What happened to Native Americans such as the Cherokees who opposed land allotment under the Dawes Act? They were forced by federal troops to accept assigned lands. They were relocated farther west to settle on new lands. They were allowed to hold land communally for a few more years. They were imprisoned until all the tribal land was allotted.

The correct answer is C. Africans had a stronger immunity to European diseases than indigenous Americans.

Explanation:

The process colonization of territories in the American continent began at the end of the  15th century and was led by settlers from different European including England, Spain, and Portuguese. Additionally, most settlers did not only conquer new territories but aimed at taking advantages of the sources in them which required a lot of workforces, for example, plantations require multiple and resistant workers. Because of this, few years after colonization took place slavery of Africans became common in the colonized territories, the preference for Africans rather than the native population can be explained as indigenous Americans had not been exposed to smallpox and because of this and other causes, their population began to decrease. Therefore, the statement that explains an important reason behind Europeans' decision to rely on Africans rather than indigenous Americans is " Africans had a stronger immunity to European diseases than indigenous Americans".

Final answer:

Europeans relied on Africans for plantation labor because Africans had developed immunity to European diseases, whereas the indigenous populations were devastated by such illnesses.

Explanation:

One important reason behind Europeans' decision to rely on Africans for labor on colonial plantations instead of indigenous Americans was that Africans had stronger immunity to European diseases than indigenous Americans. Unlike the native populations decimated by diseases like smallpox and influenza, Africans had developed immunity to many of these illnesses through centuries of interaction between Africa and Europe. Furthermore, there were not enough surviving indigenous people to perform the labor needed to exploit the natural wealth of the Americas, and thus Europeans began importing slaves from Africa in vast numbers. These African slaves were also accustomed to agricultural labor and the tropical climate, bolstering their suitability for plantation work.

The Roosevelt Corollary claimed the right of the United States to act as an international police power in the western hemisphere, as an extension of the Monroe Doctrine. The correct option is d.

The Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine was articulated by President Theodore Roosevelt in a 1904 address before Congress. This corollary asserted the right and obligation of the United States to act as an international police power in the Western Hemisphere. It was a significant extension of the Monroe Doctrine, implying that the U.S. could intervene in the affairs of Latin American nations to ensure stability in the region, prevent European interference, and maintain the financial and political order.

The correct answer to the student's question is: d. claimed the right of the United States to act as a police power in the western hemisphere.

Answer:

Stalin rose to power by helping other leaders achieve bureaucratic positions when he was secretary of the communist party. Thus, he used all the favors to reach power after Lenin died.

Hitler rose to power as a populist leader backed by a sector of people that looked or a change in society.

Explanation:Joseph Stalin rose to power by bureaucratic means, he was a revolutionary diligent leader and after Lenin reached power Stalin got into the chair or secretary of the communist party. Stalin then used his power to help different individuals reach important positions and when Lening died, he assumed full control over the Soviet Union. Lenin knew he had given too much power to him before he died because he was very powerful and he feared the worst, which Lenin did. After he died, he committed many crimes backing them with the concept of doing the best for the people. But he used the people to give the government full authority and management of resources.

On the other hand, Hitler was a populist leader that surged from the Nazi "workers national party" Which was a political party with nationalism and opposition to the government of the Versailles treaty. He rose to power by convincing the people he had the way to "make Germany great again". He despised immigrants and signaled Jews bankers and wealthy immigrants as responsible for the inequality Germany suffered. Because in his eyes they took advantage of the people. So he became popular as a nationalist and people picked him as Chancellor, then he used his power to gain control of the country.

a country forces its schools to promote official state ideology

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The policy is "a country that forces its schools to promote official state ideology."

Russian leader Vladimir Lenin tries to force the spread of Communist ideology in all the schools of the country. Let's have in mind that Lenin had initiated a series of reformations that changed the political and economic life in Russia. Lenin took land from the landlords, the Tsars, and the church. Then, he distributed those portions of land among the Russian peasants as a thank you gift after their effort during the Revolution. Knowing that the majority of people in Russia were peasants with no education, Lenin focused on impart free public education for all of them, wit heavy influences of COmmunists' ideas.

A. Diminished sovereignty of governments hope this helps!

The correct answer is A) D-Day.

The D-Day Invasion was one of the major turning points of World War II. In this invasion, the Allied Powers invaded off the coast of Normandy France. This was the largest amphibious invasion in military history and resulted in hundreds of thousands of casualties between the Allied and Axis powers. This was one of the most important battles of WWII, as the Allied victory would lead to the freeing of Europe from Nazi control.

Answer: Americans were angered by Britain's practice of impressment because it made fun of the American soldiers and thus the war of 1812 sprouted.

Explanation:

Americans were angered by the British practice of impressment because it meant the forcible recruitment of American sailors into the British navy. This violated American sovereignty and the personal freedoms of its citizens, and was a significant factor leading to the War of 1812.

The British practice of impressment greatly angered Americans in the 19th century. It involved the forcible recruitment of American seamen into the British navy, often right off American ships, which was considered an affront to American sovereignty and a violation of personal freedoms. This deeply contentious issue, along with others, eventually precipitated the War of 1812 between the United States and Great Britain.

Impressment was a recruitment practice rooted in British maritime tradition that allowed the navy to forcibly enlist sailors when they were desperately needed, especially during times of war. American sailors were often targeted due to shortages of manpower in the British navy. This angered Americans as the practice threatened their national sovereignty and the personal rights of their citizens.

https://brainly.com/question/31444615

#SPJ6

The 1917 French Army Mutinies were due to the loss suffered at the Second Battle of the Aisne which was the main action in the Nivelle Offensive. When the troops entered the battle, they were optimistic having been promised a decisive war-ending victory over the Germans by General Robert Nivelle. However, failure to win ruined their mood resulting in the mutinies

The correct answer to the question is that the French army mutinied due to poor conditions and lack of progress in the war.

In 1917, the French army experienced widespread mutinies, which were triggered by a combination of factors. The primary causes of these mutinies were the poor conditions that the soldiers had to endure, including constant exposure to the harsh realities of trench warfare, frequent and deadly battles with little to no strategic gain, and a sense of disillusionment with the war's progress and the military leadership's strategies.

The immediate trigger for the mutinies was the failure of the costly Nivelle Offensive in the spring of 1917, which had promised a decisive victory but instead resulted in heavy casualties and minimal territorial gains. The soldiers' morale was further eroded by inadequate leave, poor food, and the belief that their sacrifices were not being matched by those at home or by their allies.

The mutinies were not a complete refusal to fight, but rather a protest against the conditions and conduct of the war. The soldiers still wanted to defend their country but demanded better treatment and more effective strategies. The French high command, recognizing the gravity of the situation, took measures to address the soldiers' grievances, including granting more leave, improving food and living conditions, and replacing the offensive strategies with a more defensive approach. These reforms, along with the appointment of General Philippe Pétain as the new commander of the French army, helped to restore order and morale within the ranks.

The rise of totalitarianism after World War 1 was due to post-war societal disillusionment, economic instability, and the perceived failure of democratic governments. Desperate for stability and order, the public was drawn towards authoritarian leadership.

The rise of totalitarianism after World War 1 can be attributed to several interconnected factors.

Firstly, post-war societal disillusionment played a significant role. The massive death toll and the physical destruction of cities and infrastructure brought about by WWI left people feeling helpless and lost. In this context, charismatic leaders promising stability and order could easily attract a following.

Secondly, the economic instability also contributed towards the rise of totalitarian regimes. The Treaty of Versailles imposed hefty reparations on Germany, leading to economic disaster. Economic struggles in other countries also created an environment for extremist ideologies to flourish.

Lastly, the failure of democratic governments to deal with these crises made alternative forms of governance more appealing. Thus, authoritarian leadership seemed like a refuge from the chaos – at least initially.

https://brainly.com/question/34700079

#SPJ6

Answer & Explination

The Fujiwara family could exercise power because of having many of their daughters married into the royal family. They acted as advisers to the emperor and gained power when the young emperors took the throne.

Why did the ruler of Jammu and Kashmir hesitate to join India or Pakistan? (1 point)

Answer: The ruler's religion from the majority religion of his country.

2. What led to Kashmir signing the Instrument of Accession with India? (1 point)

Answer: An invasion by Pakistani tribesmen forced Hari Singh to reach out to India for help.

Explanation: I just took the Quick Check, or whatever it may be to you.

Answer:

Prior to 1906, there were no laws at all on foods or drugs. As a decision, control drugs usually included morphine, heroin, and cocaine in meaningful quantities. There were no labeling conditions so people didn't even know what they were taking. There were no purity conditions and no limitations on posting. Drug makers could demand that their solution could heal whatever ails you or your donkey and they often did. As a conclusion of these problems, the Pure Food and Drug Act was passed in 1906.

The Jungle

Further Explanations:

Upton Beall Sinclair was a prominent author born 20thSeptember 1878. He is well known for his books in several genres. Sinclair wrote more than 100 books and also won Pulitzer Prize for his Fiction in 1943. Sinclair also took interest in the politics as he laid the establishment of the American Civil Liberty Union in Monrovia, California. He was quite unsuccessful in the first two attempts firstly in 1920's House of Representatives election and secondly in 1922's senate election. though he assisted as the governor of California in 1930 after winning from around 50,000 votes.

The jungle book is among one of his Novels that portrayed the harsh and exploited condition of the immigrants of the United States in areas near Chicago. His primary motive was to describe the working condition of the workers in the meat industries and give rise to socialism in the United States. His initiative led to the implementation of Meat Inspection act.

Learn more

1. in a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. is elected by representatives chosen by the people. is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament. is elected directly by the people?https://brainly.com/question/477236

2. how did the battle of Okinawa affect president Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb against Japan?https://brainly.com/question/1323522

3. what did china agree to do once the treaty of Nanjing was signed? check all that apply?https://brainly.com/question/175568

Answer Details

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

ChapterUpton Beall Sinclair

Keywords:Upton Beall Sinclair,Pulitzer Prize,Fiction,American Civil Liberty Union,Monrovia, California,House of Representatives, immigrants,Chicago,Meat Inspection act.

Answer:

the Lowell Mill girls

Explanation:

Answer:

Another great quote from an even greater philosopher is “Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage.” (Laozi) Laozi meant that when someone loves you, you feel like you are believed in and when you love someone, it means that you are fighting for them and they fuel you. This comes from the philosophy of love. Many people today fall in love and can ensure that the quote is true.

Explanation:

Members of Congress, known for their diverse professional backgrounds and expertise, can become legislative committee members. These positions are strategic and may require significant fundraising efforts. Committees play a crucial role in lawmaking, and their members are often targets for interest groups seeking to influence legislation.

Members of Congress can become legislative committee members. These members typically have specific experiences, interests, and expertise that align with the committee's focus, such as agriculture or finance. Those in leadership roles and with a history of supporting pertinent issues are particularly influential in committees. Members of Congress from various professional backgrounds, including medicine, law, and public service, or even nontraditional fields like sports and entertainment, bring diverse expertise to the lawmaking process.

Legislative committees are essential for developing and reviewing legislation. Committees such as the House Armed Services Committee or the Senate Finance Committee are sought after by members whose states or districts have interests aligned with those committees. Additionally, membership on these committees often requires raising significant funds for party re-election committees, also known as "dues."

Interest groups recognize the importance of targeting committee members; they may employ individuals like lawyers to propose bills or use their influence to affect the regulatory process. Strategic targeting involves identifying committee members who are sensitive to specific concerns, particularly when they represent a large constituency or have supported related issues in the past.

Answer: The correct answers are D and E

Explanation:

The two ways in which Magna Carta influence democracy was : it declared that no "free man" could be arrested unless charged with a crime; it advocated timely and speedy trials for people accused of crimes; it took power from the king and gave it to the people.

The Magna Carta, which was published in June 1215, was the first document to express the idea that the king and his government were not above the law. It aimed to restrain the king from abusing his powers and imposed restrictions on royal power by creating law as a power unto itself.

Everyone, even the king, was required under the Magna Carta to obey the law. It also contained concepts stating that everyone has a right to the rule of law, jury trials, and a say in the laws and taxes that are imposed on them.

Democratic government in simple terms is " to the people, for the people and by the people".

A democracy is a system of government in which the people have the power to make laws and decide who will represent them in office (direct democracy) ("representative democracy"). In a democratic society, the population has generally increased over time. However, who is regarded as "the people" and how power is distributed among or delegated by the people has evolved through time and at different rates in different countries.

Democracy has seen significant change over time. Direct democracy was the first type of democracy. A representative democracy, such as a parliamentary or presidential democracy, is the most prevalent type of democracy in use today. In this type of democracy, the people choose the representatives who will represent them in government.

Supportive answer

Hence option C,D,E are correct answers

To learn more about magna carta here https://brainly.com/question/797596

#SPJ2

Answer:

The land bridges helped Native Americans across certain countries. They followed the animals from Asia or the countries below to America. The ice age animals migrated from (i don't what countries or parts. But i think it was Asia or some below.) The native Americans wanted to kill animals for food, shelter, clothing, and to upgrade their weapons. Land bridge was created over Asia to America around "The Ring Of Fire". they used that bridge to travel or get to America. When time passed, little by little the bridge was fading or drowning.

Final answer:

Latin American nations faced economic challenges after gaining independence due to cheap imports from industrialized countries and limited local industry protection. The dependence on foreign investment and infrastructure projects, as well as regional wars, further hindered stability and development. The influence of industrialized nations perpetuated economic disparities and dependency in the region.

Explanation:

Latin American nations struggled for stability after gaining independence due to a variety of challenges. With the abolition of mercantilist regulations, these nascent countries faced flooding of their markets with imported goods from industrialized nations, which hindered local industries. During colonial times, European imports had been heavily taxed, which had protected local industries. After independence, the lack of these taxes allowed cheaper European and American goods to dominate the market, negatively affecting Latin American economies.

Furthermore, attempts at industrialization in Latin America were met with obstacles. Investments such as railroads and mines were often funded by foreign capital from European and U.S. banks, leading to a cycle of dependency and limited domestic investment in infrastructure like roads and telegraphs. Wars, such as the War of the Triple Alliance, further destabilized the region and impacted industrialization efforts. Despite some growth in specific sectors like oil in Venezuela, Latin American economies remained largely export-driven.

Industrialized nations played a significant role in shaping Latin American economies by exporting their manufactured goods and dominating investment channels. Historical circumstances left Latin America at an economic, technological, and military disadvantage, which persisted long after independence was achieved.