What was the major result of the war between prussia and austria?

1. Congress Party was founded primarily to promote nationalist goals.

2. Both Nigeria and Pakistan gained independence from Britain in the 1940s.

3. The genocide in Rwanda resulted from conflict between an ethnic majority and minority.

4. India - Jawaharlal Nehru.

5. Palestinian refugees' desire to return obstructs peace with Israel.

6. The passage illustrates the rise of radical Islamic fundamentalism in the Middle East.

7. Darfur refugees are fleeing conflict between Tutsis and Hutus.

8. Malaysia has largely avoided conflict due to ethnic or religious diversity.

9. Rhodesia differed as it declared independence to preserve white minority rule.

10. Similarity between Algeria and Nigeria: both faced periods of religious conflict.

11. Bengalis successfully separated from another country to form their own nation.

12. The most serious "cloud" referred to by Nehru was conflict caused by partition.

13. Turmoil in the region was caused by Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.

14. The passage describes Iran's Islamic Revolution movement.

15. Struggles for independence in Angola and Zaire were strongly influenced by the Cold War.

Certainly! Here are the answers to your questions:

Which of the following was founded primarily to promote nationalist goals?

Answer: C. the Congress Party

What is one similarity between Nigeria and Pakistan?

Answer: D. both countries gained independence from Britain in the 1940s

The genocide in Rwanda resulted from a long conflict between:

Answer: B. an ethnic majority and minority

Which name belongs in the empty cell. India - _____?

Answer: B. Jawaharlal Nehru

What is one ongoing obstacle to peace between Israel and Palestinian Arabs?

Answer: B. Palestinian refugees want to return to the land they left in Israel

What ongoing issue in the Middle East does this passage illustrate?

Answer: B. the rise of radical Islamic fundamentalism

These women and children from Darfur are refugees from a conflict between:

Answer: C. Tutsis and Hutus

Which of the following nations has largely managed to avoid serious conflict resulting from ethnic or religious diversity?

Answer: A. Malaysia

How did Rhodesia differ from all other African nations that declared independence in the 1960s?

Answer: D. It declared independence in order to preserve white minority rule

What is one similarity between Algeria and Nigeria?

Answer: D. Both faced periods of religious conflict and violence

Which ethnic group was successful in their attempt to separate from another country and form their own nation?

Answer: B. Bengalis

At the time this speech was given, what was the most serious of the "clouds" referred to by Nehru?

Answer: B. Conflict caused by partition

What event caused turmoil in this region during the time period indicated on the map?

Answer: C. Iraq invaded Kuwait

What movement is described in the passage above?

Answer: C. Iran's Islamic Revolution

The struggles for independence in both Angola and Zaire were strongly influenced by:

Answer: C. Cold War

Answer: A night of looting and destroying Jewish homes, business and synagogues.

Context/details:

In November, 1938, there was rampant destruction of Jewish-owned businesses and synagogues and violence against Jewish people.  This occurred on the night of November 9 going on into November 10, 1938, and was called "Kristallnacht," or "The Night of Broken Glass."   It was public violence by masses of people, not a specific campaign ordered by the Nazi regime. However, Nazi officials did tell police and firefighters to do nothing -- to let the violence and destruction occur.  The next day, Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi minister of propaganda, said that this sort of eruption against the Jews was natural and understandable.  He said:  "It is an intolerable state of affairs that within our borders and for all these years hundreds of thousands of Jews still control whole streets of shops, populate our recreation spots and, as foreign apartment owners, pocket the money of German tenants, while their racial comrades abroad agitate for war against Germany."

In the days after Kristallnacht, the Nazi government said that the Jewish community itself was responsible for all the damage and destruction, and imposed enormous fines against the Jewish community.  They also arrested more than 30,000 Jewish men and sent them to concentration camps which were built to incarcerate Jews and any others that the Nazis perceived to be enemies of the German state.

The correct answer is:

B. 1783

Explanation:

The Treaty of Paris formally ended the American Revolution and was signed on September 3, 1783, by John Adams, Benjamin Franklin and John Jay (as US representatives) and David Hartley (as King Charles III representative). This document recognized the independence of the 13 Colonies and ensured peace through 10 articles which gave benefits to both countries, and limited the boundaries of the United States of America and the British North America.

Answer:

The uprising of East Germany in 1953;

More than 50,000 employees demonstrated in soviet however, the army attacked them and ended the protest

The revolution of the Hungarian in 1956;

When Imre Nagy took over power, he tried to introduce new reforms however the red army crushed his changes, and because of this he was executed

1908 Prague spring;

Alexander Dubcek introduced it after he had gained power and brought he democratic reforms; however, the soviet sent troop that ended his democratic reforms.

SOVIET COMMUNISM VS. CHINESE COMMUNISMThe Soviet Union and China are the two important states in the world history that practiced a form of communism. However, communism in the Soviet Union collapsed while it still survives in China. What were the reasons: what caused the collapse in the Soviet Union and why has the Chinese communist-party state has been more durable than the Soviet Union s?The Soviet communism ignored basic human desires like desires to own property and to express your opinions freely. Under communism, there were no free elections, no freedom of thought, and no freedom of speech. Communism bounded to create a surreal society in which people keep their thoughts to themselves being tied to the official ideology in public. Consequently, human desires and freedom were suppressed. On the contrary, the aim of Soviet communism was to increase the satisfaction of human desires. Then, how could it be that the communist regime in the Soviet Union achieved the opposite? In the former Soviet Union, every means of production was state-owned. Every thing you produced, everything you did was for the sake of state. The communists in Russia were mistaken by the belief that abolishing private ownership would lead to a higher economic growth. Yet, if people do not own their means of production, they have no incentive to be efficient or innovative. Hence, many sectors in Russia reflected inefficient use of work force. Labor productivity was low and work discipline was weak. A Soviet saying of the time describes the situation very well: we pretend to work, they pretend to pay us. There was a very low level of inequality. Every one got almost the same wage regardless of how skilled they were, or how hard they worked. Why should people be more efficient when they do not gain from such efficiency? The Soviet Union also couldn t develop technologically. Why should the people be interested in trying or developing a new technology when all get the same salary anyway? With the undeveloped technology, industrialization process could not proceed. The USSR fell behind the information technology, started to fell behind the Western powers. Gorbachev recognized that the USSR was falling apart, and whole system had to be transformed as soon as possible to catch up with the West. Democratization was uncontrollable because a serious economic decline had begun. As Marx said, If relations of production did not follow forces of production, the system was doomed to fall apart.

Chinese had a lesson from all of these. Chinese communism is very different from Soviet communism. Lenin believed that revolution should come from the proletariats, and therefore from the cities. Mao relied upon the support from peasantry. Peasantry was the revolutionary class and the base for a new society. He believed, unlike in the Soviet Union, revolution should come from the least developed part of the society, and then spread into the urban areas. Consequently, the Soviet peasantry has been wiped out, while the Chinese peasants were able to increase production. Also, the Chinese communists were able to get more support, especially from the peasantry, than the Soviet communists who came to power much more Quickly through an urban revolution. The association of Maoism and communism with national liberation is another answer for the question of how could communism survive in China. Unlike in Soviet Russia, there has been a political thought against imperialism to liberate China from the dependency of outsiders. With Mao s Cultural Revolution, China could adopt its tradition and values in the communist system. After death of Mao, his successor Deng Xiaoping came to power. He introduced free-market both to raise China out of poverty, and to keep Chinese Communist Party in power. Industrial reform has been more successful in China. It was because Deng s free-market policy had let all the factories gain great benefits. Deng s reform lead to a huge increase in both quality and quantity of the good available in the stores. While China has created important economic zones, Russians were suspicious that the Western firms were trying to exploit them by turning the USSR some kind of a colony from which they could gather raw materials. As a result, the political legitimacy of communism in China was strengthened by the country s economic development. To conclude, the failure of communism in the Soviet Union was inevitable because of the economic decline and too much rapid political change. Chinese succeeded to associate communism and Chines nationalism, Maoism, and their enduring traditions and values. Above all, they could satisfy humans material by adopting free-market policy to the communist-party state and making a successful economic and industrial development.

Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and Woodrow Wilson each had distinct approaches to imperialism, ranging from military intervention to economic influence and moral diplomacy.

Theodore Roosevelt's imperial policies, often summarized by his motto "speak softly, and carry a big stick," emphasized military power and strategic expansion. He was instrumental in the construction of the Panama Canal and enforced the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, asserting the right of the US to intervene in Latin America to preserve stability and order.

William Howard Taft followed a policy known as "Dollar Diplomacy," which aimed to extend American influence by encouraging investment in Latin American countries and China.

Rather than relying solely on military intervention, Taft's approach sought to create economic dependencies that would benefit both the US and the target nations.

Woodrow Wilson's approach to imperialism was initially more idealistic, promoting self-determination and democracy, encapsulated in his "Moral Diplomacy." However, he still deployed military forces in Latin America to protect American interests, as seen in interventions in Mexico, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic.

The major factors that drove US imperialism included the desire for new markets, access to natural resources, and strategic military locations, combined with the belief in American cultural and racial superiority.

Answer:

A. Spread diseases

Explanation:

The Colombian exchange is a process that took place between the 15th and 16th centuries, when agricultural products and other foods from the New World (the American continent) were discovered in the Old World (Europe, Africa and Asia) and vice versa. broad also includes technological advances, demographics and even diseases.

Answer:

The two main combatants in the brief Persian Gulf War were the United States and Iraq.

Explanation:

The Gulf War, which took place between August 2, 1990 and February 28, 1991, was a conflict between a 34 large American-led UN coalition and Iraq led by Saddam Hussein.

The Gulf War began when Iraq, under Saddam Hussein, invaded neighboring Kuwait to secure oil sources in August 1990. This prompted the UN to intervene and the United States, with President George H.W. Bush at the forefront, to take the lead regarding military operations, which after a month of battle defeated the Iraqi forces following a prolonged and prior airborne bombing campaign that began on January 17, 1991. US casualties were historically few for a land war, while the Iraqis were significant.

The statements are important to historical essays as they prepare readers for the evidence present in an essay.

A history essay, often known as a thesis essay, will present an argument or claim regarding one or more historical events and will provide evidence, arguments, and references to back up that assertion. The text must explain to the reader why the assertion or argument is made in the manner that it is.

Information provided in a legal investigation to support a claim is referred to as evidence, exhibit, testimony, or proof. Any information provided as evidence, whether from documents, records from other sources, or information provided by witnesses. In a trial, hearsay evidence is not permitted.

To learn more about evidences here:

https://brainly.com/question/6764645

#SPJ3

The statements in historical essays are crucial as they prepare readers for the evidence (B), not necessarily to signal argumentation (A), prevent counterclaims (C), or enable paraphrasing (D). The correct option is  B. Prepare readers for the evidence presented in an essay

The statements in historical essays are important primarily because they serve to prepare readers for the evidence presented in the essay (B). By providing a thesis statement or a clear indication of the argument being made, the author establishes the direction and focus of the essay, helping readers understand what evidence will be discussed and how it will be interpreted within the context of the argument.

While historical essays may indeed include arguments rather than mere explanations, the primary purpose of these introductory statements is not necessarily to signal that the essay will be argumentative (A).

Similarly, while the statements may help prevent certain counterclaims by framing the argument in a particular way, their main function is not to ensure that no counterclaims can be made (C).

Additionally, while these statements may involve paraphrasing sources to some extent, their primary function is not to enable paraphrasing instead of direct quoting (D).

In summary, these statements are crucial because they set the stage for the evidence and argumentation to follow, guiding readers through the author's interpretation of historical events or phenomena.

The correct option is  B. Prepare readers for the evidence presented in an essay

The United States gained significant influence in post-war peace negotiations due to its crucial contributions during World War I and its rise as a predominant world power, which allowed it to shape the post-war order at the Versailles Peace Conference and beyond.

The event that likely gave the United States more influence in post-war peace negotiations was its pivotal role in World War I. The key contributions of U.S. troops and U.S. dollars were instrumental in the outcome of the war, which in turn gave America a significant seat at the negotiating table at the Versailles Peace Conference. President Woodrow Wilson, viewed as an international hero, and his appointee, Thomas W. Lamont, played central roles in the negotiations. These factors, combined with the U.S. emerging as a predominant world power, ensured that the United States had a powerful voice in shaping the post-war world.

The influence of the U.S. continued into the interwar period and World War II, through its involvement in disarmament movements and various international agreements aimed at promoting peace and preventing future conflicts. The United States' transformation from an isolationist country to an active global leader is evident in its foreign policy and participation in international diplomacy, as it began to set the de facto global rules of engagement.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is true that several Iranian students went of the American embassy situated in Tehran and took into hostage which was nearly more than 60 American students. The cause of the decision is to allow the deposition of Shah who was expelled from his country a few months earlier before he made his way to the United States

However, the hostage was not all about Shah, however a way of revolution for students of declaring a break with the past as well as ending the interference of its affairs with the Americans. It was also a way of raising their international profile of revolutionary’s.

Answer:

1 and 3.

Explanation:

Economic depression and Germany's defeat in World War I, are the right answers.

Nazi propaganda was apprehended at the time when workers lost their jobs due to bank failure and shut down of companies and the middle classes were frightened with poverty. This was the time of the Great Economic Depression in which Nazism became popular in Germany. Moreover, the humiliating Treaty of Versailles created a call to retaliate of the loss of the First World War and restore the old fame of Germany.

A renewed interest communism, a rise in political revolution and an increase in self-destruction  bombing were global effects terrorism in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.

self-destruction bombing is an act in which an individual personally delivers and detonates explosives in order to cause the greatest amount of damage while also killing.

Iinjuring anyone within range of the explosion, with the majority of victims being unsuspecting civilians.

Thus, option B, C and E are correct.

For more details about  self-destruction bombing, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2951708

#SPJ2

Answer:

A and E!! I just took the test!!

Explanation:

The best description of NATO's military structure during the Cold War is that member countries collectively formed strategies and participated in defense plans, with the United States playing a significant but not exclusive leadership role.

The military structure of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) during the Cold War can best be described as a collective security arrangement where member countries collectively agreed upon mutual defense strategies and had input into NATO's military maneuvers. While the United States did play a leading role within NATO due to its significant military resources, it did not lead the organization exclusively. Member nations, including those from Southern Europe, were not prevented from taking leadership roles. Greece and Turkey joined NATO in 1952, demonstrating that southern European countries were indeed incorporated into the alliance's leadership and strategic planning. Option B is the best answer: Member countries had input into NATO's military strategies. In stark contrast to NATO's cooperative framework, the Soviet Union blocked Western military influence in Eastern Europe by forming the Warsaw Pact and exerting control over its satellite states.

Final answer:

The military structure of NATO during the Cold War was characterized by member countries having input into military strategies, rather than being led exclusively by the United States.

Explanation:

The best description of the military structure of NATO during the Cold War is that member countries had input into NATO's military strategies. This aligns with option B) Member countries had input into NATO's military strategies. While the United States played a leading role within NATO, it was not the exclusive leader, as other member states also contributed to military strategy and decision-making. NATO was founded on the principle of collective defense, as stipulated in Article 5 of the NATO Treaty, meaning that an attack on one member was considered an attack on all. This required a level of cooperation and joint strategy among the member nations. Moreover, NATO included not just Western European nations and the United States, but also expanded to incorporate countries from Southern and Eastern Europe, such as Greece, Turkey, and later on, some former Soviet states. The assertion that southern European countries were prevented from leading roles, or that the Soviet Union directly blocked NATO's attempts to strengthen militarily, do not accurately represent the structure and dynamics of NATO during this period.