Answer:
I think the answer is A, but I'm not so sure.
Answer:
A. While both sides agree that texting while driving is dangerous,
many people aren't willing to make it illegal.
Explanation:
In this example, the speaker is indicating that both sides which take part in the discussion have found a common ground, that is to say, that texting while driving is dangerous. Based on this assertion, then the counter-argument is presented, which in this case represents a rebuttal to that assertion.
Which of the following is a good pre-reading question to ask yourself when you are presented with a business document?
A. Does my supervisor know about this?
B. Who is the audience?
C. Is this interesting?
D. What file should this go in?
Answer:
B. Who is the audience?
Explanation:
A good pre-reading question to ask yourself when you are presented with a business document is ''Who is the audience''.
Option B, 'Who is the audience?' is a good pre-reading question to ask yourself when you are presented with a business document.
How does word choice support an author's
purpose?
Answer:
With good word choice the author is able to create a mental picture for the reader, whether it's vivid adjectives or constant use of descriptive verbs.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Which positions of power and influence do you think would benefit from the inclusion of diverse members?
Answer:
I think seeing more diverse members would benefit the Judicial branch.
The correct answers are C) members of Congress and legislature and D) judges and justices.
The positions of power and influence that would benefit from the inclusion of diverse members are the members of Congress and legislature and judges and justices.
Congress would benefit so much with members that do not think the same. To create laws that benefit the most, diversity is key because different backgrounds, belief systems, education, race, culture, only increases the possibility of better laws for the country. The same happens with the Court, judges, and judicial. If the judicial system has diversity in thinking and perspective, judges and justices are going to have a broader mind to understand and resolve issues impartially.