The leading African American that helped to found the NAACP is Du Bois .
Who is Du Bois ?William Edward Burghardt Du Bois can be regarded as an American sociologist, socialist, historian.
He was an Pan-Africanist civil rights activist who helped in the founding of NAACP, he love to fight for course of things that are good in the society.
The history described him as a man of integrity with very big heart who devote his time for humanity.
Learn more about Du Bois at;
https://brainly.com/question/4771644
Territorial changes after World War I led to the creation of new countries, including .
The answer is..
C.) POLANDJust trust a bro, it is correct.
Territorial changes after World War I led to the creation of several new countries, including: Czechoslovakia; Yugoslavia; Poland; Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania; Austria and Hungary.
What was World War I ?The war began on July 28, 1914, when Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia in response to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, by a Serbian nationalist. Over the next few months, various alliances and treaties were invoked, and the conflict quickly spread across Europe.
The war was characterized by new technologies such as machine guns, tanks, and chemical weapons, which made it one of the deadliest conflicts in human history.
Czechoslovakia; Yugoslavia; Poland; Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania; Austria and Hungary were the countries created after World War I.
Learn more about World War I here:
https://brainly.com/question/30066547
#SPJ7
2. How did the United States influence affairs
in Grenada?
Answer:
It was triggered by the strife within the People's Revolutionary Government which resulted in the house arrest and execution of the previous leader and second Prime Minister of Grenada Maurice Bishop, and the establishment of the Revolutionary Military Council with Hudson Austin as Chairman.
Explanation:
How would you have reacted to this Call to Power if you were a Bolshevik? How would you have reacted if you were a member of the provisional government?
As a Bolshevik, the most likely reaction to the Call to Power would be one of euphoria and excitement. As a member of the Provisional government however, one would react with dread and uncertainty.
What was the Call to Power?It was issued by Lenin on October 24, 1917.It gave reasons why the Bolsheviks should seize power in Russia.Lenin was a Bolshevik which meant that Bolsheviks listening to this call would most likely have been excited at the chance to take control. Members of the Provisional government however, would most likely have been afraid as they were the ones in power and so would be overthrown by the Bolsheviks.
In conclusion, Bolsheviks would have been excited and Provisional government members would have been scared.
Find out more on the Bolsheviks at https://brainly.com/question/1106721.
As a Bolshevik, you'd likely support the call to power due to a shared revolutionary and communist ideology, whereas as a member of the provisional government, you'd be alarmed by the Bolsheviks' threat to your authority. If the provisional government had made peace with the Central Powers, it might have undermined support for Lenin's Bolsheviks, although this would depend on the efficacy of the government's other reforms.
Explanation:If you were a Bolshevik during the call to power, you would likely react with enthusiasm and a revolutionary spirit. The Bolsheviks were intent on seizing power and implementing radical changes according to Communist principles. They were driven by the urgent needs of the Russian populace, namely "peace, land, and bread," and were ready to capitalize on the weakness of the provisional government and widespread disillusionment with the ongoing war. As a member of the provisional government, such as those led by Alexander Kerensky, you would likely react to the Bolshevik's call to power with opposition and concern, recognizing the significant threat they posed to your temporary authority and the liberal and democratic ideals you were possibly trying to uphold. The provisional government aimed for a gradual transition of power, but the Bolsheviks were determined to institute immediate and sweeping changes.
Considering a hypothetical situation where the provisional government had agreed to peace with the Central Powers to focus on solving Russia's internal issues, it's conceivable that this move could have undermined support for Lenin and the Bolsheviks. By addressing the urgent demands for peace, the provisional government might have satisfied a significant part of the population's immediate needs, potentially reducing the appeal of the Bolsheviks' radical approach to those issues. However, if the government failed to address the demands for land reform and food security effectively, the Bolsheviks would likely continue to gain support.
Throughout the period leading up to the October Revolution in 1917, the Bolsheviks were increasingly seen by soldiers, workers, and peasants as a viable alternative to the current government due to their decisive and straightforward promises. The Bolsheviks' subsequent actions, such as the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Germany, illustrated their commitment to fulfilling their promises, despite the unfavorable terms of the peace that ceded vast territories to Germany.
Learn more about Bolsheviks' Call to Powerhttps://brainly.com/question/15854957
#SPJ3
According to his journals, why does John Quincy Adams believe that prohibiting slavery in the
western territories is, in fact, constitutional?
The ideals of the nation are set forth in the introduction to the United States Constitution, and they include justice. Therefore, because slavery is unjust, the leaders of the nation have every right to prevent its spread into new territories
John Quincy Adams was the 6th president of the United States. He was famous for being politically independent and also his patriotism for his country. He can be called ambitious as well as determined in character.
Further information about the president is as given below:
• According to the journals of John Quincy Adams, he held the belief that prohibition of slavery in the western countries was constitutional.
• In the constitution of the United States, the ideals for the country have been written and they include the term justice.
• Slavery should be prohibited as it is simply unjust, which is mentioned in the constitution as well.
Therefore, John Quincy Adams had strong feelings regarding the prohibition of slavery during his presidency.
Learn more about John Quincy Adams here:
https://brainly.com/question/2772596
15 POINTS A.S.A.P
Why did Americans want to acquire California?
Answer:
America wanted California because of the gold available there that they didn't want other countries to get.They also wanted to express there natural born right o Manifest destiny on their newly found land.
Explanation:
HELP URGENT!!!!!!!
Something we wouldn't have today without the scientific method (name it & explain it)
Answer:
Experiments
Explanation:
Without the scientific method you couldn't do experiments. It would be an unorganized and hard to do. With the scientific method it makes it possible to do experiments. Say if you want to do an experiment about rusty pennies. You would first make a hypothesis about what could possbily happen, then do the experiment, collect the data, and your conclusion (well that's the short version of the scientific method but you get my idea). These are the vital things that makes an experiment possible, without it we wouldn't have an experiment to this day.
How was religion of the Mesopotamia’s different from religion of the Israelites?
Answer:
Mesopotamian religion was polytheistic, while Israelsities worship Judaism.
Toward which city were Union forces heading
when they met the Confederates at
Fredericksburg?
A. Chancellorsville
B. Manassas
C. Richmond
The union forces where heading towards (C) Richmond when they met the Confederates at Fredericksburg
Explanation:
The Battle of Fredericksburg refers to the battle that was fought between the Union forces and the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia in the year 1862.
The union forces where led by Maj Gen. Ambrose Burnside. and the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia General Robert E. Lee
Major General Ambrose Burnside led the Union toward Richmond and they headed towards the Confederates at Fredericksburg.
This battle (i.e. Battle of Fredericksburg) was a big defeat for the Union Army against the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia
Thus we can say that The union forces where heading towards (C) Richmond when they met the Confederates at Fredericksburg
match the following natural satellites to the celestial bodies they orbit? dysnomia. triton. titan. miranda. nix. deimos. namaka. europa—mars. jupiter. saturn. uranus. neptune. pluto.
Answer:
Planet => Satellite
Mars => Deimos
Jupiter => Europa
Saturn => Titan
Uranus => Miranda
Neptune => Triton
Pluto => Nix
Eris => Dysmonia
Haumea => Namaka
Answer:
Planet => Satellite
Mars => Deimos
Jupiter => Europa
Saturn => Titan
Uranus => Miranda
Neptune => Triton
Pluto => Nix
Eris => Dysmonia
Haumea => Namaka
Explanation:
3. Which nomadic tribe was Qin's enemy in the north?
A. The Xiongnu
B. The Mongols
C. The Huns
D. The Manchus
Answer:
b the mongols
Explanation:
srry im late
Who was the first emperor of Rome?
Nero
O Constantine
O Julius Caesar
O Caesar Augustus
Answer:
Caesar Augustus
Explanation:
I Just know
What were six important sets of actions and reactions in the head 1824 to 1846 that lead to war between the US and Mexico
Answer:
Texas was originally a part of Mexico and had a greater population of its citizens in the area.
The most important set of actions which led to the war between US and Mexico include
U.S. Senate defeating the agreement of annexation with Texas
U.S. President John Tyler signing the Brown Resolution which offered Texas terms of annexation.
In response to passage of the Brown Resolution, Mexico's minister to the U.S., Juan N. Almonte, requests his passports, breaking off diplomatic relations between the two countries
Texas convention votes in favor of annexation to the United States
In Matamoros, Mexican General Francisco Mejia issues a proclamation threatening hostilities against U.S. troops
United States declares war against Mexico and US troops occupy Matamoros.
Kennedy and Civil Rights
How did President Kennedy's position on civil rights change?
He became more cautious over time.
O He began to see a need for national civil rights laws.
* He discovered that civil rights laws were not needed.
Answer: He began to see a need for national civil right laws.
Explanation: I hope this help you!!!!!!!
Answer:
He began to see a need for national civil rights laws
Explanation:
When European nations established colonies in Africa in the late 1800s, they
controlled colonies’ government but gave colonies economic control.
allowed colonies to run their government but held economic control.
exercised complete economic and political control over the colonies.
negotiated with colonies to determine economic and political control.
Answer: Explanation:
They set up Imperial governments in the land to exploit the natural and human resources of the continent.
Each European countries involved aimed to increase its prestige by accumulating territories in other parts of the world including Africa. By 1900,the Berlin conference to divide Africa brought about nominal control of African territory by Europe. All this was done without the consent of African people.
The European nations basically want cheap labors that they cannot get from their own country..so in search of cheap labors they set up a base at south Africa and stated deporting slaves..
The European nations sought to expand their economies by obtaining raw materials from Africa which could be transported back to domestic factories and turned into manufactured goods for sale at the expense of the African people.
When European nations established colonies in Africa in the late 1800s, they exercised complete economic and political control over the colonies. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is colonies?Between the 15th and 20th centuries, when European nations colonized the Americas, Africa, and Asia for economic, political, and strategic reasons, the term "colony" was most frequently used to refer to these settlements.
The Berlin Conference of 1884 set the laws for European colonization and trade in Africa, which in turn regulated the colonization of Africa. The colonization of Africa was fueled by competition among European nations for control of African resources.
As a result, the significance European nations established colonies in Africa in the late 1800s are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on colonies, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13673860
#SPJ5
What are the most recognized causes of poverty?
-equality and marginalization.
-Conflict.
-Hunger, malnutrition, and stunting.
-Poor healthcare systems — especially for mothers and children.
-Little or no access to clean water, sanitation, and hygiene.
-Climate change.
-Lack of education.
-Poor public works and infrastructure.
Answer:
the most recognized causes of poverty are
illiteracy population increaselack of awarenesslack of family planning measures.Explanation:
Compare and contrast the governments of the Mauryan Empire and the Gupta Empire. List three similarities between the empires. List three differences between the empires.
Both the Mauryan and Gupta Empires in India unified smaller kingdoms, promoted culture, and had strong leadership. The Mauryan empire focused more on military and bureaucracy, and embraced Buddhism under Ashoka. In contrast, the Gupta Empire, while also militant, spent more time on culture and was predominantly Hindu.
Explanation:The governments of the Mauryan and Gupta Empires in India share some similarities, along with several notable differences. Both empires tried to rule a diverse society by adopting certain measures. They merged various smaller kingdoms into a unified empire and reached their heights under exceptional leaders like Ashoka of the Mauryan empire, and Chandragupta of the Gupta empire. Both empires also promoted learning and culture, with Sanskrit becoming influential in the Gupta times.
However, there were some distinct differences as well. The Mauryan Empire had a stronger military focus, possessing a large and well-administrated army, navy, and cavalry division, also a widespread bureaucracy catering to industries like weaving, mining, shipbuilding, road construction, etc. On the flip side, the Gupta Empire, while also having a military, focused more on cultural growth and learning, leading to a flourishing in arts, literature, and science.
The Mauryan Empire, under Ashoka, embraced Buddhism and promoted harmony and compassionate governance. In contrast, the Gupta era was predominantly Hindu and is known as the 'Golden Age of Hinduism', although they were tolerant of other religions.
Learn more about Mauryan and Gupta Empires here:https://brainly.com/question/502631
#SPJ2
Why did the Romans create a Republic? Please help DUE SOON!!!!!
How did Napoleon acquire Louisiana from Spain?
Answer:
By pressuring them to sign a treaty that allowed them to get the land.
Explanation:
Not sure if you need the name of the treaty but it is the treaty of san ildefonso
Which side had more resources during the Civil War?
Answer:
The North
Explanation:
The North had more resources because President abe lincoln was the president at the time and he was supplying resources only to the north not the south.
How did women’s rights activists link women’s rights to the Founding Fathers’ positions on equality and natural rights?
pls answer.
Women's rights activists linked their cause to principles of equality and natural rights from the Founding Fathers, asserting that rights like liberty and property should also apply to women. They referenced historical documents such as the Declaration of Independence in their fight, as seen with the 1848 Declaration of Sentiments demanding political equality and suffrage. They were also influenced by the egalitarian social roles of indigenous societies, like the Haudenosaunee.
Women's rights activists historically connected their cause to the principles of equality and natural rights espoused by the Founding Fathers. Abigail Adams's plea to 'Remember the ladies' during the Revolutionary discussions set an early precedent for this link. In echoing the language of the Declaration of Independence, activists argued that if 'all men are created equal' was a self-evident truth, this principle should logically also apply to women. Thus, notions like political equality, liberty, and the right to property were asserted to be as relevant to women as they were to men.
During the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848, activists, many of whom were also abolitionists, produced the Declaration of Sentiments which directly emulated the Declaration of Independence by including women in the assertion that 'all men and women are created equal.' This document catalogued the various ways in which women had been oppressed and, significantly, demanded suffrage—the right to vote—as essential to achieving equality.
In addition to referencing the ideals of the American Revolution, women's rights advocates were also inspired by indigenous societies, such as the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois), where women held significant social and political roles. The broader struggle for women's rights included fighting against institutionalized inequalities, as highlighted by activists like Betty Friedan who exposed gender-based wage disparities in the workforce. Thus, activists took a multifaceted approach that combined historical American principles with modern civil rights efforts to advocate for women's equality across social, political, and economic spheres.
What was the North's interpretation to the constitution and the South's interpretation?
PLS HELP
Please help!!! Which of the four case studies (Italy, Germany, Dual Monarchy, Ottoman Empire) of nationalism was the most successful? Explain why.
Answer:
Germany
Explanation:
Otto van Bismarck used nationalism to unite the German people and expand Prussia/Germany's military and land to become one of Europe's best militaries
why did Lobley oppose the new industrial machinery
Answer:
The industrial revolution began in Great Britain. The industrial revolution was the beginning of a new era, a new manufacturing of a new type of machinery.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
The industrial revolution began in the United Kingdom. The industrial revolution marked the start of a new era, with new machinery being manufactured.
What is industrial?
The term “industrial” refers to a large scale of manufacturing operations. The industrial work in particular areas is production in bulk. The industrial sector contributes to economic activity. The industrial are the main focuses are the production of the commodities. The industrial are the run with the large level of the workers.
During the period of the 1800s, the technology was the advanced level, the higher level of the employees and the workers are the work. There are the long work hours because of the production of the high level. There was the no hazard faced by industrial workers are the mainly in the high unemployment, that's the reason was the Lobley opposed.
As a result, the industrial revolution began in the United Kingdom. The industrial revolution marked the start of a new era, with new machinery being manufactured.
Learn more about on industrial, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4363767
#SPJ2
The expressed powers of Congress include:
A. the Supreme Court.
B. regulating trade.
C. enforcing laws.
D. creating the Internal Revenue Service.
Answer:
C. Enforcing lawsseems to be the most correct
Which statement is true about personal narrative essays?
A.
They are normally written in chronological order.
B.
They are written about the life of a famous person.
C.
They are stories that are entirely fictional.
D.
They contain a main point that is supported by evidence.
Answer:
A.
They are normally written in chronological order.
*It cant be B because it doesn't have to be a famous person and it cant be C because its non-fiction. And not D because that is an argument/persuasive essay
Personal narrative essays are written accounts of personal experiences or events from the author's life. The true statement about personal narrative essays is, "They are normally written in chronological order". Hence, option A is the correct answer.
They typically follow a chronological order, presenting the events in the order in which they occurred. This helps to create a coherent and organized narrative that allows the reader to follow the story and understand the progression of events.
Option B is not accurate because personal narrative essays are focused on the author's own life experiences, not those of a famous person.
Option C is also incorrect because personal narrative essays are based on real-life experiences and are non-fictional in nature.
Option D is not always true for personal narrative essays.
Hence, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about Personal narrative essays here:
brainly.com/question/7851404
#SPJ4
Which forms of government are described in the chart above?
A.communism
B.autocracy
C.monarchy
D.socialism
What two places were major destinations for Southern cotton?
Charleston and Mobile
Lowell and Great Britain
New Orleans and Lowell
Great Britain and New Orleans
The major destinations for Southern cotton were Great Britain, where it fed the British mills, and New Orleans, which was a key trading hub.
The major destinations for Southern cotton were Great Britain and New Orleans. The Southern states were the majority suppliers of cotton to Britain, which was then used in British mills in places like Manchester. New Orleans served as a crucial hub for domestic and international cotton trade, becoming a diverse and wealthy city because of it. This trade was so significant that by 1860, cotton exports comprised more than 60 percent of the United States' total exports.
What are dockworkers back in 1700’a
Answer:
Dockworkers are duties including transferring cargo from ship to dock.
Explanation:
and securing ships and handling unloading set-up.
how might family wealth provide deeper economic security than family income?
Q: how might family wealth provide deeper economic security than family income?
Tough question, huh? Don't worry, I'm here to help you out!
A family's wealth includes everything a family owns, like a home, other properties, savings, stocks, etc. Therefore, wealth provides a deeper economic security than income. For example, young adults who want to buy a house can turn to their parents for a down payment to get a new house, since their parents have assets. Parents with wealth can get through hard times easily. Like, if the parents got laid off, they can still pay their mortgage and continue to build equity. The families without assets, however, would be devastated if they ever got laid off. Unable to make ends meet, the families without assets would end up in a situation they weren't in before.
Hope this helped you out!
-Namira
May anyone help me please
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Im pretty sure this is right, because "allure" means something very pretty or beautiful to look at.
Therefore, an allure of the west could be the Pacific Ocean