What was the main difference between Doves and Hawks regarding U.S. presence in Vietnam?
A. Doves believed that the United States military should have a strong presence in Vietnam, while Hawks did not.
B. Doves agreed with President Johnson’s war policy, but Hawks believed Johnson’s policy was wrong.
\C. Doves believed that the Vietnam conflict was a localized civil war and did not agree with Johnson’s war policy, whereas Hawks supported Johnson’s policy and believed Vietnam was a crucial front in the Cold War.
D. Doves accepted the rising troop levels, escalating costs, and the increasing number of battlefield deaths, while Hawks questioned the war on both moral and strategic grounds.

Answer:

The Montgomery Bus Boycott was successful because the leaders and participants found ways to overcome obstacles. They also didn't succumb to frustration or give into the urge to lash out. They followed Martin Luther King Jr.'s advice to engage in nonviolent resistance.

Explanation:

answer given

Answer:

MacArthur was angry because he favored the total war.

Answer: its c

Explanation:

its c

Answer:

Pachacuti

Explanation:

The Inca expanded into a great empire under the reign of Pachacuti. Pachacuti created the Inca Empire which the Inca called the Tawantinsuyu. At its height, the Inca Empire had an estimated population of over 10 million people. The Inca were conquered by the Spanish and conquistador Francisco Pizarro in 1533.

Black Hoof was an American Indian leader who encouraged the Shawnee to practice assimilation.

Who was Black Hoof?

Black Hoof was assigned with the post of civil chief of  Shawnee Indians in the US. He was a fierce warrior who wanted Indians to adapt to US white culture.

Therefore, he was said responsible to make the Shawnee nation restricted to join together with Tecumseh's War. Finally, it converted into which the War of 1812.

Learn more about Indian assimilation war here:

https://brainly.com/question/3170828  

Final answer:

The 1973 cease-fire agreement in the Vietnam War was precipitated by the Christmas Day bombing campaign of North Vietnam, peace talks in Paris, and prior extensive bombing and mining campaigns in North Vietnam, leading to the Paris Peace Accords.

Explanation:

The events that led directly to the 1973 cease-fire agreement in the Vietnam War include a significant series of incidents and political maneuvers. Notable among these were the intense Christmas Day bombing of North Vietnam, robust peace negotiations in Paris, and the bombing and mining of North Vietnam.

Nixon's orders to bomb Hanoi and Haiphong at the end of December were initially intended to bring North Vietnam back to the negotiation table on more favorable terms for the United States. Unfortunately, this strategy resulted in extensive loss of life and did not immediately yield the desired diplomatic results. Nevertheless, on January 27, 1973, Nixon returned to the bargaining table and accepted a cease-fire that allowed North Vietnam to keep the territory it had captured in South Vietnam.

The Paris Peace Accords were influenced by a combination of military action and the changing political landscape in the United States, which was affected by antiwar sentiment and the leak of the Pentagon Papers that exposed the true nature of the U.S.'s involvement in Vietnam. This combination of factors ultimately pushed both sides to agree to cease-fire arrangements.

Answer:

D. Compound interest pays interest on the principal and the interest earned in each period.

Explanation:

just took the test

Compound interest is preferable to simple interest because it pays interest on the principal and the interest earned in each period, resulting in exponential growth. Additionally, compound interest is calculated more frequently than simple interest, allowing for faster growth of the investment.

Compound interest is preferable to simple interest because it pays interest on both the principal amount and the interest earned in each period, resulting in exponential growth. For example, if you invest $100 at an annual interest rate of 10%, with compound interest, you will earn interest not only on the $100 but also on the interest earned in each period. This leads to higher returns compared to simple interest, which only pays interest on the principal amount.

Furthermore, compound interest is calculated more frequently than simple interest. Compound interest can be paid on a monthly, weekly, or even daily basis, allowing for faster growth of the investment. On the other hand, simple interest is usually only paid once a year.

To illustrate the difference between compound interest and simple interest, let's consider an example. If you invest $1000 at an annual interest rate of 5% with simple interest, you would earn $50 in interest every year. However, with compound interest, in the first year, you would earn $50 in interest. In the second year, you would earn interest not only on the principal of $1000 but also on the $50 interest from the first year, resulting in a higher return.

https://brainly.com/question/34614903

#SPJ6

Axis countries must give up completely

is the right answer.

Mark brainliest if you feel I've helped :)

Answer:

The correct answer is B. No government can function without the consent of the people.

Explanation :

John Locke (1632 - 1704) was an English philosopher who stood out as one of the fathers of classical liberalism, because he focused his studies and reasoning on the social contract and the functioning of the state and government. His main ideas point to the fact that the social contract was the product of the consent of the population, however, he affirmed that this consent had to be renewed from generation to generation, arguing that each generation could not submit to the next under its conceptions. On the other hand, he affirmed that the consent of the people could not fall into the enslavement of the population at the service of the government. So, the correct answer is B. No government can function without the consent of the people.

The belief that slaves were personal property and not people is the drove slavers to treat slaves as chattel. Hence, option A is correct.

The most prevalent type of slavery known to Americans is chattel slavery. From the 16th to the 18th centuries, this system, which permitted persons to be bought, sold, and possessed in perpetuity, was legal and backed by the United States and other European countries.

Slavery has a lengthy history in Mauritania. Although it is technically still illegal in the country, rules banning chattel slavery are rarely enforced. Around 2% of Mauritania's population, or over 90,000 people, are thought to be slaves. Like chattel slavery, debt bondage can be passed down to future generations.

Such chattel slaves are sold in return for camels, trucks, weaponry, money, and their labor, sex, and procreation. Children of chattel slaves are still their master's property.

Thus, option A is correct.

For more information about treat slaves as chattel, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30676832

#SPJ2

The United States claimed American Samoa in 1899 through a tripartite protectorate agreement with Great Britain and Germany, which allowed the U.S. to gain control of the eastern islands, while Germany took the western islands. American Samoa provided a strategic naval base and remains a U.S. possession with a distinct citizenship status.

The United States was able to claim American Samoa through a series of historical events that reflected its strategic interests in the Pacific region. In 1899, the U.S. joined Great Britain and Germany in forming a protectorate over the Samoan islands, an agreement formalized to divide the islands between Germany and the United States. The eastern islands became known as American Samoa, with access to crucial naval resources, including a refueling station at Pago Pago harbor, which became particularly significant during World War II. Britain withdrew its claims on the islands in exchange for territorial concessions in Africa and the North Solomon Islands from Germany.

American Samoa remains a U.S. possession to this day, although unlike other territories such as Hawaii and Puerto Rico, the residents are not automatically U.S. citizens unless one of their parents holds citizenship. This unique political status reflects the historical and strategic considerations that shaped U.S. territorial expansion in the Pacific.

Answer:

c. "this would provide guidance to farmers along the mississippi and other u.s. waterways."

Explanation:

from penn foster

Answer:

D. Robert B. Taney.

Explanation:

There's a different question that says "Which of the following was part of the ruling of Chief Justice Taney in the Dred Scott case?", and the judge is Taney in the question.

Final answer:

The court packing scandal refers to FDR's attempt to expand the number of justices in the Supreme Court to secure favorable rulings for his New Deal programs. This attempt affected the behavior of the courts and damaged FDR's political capital.

Explanation:

The court packing scandal refers to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempt in 1937 to expand the number of justices in the Supreme Court in order to secure favorable rulings for his New Deal programs. Roosevelt proposed a bill that would have allowed him to appoint up to six additional judges to the court. However, the bill did not pass, and the attempt was widely criticized as an abuse of executive power.

This scandal affected the behavior of both the courts and Roosevelt's efforts. The Supreme Court began leaning in support of the New Deal even before Congress considered the bill, as two conservative justices changed their views. The court's shift can be attributed to the fear of court-packing and the need to maintain its independence. Additionally, the scandal damaged Roosevelt's political capital, as many saw his attempt as unconstitutional and an overreach of presidential power.