Which Northern European Renaissance artist was known as the Leonardo of the north? His most important works were not paintings but Engravings.

A: Albrecht Durer
B: Hans Holbein, the Younger
C: Jan van Eyck
D: Pieter Bruegel

Answer:

A. the reptile body will change.

Explanation:

When the climate and temperature changes all animals have to adapt to the changes.

Slaves of Sparta were called Helots, which might have come from the village Helots.

The populace of Sparta consisted of 3 foremost groups: the Spartans, or Spartiates, who had been complete citizens; the Helots, or serfs/slaves; and the Perioeci, who had been neither slaves nor citizens.

A state-owned serf of the historical Spartans is known as Helot. The ethnic foundation of helots is uncertain, however, they had been probably the unique population of Laconia who had been decreased to servility after the conquest of their land with the aid of using the numerically fewer Dorians.

Thus, the correct answer is Helots.

Learn more about Helots here:

https://brainly.com/question/11394350

#SPJ2

So he can be rich. He was evil and wanted more money.

Answer and Explanation:

Carnegie was a very wealth steel magnate who believed that the rich had a responsibility to use their wealth for the benefit of society. He said that rich men were intelligent and organized, so they would be the best suited in society to administer their own wealth.

Answer:

  He pardoned Nixon for any crimes committed in office.

Explanation:

  Gerald Ford was the 38th president of the United States from 1974 to 1977. He is the only person who served as vice president and president without being elected by the Electoral College.

  When he assumed as President he retained the domestic and foreign policy of the Nixon administration. One of his most controversial acts that destroyed his credibility was granting a pardon to Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States.

  In the 1976 election, Ford was defeated by Jimmy Carter.

  I hope this answer helps you.

Government Expenditure

expenditure

revenue

budget

Ancient Greece, especially the city-state of Athens, played a pivotal role in shaping modern democratic principles by introducing the concept of citizen participation in governance and influencing political thought through philosophers like Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.

Ancient Greece has made significant contributions to modern-day governments, particularly through the development of democratic principles and practices. The city-state of Athens is widely regarded for its early form of democracy, where free adult males had the right to participate in the political process by voting to create laws and impose taxes. This practice contrasted sharply with the monarchies prevalent in other parts of the ancient world, where rulers claimed divine authority.

The Athenian model of government influenced modern democratic systems in several ways. For example, citizens in Athens could vote directly on laws and elected officials, a practice which influenced the concept of a direct democracy. Notably, the idea of political participation and the value placed on citizenship informed the development of constitutional governments around the world.

Famous Greek philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle also extensively explored political theory, laying the groundwork for Western political thought. Their ideas have been fundamental to understanding the role of the individual in society and the structure of a just and rational state.

Athens was one of the greatest examples of city-states in Ancient Greece. It established the foundations of direct democracy based on certain restrictions to be able to vote and have decision-making power. In order to vote for legislation a person had to be a male citizen, adult, not submissive or a woman, foreigners were also excluded from participation. Related to Athens' social structure, male citizens had the greatest advantages regarding political and social rights, property ownership, participation, etc.

Those who belong to the aristocracy through ownership of lands or long ago inheritance are the ones in control of the political power. Then, a middle class of land-owners whose wealth was quite limited and business men, such as merchants, traders who were closely watched by the Athenian citizens who had some limited rights depending if they could ascend in Athenian society. Below, in the social structure there's women, children and teens, laborers, slaves and foreigners. The people in these diverse groups were not considered citizens with very limited rights unlike male aristocrats. Being dependent on others to survive was a key element to be disenfranchised from the decision-making process in Athens, which was the case for the afore mentioned groups.

Final answer:

The biggest change in the Neolithic Revolution was the development of agriculture, which led to the establishment of permanent settlements, population growth, social hierarchies, labor specialization, and advances in technology and culture.

Explanation:

The Neolithic Revolution was a pivotal event that changed the course of human history. This transformative era, which happened around 12,000 years ago, marked the transition from nomadic hunter-gatherer societies to settled agricultural communities. The most significant change during this time was the development of agriculture, which enabled humans to cultivate plants and domesticate animals, leading to an unprecedented increase in population size and density.

The shift from foraging to farming had many profound consequences. People began to establish permanent homes, leading to the creation of sophisticated settlements such as Çatalhöyük and Stonehenge. There were also significant advances in technology; Neolithic communities crafted stone tools for planting, harvesting, and other agricultural activities, which increased productivity and allowed for a surplus of food. Another important aspect was the emergence of social hierarchies and labor specialization, as individuals began to focus on specific tasks beyond just food acquisition.

The correct answer is the United States Constitution.

The US constitution consists of republicanism and individual rights. For example, the US Constitution establishes a republic form of government. This means that citizens have the power to vote for officials to fill positions in the government and to make laws on their behalf.

The Constitution also embeds individual rights in the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights consists of the first 10 amendments of the US Constitution. These rights are protected and can never be taken away by the government. This includes the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to petition, right to bear arms, etc.

B. Both produced important texts associated with the revolution.

Thomas Paine produced the text "Common Sense", while Thomas Jefferson is widely known for his part in the "Declaration of Independence"

~Senpai

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

Gaining control of Paris and forcing a change in the monarchy.

They believed it to be apposing the teachings of god. This could also be considered as blasphemy against the church. in other words because the theory of evolution rivaled those of the church, therefore church was against the teaching of it. this is because they didn't want people to begin questioning the legitimacy of the church or their teachings.

Hope this helps, i would love a thanks :D

A. The colonists could not own slaves.

The colonists in early colonial Georgia were dissatisfied with the trustee's policies primarily due to the prohibition of owning slaves, hindering their farming and plantation activities.

In the early years of the colonial period in Georgia, the dissatisfaction amongst the colonists was largely due to the policies of the trustees who governed the area. One key policy that caused dissatisfaction was A. The colonists could not own slaves. The trustees had established an anti-slavery policy in the hopes of creating a utopian society of independent small farmers. However, the colonists believed they needed slaves to help with their farms and plantations, making this a source of significant discontent.

https://brainly.com/question/38162609

#SPJ3

prince Henry hoped he could convert or conquer not catholic country's

Explanation:

The religion in the middle age was the most important aspect in the lives and social functioning of many countries across Europe.

The Catholic church had an enormous influence was the most important religious entity of the era, so besides the personal conviction of many explorers (Prince Henry included), to extend the ¨Word of god¨ to pagan lands, it was a huge help for them to have the Catholicism backup, for the newly conquered lands, and their own kingdoms (Portugal kingdom, in this case).

Oil and steel transformed American industry and daily life. True

I'm sure it is C I've did lots of research to get this answer  

It was similar to the American flag

Answer:

the answer is C) it looked too similar to the American flag

Explanation:

Answer: C.) British officers were often forced to serve in subordinate roles to their colonial counterparts.

For the most part, this was the opposite. The frustration was on the part of the colonial forces as they were often forced to serve in subordinate roles.

The clash of command was a serious problem for the militias. British officers generally regarded themselves as higher than colonial ones, which colonial officers considered an offence. The solution was to divide each militia unit into smalled commands, and to recommisision militia officers with a rank of captain and above with a rank of captain. This demoted all the high-ranking colonial officers and placed them as subordinate to British captains. The new system was extremely unpopular with colonials and caused many of them to resign from the military.

One way in which ancient civilizations in India and China were similar is their emphasis on philosophical and spiritual traditions.

Both India and China developed rich and influential philosophical and spiritual traditions that had a profound impact on their respective societies. In India, the ancient civilizations, particularly during the Vedic and Classical periods, laid the foundation for philosophies such as Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. These belief systems explored concepts of morality, ethics, metaphysics, and the pursuit of enlightenment.

Similarly, in China, ancient civilizations gave rise to significant philosophical schools of thought, including Confucianism, Taoism, and Legalism. These philosophical traditions focused on ethics, social order, harmony, and the cultivation of virtues.

Both India and China sought to understand the nature of existence, human conduct, and the pursuit of a meaningful life through these philosophical and spiritual frameworks. Despite differences in specific beliefs and practices, the ancient civilizations in both regions shared a common interest in exploring the deeper questions of human existence and the purpose of life.

It is important to note that while there were similarities in their philosophical and spiritual traditions, there were also distinct differences between the two civilizations in terms of their cultural, political, and social aspects.

To know more about China, here

https://brainly.com/question/11915231

#SPJ2

Answer:

Authority is a significant strength to apply power legitimately.

Explanation:

With authority becomes to power. The pair goes hand in hand. If you have authority only no power, you cannot assume to be appreciated or also accepted as an authority structure. To have power without authority is impotent. Even if you prove dominance and control, it does not mean that you have the honor or the capacity to enforce.

Authority is much important strength that is to be apply over the power legitimately.

As the authority will be turning into the power, it would be going from one hand to another. If you are having authority, but you do not have the power, then it would not be appreciated and hence it would be accepted just as the authority structure. It is impotant to have the power without the range of authority.

To gather information on identity crime, law enforcement and other authorities use technologies such as facial recognition software, smartphones, Stingray devices, and vast domestic intelligence apparatuses. These tools allow tracking and surveillance on an unprecedented scale but also provoke concerns regarding privacy and potential misuse.

Technology Used in Identity Crime Information Gathering

Technologies designed to gather information on identity crime are manifold and sophisitcated. In the effort of law enforcement to monitor potential criminal activities, various tools are employed, including but not limited to facial recognition software used by cameras in public spaces. Additionally, everyone carrying a smartphone is potentially traceable, as these devices regularly connect with cell towers and can be detected by Stingray devices, which mimic cell phone towers and can capture phone data in a wide radius. The ability to activate a phone's microphone and camera remotely also exists, providing a powerful surveillance capability. Moreover, the collection and analysis of data is not limited to those charged with wrongdoing, as seen in the post-9/11 growth of the U.S. domestic intelligence apparatus, which utilizes resources from the FBI, local police, and other authorities.

While this data collection has clear benefits for security and prevention of crime, it also poses significant privacy concerns and potential for misuse. Facial recognition technology, in particular, is a double-edged sword, as it allows for easy identification and tracking, even without an individual’s consent. Not only do these advanced technologies raise ethical questions regarding surveillance, but they also illustrate how today’s high-tech tools could impact personal freedom and privacy.

Surveillance extends to victimization statistical surveys and is also evident in the increasing development of widespread monitoring systems, like the 'Sharp Eyes' program in China, which aims to integrate various data types into a single national surveillance system.

Answer:

B is the awnser

Explanation:

Answer: Islam

Explanation: in Afghanistan the percentage of the population that practices the Islam is 99%, In Bangladesh is 90% and in Pakistan is 98% so from the options that is the cultural feature that most people share in those countries. There is a percentage of the populations of those countries that practices the Hinduism but it is small. The Punjabi is an ethnic group in some areas of India and Pakistan and the Sinhalese are also an ethnic group from Sri Lanka.  

Answer:

See image.

Explanation:

This is from my study guide.

Hello!

To answer this question we need to know the growing season of each state:

Montana has 120 days.

Pennsylvania has 130 days.

Hawaii has a year round growing season!

Meaning that Hawaii has the longest growing season out of these states.

The anti-federalists were instrumental in getting the Bill of Rights passed which guaranteed basic freedoms like freedom of speech and freedom of religion. The most important amendment, however, to the anti-federalists was the Tenth Amendment which gave any power not listed in the Constitution to the states.

Scholars and politicians disagree on this question, and both sides have arguments of value. However, the attitude most democratic countries have adopted is that of thinking they DO have responsibilities towards less developed countries. They provide several arguments for this position:

A prosperous advanced democracy has an obligation to less well-off nations due to ethical considerations and often being complicit in creating conditions of poverty.

Improved global communication has raised awareness, and practical support can be provided respectfully.

Addressing global poverty and ensuring fair worker conditions are key responsibilities.

A relatively safe and prosperous advanced democracy has an obligation towards less well-off nations for several reasons.

Global poverty is both a moral and ethical issue. Philosopher Peter Singer's 'rescue case' suggests that developed states have a duty to alleviate poverty because they can do so with minimal effort. Additionally, as pointed out by Thomas Pogge, developed countries often contribute to the persistence of poverty through international systems and institutions that disadvantage poorer nations. Hence, advanced democracies have both a moral and strategic responsibility to address global poverty and support human security.

Moreover, while it might seem undemocratic for wealthy nations to dictate policies to poorer countries, cooperation and support can be provided in ways that respect the autonomy of these nations. Providing funding for anti-pollution equipment or supporting fair trade initiatives are examples of how developed countries can assist poorer nations in a respectful and productive manner.

The marshall plan allowed the united states to compete for power with the USSR without using force

Answer: The Marshall Plan allowed the United States to compete for power with the USSR without using force.

Explanation/context:

The "Marshall Plan" was named after the man who then was US Secretary of State, George C. Marshall.  Officially the plan was called the European Recovery Program.  Marshall announced the plan in 1947, and it went into effect in 1948.  The intent was to provide aid and rebuilding to European economies after the damaging effects of World War II.  

In his speech introducing the plan, Secretary Marshall had said:  "Our policy is not directed against any country, but against hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos. Any government that is willing to assist in recovery will find full co-operation on the part of the United States. Its purpose should be the revival of a working economy in the world so as to permit the emergence of political and social conditions in which free institutions can exist."

The view in the communist-controlled Eastern bloc was that the US was trying to use such a policy to spread its influence and threaten their patterns of government under communism.  So the plan ended up building allies for the US in Western Europe, while the Eastern European countries sided with the Soviet Union.  So it was an example of Cold War tactics of competition between the US and the USSR, apart from the use of military force.