What could best be inferred from the map? A. Phoenicia was frequently at war with other empires. B. Phoenicians traded with peoples in Africa and Europe. C. The population of Phoenicia and its colonies was larger than that of Greece and its colonies. D. Greece and its colonies benefitted from a better climate for agriculture.

Mogul officials called "zamindars" kept a portion of the taxes paid by peasants as their salaries.

Zamindar literally means the one who holds the land (Zamin meaning land and “Dar” the one who keeps/holds). Amid the Mughal Domain; Zamindars had a place with the respectability and were part of the decision class. Their tribal spaces were treated as jagirs (properties). Under English colonial control in India, the permanent settlement united what ended up known as the zamindari framework.

C. Military leaders staged a coup to create a fascist government.

The Spanish Civil War was between the Republicans and the Nationalists. The coup, supported by the military units, left Spain militarily and politically split. The Nationalists was supported by the Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy with soldiers, ammunition etc. The Republicans was backed by the Communist Soviet Union and leftist Mexico. The War lasted from 1936 to 1939.

The right is the: C. Military leaders staged a coup to create a fascist government.

The event of the Spanish Civil war was held in between the Republicans and also among the Nationalists. Nationalists were hugely supported by Nazi Germany all along with the Fascist from Italy along with soldiers.

Here it goes:

People in authority have many additional rights, and if these are not controlled (which they are, but not always work) things can get bad. For example, corruption. Corruption is a dishonest act of people in power which most of the time involve the fraude of money. When those im power start "robbing" money, many things can happen such as: not being able to pay or reducing pensions, public services will worsen, etc.

Hope it helped,

BioTeacher101

Hello....

In four to five sentences, explain what some of the consequences might be if people in authority were not bound by certain rules governing their behavior.

Well, everyone can't be part of the authority. Some of the consequences may include being robbed in many occasions and being not able to pay back those losses. Another really big problem is corruption. People can turn really bad and destroy the United States.

It started in the 1870's and it ended in the 1950's

Hoped This Helped

The answer is Into the 1930s

The Arab Spring was a loosely related group of protests that ultimately resulted in regime changes in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. Not all of the movements, however, could be deemed successful—at least if the end goal was increased democracy and cultural freedom. In fact, for many countries enveloped by the revolts of the Arab Spring, the period since has been hallmarked by increased instability and oppression. Given the significant impact of the Arab Spring throughout northern Africa and the Middle East, it’s easy to forget the series of large-scale political and social movements arguably began with a single act of defiance.

The Arab Spring began in December 2010 when Tunisian street vendor Mohammed Bouazizi set himself on fire to protest the arbitrary seizing of his vegetable stand by police over failure to obtain a permit. Bouazizi’s sacrificial act served as a catalyst for the so-called Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia. The street protests that ensued in Tunis, the country’s capital, eventually prompted authoritarian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali to abdicate his position and flee to Saudi Arabia. He had ruled the country with an iron fist for more than 20 years.

Answer: Diplomacy.

Diplomatic sanctions are issued by countries or by the United Nations. These sanctions trigger the reduction or removal of diplomatic ties, such as embassies and consulates. The severance of diplomatic relations is one of the measures contained in Article 41 of the UN Charter, and have historically been one of the most frequently used sanctions.

Final answer:

Speculations about Aye being responsible for Tutankhamun's death primarily stem from Aye's sudden rise to power following Tutankhamun's untimely demise. While there is no definitive evidence proving Aye's guilt, the circumstances of his ascent to pharaoh after marrying the widowed Ankhesenamun amidst a time of religious and political turmoil have fueled these theories.

Explanation:

The question 'What evidence exists that makes Aye seem guilty for killing King Tutankhamun?' refers to the historical speculations surrounding the death of the young Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun. The suspicion towards Aye, who was Tutankhamun's advisor and became pharaoh after marrying the widowed Ankhesenamun, arises from the tumultuous period of transition that followed Tutankhamun's untimely death at the age of eighteen. While there is no concrete evidence that directly implicates Aye in the murder of Tutankhamun, this unsettled period in Egyptian history, the young age of Tutankhamun's death, and Aye's ascension to the throne shortly thereafter have contributed to the theory that Aye could have had a motive to facilitate his own rise to power.

Speculation about Ay's involvement in King Tutankhamun's death is based on his quick accession to power and marriage to the widow Ankhesenamun, but no concrete evidence has been found to conclusively name him as the murderer. Theories regarding King Tut's death vary widely with no definitive proof.

There are multiple theories surrounding the death of King Tutankhamun, including one that implicates his successor, Ay, in the young king's death. One piece of circumstantial evidence against Ay is his rapid accession to the throne; he married Tutankhamun's widow, Ankhesenamun, which allowed him to become pharaoh. Historical records indicate a return to traditional religious practices following Akhenaten's monotheistic reign, which was consolidated under Tutankhamun and furthered by Ay. There are also suggestions of an attempt to erase Akhenaten and his successors from history, a process that began under Smenkhkare and continued under Tutankhamun and Ay.

However, there is no definitive evidence that Ay was responsible for Tutankhamun's death. Theories include a chariot accident or a hippopotamus attack, and modern scientific analysis, such as the C-14 decay rate testing, has been focused on determining how long ago King Tutankhamun died rather than finding proof of murder. It is important to note that much speculation still surrounds the death of King Tutankhamun, and no concrete evidence has been found to conclusively name Ay or any other individual as his murderer.

Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. His invention automated the seed separation process. His machine could generate up to fifty pounds of cleaned cotton daily, making cotton production profitable for the southern states. Whitney invented the Cotton Gin.

Answer:In 1794, U.S.-born inventor Eli Whitney (1765-1825) patented the cotton gin, a machine that revolutionized the production of cotton by greatly speeding up the process of removing seeds from cotton fiber. By the mid-19th century, cotton had become America's leading export.

Explanation:

google said so :)

Answer:

80

i5 times10 equals 50 plus 3 times 10 which equals 30 and 30 plus 50 equals 80

To find : Total Money, owned by Urmar

Given : 5 and 3 dimes in left & right pockets respectively ; a dime = 10 cents

So, total money of Urmar

= ( Total dimes ) x number of cents per dime

= ( 5 + 3 ) x 10

= 8 x 10

= 80 cents , or 8 dimes

Hence, Urmar has 80 cents , or 8 dimes

To learn more, refer https://brainly.com/question/12174267?referrer=searchResults

Abraham maybe chose the longer way to get to his desired destinations, but he for sure chose the safer way to them. He chose the longer way because of the harsh conditions of the Arabian desert. It is a vast, hostile desert, where sandstorms are very common and deadly, and food and water are almost impossible to find. Also, on the Arabian Peninsula, in this period of time, there was still and active chain of volcanoes, so traveling through the desert was pretty much suicide.

Question 1:

Korea's location has played a central role in their relationship with China thorughout history. China's proximity to the Korea meant that both cultures greatly influenced each other, and there was significant trade operating in this area. However, China has had a stable government and large population for much of its history, giving them a considerable advantage in military affairs. Also, the proximity of Japan to both countries represented a common threat that often motivated alliances.

During the Ming dynasty, interactions between the two countries were mostly peaceful and close, based on their shared Confucian values and their shared origin from Mongol rule.

Question 2:

Tokugawa Ieyasu was the founder and first shogun of the Tokugawa Shogunate of Japan. The shogunate ruled Japan from 1600 until the Meiji Restoration in 1868. Ieyasue obtained power in 1600 and remained in power until his death in 1616. When Tokugawa Ieyasu took power in 1600, about 20% of Japan was controlled by Tokugawa or related households.

Final answer:

Korea's proximity to Ming China put it under pressure to adhere to tribute demands due to its less powerful status. Tokugawa Ieyasu gained control over Japan in the early 1600s, but the exact percentage of control is not specified in the provided materials.

Explanation:

Korea's Geopolitical Susceptibility to Ming China :

Korea's geographic location, neighboring the powerful Ming dynasty, made it susceptible to Ming pressures, such as the imposition of tribute systems. Being a smaller nation sandwiched between China and Japan, Korea often found itself in a position where it had to acquiesce to the demands of more powerful neighbors to maintain its sovereignty and peace. The tributary system that Korea was part of not only demonstrated its subordinate relationship to China but also ensured a form of diplomatic relations and mutual benefits, albeit with Korea in a lesser position.

Tokugawa Control of Japan :

When Tokugawa Ieyasu took power in the early 1600s after the Battle of Sekigahara in 1600, he and his related households controlled a significant portion of Japan. However, the exact percentage of this control is not clearly stated in the provided materials. Nevertheless, the consolidation of power under the Tokugawa shogunate marked the beginning of a period of relative peace and national unification, which was in contrast to the previous era of continuous internal strife among various daimyos.

Not all European countries during the Age of Absolutism were ruled by absolute monarchs; England moved towards a constitutional monarchy, the Dutch Republic was an oligarchy, and the Holy Roman Empire was a confederation with an elected emperor.

During the Age of Absolutism, not every European country was governed by an absolute monarchy. While countries like France exemplified absolutist rule, other nations had different forms of government. One notable example of a country that did not follow the absolutist rule during this period was England. After a series of events that included the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, England developed a constitutional monarchy where the power of the monarch was limited and regulated by a parliament. Another example is the Dutch Republic, formally known as the Republic of the Seven United Netherlands, which was a confederation of states with elected leaders, functioning more as an oligarchy than a monarchy.

Additionally, the Holy Roman Empire was a loose confederation of states with an elected emperor rather than an absolute ruler. The complexity and fragmentation of this entity meant that it operated with significant internal autonomy amongst its princely and ecclesiastical territories. Lastly, the concept of nation-states began to emerge, further diversifying the political landscape of Europe

Military conquests by the Arab Empire and traders of Islamic faith were the primary means for spreading Islam to Africa, Europe, and Asia. I think its this one

To allow supporters and opponents of a bill to state their cases

Answer:

B. To allow supporters and opponents of a bill to state their cases

Explanation:

At the point when the bill  reaches in the House, there starts the discussion on it. The motivation behind the discussion is to examine the bill in length and in accordingly we see either the individuals sent the bill for amendment, urge passage or defeat the bill. So the representatives debate the bill so as to expand the proficiency of the process.

ONE REASON: was that naepolation was getting old and sick , he was poisoned

TWO REASON : the army

The collapse of Napoleon's empire can largely be attributed to the catastrophic invasion of Russia, which severely weakened his forces, and the rise of nationalism across Europe, which spurred revolts and resistance.

There are many factors that contributed to the collapse of Napoleon's empire, but two significant reasons stand out: the disastrous invasion of Russia and the rise of nationalism across Europe.

The Invasion of Russia

In 1812, Napoleon embarked on a massive campaign to invade Russia, a decision that proved to be one of his greatest miscalculations. Despite assembling a massive army of 600,000 troops, the result was catastrophic. The Russian strategy of scorched earth, combined with the onset of a brutal winter, decimated Napoleon's forces. By the time they retreated, only about 100,000 soldiers survived. This disaster damaged Napoleon's reputation as a military genius and significantly weakened his army.

Nationalism and Revolts

Napoleon's empire, despite its initial successes, planted the seeds of its own demise through the spread of nationalist sentiments. Occupied territories experienced a taste of egalitarian social systems and legal reforms, which inadvertently fostered a sense of identity and unity among disparate groups. This growing nationalism spurred revolts and resistance across the empire, as people began to envision themselves not just as subjects of a vast empire but as members of distinct nations. The looting of occupied territories to enrich France further alienated these populations, contributing to the empire's instability.

Why were President Wilson’s Fourteen Points not incorporated in the Treaty of Versailles?

A. The Allied delegates wanted Germany to pay reparations for the war.

B. The Allied delegates wanted a provision to restore democracy in Russia.

C. The Allied delegates felt the Fourteen Points were too easy on Germany.

D. The Allied delegates felt the Fourteen Points would restrict their expansion goals.

The correct answer is D.

Answer:

D. The Allied delegates felt the Fourteen Points would restrict their expansion goals.

Explanation:

Woodrow Wilson points were considered by France and Italy but the British were unwilling to cooperate, keeping a large fleet overseas.

Since UK delegates met with the Allies and directly blamed Germany, explicitly stating as a notion to be included in the treaty of Versailles.

Germany's army was to be limited in size and prohibited an air force, but the winning Allies were to keep their large armies.

The 14 points by US delegation headed by Wilson were a peace offer to German and Austrian Empires, with honorable means in terms of equals.

The US did not ratify the Treaty noticing it favored the UK and the points were abandoned.

The "Irreconcilables" a group of Republicans opposed the Versailles Treaty since it had little to do with the initial US proposal for peace. The points were seen as to idealistic and ultimaltely were abandonned.

Answer:

The steam engine was the most important invention of the industrial. The steam engine was important because it helped to power the industrial revolution. Before the steam engine, all the factories were powered by horse, water, and wind and had to be located near a river to utilize the water power.

All of these sources were unreliable but with the invention of steam engines, the factories could be located far from the rivers. During the 1800s the design of these engines was improved and they became efficient and smaller. They were utilized in factories and transportation including trains and steamboats.

Answer:

They were expensive luxury items designed for the wealthy.

Explanation:

The asian goods were somthing that not all people could afford, because they had to be transported from Asia so carrying cheap objects wasn´t profitable so they started to export more and more expensive items that the merchants were able to sell to the wealthy people back in Europe, spices and fabrics were the most demanded asian goods and were signs of wealth in Europe.

Answer:

A. They were expensive luxury items designed for the wealthy.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

Option C.

Explanation:

Delegates petitioned against the Stamp Act, is the right answer.

The Stamp Act Congress is also recognized as the Continental Congress of 1765. It was a conference of some of the colonies of Britain in North America. It was the first conference of chosen delegates from several of the American colonies to launch a unified demonstration against the new taxation system enforced by the British parliament. The British parliament with the introduction of the Stamp Act imposed taxes on papers including legal documents, calendars, playing cards and newspapers etc.

Answer:

c is the answer

Explanation:

none

Similarities

Differences

Final answer:

A Chinese traveler from the Han dynasty would find India's caste system and the Greco-Roman practice of slavery and polytheism surprising or offensive but would appreciate the cultural heritage, learning, and arts that resonated with their own culture. They would also notice the interconnectedness of cultures, such as Hellenistic influences on Buddhist representations.

Explanation:

An observant Chinese traveler from the Han dynasty, such as Zhang Qian or the Buddhist monk Xuanzang, might find the religious practices and social structures in India or the Greco-Roman world quite different from their own experiences. They would likely be surprised or even offended by the caste system in India, which was in stark contrast to the more meritocratic system prevalent in Han China. Furthermore, the polytheistic religions and the use of images in worship in both India and the Greco-Roman world could be jarring to someone from a culture influenced by Confucianism and Daoism. They might also take issue with the Greco-Roman practice of slavery, which was less common in Han China.

However, these travelers would also notice similarities, such as a strong emphasis on cultural heritage and the existence of sophisticated urban centers. They might appreciate the philosophical depth found in Buddhist and Hindu teachings, which resonated with Chinese religious thought, as well as the reverence for learning and the arts. Additionally, seeing the representation of Buddha in Greek togas due to Hellenistic influence might be remarkable and signify the interconnectedness of these ancient cultures. Xuanzang, for example, brought back to China a more Hellenistic representation of the Buddha, amalgamating cultural elements from his travels.

I'm pretty sure it's prohibition.

Answer:

I have a similar question except it has four answer choices.

The answer choices I have are "Scopes trial", "revival of the Ku Klux Klan", "Fascism", and "Prohibition".

Out of my choices, I'm chosing Scopes, KKK, and Prohibition.

Sadly, it doesn't tell me what questions I got correct, it only shows me the over-all grade, so I can't tell you if that's correct.

Explanation:

Try "Prohibition", and "Scopes trial" :)

EDIT: I was correct, Prohibition and Scopes trial are the correct answers. Sorry for the blur

D) He brought in unexpected reinforcements.

George Meade had his reserved men placed behind the center of his line on cemetery ridge right before they were going to be over run. This in turn overwhelmed the Confederates and lead to victory.

The biggest reason is B) for the chance of making a profit

Many businesses are created so that the enterpenuer can try to make a large amount of profit to live an exceptionally well lifestyle, or even make rich

~Rise Above the Ordinary, Senpaii

C. cases sent up from circuit

Castro shared good relations with US Cold War rival, the Soviet Union.

Castro declared that he would assassinate US president Dwight Eisenhower and destroy the US government.

Answer:

A and B

Explanation:

just took the test on plato

Answer:

America was Britain's enemy in the French and Indian War, but they were allies in the American Revolutionary War.

The French and Indian War was a struggle between the British and French with their respective Native American allies over territory in North America, where the American colonies were allied with Britain. The American Revolutionary War was a subsequent conflict where the American colonies fought for independence against Great Britain.

The French and Indian War and the American Revolutionary War were two distinct conflicts that occurred in different time periods in the 18th century. The French and Indian War, also known as the Seven Years' War, was principally a struggle for empire between the British and French, with each side supported by military units from home and by Native American allies. It began primarily as a contest for territory in North America, with battles predominantly fought in the region now known as Canada and along the frontier of New France and British America. The American colonies were Britain's allies during this war. On the other hand, the American Revolutionary War was a conflict between Great Britain and its Thirteen Colonies in North America which declared independence as the United States of America. After more than a decade of growing estrangement between the British crown and many North American colonists, the colonies declared their independence and fought for self-governance.

The Justinian Code was important as it simplified and streamlined centuries of existing Roman laws and Justinian's own laws and into one system. Four sections made up the code, and these were the Codex Constitutionum, Digesta, Institutiones and the Novellae Constitutiones Post Codicem.

Justinian I was Emperor of the Roman Byzantine Empire from 527 to 565. The first code, which included only the Codex was completed in 529. The Digesta and Institutiones were added in 534.

In the effort to simplify the code of laws, Justinian appointed 10 men to research all known laws and ordinances in the history of the empire. The commission siphoned out any outdated laws or laws that contradicted each other, and the result was known as the Codex Constiutionum.

The Digesta was a collection of 50 books of jurists rulings over the centuries. Any rulings that didn't appear in these books were then unable to be cited by lawyers in any court tribunal. This collection was built upon the research of 16 lawyers. The Institutiones amounted to a textbook for law students.

Finally, the Novellae Constiutiones Post Codicem acted as a supplement to the code and included Justinian's own ordinances that he announced between 534 and 565. This collection was added to the code after the first revision of the code.The Justinian Code was important as it simplified and streamlined centuries of existing Roman laws and Justinian's own laws and into one system. Four sections made up the code, and these were the Codex Constitutionum, Digesta, Institutiones and the Novellae Constitutiones Post Codicem.