Answer:
The answer is:
It was "invaded," or "reoccupied" by China in 1950.
Explanation:
In 1950, the People´s Liberation Army entered Tibet and established Chinese control again. Since then, it is considered a province of the People´s Republic of China. Tibet enjoys a rich and old culture that is clearly different from Han culture. It was a territorial gain of the Qing dynasty, the last dynasty, it isn´t an ancient Chinese territory.
Who defended the Alamo?
A small band of Texan revolutionaries
A small band of Spanish missionaries
A small band of Mexican soldiers
Answer:
The right answere here is : "A small band of Texan revolutionaries."
Explanation:
Answer:
a
Explanation:
This British theatre artist made his reputation between the wars at the Old Vic in London, where he broke with traditional staging by interpreting classic dramas imaginatively and developing unique production concepts, including presenting Shakespeare in modern dress.
Answer:
Tyrone Guthrie is the correct answer.
Explanation:
He was British theatrical director and is well known for his realistic approach to the modern and Shakespearean drama that led to the revival of interest in the traditional theatre. He studied at the University of Oxford and made his debut as the manager of Oxford Repertory Company. He also worked as director and announcer for the BBC. He was one of the first writers who wrote plays suitable for radio performance and experimented with different approaches to the traditional theatre while working as the director of the production at the Festival Theatre, Cambridge.
Although American artists were an ocean apart from Europe, some visited and many adopted the artistic styles of the faraway continent. Using formal analysis, can you identify the style of these eighteenth- and nineteenth-century American artworks?
Trying to create a uniquely American style.
American artists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries were influenced by European styles such as Realism, Romanticism, and the classical styles of ancient Greek art. Realists depicted life as it was, Romantics emphasised emotion and nature, while Greek styles pursued the ideal human form.
Explanation:During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, American artists were heavily influenced by several dominant styles in Europe. These included the artistic and literary movement of Realism, the Romanticism, and the classical styles of ancient Greece.
Realism was an important movement during the nineteenth century. Realists chose to depict life as it was, with an unflinching focus on the contemporary world around them. They often depicted scenes of the countryside, as well as the gritty reality of burgeoning urban centers. Artists like John Sloan and George Luks epitomized this style.
The Romanticism movement began in response to industrialization in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Romantic artists valued emotion and imagination, often focusing on nature and the ordinary person as subjects. They strove to emphasize the beauty and power of nature, often lamenting the negative impacts of cities and industrial development.
Finally, the influence of ancient Greek art was also significant. Greek artists of the Classical Age pursued a uniquely realistic style, aiming to depict the ideal human form in their art. This style greatly influenced European Renaissance artists and, in turn, American artists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Learn more about Artistic Influences here:https://brainly.com/question/39438541
#SPJ11
The prices of slaves in antebellum america rose and fell along with the price of what?
Answer:
Price of cotton
Explanation:
The prices of slaves in Antebellum America rose and fell along with the price cotton because most slave labour were used in the production of cotton production. Therefore, the rise in the price of cotton causes an increase in the demand of slaves and when cotton price falls, the demand for slaves also decreases.
The wealthy planter of cotton ensured that slave property was exempt from taxation.
Cotton has a long growing season. Slaves plowed the land in March, seeded in early April, and had to chop away the surrounding grasses once the plants began to grow. Then in August, the four-month long picking season began.
More than 2,000 African-American men held public office during Reconstruction. They were elected into positions at all levels of government, including the –, the U.S. Senate, and as governor of –. This represented a fundamental shift in power in the –
Reconstruction witnessed over 2,000 African American men participating in governance across various levels, including Hiram Revels and Blanche K. Bruce as U.S. Senators. Their involvement led to impactful changes like the establishment of Southern public schools, although these gains were largely reversed after Reconstruction ended.
Explanation:During Reconstruction, more than 2,000 African American men were elected to public office at all levels of government, marking a significant transformation in American politics. Hiram Revels and Blanche K. Bruce were notable figures who served as United States Senators from Mississippi. This period saw African Americans holding a variety of positions, including those in the U.S. Senate, state legislatures, and local governmental roles such as school board commissioners, justices of the peace, and sheriffs. The participation of African Americans in government was followed by positive reforms, including the establishment of public school systems in the South, and the involvement of previously disenfranchised groups in the political process. However, the end of Reconstruction saw a rollback in these advancements, with many African American officeholders losing their positions, and a subsequent long hiatus before African Americans would once again participate in politics in significant numbers.
Final answer:
More than 2,000 African-American men were elected to public office during Reconstruction, including positions such as the U.S. Senate and roles like governor. Notably, Hiram Revels and Blanche K. Bruce served as U.S. Senators from Mississippi, representing a fundamental shift in power dynamics in the South.
Explanation:
During the Reconstruction era, following the Civil War, there was a significant increase in the political engagement and empowerment of African Americans. This period saw a remarkable transformation in the South, with the election of over 2,000 African-American men to various levels of government, including both local and national offices. African Americans also took on roles as postmasters, customs officials, assessors, ambassadors, school board commissioners, county commissioners, and more. The public school system was established in the South, mental asylums and hospitals were opened to all, and efforts were made to encourage industrial development and internal improvements. Despite facing considerable danger and violence from groups like the Klan, African American politicians persisted in their roles. Educational advancements among African Americans during this time also played a crucial role, as many of the elected officials, including Revels and Bruce, were well-educated, which was a significant factor in their rise to high offices. The presence of African Americans in government during Reconstruction marked a significant, though temporary, shift in American politics and society.
Unethical corporate behavior would have no negative impact on a community if it were to lead to an economic decline.
Unethical corporate behavior would have no negative impact on a community if it were to lead to an economic decline is false.
Explanation:
An economic decline is in all manners a negative trait irrespective of what actions it has surfaced through. Unethical corporate behavior, in the first place, can be deemed to be a negative activity responsible for the loss and eventual decline of the market, leading it to an overall economic decline.
It is because of certain unethical corporate practices followed by only a few players that are a part of the market, the entire market suffers and pays the cost.
President washington signed into law the judiciary act of 1789. Name this law
Answer:
An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States
Explanation:
Judiciary Act of 1789, titled "An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States," President George Washington signed into law on September 24, 1789. The Judiciary Act of 1789 recognizes the structure of the federal court system.
Answer:
Feb 1791
Explanation:
How is a world war different from a standard war ?
Answer:
When you say a "standard war" you refer to a local or localized armed conflict within a small geographical space, probably between two countries. A "world war" means a violent conflict with the participation of many actors fought in war theaters in different parts of the globe simultaneously.
Explanation:
Final answer:
World War I was a total war, involving modern weapons and impacting global power dynamics.
Explanation:
World War I was different from a standard war in that it was the first industrialized war with the use of modern weapons like tanks, airplanes, machine guns, and poison gas. It was considered a total war, involving every level of society, with no restrictions on weapons or targets.
The war affected daily life in unprecedented ways, transformed national boundaries, and had a lasting impact on geopolitics and global power dynamics.
World War I was a truly global conflict fought on multiple fronts, involving nations from nearly every continent, resulting in millions of military and civilian casualties.
What year did Gavrilo princip shoots archduke franz ferdinand in sarajevo
Answer: 1914
Explanation:
How does the quote below give motive to settlement affected the early communities in those regions.
“No people can be truly happy, [even] under the greatest enjoyments of civil liberties, if [deprived] of the Freedom of their conscience as to their religious profession and worship.”
– Pennsylvania Charter of Liberties, authored by William Penn in 1701
Answer:
The message conveyed here is that religious freedom is the most important of all human freedoms. If men are impeded from worshipping in the way their conscience dictates, then they can´t be truely free nor happy.
Explanation:
What does Barton do when Wilson tells him about the sick friend and ask for money??
Barton went to the druggist shop to get medicines for the sick person so that he could be treated.
Explanation:
Barton is a worker of Carson but in unemployed at that particular time and was going through poor conditions. But when one Wilson goes to visit Barton and tells him about his sick friend and asks for help, Barton takes whatever he had for dinner to Carson and his sick friend and then later visits a druggist store to buy medicines for the guy who is Wilson's friend and is sick so that he could be treated.
Learn more about worker here:
https://brainly.com/question/30822208
#SPJ6
When Wilson tells Barton about his sick friend and asks for money, Barton responds by giving Wilson $20.This action signifies Barton's willingness to help a friend in need, showing compassion and support during a difficult time.
When Wilson informs Barton about his sick friend and requests financial assistance, Barton demonstrates empathy and generosity by giving Wilson $20. This action signifies Barton's willingness to help a friend in need, showing compassion and support during a difficult time.
In the context of the story "The Lie" by Kurt Vonnegut, when Wilson tells Barton about his sick friend and asks for money, Barton responds with a lie. Barton lies to Wilson, telling him that he has no money to spare.
This is despite the fact that Barton actually does have money; he chooses to lie to avoid giving any to Wilson. This response highlights Barton's dishonesty and the theme of deception within the story.
In the short story "The Furnished Room" by O. Henry, Barton reacts to Wilson's request for money to help his sick friend by initially refusing to lend him any.
However, Barton eventually relents and gives Wilson a dollar, despite being low on funds himself. This act of kindness contrasts sharply with Barton's earlier behavior, where he seemed indifferent to Wilson's plight.
______ is the organized, collective fighting involving at least one political unit that seeks political or economic control over a territory or other important resource against another political unit or social group.
Answer:
The answer is war.
Explanation:
War involves collective fighting and it aims at territorial expansion, economic dominace or control over a resource. Ther can also be wars of survival.
Critical Thinking: Has the presidency become too powerful in comparison to Congress? Explain your answer.
Answer:
From the founding of the American state until the beginning of the 20th century, the US Congress, i.e., legislature was the dominant branch of power. However, at the beginning of the 20th century, and especially in the 30s, the main trend in the development of the state mechanism was the strengthening of the role of the executive branch in it. This was due to the flexible redistribution of powers between the legislative and executive powers, mainly through the self-restriction of Congress in favor of the federal government.
Strengthening the role of the president and his administration was observed. The most striking manifestation of this trend is the expansion of the prerogatives of the American president. Along with the exclusive powers of the president, which are prescribed in the Constitution, the US Congress in the 20th century transferred delegated powers to him and legislated them.
The growing number of economic, social, and political problems of the 20th century required an effective nationwide leadership, which the Americans found in the person of the President. The US presidency did not usurp power - to a large extent, this power was "presented" to the President by Congress, which in difficult times tends to delegate its responsibility and some executive powers.
US Presidents became the main initiators of large-scale reforms of American society: The New Deal by F. Roosevelt, The Great Society by L. Johnson, Reaganomics.
Given the difficult political circumstances, the US Constitution provided the president with formal means of interaction in lawmaking with Congress. In addition, Congress expanded the legislative powers of the president (and federal institutions subordinate to him) by granting him the right to issue executive orders having the force of law.
Explanation:
Select the three topics that are too broad in the list below. Rocky Mountain Goats Legends about Robin Hood Birds Solomon's Temple Astronomy Weather Forecasting How Steel Is Made Animals in the Bible Egyptian Pyramids Kangaroos The Bible Hunting the Whale
Answer:
The three topics that are too broad in the list are:
Birds
Astronomy
The Bible
Explanation:
The three topics that are too broad are Birds, Astronomy and The Bible since these three topics have multiple divisions and sections that could be a topic by themselves, besides the other options specify a kind of group such as "Rocky Mountain" Goats, Legends about "Robin Hood", "Solomon's" Temple, Weather "Forecasting" "How" Steel Is Made, Animals "in the Bible", "Egyptian" Pyramids, Kangaroos could be considered broad because it is just a word and it may seem very general but in fact it is already a category in the animal world and finally, Hunting "the Whale"
Answer:
im pretty sure the awnser is
Birds
Astronomy
The Bible
Explanation: tell me your opinion if I am right or not.
Some states no longer allow the death penalty. Why do you think the death penalty should be allowed or not be allowed? Should there be exceptions to the rule?
The acceptance or abolition of the death penalty varies between different states in the US, and internationally. Factors at play include potential incorrect accusations, bias towards racial minorities, societal views on the harshness of punishment, and the type of crime committed. Execution of those with intellectual disabilities or underaged offenders is not permitted.
Explanation:The death penalty is a controversial topic with differing viewpoints. Some states in the United States have abolished the death penalty, believing it goes against the US Constitution's prohibition of 'cruel and unusual punishments.' Some of the concerns against the death penalty include potential incorrect judgement leading to execution of innocents, bias towards racial minority defendants, and the belief that life imprisonment serves as a more effective criminal punishment.
However, some states have maintained the death penalty, making revisions to execution procedures in order to conform to constitutional standards. Certain types of criminal acts, such as premeditated murder, qualify as capital crimes and justify death penalty in these states. There are restrictions though, such as exclusion of defendants with intellectual disabilities or those under eighteen.
In the international context, many countries, including all of Europe except Belarus, have abolished the death penalty, choosing instead life imprisonment without parole. Ultimately, the presence or absence of the death penalty can depend on societal perceptions of cruelty and unusual punishment, as these standards tend to evolve over time.
Learn more about Death Penalty here:https://brainly.com/question/31124393
#SPJ2
The debate on the death penalty encompasses ethical, legal, and practical considerations, with arguments against its use highlighting issues like wrongful convictions, racial bias, and the irreversible nature of execution. Supporters argue for retribution and deterrence, yet evidence suggests life imprisonment may be a fairer and more humane alternative. The Supreme Court has also narrowed the application of the death penalty in recent years.
The debate on whether the death penalty should be abolished is complex and involves various ethical, legal, and practical considerations. Advocates for its abolition point to the irreversibility of execution and the risk of wrongful convictions, exemplified by over 130 people being released from death row due to new evidence. High-profile cases and state decisions, such as the moratorium on executions in California, highlight the contentious nature of capital punishment. The United States stands out among Western democracies for its continued use of the death penalty. Arguments against its use include the lack of dependability in application to meet due process standards, its non-deterrent effect, racial bias in sentencing, and the moral argument that as society advances, we should move away from physically harming individuals as a form of punishment.
On the other hand, supporters of the death penalty cite retribution, deterrence, and cost-saving arguments, though evidence for deterrence is inconclusive, and cost analyses often show that life imprisonment is less expensive due to the lengthy and complex legal process of executing someone. Furthermore, Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the application of the death penalty and prohibit its use on defendants with mental disabilities, those who were under eighteen when they committed the crime, and for crimes not resulting in death.
In conclusion, while some argue that certain heinous crimes warrant the death penalty, the myriad concerns about fairness, potential for irreversible error, moral objections, and international standards suggest that life imprisonment could be a more suitable and humane alternative. It preserves the possibility of rectification in cases of wrongful conviction and aligns with evolving societal values that reject intentional physical harm as punishment.
PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
The Roman church was definitely founded by Priscilla and Aquila.
True
or
False?
Answer: false
Explanation:
If I am not incorrect it was Jesus crust that founded the church
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
It was Jesus Christ
How to say my friend, John, he is funny, and nice. He is also strong and tall
in french. No Google translate
Answer:
mon ami John, il est drôle et gentil. Il est aussi fort et grand
Explanation:
hey we both got right
Answer: I hope this helps
Explanation:
English-How to say my friend, John, he is funny, and nice. He is also strong and tall
French- Comment dire mon ami, John, il est drôle et gentil. Il est aussi fort et grand
How did the invention of the telegraph impact American society? Select the two correct answers.
A.
Trains could travel at higher speeds in a safer manner.
B.
Moving out west became cheaper and much faster.
C.
Business owners in the West could stay in touch with eastern markets.
D.
Those who moved out west could communicate with family members in far-away cities.
E.
Miners could access gold and other metals that were deeper in the mines.
Answer:
The answers are:
C. Business owners in the West could stay in touch with eastern markets.
D. Those who moved out west could communicate with family members in far-away cities.
Explanation:
Answer:
C and D
Explanation:
Telegraph was developed by 2 different teams of researchers who were from Britain and the U.S. but the final improved touch added to it was by Samuel Morse a former painter who moved from Europe to America. The aim was to make communication faster and better. It also marked the beginning of Communication revolution in the 1800s.
Before the telegraph was invented the earlier methods of communications were drumbeats or smoke signals and semaphore (mostly used in railroads during the 1790s) these weren’t effective enough because they had limitations such as the weather and misinterpretation of the original message. So, when this mode of communication was invented it covered the whole American continent by 1861 and expanded even to Europe by 1866. Business community were also the beneficiary party of this invention as they were getting updated information faster. Western Union was the first company to make use of it. Families hadn't need to wait for months to receive messages from their loved ones.
shifted from the lower South to the upper South. was in Charleston, South Carolina remained, as it had been, primarily within the lower South. remained, as it had been, primarily within the upper South. shifted from the upper South to the lower South.
I think that the sentence is missing and I found it which is: prior to 1860, the center of economic power in the south.
The answer is: shifted from the upper south to the lower south.
Hope this helps.
What year was veterans day first celebrated as a national holiday
Answer:
1938
Explanation:
Veterans Day originated as "Armistice Day" on Nov. 11, 1919, the first anniversary of the end of World War 1. Congress passed a resolution in 1926 for an annual observance, and Nov. 11 became a national holiday beginning in 1938.
Veterans Day was first celebrated as a national holiday on November 11, 1954, expanding the commemoration from the original Armistice Day to honor all U.S. military veterans.
Veterans Day was first celebrated as a national holiday in the United States on November 11, 1954. Before that, the day was known as Armistice Day, commemorating the end of World War I. The transition to Veterans Day was made to honor all U.S. veterans, not just those who served in World War I. The significance of the day is to recognize and honor the courage and sacrifice of those who served in the military, and it stands as a reminder of the cost of war.
During President Clinton's 1996 reelection bid, he used a political strategy later termed "triangulation," where he adopted some of the most popular Republican policies like welfare reform, making his opponents' positions seem extreme among middle-class voters. T or F?
Answer:
The statement is true. During President Clinton's 1996 reelection bid, he used a political strategy later termed "triangulation," where he adopted some of the most popular Republican policies like welfare reform, making his opponents' positions seem extreme among middle-class voters.
Explanation:
Triangulation is a concept within politics which means that in basic political issues one seeks to find a third position between one's own and one that the opponent represents in order to be able to attract the often decisive group of voters in the political midfield.
The term triangulation was originally coined by Bill Clinton's former chief adviser DickMorris, as a way of describing his strategy to get Clinton re-elected as president in the 1996 election. Morris advocated a policy that was far more liberal with the Republican Party, while it differed from its own Democratic Party in traditional matters. Clinton was described as having used the method primarily when he began to receive weak support in Congress. The NAFTA free trade agreement of 1993 and the reform of social grants of 1996 are two examples of triangulation.
At the end of China Civil War, the United States refused to accept the Communist People's Republic of China as China's true government. What were the advantages of such a policy? What were the disadvantages? Do you agree with this decision? Why or Why not?
Answer:
Throughout Second World War, the US supported the government of Nationalist leader, Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek. It kept that support after the restart of the civil war following the Japanese surrender in 1945. Washington kept its backing up to the last months of the life of Chiang´s regime in China. Chiang was a Christian (Time magazine called him "the Christian Warrior of China" and a staunch anti-Communist, great merits to the American eyes. Advantages? American policy makers saw him as an ally that was the best option for American interests in China and Asia, and he was a sure asset in the fight against communism. Disadvantages? That vision did not take into account the real balance of forces and circumstances in China, because the Communists were a powerful player not only in the war but in domestic politics; they enjoyed Soviet support. In 1949, Chiang and the remnants of his army had to run to the shelter of Taiwan. The US policy failed and there was a witch-hunt to find "who lost China" in diplomatic circles. Was there a possibility of a significant rapprochement with the Communists of Mao Zedong? There is no clear answer, but the perspectives of such outcome were rather grim at that time.
Explanation:
What were the positive and negative effects of british rule on india
Answer:
There were many positive and negative effects of British Rule in India.
Explanation:
The negative effects were that Indian people did not have power or say in the political decisions of the country. India did not have identity of tis own. They used divide and rule to rule over the country for around 200 years. The country which was so rich in its culture had become a mere slave to the Britishers.
Positive effects can be that there was an increase in production of goods. There was better hygiene amongst people and there were vaccinations and medicines available, which led to increase in population.
For most of the Soviet era, alochol was a tremendous source of revenue for the Soviet state, which exercised a monopoly on alcohol's production and distribution. For example, in 1979 the Soviet state derived a whopping 25.4 billion rubles in indirect taxes from the sale of alcoholic beverages, an amount greater than what was paid in income tax.
Answer: true
Explanation: the alcoholism in that time was the major cause in the soviet society of the high rates of child abuse, self damage, divorces, absenteeism, and accidents on the job. Also it contributed to the rise of mortality rates particularly among Soviet males that was detected in the 1970s. Alcohol was one of the initial catalysts of that time.
Socially conscious journalists who dramatized the need for reform were known as
Answer:
Muckrakers
During the Progressive Era in the United States from the 1890s - 1920s the progressive and open-minded journalists were called muckrakers. They would usually expose institutions and their leaders as corrupt. Sparking investigating journalism and they had big audiences in many magazines. Magazines were very important for them since they were not very expensive and were looking for talented writers.
What is the relationship between the principles of federalism and the separation of powers
Answer:
The relationship between the principles of federalism and the separation of powers is that they both split the power between national and state governments.
Explanation:
Final answer:
The principles of federalism and the separation of powers are closely related in the U.S. government system, working together to create a system of checks and balances.
Explanation:
The principles of federalism and the separation of powers are closely related in the U.S. government system. Federalism refers to the division of powers between the national government and the state governments, while the separation of powers refers to the division of powers among the three branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. These principles work together to create a system of checks and balances, where each branch has its own responsibilities and limitations, preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful.
For example, the federal government has the power to regulate interstate commerce, while the state governments have the power to regulate intrastate commerce. This division of powers allows for a balanced distribution of authority between the levels of government.
Ap us history "If any one proposition could command the universal assent of mankind, we might expect it would be this:________
a) that the government of the Union, though limited in its powers, is supreme within its sphere of action.
b) This would seem to result necessarily from its nature.
c) It is the government of all; its powers are delegated by all; it represents all, and acts for all.
d) Though any one State may be willing to control its operations, no State is willing to allow others to control them.
e) The nation, on those subjects on which it can act, must necessarily bind its component parts.…
f) Although, among the enumerated powers of government, we do not find the word ‘bank’ or ‘incorporation,’ we find the great powers to lay and collect taxes; to borrow money; to regulate commerce; to declare and conduct a war; and to raise and support armies and navies…
g) a government, intrusted with such ample powers…must also be instructed with ample means for their execution.…
We are unanimously of opinion, that the law passed by the legislature of Maryland, imposing a tax on the Bank of the United States, is unconstitutional and void." Chief Justice John Marshall, McCullough v. Maryland, 1819
Answer and Explanation:
a) that the government of the Union, though limited in its powers, is supreme within its sphere of action.
The text above expresses ideas that can be understood if we think of the debates about the relationship between the federal government and the states governments.
Why did a riot break out at the Democratic National Convention in 1968? Check all the boxes that apply. a) Police responded violently to the protestors. b) Police defended themselves against the use of tear gas. c) Protestors became aggressive in expressing their views. d) Protestors were angry about the war in Vietnam.
Answer:
a c d
Explanation:
e2020
The riot at the 1968 Democratic National Convention was a result of violent a) Police responded violently to the protestors, c) Protestors became aggressive in expressing their views. d) Protestors were angry about the war in Vietnam, and heightened tensions within the convention center regarding the adoption of an antiwar platform.
The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago became a historical flashpoint as a result of numerous factors leading to significant riots. The options that apply to the question are: a) Police responded violently to protestors. c) Protestors became aggressive in expressing their views. d) Protestors were angry about the war in Vietnam.
Mayor Richard Daley's administration prepared for a large number of protestors by mobilizing a strong police and National Guard presence. The initial protests were peaceful, but tensions escalated as police issued stern threats and clashes began at the behest of Mayor Daley's orders to maintain law and order. The protesters were a mix of antiwar activists, some advocating peacefully for the DNC to adopt an antiwar platform, and others who sought to incite violence to discredit the party. These confrontations escalated into violent clashes that were broadcast on national television, contributing to a sense that America was in a state of chaos.
In a 2009 interview, while defending his foreign policies, President Barack Obama objected to comparisons between the war in Afghanistan and the war in Vietnam. Obama’s attempt to avoid a comparison to Vietnam is not unique, as many Americans now view the Vietnam War as a mistake. Is this opinion supported by historical realities? For your essay, develop an argument evaluating this contemporary view of the Vietnam War. In doing so, respond to the following questions: Why has the Vietnam War come to be viewed in a negative light? Is this negative view warranted? In your answer, consider topics such as: why the United States got involved in the war, the experience of fighting in the war, the reasons that the U.S. withdrew, and the effects of that withdrawal. Use examples from your studies as evidence to support your answer.
gosh I need help please
Answer:
As President Obama announced he's sending more troops to ... on critics who made comparisons between the current situation and the war in Vietnam. nations that recognizes the legitimacy of our action," Obama said during his U.S. and coalition forces have been fighting in Afghanistan for more than
2,300 of them American
Explanation:
hope this helps have a wonderful and blessed day
The US was involved in the Vietnam War as it did not want to cross Vietnam into Communism by sending troops to the nation.
What were the stages of US involvement in Vietnam war?Eisenhower sent American military advisers to South Vietnam to train state troops.Kennedy sent 3,000 military advisers, helicopters, and American pilots to South Vietnam.Johnson urged Congress to pass the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and send more American troops to Vietnam.The Tet Offensive pressured the majority of Americans to oppose the war.Nixon announced the Vietnamization plan, withdrawing US troops without appearing defeated.Thus, these were the reasons behind US involvement in the Vietnam War.
Learn more about the Vietnam War here:
https://brainly.com/question/893844
#SPJ2
Choose 2 religions (Christian/Buddhist/Hindu/Shinto/Islam) OR 2 denominations (Roman Catholic/Lutheran/Calvinist/Anabaptist/Orthodox; Sunni/Shi’as) and compare and contrast their influence on politics and/or society in Renaissance Era (approx. 1300-1650). Hint: You may need to look in Units 2 and 3 for information about some of these religions/denominations.
Answer:
Catholic Church
From the High Middle Ages until the mid sixteenth century, the Catholic Church was hegemonic in Western and Central Europe. The Pope had great political power, and kings sought his approval.
The influece of the Catholic Church in society was hegemonic too. Most people in the era were poor farmers who worked small plots of land, many of them in servitude, even if feudalism was weakening by the end of this period. Their lives revolved around work and church. However, most of them were illiterate, and could not read the Bible. They were subject to the teachings of the local catholic priests.
The Catholic church had direct political control over a region of central Italy known then as the Papal States. The pope raised armies and levied taxes, just like the king of any other state.
Calvinism
Calvinism originated in Switzerland, in the early to mid sixteenth century. The leader was Jon Calvin, a swiss theologian who opposed many of the aspects of the Catholic Church. He did missionary work in Switzerland and Italy, and a movement around his teachings began to form, especially in Geneve.
Calvinism argued for a strict life guided by the teachings of the bible. As other protestant denominations, it promoted literacy among its members so that each one of them could read the bible, as the bible was considered the only and direct source of theological wisdom.
Calvinism influenced the other denominations in Scotland, the Netherlands, Germany and Scandinavia. It also influenced the Puritans in England.