what event likely gave the united states more influence in post-war peace negotiations

Answer:

wade davis

Explanation:

Answer:

Its the recognition of African American culture

The age of eligibility for full social security benefits was 65, but between 2002 and 2007 rose to 67.

Social Security is a federal program that provides financial assistance to eligible individuals and families. It was created in 1935 as part of the New Deal and is primarily funded through payroll taxes. The program provides retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to millions of Americans.

The age of eligibility for full social security benefits increased due to concerns about the sustainability of the program. As life expectancy increased and the number of retirees grew, there were fears that the program would become insolvent. Increasing the age of eligibility was seen as a way to reduce the financial strain on the program.

Therefore, the age of eligibility for full social security benefits was 65, but between 2002 and 2007 rose to 67 due to concerns about the sustainability of the program.

Learn more about social security, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30517240

#SPJ2

The division of Europe into West and East is one of the negative political effects of World War II. This conflict between the East and West of Europe resulted in a Cold War which was the reason why there was a division of Europe into 2 distinct political blocs. This composed of the Soviet-controlled Eastern European and capitalist Western Europe.

Answer:

Explanation:

The division of Europe into the east and west was a negative political effect because;

"Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, anti-democratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union." ~ Revelations from the Russian Archives, The Soviet Union and the United States, Library of congress

Answer: Willian Penn arrived in Pennsylvania in 1692, a colony of the New World (referring to the ancient name of newly discovered America) when he was granted a royal charter by King Charles II.

Explanation: Pennsylvania is the most successful English colonies. William Penn was a Son of naval admiral and was a friend of King Charles II and his brother Duke of York. he joined a religious group of Quakers who believed that ministers were unnecessary and everyone should act according to their own "Inner Light". They started civil disobedience, they stopped paying taxes and they ware regarded as dangerous to England and Anglican Church. After his father's death, he inherited a debt that Charles II  owed to his father, he acquired a Royal charter as a payment of debt and he decided to make his own colony as a safe haven for Quakers. He wrote his own constitution of the colony with three important points:

1) Equality for all

2) Right to Vote

3) Purchase of land.

Religious tolerance was a prominent feature of his colony.

Answer:

A.)

Explanation:

As the japanese country is a constitutional monarchy, the government style is most similar to the representative democracy.

This is a form of monarchy that is guided by a constitution whereby the Prime minister serves as President but are checked by the House of parliament.

Hence, the constitutional monarchy is most similar to the representative democracy because the Parliament are voted for by the citizens

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about constitutional monarchy

brainly.com/question/3710038

The United States has some experiences/conflicts that are seen on a consistent basis.

For example, the power of the federal government is one that has been seen throughout history. The development of the US Constitution saw Anti-federalists fighting against Federalists in terms of what rights/powers the federal government should have. Today, debates still arise over the issue of what powers the federal government has, especially when it comes to the issue of implied powers.

One success that we share with the Americans in the past is the desire for innovation. Throughout American history, developments in communication and transportation continue to positively influence American society. Even though this is different depending on the time period, the spirit of ingenuinity is something that is seen in all times of American history. This is especially true for the era of the Market Revolution (development of canals, railroads) and today (iPhones, Personal computers, etc.)

He wished to console the nation through the Great Depression and tell them about the war  were the goals of president roosevelt's "fireside chats.

In order to ensure fairness for all and do no favors to anyone, Roosevelt thought that the government should serve as the primary mediator of the nation's competing economic forces, notably between capital and labour.

She worked for civil rights for Asian Americans, African Americans, and World War II refugees as well as increased employment opportunities for women. After her husband's death in 1945, Roosevelt remained active in politics for the remaining 17 years of her life.

He made the President the center of American politics instead of Congress or the political parties. Roosevelt achieved this by leaning on his personal charisma and taking harsh executive action.

Thus, He wished to console the nation through the Great Depression.

For more information about Theodore Roosevelt's goal, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12505404

#SPJ2

The Senate could have prevented Tiberius Gracchus's murder by agreeing to provide more equality for the common people, endorsing his redistributive land reforms, and showing a willingness to address social and economic tensions. Option 1) is correct.

To support Tiberius Gracchus and potentially prevent his murder, the Senate could have done the following: agree to provide more equality for the common people by supporting his law to redistribute public land to landless Romans. This measure was a direct challenge to the senatorial class, as it threatened the large estates many of them had accumulated. Tiberius Gracchus was intent on addressing the decline of the free, farm-owning common Roman population, upon which the strength of Rome's armies relied. Agreeing to support Tiberius's reforms would have shown the Senate's willingness to compromise on the pressing social and economic issues of the day, alleviating some of the tension that ultimately led to violence.

Other options such as agreeing to give more farming land to the patrician class, agreeing to allow the Senate to appoint new consuls, or agreeing to give slaves and foreigners the right to vote were not directly related to Tiberius's reforms and would not have addressed the root causes of the conflict at that time.

The correct answer is D) U.S. forces would withdraw and ARVN troops would assume more combat duties.

President Richard Nixon's plan for Vietnamization of the war was "U.S. forces would withdraw and ARVN troops would assume more combat duties."

The Vietnamization policy was the strategy designed by US President Richard Nixon to gradually reduced the participation of the US troops in the War of Vietnam. Due to the many protests in America against the presence of the US troops in Vietnam and the bad results of the Tet Offense, people increasingly continued to question the US involvement in Vietnam. From then on, the South Vietnamese troops had to more involved in the war with the counseling and training of the US.

Several factors caused World War II in Europe, including the unchecked rise of fascism in Italy and Germany, the power struggle between Germany and the Soviet Union, and Japan's ambition to rid Asia of Western influences. The West's indecision over whether fascist Germany or the Communist Soviet Union posed a greater threat to world peace also played a part. Additionally, the fallout from World War I, including economic depression and social upheaval, helped extremist political ideologies rise.

There were several factors that caused World War II in Europe. First, the rise of fascism in Italy and Germany went unchecked, specifically with the Nazis gaining diplomatic advantage and British and French acquiescence to their expansionism in Austria and the Sudetenland. This led to their military domination over parts of Europe. Second, one of the sparks for the war was the struggle for power between Germany and the Soviet Union, with the former launching a surprise invasion against the latter in 1941. Third, Japan's perception of Western racism and its ambition to rid Asia of Western influences (though it also regarded itself as the new regional leader) also contributed to the wider global conflict.

Moreover, there was the West's indecision over whether fascist Germany or the Communist Soviet Union was the greater threat to world peace. This uncertainty was partly due to political conservatives in England and France hoping for a German alliance against the Soviets. Lastly, economic depression and the social upheaval it created, in part owing to the fallout from World War I, helped extremist political ideologies like fascism and communism grow.

https://brainly.com/question/12602320

#SPJ12

The causes of World War II in Europe include the rise of fascism and totalitarianism, the unjustified expansion of Nazi Germany, and international territorial disputes and tensions.

Learn more about Causes of World War II here:

https://brainly.com/question/12602320

#SPJ6

In the 1858 Illinois Senate election, supporters of slavery were most likely to support Stephen A. Douglas.

Douglas believed that slavery had reached its natural limits and was no longer viable in areas with bad climatic and soil conditions. He claimed that considering slavery as largely a local problem would aid in finding a solution to the problem.

In order to resolve the problem of bringing slavery into the territories, Douglas emerged as the primary proponent of popular sovereignty, which advocated for giving each territory the right to decide whether to permit. He participated in the Compromise of 1850, an attempt to prevent a sectional crisis, as one of its brokers.

The expansion of American territory was strongly supported by Douglas, who also wished for a transcontinental railroad and a free land/homestead policy.

Thus, In the 1858 Illinois Senate election, supporters of slavery.

For more information about Stephen Douglas say about slavery, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2479829

#SPJ6

Historical figures held mixed views on England, admiring its constitution and political theory while also critiquing its policies and social order. Positive sentiments were expressed about England's governance, but negative criticisms focused on the effects of biases and taxes imposed on colonies.

The opinions on England from various historical figures represented in the provided excerpts showcase a mix of positive and negative views.

On one hand, England's constitutional framework was admired, as evidenced by the desire of Count Confalonieri for a constitution similar to England's (as suggested by Lord Castlereagh's reply, albeit with a hint of sarcasm). This admiration reflects the positive aspects of English political theory and structure.

However, there were also critiques, such as Hume's paradoxical support for the Stuarts despite his republican leanings or Hamilton's bias towards England influencing American foreign policy (implying negative opinions from those who were against such bias).

The killing of an Admiral as a display of discipline and power suggests a darker side to England's order. The comments by Vergennes about England's future regrets and the burdensome taxes imposed on American colonies reflect the negative consequences of English policies.

Overall, historical figures like Jefferson, and Hume, and influential individuals like Morgans and Montesquieu had complex views of England, recognizing its strengths but also acknowledging its flaws and the consequences of its actions, both domestically and internationally.

Final answer:

The President is part of the executive branch, which enforces laws, while the judiciary branch, including the Supreme Court, interprets laws. These two branches, along with the legislative branch, form the tripartite system of the United States government, with checks and balances in place.

Explanation:

The statement that the President is in a different branch than the judiciary branch of government is correct. The United States government is divided into three branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. The legislative branch, made up of the two houses of Congress, is responsible for making laws. The executive branch, headed by the President, enforces the laws. This branch includes the President's executive cabinet and the civilian head of the armed forces. The judicial branch interprets laws and has the authority to conduct judicial review, determining the constitutionality of laws.

Members of the judicial branch are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Thus, although separate, the branches interact, with the President and Congress being able to check and balance the judiciary. For example, the President nominates justices to the Supreme Court, who then serve for life, allowing a President to influence the judiciary even after leaving office. The President can also submit amicus briefs to the Court and influences the solicitor general.

The difference between authoritarian governments and totalitarian governments is that totalitarian governments C) have an official guiding ideology.

This is different from authoritarian governments where the government doesn't necessarily impose on citizen rights so long as they don't go against the power of the government

In conclusion, option C is correct

Find out more on totalitarian governments at https://brainly.com/question/463275.

Answer: The irony lays in the fact that West Berlin, though walled-in, was a place of freedom.

Explanation:

Since many East Germans were flying to West Germany by first getting to West Berlin, a 13 feet high and 100 miles long wall was built around that side of the city. György Ligeti, a Hungarian composer, described the walled-in West Berlin as “a surrealist cage in which those inside are free.”

Answer:

The Criollos

Explanation:

The Criollos were a social class in the caste system of the overseas colonies established by Spain in the 16th century, especially in Latin America.

The name was used for people of pure or mostly Spanish blood, but who were born in the colony.

On the frontier of the Spanish empire, criollos held more important positions in the colonial administration because of the scarcity of peninsulars and their reluctance to serve in remote regions.