Which is correct concerning the structure of the Georgia State Constitution? A It is unique because there is no bill of rights in it. B It is a short document that consists only of a preamble, a bill of rights, and a brief description of the three branches of government. C After the preamble, each piece of the government, including a bill of rights, is explained in its own section. D All parts of the constitution are written under one long section. Plz help!

Answer:

this isnt complete

Explanation:

Answer:

ensure America had the military munitions necessary to fight World War II.

Explanation:

Answer:

Gender disparity among developing nations are still one of the major problems that social services and communities face daily. Mostly, these are due to factors such as traditional and conservative belief systems which are faulty.

Explanation:

Gender disparity among developing nations are still one of the major problems that social services and communities face daily. Mostly, these are due to factors such as traditional and conservative belief systems which are faulty. Thank you for your question.

Answer:

The Constitution is one source of law. When something is done in violation of the Constitution it is "unconstitutional". Legal vocabulary aside, that term means exactly what it says: contrary to the Constitution. Because the Constitution is a source of law, everything that is unconstitutional is also illegal.

Explanation:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title.

"The correct answer to the question is that a provision in a state constitution that directly conflicts with the U.S. Constitution or federal law would be considered a violation of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution and establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the  supreme Law of the Land.  

This means that when state laws or state constitutions are in direct conflict with federal laws or the U.S. Constitution, the federal provisions will prevail.

For example, if a state were to pass a law or amend its constitution to deny a fundamental right protected by the U.S. Constitution, such as freedom of speech or the right to vote based on race, that state action would be invalidated by the federal courts because it violates the U.S.

Constitution. Similarly, if a state law or constitutional provision attempted to regulate an area exclusively under federal control, such as immigration or the coining of money, it would also be struck down as unconstitutional.

In summary, any state constitutional provision that conflicts with the U.S. Constitution or federal law would be a violation of the Supremacy Clause and would not be upheld in a court of law."

Answer:

D.) Brown v Board of Education

Explanation:

This case was important because the Supreme court ended up ruling that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. "Separate but unequal' is what they ruled.

Answer:

The right choice is:

(B) Lack of connection to previous European civilizations.

Explanation:

Such an statement is wrong and absurd. The Italian peninsula is where Rome was built and from where it evolved into the most  powerful and important empire of ancient Europe. Classical Roman and Greek cultures are the foundations of Western civilization. The rediscovery of classical culture was one of the main features of the Renaissance.

Answer:

c The author gives a sequenced list of the benefits of the Patriot Act.

Explanation:

i jus got it right

The problem-solution text structure is a way of organizing information that focuses on identifying a problem and then proposing a solution. The author begins by describing the problem, which in this case is the September 11 attacks. The author then discusses the solution, which is the Patriot Act. The author describes the provisions of the Patriot Act and how they are intended to prevent future terrorist attacks.

The author also discusses the benefits of the Patriot Act. The author argues that the Patriot Act has made the United States safer and has helped to prevent terrorist attacks. The author provides examples of how the Patriot Act has been used to catch and prosecute terrorists.

Finally, the author acknowledges some of the concerns that have been raised about the Patriot Act. The author argues that the benefits of the Patriot Act outweigh the risks. The author also argues that the Patriot Act has been implemented in a way that protects civil liberties.

Here is a more detailed explanation of the problem-solution text structure:

Problem: The author identifies the problem that they are addressing. In this case, the problem is the September 11 attacks.

Solution: The author proposes a solution to the problem. In this case, the solution is the Patriot Act.

Benefits: The author discusses the benefits of the solution. In this case, the benefits of the Patriot Act are that it has made the United States safer and has helped to prevent terrorist attacks.

To know more about Patriot Act.

https://brainly.com/question/30690583

#SPJ12

Answer:

C. Erechtheion

Explanation: it was known as the temple of Poseidon and Athena.

Answer:

Overview

The old and the new came into sharp conflict in the 1920s. While many Americans celebrated the emergence of modern technologies and less restrictive social norms, others strongly objected to the social changes of the 1920s.

In many cases, this divide was geographic as well as philosophical; city workers tended to embrace the cultural changes of the era, whereas those who lived in rural towns to traditional norms.

The Sacco and Vanzetti trial in Massachusetts and the Scopes trial in Tennessee revealed many Americans’ fears and suspicions about radical politics, and the ways in which new scientific theories might challenge traditional Christian beliefs.

Answer:

Iraq would generally be wealthier and would be a significant power in the region. If they allowed the annex of Kuwait

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Form their own ideas about their relationship with god

The leaders of the Great Awakening urged D. form their own ideas about their relationship to God.

The First Great Awakening divided many American settlers. On the one hand, it was an experience of connecting colonies. It led to the common sense of being American because it was the first major "national" event experienced by all colonies.

A revival movement aimed at purifying religion from the factual distraction and renewing our private beliefs in God. The movement was a response to the decline of religion and rising skepticism during the Enlightenment of the 18th century.

Click here for more information on First Great Awakening https://brainly.com/question/1143816

# SPJ2

Answer: His Commentaries on the Laws of England.

Born: July 10, 1723

Death: February 14, 1780

"William Blackstone was important because he was an English jurist, judge, and Tory politician of the eighteenth century, best known for writing the Commentaries on the Laws of England.

The Commentaries, published between 1765 and 1769, were divided into four volumes, each dealing with a different aspect of the law:

 1. The Rights of Persons: This volume dealt with the rights and duties of individuals, including the legal status of women and children, and the law of domestic relations.

2. The Rights of Things: This volume covered property law, including real and personal property, estates in land, and the acquisition of property.

3. Private Wrongs: This volume addressed civil procedure and remedies, including contracts, torts, and the court system.

4. Public Wrongs: This volume focused on criminal law, discussing crimes against the state, the prosecution of offenders, and the nature of punishment.

 His work remains a cornerstone of common law legal theory and practice."

Answer:

Texas was annexed by the United States in 1845 and became the 28th state. Until 1836, Texas had been part of Mexico, but in that year a group of settlers from the United States who lived in Mexican Texas declared independence. ... The annexation of Texas contributed to the coming of the Mexican-American War (1846-1848)

Explanation:

Texas was annexed by the United States in 1845 and became the 28th state. Until 1836, Texas had been part of Mexico, but in that year a group of settlers from the United States who lived in Mexican Texas declared independence. ... The annexation of Texas contributed to the coming of the Mexican-American War (1846-1848)

The U.S. was hesitant to annex Texas due to the threat of war with Mexico and the issue of slavery, which would have disturbed the balance between free and slave states.

Reasons for U.S. Reluctance to Annex Texas in 1836

The United States was hesitant to annex Texas in 1836 for several reasons. One significant concern was the potential for a war with Mexico, as Mexico had not recognized Texas's declaration of independence and considered the area part of its territory.

Another reason was related to the contentious issue of slavery; annexing Texas would mean adding more slave territory to the United States. This action would have angered abolitionists and upset the delicate balance between free and slave states in Congress, fueling tensions that could have led to a civil war.

Answer: Affirmative action in the United States is a set of laws, policies, guidelines, and administrative practices "intended to end and correct the effects of a specific form of discrimination" that include government-mandated, government-sanctioned and voluntary private programs.  

The critics of affirmative action point to a number of perceived failures in its policies—including the cost of the programs, the possibility of hiring less qualified candidates, and lack of historical progress in changing the representation of targeted groups.

Affirmative action seeks to redress historical discrimination by providing opportunities to disadvantaged minorities. It is supported by many for improving overall fairness, but critics argue it promotes inequality and overlooks disadvantaged individuals from non-minority groups.

Affirmative action is the active efforts by government or businesses to give special rights to minorities in hiring, promotion, or access to education to make up for past discrimination. This practice originated from the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Executive Order 11246, both aimed at prohibiting discrimination in employment and providing equal opportunity.

Contemporary philosophers such as James Rachels, Judith Jarvis Thomson, and Mary Anne Warren have all argued in favor of affirmative action. They believe that such policies help to correct historical imbalances and improve the overall fairness of the admission and hiring process, particularly for groups facing entrenched discrimination.

However, criticisms of affirmative action have arisen. Some critics express concern that the policy can inadvertently promote inequality, as it might lead to the belief that certain individuals were admitted or hired solely based on their race or gender rather than on their merit. Additionally, the policy has been criticized for potentially bypassing disadvantaged individuals from non-minority groups and favoring affluent members of minority groups instead.

https://brainly.com/question/39557953

#SPJ3

Answer:

In February 1898, Puerto Ricans had a lot to celebrate. After centuries of Spanish colonial rule, they had just become an independent part of Spain, complete with a Constitution and voting rights. But within only a few years, the U.S. would throw all that asunder, paving the way for Puerto Rico’s nonvoting territory status today. Some say that Puerto Rico should become a fully independent republic because there will be economic chaos and its citizens will die of hunger given that the land has no natural resources to sustain its population. But I personally think that they should because if they were given a chance and had the money and resources they need then they could prosper just like everyone else.

Explanation:

Sarah and Oveta Culp had great contribution in the war and also made convictions to strengthen the passing of equal rights.

Explanation:

One of the most important amendments which were passed by Texas was the amendments where the citizens of Texas were given the equal rights and opportunities in the country.

There would be no discrimination on the access of the rights and opportunities on the basis of sex, color, caste, creed and so on. On the passing of this amendment, some people like Oveta and Sarah had great contributions who had made convictions of equal rights. They also had contributions in the war also.

Answer:

One of the most important amendments which were passed by Texas was the amendments where the citizens of Texas were given the equal rights and opportunities in the country.

There would be no discrimination on the access of the rights and opportunities on the basis of sex, color, caste, creed and so on. On the passing of this amendment, some people like Oveta and Sarah had great contributions who had made convictions of equal rights. They also had contributions in the war also.

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

yes Nepal is in himalayas

Nepal is indeed in the Himalaya Mountains.

The Himalayas are a mountain range in South Asia which separates the plains of the Indian subcontinent from the Tibetan Plateau.

Nepal is a landlocked country in South Asia, located mainly in the Himalayas, and includes eight of the world's ten highest peaks, including Mount Everest, the highest point on Earth.

The country's terrain is mostly mountainous, with the highest point being the summit of Mount Everest at 8,848.86 meters (29,031.7 feet) above sea level.

The Himalayas play a crucial role in Nepal's culture, environment, and economy, influencing everything from agriculture to tourism.

Answer:

Through his newspaper, The Liberator, William Lloyd Garrison spoke out against slavery and for the rights of black Americans for 35 years. The tone of the paper was established in the first issue of the paper with Garrison's editorial entitled, "To the Public," in which he made the bold statement that he would "strenuously contend for the immediate enfranchisement of our slave population." In other words, not only would he crusade for the emancipation of slaves, he would also work to give freed slaves citizenship with the right to vote. And he would do so with determination. . .

Explanation:

Help it helps you

William Lloyd Garrison, a prominent abolitionist, spent a significant amount of time in Baltimore during the early 1830s. His time in the city played a crucial role in shaping and solidifying his views on slavery.

Witnessing the Harsh Realities of Slavery:

Garrison, during his stay in Baltimore, witnessed firsthand the brutalities and harsh conditions of slavery in the Southern states. Observing the daily lives of enslaved individuals and the inhumane treatment they endured had a profound impact on Garrison's perspective.

Interaction with Enslaved Individuals:

Garrison had direct interactions with enslaved individuals, hearing their stories and experiences. These personal encounters humanized the suffering caused by slavery and fueled his commitment to the abolitionist cause.

Encountering Anti-Abolitionist Sentiments:

Baltimore had a strong pro-slavery sentiment, and Garrison faced opposition and hostility from those who supported the institution. These encounters with opposition likely strengthened his resolve to advocate for the immediate and uncompromising abolition of slavery.

Learn more about William Lloyd Garrison

https://brainly.com/question/3764336

#SPJ3

Answer:

give tn3235 brianliest she is right.

Explanation:

Answer:

The ancient Olympics were as much a religious festival as an athletic event. The games were held in honor of the Greek god Zeus, and on the middle day of the games, 100 oxen would be sacrificed to him.

The Answers are

Destruction of railroad and telegraph lines

Burning buildings

Enslaved people escaping to the Union army Explanation:

Sherman's March painting depicts the Union Army's destruction of infrastructure, burning buildings, and enslaved people escaping to the army during the American Civil War.

The painting of Sherman's March primarily depicts the destruction brought by the Union Army during the American Civil War. It shows segments of the Union Army destroying railroad and telegraph lines, crucial infrastructures for the Confederate Army. The painting also depicts burning buildings, symbolic of the wide-scale destruction brought by the march. Enslaved people escaping to the army is another significant facet of the painting. These images together provide an illustrative portrayal of the significant historic event which was Sherman's March.

https://brainly.com/question/32054136

#SPJ2

NATO was established in 1949 as a military alliance between the United States and Western Europe to ensure mutual defense and collective security. Hence, the correct answer is B.

NATO was created in 1949 as a military alliance between the United States and Western Europe. It was formed to provide mutual defense and collective security against potential threats, particularly from the Soviet Union. Member nations agreed that an attack on one would be considered an attack on all, leading to the creation of a standing army to defend Western Europe.

The correct answer is The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was created in 1949 as a military alliance between the United States and Western Europe.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was indeed established as a military alliance between the United States and Western European countries. It was formed on April 4, 1949, with the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty. The primary purpose of NATO was to provide collective defense against the potential threat posed by the Soviet Union and its allies during the Cold War era. The organization was not created by the United Nations, nor was it a direct result of the Marshall Plan, although both the UN and the Marshall Plan contributed to the post-World War II environment that led to NATO's creation. Additionally, it was not an alliance between the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe; in fact, NATO was created in part as a counterbalance to the military alliances formed by the Soviet Union with Eastern European countries, such as the Warsaw Pact.

Answer:

A. When the goverment doesn't protect their natural rights

Please mark brainliest if this helps...

Texas Secession Convention  sought for leaving the Union after the election of Republican whose election rules and promises were unacceptable to them.

Explanation:

The Texas Secession Convention decision that was fateful in 1860 and was one that decided in favor for leaving the Union was made shortly after it was decided that the Republicans who would form the government.

The main reasons of the secession were:

Answer:

Texas Secession Convention  sought for leaving the Union after the election of Republican whose election rules and promises were unacceptable to them.

Explanation:

I took the assigment and got a 100%

Answer

Coal

Explanation:

Final answer:

Uranium is the natural resource mentioned that can only be found in Canada, according to the provided map and information.

Explanation:

According to the map and the provided information, the natural resource that can be found only in Canada and not in the neighboring regions like Alaska is uranium. While oil, silver, and coal are found in both Canada and other regions such as the United States (notably Alaska and the province of Alberta in Canada), uranium is specifically mentioned as a resource located in the Canadian Shield. Canada is well known for its extensive natural resource deposits, with regions such as the Canadian Shield harboring a wealth of metallic ores including uranium.

Answer:

A and E

Explanation:

The options that summarize the central ideas of the text are:

A. WWI was caused exclusively by the assassination of Franz Ferdinand.

E. Trench warfare, because it was so deadly, was outlawed in future warfare at the Paris Peace Convention.

World War I started by Germany in 1914 against the alliance of French and Russia.

Thus, the correct options are A and E.

Learn more about WWI

https://brainly.com/question/3300089

Answer:

the Civil Rights Act prohibited racial discrimination in employment and education and outlawed racial segregation in public places such as schools, buses, parks and swimming pools.

President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited discrimination in public accommodations, housing, and employment, and established the EEOC. He also enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to eliminate racial discrimination in voting. These laws were crucial advancements in civil rights.

President Lyndon B. Johnson is widely recognized for his significant contributions to civil rights in the United States. During his presidency, two landmark civil rights laws were enacted: the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is monumental legislation that prohibited discrimination in various sectors of society such as public accommodations, housing, and employment based on race, religion, national origin, and gender. Additionally, it established the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to address employment discrimination.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 sought to remove racial discrimination in voting by abolishing literacy tests and other discriminatory practices that had historically been used to disenfranchise African American voters. This act represented a significant step forward in ensuring that all citizens had the right and opportunity to participate in the electoral process.

These two acts are critical milestones in the pursuit of equality and justice in America, greatly advancing the civil rights movement and influencing the legal and social landscape of the nation.

In both Hinduism and Buddhism, the virtue of a person's life impacts their afterlife through the concepts of karma and reincarnation, leading towards ultimate liberation - Moksha in Hinduism and nirvana in Buddhism.

According to both Hinduism and Buddhism, the extent to which a person has lived a virtuous life determines the quality of his or her afterlife. This concept in both religions is deeply intertwined with the ideas of karma and reincarnation. In Hinduism, karma is the sum of a person's actions in this and previous states of existence, viewed as deciding their fate in future existences. Good karma can lead to being born into a higher caste or a more conscious lifeform, whereas bad karma can result in a lower form of life. The end goal is reaching Moksha, where the soul is released from the cycle. In Buddhism, there is no permanent soul, but karma still affects the rebirth cycle with virtuous actions leading to better rebirth circumstances. The ultimate goal here is achieving nirvana, a state of liberation and freedom from suffering.

Answer:

The world leaders along with President George H. W. Bush pledged to donate $24 billion to assist the former Soviet republic in reclaiming their lives.

Explanation:

The Soviet Union had been confronted with numerous attempts by the hard-line Communist leaders to lead their nation away from the democratic aim of pro-democracy Mikhail Gorbachev. But despite their efforts, Gorbachev and the supporter of democracy won in the end, leading to the end of Communist rule in the Soviet Union.

After the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the end of the coup by the communist soldiers to try to topple Gorbachev and his plans, numerous nations including the United States under President George H.W.Bush pledged assistance of $24 billion to the newly democratized nation.