what reservations does nick have about gatsby's feelings for daisy

In chapter 5 of To Kill a Mockingbird, Miss Maudie's comparison between Jem and Jack reveals Jem's genuine curiosity and fascination with Boo Radley and the items found in the tree. This comparison also highlights the contrast in attitudes between Jem's open-mindedness and his Uncle Jack's narrow perspective.

In chapter 5 of To Kill a Mockingbird, Miss Maudie likens Jem to his Uncle Jack in terms of their contrasting attitudes towards Boo Radley and the items found in the tree. Jem's curiosity and fascination with Boo's mysterious nature is evident through his desire to unravel the mystery surrounding him, while Uncle Jack dismisses Boo as a strange and irrelevant figure.

Miss Maudie's comparison reveals that Jem is genuinely intrigued by Boo Radley and is likely pondering the significance of the objects left in the tree. Jem's curiosity and desire for adventure compel him to explore the unknown, wanting to understand Boo and the reasons behind the items. This comparison also highlights the stark contrast between Jem's open-mindedness and his Uncle Jack's narrow perspective.

https://brainly.com/question/31402935

#SPJ6

Question: Reread paragraph 2 of this speech excerpt. What was President Kennedy's main reason for writing this paragraph?

Options:

Answer: The correct answer is: To explain that a moon mission would be an amazing feat that required boldness.

Explanation: President Kennedy mentions that the equipment that will be used is all that will be needed for having enough guidance, propulsion, control communications and food and survival for landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth but that it will be a challenge due to many factors, one of them being the speed which has dangerous heat effects. In the end of his speech, he mentions the need of doing this right the first time and that they must be bold to accomplish it.  

Answer: The correct answer is: To explain that a moon mission would be an amazing feat that required boldness.

Explanation:

The analysis of the excerpt reveals that none of the provided options accurately point out a fault in the passage, as it correctly connects Arthur Miller's play 'The Crucible' to its historical context of McCarthyism without the issues suggested by the options.

To address the question regarding what is wrong with the excerpt from a literary analysis essay about The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, let's examine the options given. The paragraph in question outlines the parallels between the Salem witch trials depicted in Miller's play and the McCarthyism era of the 1950s, where accusations of communism caused widespread fear and unjust persecution in America.

Therefore, the real discrepancy is that none of the options accurately identify a fault in the excerpt. The paragraph appropriately connects historical context with literature without committing the errors described in the options provided.

Answer:

Explanation:

1.'Praising the productivity of the individuals and being content with one's chosen occupation in life' is the dominating theme of the poem as Whitman praises the individual's work and displays joy in being productive.

2. 'All races of people are beautiful and should be considered a part of America' as Whitman felt that they all together constitute America and each plays their own part and admire their uniqueness and diversity.

3. There is no real difference in theme because Hughes' version "I, too" is inspired by Whitman's "I hear America singing". Both poems celebrate the freedom and uniqueness of individuals. Both the poems are an attempt to expel racism from America and celebrate togetherness and individuality.

THE ANSWER IS TO "prosecute individuals for human rights violations."

1.     The main argument in this essay is that if the audience does not accept the villain the poet (specifically Shakespeare here) writes, then Shakespeare will become the villain of his own play.

2.     In lines 25-44 the author is supporting the fact that the poet is completely at the mercy of his audience. Sometimes the reception by the audience has nothing to do with the play itself, it might be differences from audience to audience based on who is there and how they are feeling on that particular night.

3. Shakespeare cannot give up revenge because it is what the audience wants. The author says that “tragedy is revenge”. If he gives up revenge, he is giving up his audience and therefore his entire basis of work.

4. The author presents this information directly from the text because the structure of the lines is as important as what they are saying. Hamlet presents the images of his father and his uncle next to each other, and the meter of the lines represents that back and forth of comparison by mirroring each other. “This was your husband/Here is your husband”. The repetition with slight changes in description show the contrast better than a summary could.  

5. The author says this is a “catchy example” because Hamlet needs to adopt the same sense of grand military action towards Claudius for his revenge as Fortinbras does for what seems like nothing. Hamlet needs, like Fortinbras, to be willing to throw away everything for “an eggshell”.

6. Laertes is like the actor that played Hecuba because he is able to turn on his tears and emotions even if it contradicts what he is feeling inside. This similarity suggests that Laertes cares more about the show of things, in the same way he seems to care more about the ceremony surrounding Ophelia’s burial than her death itself, than the things themselves. It shows that he is all for show rather than sincerity.

7. These lines relate to the author’s argument because it reinforces the idea that the audience is actually in control of the play. It shows examples of lines that represent the height of the trauma and tragedy, so that the audience knows the ending is near.

8. Gertrude refers to Hamlet’s outburst as “madness” and he refers to his own outburst as “towering passion.” The differences here are in who the audience chooses to believe. If the audience follows Gertrude’s lead by thinking he is mad, they will receive the ending differently than if they trust Hamlet himself that his outbursts are an outpouring of passion.

1. The claim and the central idea in lines 1 - 24 in René Girard's Hamlet's Dull Revenge are that Hamlet is not convinced that Claudius deserves to die.  Hamlet thinks that his father may have contributed to his murder.

2. The central idea that the author supports in lines 25 - 44 is that audience reception sustains the author. Without the audience, the author lacks business.

3. Shakespeare concentrates on the issue of revenge to satisfy his audience. Similarly, Hamlet is bent on revenge to satiate his people because they know Claudius murdered his father. One can agree with the author that "tragedy is revenge."

4. The value for Girard to quote directly from Shakespeare's play in lines 86 - 104 instead of using a summary of the dialogue is to preserve originality. This originality shows in how Hamlet vividly juxtaposes his father and uncle side by side. Thus, by repeating the lines, the intended contrast is achieved.

5. Fortinbras' army remains a "catchy example for Hamlet" because Hamlet took grand military action against Claudius in his revenge like Fortinbra. It is like throwing away everything to preserve the eggshell.

6. Laertes is like Hecuba in that he uses his tears and emotions to contradict his inner feelings by overemphasizing outward appearances. After all, Laertes cares more about Ophelia's burial than her gruesome death. This similarity suggests that, like Hecuba, Laertes lacks sincerity but lives on make-believe.

7. The section from lines 137 - 148 relates to the author's argument by reinforcing that the audience controls the outcome of any literary production. The author does not just write anything they like without considering the needs of their audience.

8. The central idea that Girard infers from the reference by Gertrude to Hamlet's outburst as "madness" while his outburst is "towering passion" is to give the audience the final decision-making.

Thus, the audience must choose whom to believe and how they want the play should end. Are the audience entertained by tragedy or comedy?

Learn more about "Hamlet's Dull Revenge" by René Girard at https://brainly.com/question/9526871

Answer:

A. Images of nature

Explanation:

In Komunyakaa's "Camouflaging the Chimera" the narrator is describing what the soldiers did into the nature, he shows the scene like “We tied branches to our helmets. We painted our faces & rifles with mud from a riverbank,” on  the other hand, Kinnell's part 1 of "Vapor Trail Reflected in the Frog Pond" include in his poem imagery of the moon, a frog pond and hills, he is also portraying the nature that surrounds the soldiers.

Answer:

The answer is indeed letter A. images of nature.

Explanation:

We are analyzing the images described in two poems concerning Vietnam and the war, "Camouflaging the Chimera", by Komunyakaa, and "Vapor Trail Reflected in the Frog Pond", by Kinnell. In both works, we are presented with a description of nature, as if to show how peaceful it is in contrast with the war taking place, or how men are capable of using it for their own bloody purposes.

In "Camouflaging the Chimera", soldiers are camouflaging themselves using everything nature has to offer - branches, mud, bamboos. The author describes what makes the forest alive: the breeze off the river, the rock apes, the crawling chameleons. In "Vapor Trail Reflected in the Frog Pond", the frogs in the pond are described in part 1, again contrasting with what men are doing. The old frogs have puffy eyes, the young ones aren't even fully developed yet, having only the "beginnings of necks." Both poems provide readers with a description of nature living side by side with destruction and death.

B. He is disgusted by them.

The answer is: B. he is disgusted by them.

During the story of “The Grapes of Wrath” we can notice that Steinbeck always describes the banks as “monsters”, he shows them as something malicious that enjoys the famers and land owner bad luck, they were insatiable and nearly unstoppable, taking into account that the novel is located during the Great Depression.

Answer:

The best situation is #1, having $3,280.00 in savings account earning a 4.25% APR and $1,320.00 due on a credit card with a 13.5% APR. I just took the test, and this was the correct answer.

Explanation:

Interest Accrued: ($3,280.00)(0.0425)(1/12) = 11.62

Interest Accrued: ($1,320.00)(0.135)(1/12) = 14.85

Take in consideration for number #1 that there are plenty in savings with low interest, enough for you to pay off the credit card and still have money left.

Answer:

The quoted lines from William Shakespeare’s “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” introduces and also develops Helena’s character.

The literary device which Shakespeare has used is personification.

Explanation:

This kind of literary device is the attribution of a human characteristic or personal nature to something that is not a human or is a representation of an abstract quality in the human form. Going through the lines carefully, it is noticed how Helena’s character introduction is done. With the help of personification, the character’s nature is revealed in layers and concluded.

On mine, it said that A was correct.

Answer:

A. To show the audience that he believed Boniface deserved to be in Hell as well.

Explanation:

Dante Alighieri's famous epic poem "Divine Comedy" consists of three parts- Inferno, Purgatory and Paradise. The part of Inferno is the first, showing Virgil and Dante in the world of suffering interacting with the various sinners.

The excerpt given in the question is from Canto XIX where Virgil and Dante had gone to the Third pouch, a place where the sinners of simony are punished. One of the souls they meet was that of Pope Nicholas III who mistook Dante for Boniface. Now, Boniface was also a pope during that time but was still alive when the this scene was happening. By his mistaken identification of Dante as Boniface, Pope Nicholas seems to provide a reference to the future of Boniface. Dante included this scene to show the audience that even Pope Boniface is also deserving of hell.

Juliet begs for pardon because She feared she had been to "light," not "strange," enough.

She claims that if he refused to take the name "Montague," she would offer herself to him; alternatively, if he just professed his love for her, she would decline to take the name "Capulet."

Juliet is shocked when Romeo answers to her request since she had assumed she was alone. He responds that love brought him to her when she asks how he came across her.

She feels humiliated since he overheard her declare her love for him. I have no delight of this touch to-night, Juliet declares in scene two after exchanging vows of love. She doubts Romeo's sincerity. She begs his forgiveness because she has been vocal about her love for him.

To learn more about Juliet

https://brainly.com/question/1409935

#SPJ2

Answer: (A)He is playful and creative.

Explanation: you're welcome give me five stars plz

Answer:

(A)He is playful and creative.

Explanation:

Just took quiz

Answer:

The answers are explained below.

Explanation:

All the definitions were consulted in the Cambridge Dictionary.

Receptacle is defined as "a container used for storing or putting objects in."

Consummation refers to "the act of making a marriage or romantic relationship complete by having s.x" as well as "the act of making something complete or perfect."

Obliterated means something that doesn't have any signs.

That is false because parents can do a lot.

Answer:

1. False

2. False

3. True

4. True

Explanation:

1. It is false that parents can do very little to encourage brain development in their children. Parents can encourage brain development in several ways. They can interact with their baby and talk to him. They can also take him out so that he can become familiar with different environments. Another thing parents can do is let him explore and discover how things work on their own.

2. Brains do not properly begin to age for several decades. Moreover, the speed by which they age depends on the person and the person's lifestyle. Some parts of the brain, moreover, take a very long time to fully develop, sometimes until 35 years old.

3. Assertive technology refers to devices that are employed by people with disabilities or the elderly, either for assistance, adaptation or rehabilitation. These can help children remain in regular classes or communicate with parents and friends.

4. It is true that babies are born with some connections between brain cells. They possess several neurons as well as synapses, and these allow babies to perform the tasks that are necessary for their survival.

Here are the answers to the whole assessment:

1.  B

2. C

3. B

4. B

5. A

I hope this helps! Have a great day! :D

Final answer:

The setting in literature includes the time of day, the specific location, the atmosphere or mood, and the time period of the story. These aspects together establish the context and environment where the plot unfolds and characters interact, and they play a significant role in shaping the reader’s perception and understanding of the narrative.

Explanation:

When analyzing the setting of a story, a reader should indeed consider various elements that contribute to the overall atmosphere and context in which the characters and plot are situated. The time of day during which the story takes place can set expectations for what might happen, as different events are often associated with different times, such as morning or midnight. Furthermore, the city or precise location where the events unfold - whether it be a zoo, a residence, or the wilderness - introduces unique circumstances that affect the story.

The atmosphere or mood of the place, informed by geography, weather, and social conditions, creates an environment that can profoundly influence the narrative and thematic development. For example, Edgar Allan Poe uses a dark, oppressive setting in The Fall of the House of Usher to evoke feelings of confinement and depression, effectively sharing the narrator's experiences with the reader through the story's setting.

We also examine how the setting interacts with the plot and characters; whether it's a crucial aspect of the story's development or simply a backdrop. Time period is another critical component, affecting the language, atmosphere, or social circumstances within the story. The duration of the story's events, from beginning to end, helps to understand the narrative's pace and progression.

Finally, when a story's setting is not directly defined, the interpretive work falls to other storytelling components, such as costuming or prop selections, in order to provide clues about the setting.

In sum, the time of day, the location, the atmosphere, and the time period are all critical when considering a story's setting.

Answer:

c complex

Explanation:

I just did the test

Answer:

C Complex

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

In the first novel, the author senses the hospital, which makes him sick, and in the second plot, the scent of the Battle of the Blossoms (which is most likely smoke and possibly incense from the band of warriors). The hospital scent may be a residual feeling from the Aztec warriors finding its way into his dream of the hospital because the narrator says he "doesn't dream smells." The smells described in each plot are different, for example, in the plot where the man was in the hospital getting his x-ray, he said it smelled like reek, and in the plot where he was running through swaps, he said it smelled like war. This difference affects the sound of each plot because, in the first plot, there was no mention of any scent, while in the second plot, there was more mention of the smell.

Answer:

Explanation:

The Tatler and The Spectator are literary journals distributed in the eighteenth century. The diaries turned out to be popular to the point that different journalists and editors imitated these two distributions.  

Joseph Addison and Richard Steele, authors of the essay series The Tatler (1709-1711) and The Spectator (1711-1712). Addison and Steele knew each from the age of thirteen, and they likewise covered at Oxford. They ran into each other again in London in the early piece of the eighteenth century; them two had political and literary aspirations.

Answer: C. The gunmetal clouds crept over the land.

Explanation: Apex

The answer is the second one:  “doing research things you see in the piece.”

When looking at text or art, one will always “bring to the table” prior knowledge with which he or she will analyze a work.  And, strong claims are best made when the piece is understood within the context it was created.   That said, it’s good to know as much as possible about the time period things were created in and to know as much as possible about the author because it will help one more fully understand the content.  Most importantly, it helps to know about content within a work, so researching content that is foreign to you will help you in your ability in understanding the meanings of content that will shed light on the meanings and themes within a given work.  So, yes, what will help you write a better analysis when you are looking at either text or art is doing research about things you see in a piece.

PART A

It is beautiful and has many natural attributes.

PART B

His Village is fertile, attractive, and remote, resulting in a pleasant, sheltered childhood.