per unit. Therefore, Griffin can afford to spend $24 ($1,200,000÷50,000) per phone unit on variable costs.
Learn more about Variable Cost Calculation here:https://brainly.com/question/31149244
#SPJ6
Griffin Corporation can afford to spend $24 per unit on variable costs to achieve a desired profit of $150,000, given their annual fixed costs and the sales price of the telephones.
Calculation
Sales Price per Unit (SP): $36Fixed Costs (FC): $450,000Desired Profit (P): $150,000Units Sold (Q): 50,000Formulating the Equation
We can use the contribution margin formula:
Total Revenue (TR) = SP * QTotal Costs (TC) = FC + (Variable Cost per Unit (VC) * Q)For Griffin to achieve its desired profit:
TR = TC + P
SP * Q = FC + (VC * Q) + P
$36 * 50,000 = $450,000 + (VC * 50,000) + $150,000
Simplifying:
$1,800,000 = $600,000 + (VC * 50,000)
Solving for VC
Subtracting the fixed cost and desired profit from total revenue:
$1,800,000 - $600,000 = VC * 50,000
$1,200,000 = VC * 50,000
VC = $1,200,000 / 50,000
VC = $24 per unit
Therefore, Griffin can afford to spend $24 on variable costs per unit to achieve the desired profit.
Fox, Inc. is considering a five- year project that has initial after- tax outlay or after- tax cost of $170,000. The future after- tax cash inflows from its project for years 1 through 5 are $45,000 for each year. Fox uses the net present value method and has a discount rate of 11.25%. Will Fox accept the project?
Answer: Since Net Present Value is negative i.e. -4724.
[tex]\therefore[/tex] Fox will not accept the project.
Explanation:
Net Present Value = Initial after- tax outlay + Cash inflows[tex]\times[/tex]PVIFA(11.25%,5)
= -170000 + 45000[tex]\times[/tex]PVIFA(11.25%,5)
= -170000 +45000[tex]\times[/tex]3.6728
= - 4724
Since Net Present Value is negative i.e. -4724.
[tex]\therefore[/tex] Fox will not accept the project.
A home equity loan can be risky because the lender can foreclose if you don’t make your payments. True or False
Yes, a home equity loan can be risky because if payments are not made, the lender can foreclose. This risk was exacerbated by the securitization process, leading to reckless lending like subprime and NINJA loans.
Explanation:The statement is true that a home equity loan can be a risky move for borrowers because the lender has the power to foreclose if you do not make payments. A major factor responsible for this is the securitization process. The process, initially intended to redistribute risk and make lending more fluid, lost its direction when banks, not bearing the brunt of bad loans, began to lend carelessly. In the midst of this reckless lending, loans with little borrower appraisal, like subprime loans and NINJA loans, proliferated. These are loans made without sufficient regard for the borrower's ability to repay. Consequently, they became part of the complex puzzle leading to the global financial crisis, affecting home ownership adversely.
Learn more about Home Equity Loan Risk here:https://brainly.com/question/34170972
#SPJ12
Managing complex projects often involves use of multidisciplinary teams (MTs) including personnel from a. different college majors. b. different organizations including subcontractors. c. different work units within the organization. d. various combinations of college majors, work units, subcontractors, and industry partners.
Answer: d. various combinations of college majors, work units, subcontractors, and industry partners.
Explanation: Managing complex projects often involves the use of multidisciplinary teams (MTs) including personnel from various combinations of college majors, work units, subcontractors, and industry partners. Managing a complex project is a work of coordination of all these teams of the project to achieve the goals. The project manager is in charge of project coordination.
This answer provides an understanding of how multidisciplinary teams (MTs) are used to manage complex projects, explaining their importance in today's rapidly changing workplace landscape. It emphasizes the diversity found in these teams and the varied types of teams seen in the business world.
Explanation:Managing complex projects involve the use of multidisciplinary teams (MTs), which can encompass members with unique skill sets from different college majors, different organizations including subcontractors, various units within the same organization, and combinations of these elements. This practice has increased in popularity due to shifts in technology, economics, globalization, foreign competition, and varying workplace demographics, necessitating a responsive and adaptable organizational structure.
Modern businesses significantly benefit from task division amongst diverse team members, just like in a restaurant where jobs of varying complexities are divided into roles like top chef, sous chefs, kitchen help, servers, greeters, janitors, and business managers. Similarly, larger, complex organizations such as hospitals or manufacturing factories can have hundreds of distinct job classifications.
Teams are categorized into three primary types: problem resolution teams, creative teams, and tactical teams. However, studies are also being conducted on the effectiveness and functionality of virtual teams, especially with the increasing globalization of organizations and the incremental reliance on digital communication.
Learn more about Multidisciplinary Teams here:https://brainly.com/question/9493769
#SPJ3
For a market to be competitive:a. each buyer and seller is small, relative to the whole market; no single decision-maker has any influence over the market price.B.sellers must produce goods and services that are different from their competitors.C.sellers should have substantial pricing power.D.the price must be a fair price
Answer: Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
Each of the buyer and seller are small when we are relating it with the whole market. so, there will be no power in the hands of a single decision maker and if a firm wants to change their prices then it will not have any influence on the market price. In a competitive market, there are large number of buyers and sellers, thus, one buyer or seller doesn't have any impact on the market price.
Answer: A
Explanation:
It's a competitive market
ells Company's delivery truck, with a cost of $56,000 was destroyed by fire. At the time of the fire, the balance of the Accumulated Depreciation account amounted to $38,000. The company received $32,000 reimbursement from its insurance company. The gain or loss as a result of the fire was
Answer:
The company will earn a gain of $14,000.
Explanation:
The original cost of the ells company's delivery truck was $ 56,000 and the accumulated depreciation account had a balance of $38,000, which means a provision for the $38,000 was made in case something bad happens to the truck, and it eventually did as the truck was destroyed by fire and hence the amount of $18,000 ($56,000 - $38,000) was left which was not covered by the company.
The company received $32,000 as insurance , which means the $18,000 loss would be covered here - $32,000 -$18,000 = $14,000, and also the company will gain $14,000.
On April 2, 2018, Montana Mining Co. pays $3,721,000 for an ore deposit containing 1,525,000 tons. The company installs machinery in the mine costing $213,500, with an estimated seven-year life and no salvage value. The machinery will be abandoned when the ore is completely mined. Montana begins mining on May 1, 2018, and mines and sells 166,200 tons of ore during the remaining eight months of 2018. Prepare the December 31, 2018, entries to record both the ore deposit depletion and the mining machinery depreciation. Mining machinery depreciation should be in proportion to the mine’s depletion. (Round your unit depreciation and depletion rates to 2 decimal places.)
Answer:
Dep expense 428,796
Acc Depp Machine 23,268
Acc dep deposit 405,528
Explanation:
213,5000 machine used in the ore deposit, so it will depreciate at the same rate.
3,721,000 ore deposit
166,200/1,525,000 = 0.108983606
213,500 x 0.108983606 = 23,268
3,721,000 x 0.108983606 = 405,528
Why do economists calculate GDP by both the expenditure approach and the income approach?a. economists disagree on the best measureb. the combined methods provide a more accurate measure of GDPc. some economists learned to do it one way and others learned anotherd. these are really just two different names for the same thing
Answer: Option (b) is correct.
Explanation:
Economists are generally using both the methods for calculating GDP because the combined estimates from both the methods provides a more appropriate measure of GDP.
For instance, there is an construction industry and for this industry all the costs incurred before the generation of income. So, expenditure method is more appropriate for this type of industry.
Alternatively, in the service sector income method is more appropriate than the expenditure method.
Answer:
the combined methods provide a more accurate measure of GDP.
Explanation:
"Ceteris paribus" means demand will change when price changesa. no matter what other factors may influence the marketb. if other market factors remain constantc. only if the supply also does not changed. only in the short-term
Answer:
The correct answer is option b.
Explanation:
The term Ceteris paribus is a Latin phrase which means holding other things constant.
Ceteris paribus in the law of demand means keeping other market constant, the demand for a commodity will change with change in the price.
The other market factors here are income, population, taste and preferences etc.
Final answer:
Ceteris paribus means 'other things being equal' and is used when analyzing how changes in one variable, like price, affect demand or supply, assuming all other factors are held constant. It is a fundamental economic principle for isolating the effects of one variable on another in economic analysis.
Explanation:
Ceteris paribus is a Latin phrase that translates to "other things equal" and is commonly used in economics to describe a situation where all other variables are held constant while analyzing the relationship between two specific variables. This concept is key when examining the effect that changes in price have on the demand or supply of a good or service. When we say demand will change when price changes ceteris paribus, we mean that demand will only change because of the price movement if other market factors remain constant (b).
In real-world economics, demand and supply are influenced by various factors such as consumer income, the price of other goods, and production costs. To rigorously understand the impact of price changes, economists assume a ceteris paribus condition where these other factors do not change. This approach allows economists to isolate the effect of the price change on demand or supply without interference from other variables.
If any factors other than the price were to change, such as a shift in consumer tastes or a technological advancement in production, the corresponding demand or supply schedule would need to be reassessed to reflect these changes. Thus, the ceteris paribus assumption is crucial for simplifying the complex relationships in economic analysis and is not indicative of short-term analysis nor does it apply when other variables, including supply, change.
Suppose the standard deviation of the losses had been $3000 instead of $1000. What would the larger standard deviation do to the width of the confidence interval (assuming the same level of confidence)?
Answer:
As the standard deviation increases from $1000 to $3000, this will cause the confidence interval to go more wider.
Explanation:
Confidence interval is a tool used by many statisticians to take out the estimate amount of uncertainty which is associated when a sample estimate is taken out of a population parameter.
Standard deviation is a tool which is used to measure the amount of variations and when this standard deviation increases this means that the amount variations also increases and thus the confidence interval will go more wider as standard deviation shifts from $1000 to $4000 as given in this case.
You work for a marketing firm that has just landed a contract with Run-of-the-Mills to help them promote three of their products: guppy gummies, flopsicles, and mookies. All of these products have been on the market for some time, but, to entice better sales, Run-of-the-Mills wants to try a new advertisement that will market two of the products that consumers will likely consume together. As a former economics student, you know that complements are typically consumed together while substitutes can take the place of other goods. Run-of-the-Mills provides your marketing firm with the following data: When the price of guppy gummies increases by 5%, the quantity of flopsicles sold decreases by 4% and the quantity of mookies sold increases by 5%. Your job is to use the cross-price elasticity between guppy gummies and the other goods to determine which goods your marketing firm should advertise together.
By utilizing the concept of cross-price elasticity, the data indicates that guppy gummies and flopsicles, due to their negative cross-price elasticity, are complementary goods and should be advertised together. Guppy gummies and mookies, having a positive cross-price elasticity, are substitutes and are not typically consumed together.
Explanation:Based on the data provided, we can use the concept of cross-price elasticity to determine which products are complements and which are substitutes. Remember that substitute goods have positive cross-price elasticities: if the price of good A increases, the quantity consumed of good B also increases. On the other hand, complement goods have negative cross-price elasticities: if the price of good A increases, the quantity consumed of good B decreases.
In the case of guppy gummies and flopsicles, when the price of guppy gummies increases by 5%, the quantity of flopsicles sold decreases by 4%. This negative cross-price elasticity suggests that these goods are complements, meaning they are consumed together. Hence, it's a good idea to advertise these two products together.
Alternatively, when the price of guppy gummies increases by 5%, the quantity of mookies sold increases by 5%. This positive cross-price elasticity implies that guppy gummies and mookies are substitute goods, and they are not typically consumed together. Thus, it's not advisable to advertise these two products together.
Learn more about Cross-Price Elasticity here:https://brainly.com/question/32539362
#SPJ3
Splitland is a developing economy with two distinct regions. The northern region has great investment opportunities, but the people who live there need to consume all of their income to survive. Those living in the south are better off than their northern counterparts and save a significant portion of their income. The southern region, however, has few profitable investment opportunities and so most of the savings remain in shoeboxes and under mattresses. How could the development of the financial sector benefit both regions and promote economic growth in Splitland?
Answer: The presence of a financial intermediary would reduce the information costs that may have prevented the southerners from lending directly to the northerners in the past. This would promote economic growth.
Explanation: Information is key in modern societies.
The information costs that would have previously prohibited southerners from lending directly to northerners would be reduced by the establishment of a financial middleman. This would encourage economic expansion.
What is economic expansion?A real GDP expansion occurs when it takes two or more quarters to go from a low point to a high point. When the economy is stimulated, there is an increase in employment, which is followed by a rise in consumer confidence and discretionary expenditure.
The stage is additionally referred to as economic recovery. The term "business cycle" refers to a process that contains four phases: expansion, peak, contraction, and trough.
It is common knowledge that the economy is thriving during an expansion. Low interest rates, which make borrowing money affordable, considerable corporate activity, as well as significant discretionary spending, are characteristics of a thriving economy.
When expansion reaches its pinnacle, a peak happens. When there is a significant amount of demand for a good, inflation happens, and prices start to rise. Consumer spending starts to decline over time, and macroeconomic indices stop rising.
Learn more about economic expansion, here
https://brainly.com/question/2614672
#SPJ2
Consider an imaginary economy that has been growing at a rate of 4% per year. Government economists have proposed a number of policies to increase the growth rate but first need to convince the president that the policies will pay off. To do so, they want to present a comparison of the number of years it will take for the economy to double, depending on the growth rate. Using the rule of 70, determine the number of years it will take the economy to double at each growth rate. Growth Rate Years Required to Double (Percent) (Nearest whole number of years) 4 5 6
Answer:
If the rate is 4%: 70/4 = 17.5 years - about 18 years
Explanation:
The rule of seventy allows you to determine how long the amount invested will double. For this, just divide 70 by the annual rate of return. The rule of seventy can be applied intuitively for the calculation of other growth rates, such as a country's GDP.
The calculation is simple, just divide 70 by the value of the growth rate.
If the rate is 4%: 70/4 = 17.5 years - about 18 years
If the rate is 5%: 70/5 = 14 years
If the rate is 6%: 70/6 = 11.6 years - about 12 years
Using the rule of 70, we can determine the number of years it will take for the economy to double at different growth rates.
Explanation:To determine the number of years it will take for an economy to double at different growth rates, we can use the rule of 70. The rule of 70 states that the doubling time of a variable is approximately equal to 70 divided by the growth rate. Therefore, for a 4% growth rate, it will take approximately 17 years for the economy to double (70 / 4 = 17.5). For a 5% growth rate, it will take approximately 14 years (70 / 5 = 14). And for a 6% growth rate, it will take approximately 12 years (70 / 6 = 11.67).
Learn more about Doubling time here:https://brainly.com/question/27314121
#SPJ3
The slogan of Natural Care Products is "Loving the Earth." This is more than just an advertising message. The company hires people who not only have job-related skills but also a commitment to sustainability and enjoyment of nature. The employees regularly have opportunities to sign up for service projects such as river cleanups and recycling drives. Employees are enthusiastic about developing and marketing products made with all-natural ingredients sustainably sourced. The HR department uses its communication tools to remind employees about how everyone contributes to realizing this eco-friendly vision for the company. Together, these efforts at Natural Care Products create _____.
Answer:
The correct answer would be Brand Alignment.
Explanation:
In simple words, Brand alignment is the alignment of your company's employees behaviors, sales promotions, product development, sales and marketing efforts, etc, with the goal of the company. In this example, The slogan of Natural Care Products is 'Loving the Earth', which means the goal of the company is to actually love the earth by making efforts for it to clean it and make it pollution free and to do everything which makes the earth live longer. In this regard, the Natural Care Products Company not only hires enthusiastic employees who are inclined towards saving the earth, but also creates their products from all natural sources, plus arrange many opportunities for the employees to sign up for recycling activities. Their all such activities come under the Brand Alignment.
Miller Company's total sales are $120,000. The company's direct labor cost is $15,000, which represents 30% of its total conversion cost and 40% of its total prime cost. Its total selling and administrative expense is $18,000 and its only variable selling and administrative expense is a sales commission of 5% of sales. The company maintains no beginning or ending inventories and its manufacturing overhead costs are entirely fixed costs. Required:1. What is the total manufacturing overhead cost? 2. What is the total direct materials cost? 3. What is the total manufacturing cost? 4. What is the total variable selling and administrative cost? 5. What is the total variable cost? 6. What is the total fixed cost? 7. What is the total contribution margin?
Answer:
1. Total manufacturing overhead cost = $35,000
2. Total Direct Material cost = $22,500
3. Total manufacturing cost = $72,500
4. Total Variable Selling and Administrative Cost = $6,000
5. Total variable cost = $43,500
6. Total Fixed Cost = $47,000
7. Total contribution margin = $76,500
Explanation:
Provided Sales = $120,000
Direct labor Cost = $15,000 which = 30% of total conversion cost
Total conversion cost = $15,000/30% = $50,000
Conversion cost = Labor cost + Manufacturing cost, manufacturing cost = $50,000 - $15,000 = $35,000
Provided Direct labor cost is 40% of total prime cost.
Total prime cost = Direct material + direct labor = $15,000/40% = $37,500
Direct material = $37,500 - $15,000 = $22,500
Provided selling and distribution expense = $18,000
Variable = Sales commission of 5% on sales = $120,000 X 5% = $6,000
Fixed Selling expenses = $18,000 - variable $6,000 = $12,000
Manufacturing Overhead cost is completely fixed = $35,000
Now we have total manufacturing cost = material + labor + manufacturing overheads = $22,500 + $15,000 + $35,000 = $72,500
Total variable cost = Material + labor + Selling & Administration
= $22,500 + $15,000 + $6,000 = $43,500
Total fixed cost = Manufacturing + Selling & Administrative
= $35,000 + $12,000 = $47,000
Total contribution margin = Selling Value - Total Variable Cost = $120,000 - $43,500 = $76,500
Final Answer
1. Total manufacturing overhead cost = $35,000
2. Total Direct Material cost = $22,500
3. Total manufacturing cost = $72,500
4. Total Variable Selling and Administrative Cost = $6,000
5. Total variable cost = $43,500
6. Total Fixed Cost = $47,000
7. Total contribution margin = $76,500
Two methods are used to predict how many customers will call in for help in the next four days. The first method predicts the numbers of callers to be 23, 5, 14, and 20 for the four respective days. The second method predicts 20, 13, 14, and 20 for the four respective days. The actual numbers of callers turn out to be 23, 10, 15, and 19. Which method has the bigger forecast bias?
Answer:
The method 1 will have a bigger forecast bias ( whose value is 5 ) than the method 2 ( whose value 0 ).
Explanation:
To know which method will have the bigger forecast bias , we will see the deviation of both methods from the actual forecast numbers and then by seeing which one is having a bigger deviation value , we can say which one is having bigger forecast bias.
FORECAST BIAS = ACTUAL NUMBER - FORECAST NUMBER
Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast
caller turn method 1 method 2 bias method 1 bias method 2
23 23 20 0 3
10 5 13 5 -3
15 14 14 1 1
19 20 20 -1 -1
TOTAL 5 0
from the above information we can say that the method 1 with forecast bias value of 5 is much bigger than the method 2 with forecast bias value of 0.
A bank provides its customers mobile applications that significantly simplify traditional banking activities. For example, a customer can use a smart phone to take a picture of a check and electronically deposit into an account. This unique service demonstrates the bank's desire to practice which one of Porter's strategies?
Answer:
The correct answer would be Differentiation Strategy.
Explanation:
There are three generic strategies of Porter. One is Cost Leadership, other is Differentiation and the last one is Focus.
Among these strategies, Differentiation is the strategy which is used by the bank in this question. Differentiation is a strategy used by the companies to make them unique in the industry through some dimensions which are highly valued by the customers or clients of that company. For Example in this question, the bank provides the facility of transferring money in an account by just snapping a shot of check and depositing it into that account. This feature make them unique in the banking sector. So this is called the differentiation strategy.