Answer:
A. Henry, W.A., III. (1990, April 8). Making the grade in today's schools. Time, 135, 23-31.
Explanation:
From the given answers, I'm presuming the citation needs to be written in APA style.
Basic form for citing periodicals (magazines, journals, newspaper etc.) is:
- the author's name - only last name is fully written followed by initials
- publication year - written in parentheses, for magazines and newspapers we write year and date
- title of the article - only first word and proper nouns are capitalized
- the title if the periodical and volume/issue number - in title case and italicized
- page number - for newspaper written with p.
So, since this is an article from the magazine, it should be cited as:
Henry, W. A., III. (1990, April 8). Making the grade in today's schools. Time, 135, 28-31.
The Foster Portfolio (Kurt Vonnegut, 1951)
Why didn’t the narrator take Herbert seriously at first?
Answer:
The Narrator didn't believe Herbert at first because Herbert appeared to be very poor, and he thought he was not going to make any money off him.
Explanation:
The Foster Portfolio is about an investment broker who was called by Herbert Foster to look at his portfolio and manage it.
He went to Herbert's house for that purpose but was initially disappointed with the general lack of affluence of the household and its occupants.
According to the narrator "my business is handling other people’s money, and I have a great respect for money" and that he is "a salesman of good advice for rich people", so he couldn't see how he could help a man who appeared to be neither rich nor to have any money to speak of.
That was why he didn't beleive Herbert was in ned of his services.
The narrator initially underestimated Herbert in 'The Foster Portfolio' due to his modest demeanor, which is a common literary theme showing how first impressions can be misleading.
In Kurt Vonnegut's "The Foster Portfolio", the narrator did not take Herbert seriously at first due to preconceived notions about his appearance and behavior. Herbert's unassuming and modest demeanor led the narrator to underestimate him. It's common in literature for characters to make judgements based on first impressions, which can often be misleading. The narrator's initial perception was challenged as the story unfolded, revealing a complex and unexpected reality about Herbert's life and circumstances.
"At least," said the number devil. "Okay, now let's pretend that everyone's gone on a chewing spree and we're down to the last piece of chewing gum. I pull another one out of my pocket, the last one that I've saved for myself, and what have we got? All those trillions of chewed pieces of chewing gum plus one. Do you see what I mean? I don't really need to count them. All I need is a recipe to take care of anything that comes along. And that I have." After thinking over all that the number devil had said, Robert was forced to admit that he had a point. What is the number devil trying to accomplish?
Answer: B he is trying to make robert think.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is b
Explanation
I was privy to the secret griefs of wild, unknown men. Most of the confidences were unsought—frequently I have feigned sleep, preoccupation, or a hostile levity when I realized by some unmistakable sign that an intimate revelation was quivering on the horizon.
In my own sentence. The book is called the great gatsby
Answer:
What is the question?
Explanation:
The passage describes the narrator's encounters with unsolicited confidences and their response to them.
We have,
In "The Great Gatsby,"
I had the privilege of witnessing the hidden sorrows of mysterious individuals, often unintentionally, as they shared their personal burdens with me, while I occasionally pretended to be asleep, disinterested, or humorously dismissive when sensing the impending disclosure of their intimate secrets.
The passage describes the narrator's experience of being entrusted with the private troubles of unfamiliar individuals.
The narrator often found themselves in situations where people would open up and share their intimate revelations, even though the narrator did not actively seek these confidences.
In response, the narrator would pretend to be asleep, preoccupied, or dismissive, hiding their genuine interest or emotional involvement.
The passage suggests that the narrator had access to the hidden emotions and vulnerabilities of these individuals, which provided them with a unique perspective on their lives and struggles.
Thus,
The passage describes the narrator's encounters with unsolicited confidences and their response to them.
Learn more about The Great Gatsby here:
https://brainly.com/question/837802
#SPJ2
On January 16, 1917, in a clear attempt to convince the Mexican government to help Germany in the war, Arthur Zimmermann, the German foreign secretary, sent a telegram to Count von Bernstorff, the German ambassador in Washington. The foreign secretary wanted to be certain that this message reached von Bernstorff, so he made arrangements for it to be carried aboard a U-boat to Sweden and from there to Washington through diplomatic channels. —The Dark Game, Paul Janeczko Which inference can a reader make based on the information in the passage? The message Zimmermann wanted to send to von Bernstorff was very important. Count von Bernstorff was expecting the message. U-boats were designed to transport messages securely. Zimmermann wanted to reach out to the Mexican government for support.
Answer:
the message Zimmermann wanted to send to Von Bernstoff was very important.
Explanation:
They didn't go through all that trouble to send it because it was non-important
so it had to be important
The inference "Zimmermann wanted to reach out to the Mexican government for support." can a reader make based on the information in the passage. So the correct option is D.
A reader can conclude the following from the extract and the supporting data: First, Arthur Zimmermann wanted to convey to Count von Bernstorff a message that was crucial (Option A).
Because Zimmermann made particular measures to ensure the communication was delivered through a U-boat and diplomatic channels, this conclusion can be drawn. Clearly, the message's content was important and its delivery was essential.
Inferring that Zimmermann wanted to team up with the Mexican government to fight the Americans is likewise accurate (Option D). He had compelling reasons for sending the Zimmermann telegram, which gave the German ambassador specific instructions to ask Mexico to join the war on the German side when the United States entered the battle.
Learn more about Zimmermann here
brainly.com/question/29004538
#SPJ12
The complete question is:
On January 16, 1917, in a clear attempt to convince the Mexican government to help Germany in the war, Arthur Zimmermann, the German foreign secretary, sent a telegram to Count von Bernstorff, the German ambassador in Washington. The foreign secretary wanted to be certain that this message reached von Bernstorff, so he made arrangements for it to be carried aboard a U-boat to Sweden and from there to Washington through diplomatic channels. —The Dark Game, Paul Janeczko.
Which inference can a reader make based on the information in the passage?
A. The message Zimmermann wanted to send to von Bernstorff was very important.
B. Count von Bernstorff was expecting the message.
C. U-boats were designed to transport messages securely.
D. Zimmermann wanted to reach out to the Mexican government for support.
Identify the adjectives (the ball bounced into the round hoop)
Final answer:
The word 'round' is the adjective in the sentence 'The ball bounced into the round hoop,' as it describes the noun 'hoop.'
Explanation:
To identify the adjectives in the sentence "The ball bounced into the round hoop," we look for words that describe nouns. In this case, the word "round" is an adjective because it describes the shape of the noun "hoop." English adjectives follow a specific order: opinion, size, physical quality, shape, age, color, origin, material, type, and purpose. Remember, since adjectives modify nouns, they provide more detail about the object being discussed, like its size, color, shape, etc.
Pay attention to how the poem at once seems to describe a pleasant outing and the experience of being called away from life by death. What difference do you observe between these two aspects of the poem? What effect does this difference have on the poem?
Answer:
In the poem, the speaker seems to be discussing a pleasant date, as if oblivious to the fact that this is a journey to death. The tone of the poem seems light and perhaps even dismissive of all the scenes passing by, as though these cornerstones of life were not terribly significant. However, the underlying mood of the poem is somewhat sad because the speaker is describing a world she’s leaving behind. This difference between the descriptions of the outing and of dying creates some dramatic irony. The speaker sees but doesn’t really see the world of the living because she’s already dead.
Explanation:
This is the exact from Edmentum so make sure to change it up a little.
Answer:
In the poem, the speaker is by all accounts talking about a lovely date, as though careless in regards to the way this is an excursion to death. The tone of the sonnet appears to be light and maybe even cavalier of the apparent multitude of scenes cruising by, like these foundations of life were not horribly noteworthy. Notwithstanding, the fundamental state of mind of the sonnet is fairly dismal in light of the fact that the speaker is depicting a world she's abandoning. This contrast between the depictions of the trip and of passing on makes some emotional incongruity. The speaker sees yet doesn't generally observe the universe of the living since she's as of now dead.
Explanation:
How does the informal style help you better understand
the content of the passage?
* It connects science to plumbing.
It compares and contrasts ideas.
o It helps me visualize what the author is describing
O It teaches me useful science vocabulary.
Answer: C
Explanation:It helps me visualize what the author is describing
Answer:
c
Explanation:
egde2020
Darwin observed different species of an animal on separate Galapagos Islands. Which animal did he observe?
Answer:1:finch 2:beak
Explanation:its right
“The Veldt”
The children retaliate against their parents by conjuring up?
The veldt is based on man vs man.
Explanation:
Lydia and George try to create a positive lifestyle for their children. But their children, Peter and Wendy are against their parent's plan of moving to a country.They set up a nursery. The glass walls of the house could project any environment. They felt the house fulfills all the needs of the children but later it becomes a point of stress. This shows Veldt acts as a warning about the use of technology. When people become obsessed with technology, they lose their emotional connections.Which effects will expansionary fiscal policy have on short-term and long-term output?
Answer:D
Explanation:
Answer: d
Explanation:
Grade
Unit Test
Unit Test Active
TIME REMAINING
01:36:36
Read the following two sentences.
Use the context clues to find the definition for the word
unearth as it is used in these sentences.
The treasure they discovered had been buried deep in the
sand. It would take all day to unearth it.
to uncover
to dig out
to find
to get up
Answer:
it would take forever to dig out
Answer
B, To dig out
Explanation:
The treasure was buried DEEP into the sand, if they wanted to get it out, they would have to dig it. It's not A, because the treasure is deep in the sand and you can't just uncover it. And it doesn't take all day to uncover something. Its not C because they already found the treasure, now they have to dig it it out. It's not D either because getting things up makes no sense.
Should the government control social media? Why or why not?
Answer:
In my opinion, no. Because that's a form that people can express themselves. Plus, the government probably won't let anything on there that they find offensive to them. So it kinda violates our freedom of speech. (hope this helps!!)
Answer:
No
Explanation:
The government should not control Social media as these are platforms not publishers. It gives an easy voice to the users who exhibit certain opinions out of their consciousness that should not be controlled. It could be censored or monitored to an extent that it does not violate laws or threaten other users.
Social media platforms are privately owned, with their own rules and regulations guaranteed by the government itself. They cannot be completely owned by government.
Censorship is politically motivated that aims to privatize or polarize the social media. Government's interference obstructs the production or consumption of the information.
Individual speech can be easily influenced by government's agendas. The right to free speech is violated due to the restriction imposed upon the users who are guaranteed free expression in the public sphere.
Describe some of the positives and negatives of learning at home versus learning in the classroom.
Answer:
home:
advantages:
Work at Your Own Pace. ...
Stay Comfortable. ...
Bring Classes to You. ...
Long Term Sustainability.
disadvantages:
Socialization. ...
Criticism from others. ...
Worry. ...
Knowing where to Start. ...
Finding a method that suits your family. ...
classroom:
advantages:
A classroom environment offers students the opportunity to have face-to-face interactions with their peers and instructors. This is an added social benefit as well as an educational aid. Because students see the same peers in class every session, they get a chance to form friendships
disadvantages:
ravel time and cost.
Attendance times can be restrictive or inconvenient.
Shy students may have trouble approaching the instructor with questions.
You usually have to sit through each lecture even if you already know most of the material.
Answer:
Positives are you can work at your own pace negitive is that it may take time to adjust i your new learning enviorment
Explanation:
(the giver) Could the other people in the Community see colors? If not, why not?
help me pls ill love u forever
Answer:
No; They did not have the capacity to see beyond.
Explanation:
How did increase in trade affect the spread of the Black Death?
A) increased contact with other countries through trade allowed the plague to spread farther.
B) trade with the rest of the world allowed Europe to search for potential cures for the plague.
C) traders who left Europe were spread from the disease that was quickly spreading through Europe.
D) Animals infected with the plague hid on tradeships and introduced new variations of the plague around the world.
Answer:
A) makes the most sense to me
Once someone mars, or hurts, your reputation, is it hard to rebuild? Use evidence from The Crucible to support
your response. Write 2-4 complete sentences.
Answer:
Yes, in the context of 'The Crucible', it is hard to rebuild one's reputation once someone mars or hurts it.Explanation:
In the novel "The Crucible" , the townsfolk were all afraid of their reputation being tainted by someone. This was because the society construed any wrongdoings as an act of greatest shame.The people tried their best to get away from trouble for the fear of tarnishing their reputation. This can be seen in the way the protagonist of the novel false testified against Abigail who was accused of witchcraft.A resolute man is: a. determined. c. cautious. b. shy. Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Final answer:
The best answer to the question 'A resolute man is:' is 'a. determined.' A resolute person shows steadfast determination, unwavering firmness, and courageous purpose in their actions and decision-making processes.
Explanation:
The correct answer to the question “A resolute man is:” is a. determined. The word resolute describes a person who is admirably purposeful, determined, and unwavering in their decisions and actions. A resolute individual embodies qualities such as being courageous, having a firm will, and being decisive in their endeavors.
Examples of resolute behavior include a soldier who offers obstinate resistance when surrounded and fights hard under pressure, as mentioned in the given reference materials. Another example is someone who seeks Self-realization with unwavering focus, rather than being distracted by endless and many-branched thoughts. Being resolute means having a clear and determined vision, pursuing it with energy and purpose, and not being swayed by external distractions or temptations.
A resolute man is not shy or cautious in the context of this question; rather, he is someone who acts with conviction and clear purpose towards his goals, demonstrating an unyielding spirit and dedicated mind.
Are u an arianator?
Answer: YES
Explanation:
Pick the sentence that avoids redundancy and wordiness.
I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS FIRST!
A. We hoped that the person who managed the restaurant would sponsor our baseball team.
B. We all really hoped that the restaurant person would sponsor our baseball sports team.
C. We hoped that the restaurant manager would sponsor our baseball team.
D. We were all really hoping that the person who managed the restaurant would sponsor our baseball team.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
least redundant
Answer: C) We hoped that the restuarant menager would sponsor our baseball team.
Explanation: The rest don't make sense because they keep saying "person" for no reason.
Read the excerpt from Holes.
Mr. Sir laughed. "You see any guard towers?"
"No."
"How about an electric fence?"
"No, Mr. Sir."
"There's no fence at all, is there?"
"No, Mr. Sir."
"You want to run away?" Mr. Sir asked him.
Stanley looked back at him, unsure what he meant.
"If you want to run away, go ahead, start running. I'm not going to stop you."
Stanley didn't know what kind of game Mr. Sir was playing.
What does the statement “Stanley didn’t know what kind of game Mr. Sir was playing” demonstrate about the character of Stanley?
He has no sense of humor and cannot understand Mr. Sir’s jokes.
He has a very hard time understanding and talking to other people.
He is easily annoyed when other people say things that he does not like.
He is confused when people do not appear to be speaking honestly.
Answer:
D
I hope this helps
this is what I think the answer is lol
Answer:
D
Explanation:
What type of device does Susan B. Anthony employ in her speech when she asks, "Are women persons?
A. understatement
B. false analogy
C. rhetorical question
D. overstatement
Answer:
C
rhetorical question
How does Andy’s mom react to him saying I can’t deal with this by myself
Which external feature is MOST critical in classifying this tree as a white fir?
A) shrub or tree
B) berries or cones
C) leaves or needles
D) cones hanging or upright
Answer:cones hanging or upright
Explanation:
Final answer:
A white fir can be classified by its needle-shaped leaves, which are evergreen and soft, as well as its distinctive cones with bracts emerging between the scales, often likened to a "mouse butt" appearance. In Siberian forests, such trees are typically classified as conifers.
Explanation:
The external feature that is most critical in classifying a tree as a white fir is C) leaves or needles. Conifers such as the white fir have needle-shaped leaves, which is a defining characteristic of this group of plants. These leaves are usually present on the plant for more than a year, making the tree evergreen. Additionally, white firs have specific needle features such as being soft and not sharp. Cones are also important for identification; for white firs, the cones have bracts that emerge between the scales, sometimes nicknamed a "mouse butt" appearance. In the northern forests of Siberia, a tall tree like the white fir is likely a conifer because of these distinctive features.
How does Roald Dahl use dramatic irony to engage his readers? What effect(s) does this irony have on a readers’ experience?
Answer:
Roald Dahl used dramatic irony to create a suspenseful yet intriguing scene for the readers. It captures our attention and did it so well as to entice us to know what the ending will bring.
This dramatic irony makes the readers so engrossed in anticipation, eagerly awaiting the moment the crime may be solved.
Explanation:
In his story "Lamb to the Slaughter", Roald Dahl used dramatic irony to reveal the true events and to maintain the suspense. The dramatic irony is seen when the audience knows the happenings in the story but the characters have no idea about it.
Likewise, the police officers who came to investigate the death of their fellow detective Patrick Maloney who had been killed in his own home. As readers, we know that he was killed by his wife Mary with a "leg of lamb" that she was planning to make for dinner. Then, when the officers accepted to have dinner with their dead colleague's wife, they had the very same murder weapon for dinner, the "piece of evidence" that they need to prove the murder. The best scene is when they admitted the weapon may be "right under our very noses", which it literally is, on their plates.
This dramatic irony provides huge suspense and also some hilarious results/ effects for the readers. It allows us to feel or see the side of the story that before the characters do, but more importantly it builds the suspense for how the story will end.
Monty Hall, the host of the TV game show "Let’s Make A Deal", shows you three curtains. One curtain conceals a valuable prize, while the other two conceal junk. All three curtains are equally likely to conceal the prize. He offers you the following "deal": pick a curtain, and you can have whatever is behind it. When you pick a curtain, instead of giving you what lies behind the curtain, Monty (who knows where the prize is) opens one of the remaining curtains to show you that there is junk behind it, and offers the following "new, improved deal": you can either stick with your original choice, or switch to the remaining (unopened) curtain. Amidst the deafening roars of "Stand pat!" and "Switch!" from the crowd, Monty points out that "previously your chances of winning were 1/3, and now, since you know that the prize is behind one of the two unopened curtains, your chances have increased to 1/2, and thus the new improved deal is indeed better."
Answer:
Explanation:
I consider the Monty Hall game show problem to be a statistical illusion. This statistical illusion happens because your brain’s process of evaluating probabilities in the Monty Hall game show problem is usually on a false assumption. Statistical illusion is similar to optical illusions, the illusion seems more real than the actual answer.
To thoroughly view this statistical illusion, one needs to carefully break down the Monty Hall game show problem and identify the wrong assumptions. This process highlights how important it is to check that you’re clicking with the assumptions of a statistical analysis before trusting any of the results.
Monty Hall asks you to choose one of three doors in the show. One of the doors shields a prize and the other two doors contains no prize. You then loudly state out which door you pick, but you don’t get to open it right away. Monty then, opens one of the other two doors, and there, sit no prize behind it. At this stage, there are two closed doors containing one of which you picked. The prize sits behind one of the closed doors, but you can't tell which one.
Monty then asks you the ultimate question, “Do you want to switch doors?”. Majority of people assume that both doors are equally likely to have the prize. It seems like the door you chose has a 50/50 chance. Typically, there is no actual reason to change and most stick with their initial choice. Theories were then speculated that switching doors doubles one's chances of winning the prize if they switch doors. Before, it was mere speculated theory but now, people are starting to see the sense behind it. Through a probability test, it is claimed that one has 66% chances of winning the prize if they switch doors over a 33% chance if they don't switch doors.
What is the best explanation of the
situational irony in this passage?
The children are quiet on the train
instead of loud.
The aunt is pleasant and funny instead of
strict.
The bachelor remains silent when he is
expected to respond.
The aunt expects obedience from the
children, but does not get it.
Answer:
The aunt expects obedience from the children, but does not get it.
Explanation:
EDGE 2020
Answer: D
Explanation:
Identify the theme of Audre lordes poem hanging fire support your answer with at least three example
Answer:
the mockingbird
Explanation:
These examples illustrate the theme of the poem as the internal conflict and desire for self-determination in the face of external pressures and societal norms. Audre Lorde uses the voice of a young woman to explore broader issues of identity, race, and the struggle to find one's place in the world."
"The theme of Audre Lorde's poem ""Hanging Fire"" revolves around the internal struggles and pressures faced by a young black woman as she confronts the challenges of adolescence, identity, and societal expectations. The poem reflects the speaker's feelings of being trapped and the fear of not living up to the potential that others see in her.
To support this interpretation, consider the following examples from the poem:
1. The title ""Hanging Fire"" itself suggests a sense of urgency and something being held in suspense or delayed. This can be seen as a metaphor for the speaker's life, where decisions and actions are pending, and there is a feeling of being stuck or in limbo.
2. In the lines ""I am fourteen and my skin has betrayed me / the boy I cannot live without / stares through me,"" Lorde touches upon the theme of identity and self-image. Additionally, the unrequited love from the boy who does not truly see her emphasizes her feelings of invisibility and rejection.
How does the timeline support the text?
It emphasizes the problem-solution structure of the
passage.
It explains further the connection between the sugar
industry and slavery.
It supports the central ideas of the passage with
specific dates.
It provides key locations to events described in the
passage.
Answer:
c.It supports the central ideas of the passage with specific dates
Explanation:
I believe the answer is C, because If you look at the timeline (Which is added below) it does not give specific details. The timeline states ideas that support the passage with the specific dates. The passage gives a very descriptive points of the time of the event. However, the timeline just summarizes what the passage already stated.
hope it helps
Answer:
c
Explanation:
took on edge22
Me ayudan con esto!!
Past Simple or Past Perfect
1. I wish I …………………….. (be) taller. I’m the shortest person in my class.
2. Before she …………………. (leave) home, Amy ……………………. (put on) some make-up.
3. I ……………………………. (feel) offended because my friend ………………………. (call) me an ungrateful princess.
4. I wish I ……………………… (not go) to the party. I have a terrible headache now.
5. My sister ………………………. (tell) me she ……………………………. (not touch) my stuff in my room but honestly I don’t believe her.
6. Before I ………………………. (rush) downstairs to the kitchen, I ……………………….. (make) my bed.
7. When Charles ……………………. (enter) his office, he …………………………. (realise) someone …………………………… (search) his drawers.
8. Andy ……………………….. (tighten) his safety rope before he …………………….. (start) climbing the rock.
9. When the kids ………………….. (come) back home, their dinner …….…………. (be) ready.
10. After he ……………………………. (win) the gold medal at the Olympic Games, he …………………….. (decide) to go on holi
1. I wish I **were** taller. I’m the shortest person in my class.
2. Before she **left** home, Amy **had put on** some make-up.
3. I **felt** offended because my friend **had called** me an ungrateful princess.
4. I wish I **had not gone** to the party. I have a terrible headache now.
5. My sister **told** me she **had not touched** my stuff in my room, but honestly, I don’t believe her.
6. Before I **rushed** downstairs to the kitchen, I **had made** my bed.
7. When Charles **entered** his office, he **realized** someone **had searched** his drawers.
8. Andy **tightened** his safety rope before he **had started** climbing the rock.
9. When the kids **came** back home, their dinner **was** ready.
10. After he **won** the gold medal at the Olympic Games, he **had decided** to go on holiday.
The use of past simple and past perfect tense in these sentences helps convey a sequence of events and highlight the chronological order in which they occurred. Past perfect tense is employed to denote an action completed before another action in the past. For instance, in sentence 2, "Before she left home, Amy had put on some make-up," the past perfect tense "had put on" indicates that the action of putting on makeup was completed before Amy left home. This helps establish a clear timeline of events.
Similarly, past perfect is used in sentence 3, "I felt offended because my friend had called me an ungrateful princess." The past perfect "had called" signifies that the act of calling occurred before the narrator felt offended.
In sentences 5 and 6, past perfect is used to clarify the sequence of actions. In contrast, past simple is utilized in sentence 9, "When the kids came back home, their dinner was ready," where the past simple tense "came" indicates an action that occurred later than the action expressed by the past perfect "had been ready." This mixture of past simple and past perfect enhances the overall narrative clarity and provides a well-structured account of various events unfolding in the past.
Past Simple is used for actions completed in the past that did not have any connection to other past actions. Past Perfect is used to describe actions that happened before another action in the past. The sentences provided mix both of these tenses based on the sequence and relationship of past events.
Explanation:The appropriate tenses for the sentences are as follows:
I wish I had been (Past Perfect) taller. I’m the shortest person in my class.Before she left (Past Simple) home, Amy had put on (Past Perfect) some make-up.I felt (Past Simple) offended because my friend had called (Past Perfect) me an ungrateful princess.I wish I had not gone (Past Perfect) to the party. I have a terrible headache now.My sister told (Past Simple) me she had not touched (Past Perfect) my stuff in my room but honestly I don’t believe her.Before I rushed (Past Simple) downstairs to the kitchen, I had made (Past Perfect) my bed.When Charles entered (Past Simple) his office, he realised (Past Simple) someone had searched (Past Perfect) his drawers.Andy had tightened (Past Perfect) his safety rope before he started (Past Simple) climbing the rock.When the kids came (Past Simple) back home, their dinner was (Past Simple) ready.After he won (Past Simple) the gold medal at the Olympic Games, he decided (Past Simple) to go on holiday.
which line best supports the writers opinion that kamen has done things that have never been done before
Answer:
A. This quote is from the inventor of a three-phase motor, Nikola Tesla.
Explanation:
Answer:C.
Explanation: because tho ther guy said it was A it is wrong try C im correct