What plays a major role in India’s agricultural production

The Soviet Union formed the Warsaw Pact in response to NATO. It was a collective defense treaty among eight communist states in Central and Eastern Europe during the Cold War, established to balance the power and counter the perceived threat from NATO.

In response to NATO, the organization that the Soviet Union formed was the Warsaw Pact. Formally known as the Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation, and Mutual Assistance, this was a collective defense treaty among eight communist states of Central and Eastern Europe in existence during the Cold War. The treaty was established as a balance of power to counter the NATO alliance, which was perceived as a direct threat by the Soviet bloc.

The Soviet Union formed the Warsaw Pact in response to NATO. It was a collective defense treaty among eight communist states in Central and Eastern Europe during the Cold War, established to balance the power and counter the perceived threat from NATO.

#SPJ6

Stared on July 28, 1914, Ended on November 11, 1918

Answer:

George Washington led the Continental Army.

Explanation:

Abuses and usurpations are fancy words to describe when you aren't being treated right. The colonists felt mistreated and taken advantage of by the British and went to war to fight for their independence. George Washington was selected to lead the Continental Army and believed it was his right and duty to defend his country and fight for independence from Great Britain.

Kurt Vonnegut describes a society 120 years in the future in "Harrison Bergeron" to create a stark contrast with contemporary society and warn of potential issues if inequalities are not addressed.

In Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron," the author depicts a society in the year 2081 where every form of human inequality has been eradicated by the 211th, 212th, and 213th amendments to the Constitution. Vonnegut chose a future setting for several reasons. Firstly, setting the story in the future allows for a sharp contrast between the reader's present-day society and the imagined dystopian future. This contrast serves to highlight current societal inequalities and provoke thought about the direction in which society is headed. Secondly, a future setting provides a warning of what could potentially happen if current societal issues related to equality are not effectively addressed. This speculative approach is characteristic of dystopian fiction, which often serves as social commentary on contemporary issues. The case of "Harrison Bergeron," reflects concerns about the potential overreach of government in the pursuit of enforced equality, a topic that resonates with historical struggles for civil rights and the interpretation of amendments like the Fourteenth Amendment, which invokes equal protection under the law.

Final answer:

The western world faced political and economic challenges in the 1920s and 1930s, including the Great Depression. Various countries reacted differently to these challenges.

Explanation:

In the 1920s and 1930s, the western world faced significant political and economic challenges. The Great Depression, which began in 1929, caused widespread unemployment and poverty. Various countries reacted to these challenges in different ways.

Some countries, like the United States, implemented government intervention and social programs to alleviate the effects of the Depression. Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal introduced various relief, recovery, and reform measures. Other countries, like Germany, Italy, and Japan, saw the rise of authoritarian leaders and the adoption of more nationalist and militaristic ideologies as a response to economic instability.

The political and economic challenges of this time period had a profound impact on the course of history, leading to World War II and shaping the development of international relations and economic policies in the following decades.

C, economic Sanctions

Good luck on your exam!

If you encounter this situation wherein you have some serious problem with the some aspect of the company’s job offer, you should try to talk with the company’s personnel representative and see if you can resolve or clarify the issues. If you cannot resolve the issue, then you should reject the offer.

Answer:

See if you can clear (up) or clarify the issues with a Company's (human resource) representative in turn.

Explanation:

°You have be true to yourself°

Basically, The motto I recommend is:

"Don't do anything that goes against your consciousness".

There is a question of honesty and sincerity in this case of decisions since it is your CAREER FUTURE what's at stake, and even though can be strong position you need to take and can be taken as inconsiderate from your part- it is a real mature request but do it in a modest and honest mood to claim that  you must take care of yourself and ANY decisions you make; on the other hand you value the offer and I would appreciate their considerations but decisions have a cost, a risk and a benefit for everyone involved, so you can if possible take your time to reflect and maybe you can gain some waiting game time off to make them reflect, that YOU may be the BEST person they're looking and wanting for the job  

Answer: B) How were public schools finally integrated after segregation was deemed

Explanation: While each question is related to schools, this question is specifically about the desegregation or integration of schools.

When one gets married, they will have to give up being single so this statement is True.

When you get married, you will be trading this for being single because you cannot be simultaneously single and married.

In conclusion, this is true.

Find out more on tradeoffs at https://brainly.com/question/7072776.

The correct answer is letter D.

A cottage industry is a small-scale, manufacturing business often run from someone’s home rather than a purpose-built facility.

Cottage industries are defined by the amount of investment required to start, as well as the number of people employed.  

They often face a significant disadvantage when competing with factory-based manufacturers that mass-produce goods.

The first cottage industries were light manufacturing operations in England and the United States engaged in subcontracted garment-making, textiles or sewing, as well as shoemaking and small metal machine parts.  

They may have been made up of family members engaged in producing finished goods by utilizing raw materials supplied by a business manager. Many contemporary industries that currently operate in factories were once cottage industries before the Industrial Revolution.

Cottage industries play a significant role in the economies of developing countries.  

These economies sometimes lack the capital and financial systems to support larger industries. It may be difficult for smaller firms to grow due to a lack of available capital or because of uncertainty relating to private property and legal rights. Cottage industry is still seen in Asia, India and South America.

I would say either a or c. Hope that helps.

I think the answer is the one that says "Uncovered and Reported on political and business corruptions."

Final answer:

In the 1920s, women gained significant changes in their lives predominantly through increased work opportunities and the right to vote, as they began to assert more independence and political influence.

Explanation:

During the 1920s, life changed for women in two significant ways: work opportunities and the right to vote. The post-World War I era saw many countries grant suffrage to women as a reward for their contributions during the war. Furthermore, the number of women in the workforce increased as societal attitudes shifted, allowing women access to a broader array of employment opportunities, though these were often in low-paying and traditionally female-dominated professions such as teaching and nursing. While the push for equal pay was a part of the discourse, it was not yet a widespread reality for women of the 1920s.

Collectively, these advancements in political and social spheres created a new era of independence for women. However, it's important to note that while the right to vote was universally extended to women in the United States with the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920, the struggle for full equality, including equal pay, persisted.

A U.S. senator elected during the November general election takes office on January 3rd of the following year. The terms of Senators are staggered so roughly one-third are up for election during each general election.

In the United States, a senator who is elected during the general election in November takes office the following year on January 3rd, as specified in the 20th Amendment of the Constitution. This happens on an even numbered year. The terms of Senators are staggered so that about one-third of the 100 U.S. Senators are up for reelection during each general election, which is held on the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November.

For example, if a senator wins the general election in November of 2022, they would officially take office on January 3rd, 2023, starting their six-year term. The time between the election and taking office is often used for transition purposes.

https://brainly.com/question/20795181

#SPJ12

The correct answer is the ruling declared that school segregation was unconstitutional.

Before the Brown vs. Board of Education case, segregated schools for black and white citizens were allowed thanks to the ruling in the Plessy vs. Ferguson Supreme Court case. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that "separate but equal" was constitutional.

However, the Brown vs. Board of Education overruled this case. The Supreme Court justices ruled in favor of the Brown family and their claim that segregated schools for black and white citizens clearly violated the 14th amendment of the US Constitution. More specifically, it violated the Equal protection clause.

The correct answer is A)"with all delibrate speed."

Even though the Supreme Court ruled that segregated schools needed to be integrated, several Southern states fought this ruling. For example, in Arkansas the governor used the Arkansas National Guard to stop nine African-American students from attending Central High School. This event, which took place in 1957, resulted in President Eisenhower using the US National Guard to escort these students into their classrooms.

This situation was somewhat common in the south, as several different public schools and universities did their best to delay integration.

Final answer:

The Ottoman Empire managed its conquered peoples' religious diversity through the millet system, ensuring autonomy, while the Mughal Empire, particularly under Akbar, practiced religious tolerance and inclusivity to harmonize Hindu and Muslim subjects. Differences in these policies affected the stability and success of each empire, where tolerance under the Mughals led to a rich cultural blend but changes in policy by successors led to unrest.

Explanation:

Ottoman and Mughal Empires' Religious Policies

The Ottoman Empire and the Mughal Empire had distinct approaches to managing the religious diversity of the people they conquered. The Ottomans implemented a system known as the millet system, which provided a certain degree of autonomy to different religious groups, allowing them to govern themselves in matters of personal law. This system had the advantage of creating a sense of community and loyalty within diverse populations, which in turn provided stability and facilitated peaceful coexistence among various religious groups within the empire.

On the other hand, the Mughal Empire, under the rule of Akbar, adopted a policy of religious tolerance and inclusivity. Akbar sought to integrate his predominantly Hindu subjects by implementing policies that promoted cooperation. He eliminated the jizya (a tax on non-Muslims), patronized Hindu culture, and employed Hindus in high government positions. This approach not only reduced conflict but also fostered a rich cultural and intellectual life, blending Islamic and Hindu traditions in art, architecture, and administration. The Mughals' policy promoted a more syncretic culture, contributing to the empire's success during Akbar's reign.

However, there were differences in the levels of success attributable to these policies. The Ottoman policy was generally effective for much of their history but occasionally led to segregated communities and could incite tensions if the autonomy of a certain millet was felt to be encroached upon. For the Mughals, the policy of tolerance under Akbar was greatly successful, but his successors' departure from these policies, such as Aurangzeb's attempts to reimpose the jizya and enforce Islamic orthodoxy, led to civil unrest and weakened the empire's cohesion.

Final answer:

The Ottoman Empire used the millet system to govern different religious communities, ensuring stability. The Mughal Empire promoted religious tolerance and integration, leading to unity and success.

Explanation:

The Ottoman Empire and the Mughal Empire handled the religious beliefs of the people they conquered differently. The Ottoman Empire had a policy known as the millet system, which allowed religious communities to govern their own internal affairs. Different religious communities, such as Muslims, Christians, and Jews, were recognized and had their own legal and administrative structures. This policy helped to maintain social order and allowed the Ottoman Empire to govern a diverse population, resulting in stability and success.

On the other hand, the Mughal Empire had a policy of religious tolerance and integration. The Mughal emperors, particularly Akbar, promoted a policy of religious syncretism and allowed Hindus to practice their own religion freely. Akbar even attempted to create a new religion called Din-i Ilahi, which blended elements of Islam, Hinduism, Christianity, and other religions. This policy of religious tolerance and integration helped to unite the diverse religious and ethnic groups within the Mughal Empire and contributed to its success.