Which of the following topics would be most interesting to a time-oriented listener? a. maximizing your productivity during the day b. instructions for an upcoming project c. thoughts about a recent election d. all of the above

metaphor, like or as wasn't used

Metaphor, bc it doesnt use like or as

what the answer choices.

Feld defines success as being "WEALTHY"

Splendid carriages , with splendid people in them and .............royal enclosure.

Clothing was all of lovely silks and satins, shining with jewels, at his hip a little.........

Dagger.

Answer:

Read

Explanation:

Splendid carriages, with splendid people in them and splendid servants outside, were arriving and departing by several other noble gateways that pierced the royal enclosure.

(Because carriages, servants, royal are all words in which they relate to wealth)

clothing was all of lovely silks and satins, shining with jewels; at his hip a little jewelled sword and dagger; (Silk clothes were expensive, so were jewels and swords)

This passage from "The Great Gatsby" is the introduction of how and why the man changed his name. This certainly presents the notion of ambition and uniqueness in behavior.

However, the question asks the theme it explore. So, the correct answer is "Option-D", which states:

Good luck follows those who are really ready for it; ambitious individuals go to great length to gain status.

Answer:  C.) Personification

It is giving life like actions to a non-living thing. Which makes it personification.

Hope this helps. :)

I think its c the name under which the website domain is registered.

Answering the question, “even after weeks of thought, he just didn't know how to right his wrong”

Let take a look at the sentence: ''Even after weeks of thought, he just didn't know how to_____his wrong.'' After the comma, It is seen that what is missing in the sentence is the verb ''right''.

In the question asked, there is the use of the phrase ''right the wrong'' with the omission of right. 'Right the wrong' is a common phrase that means to correct something bad that had been done earlier before the present time. So, to correct a situation, one may decide to make amends.  

This amends means "right the wrong''. For instance, if you have offended a close friend of yours so badly that you feel you need to make amends, you may then right the wrong by making the situation better regardless of what he had done.

However, in "...he just didn't know how to___his wrong,'' the pronoun, 'he,' is the subject while 'right' is the appropriate verb. “Right” is the correct option because it rightly expresses the meaning of the sentence. And so, with effusion of 'right,' the sentence becomes:  

"Even after weeks of thought, he just didn't know how to right his wrong.''

LEARN MORE:

KEYWORDS:

I believe it is either , or ; as so.

"I believe ... therefore, ..."

"I believe ... ;therefore ..."

But I'm leaning to ,

Hope it helps.

To make the broadcast seem more credible

There was no intention of making the radio version seem real but only realistic

Answer:

  There is an interview with the U.S. secretary of the interior in the radio version to make the play more realistic and also to set that the events were happening on American soil.

Explanation:

  The radio version was an adaptation of the novel with the same name written by H.G. Wells, the adaptation was made by Orson Welles and was broadcast on 1939. Some differences between the novel and the radio version were the place of the events and the tense in which they were told. I believe that Orson Welles added the interview to make clear the difference I mentioned before.

  Firstly by interviewing an actor that represents the U.S. secretary of the interior, he was clarifying that the action took place on American soil. And last but not least the live interview showed that the actions were taken place at that same time so it was in the present tense, unlike the novel that is written in the past tense.

  I hope this answer helps you.

where are the drop downs

Answer:

1. dank

2. palpable

The answer is A) The author believes the experience dehumanizes people both on and off the train.

In Night, Elie Wiesel shares his experience in the Nazi concentration camps. Through the book, he writes how the values of humanity are lost and some of the concepts he grow up with are useless now.

In this excerpt we can see how the situation happening inside the wagon is inhuman, because the people on the train are considered to be less than humans, more like animals, because their need for food makes them fight for something as minimal as a crust of bread.

One of the values that makes us human is the solidarity and the ability to share feelings with other humans. In this excerpt, we can also see that the passersby and the workers enjoy watching people fight for bread crumbs, therefore they have lost this value, becoming less human for it.

The options B and C are incorrect, because the passersby and the workmen are not sharing food rations with the hungry prisoners (only bread crumbs, that can't be considered rations), nor being kind with them. The option D can be also considered correct but is not as descriptive as the option A.

Answer:a

Explanation:

on edge

A) , however,

-Hiadamcom/Agarvated

Answer:

C) ; however,

Explanation:

In this example, the best way to transition from one sentence to the next would be by using a semicolon and a transition word. In this case, the semicolon is separating two independent sentences. Therefore, it performs the role of a period. Moreover, the transition word allows the reader to move easily and efficiently from one idea to the next.

This suggests that the Maori believe that teamwork helps family members achieve their goals.

The Māori myth's portrayal of children working together to separate their parents emphasizes the cultural value of family unity and the significance of communal goals within the cultural framework. It reflects the family structure as a cultural universal and serves to address fundamental cultural categories through the use of mythemes with binary oppositions. Indigenous myths are thus key in understanding cultural values as societies balance tradition and modernity.

The best explanation or analysis of the evidence provided by the Māori myth, where children work together to separate their parents to become free, suggests that it illustrates a cultural value placed on family relationships and kinship. The children's collective action to achieve freedom symbolizes the importance of a united family working towards a common goal. This can be seen as a reflection of how the Māori culture prioritizes familial bonds and the group's well-being over individual desires. This mirrors the broader concept that family units and their cohesion are crucial elements of cultural identity, as indicated by George Murdock's recognition of the family structure as a cultural universal.

In the context of indigenous cultures, myths are not just fantastical stories; they serve a deeper purpose. As per the anthropologist Lévi-Strauss's theory of mythemes, the critical points of a myth, such as actions and consequences, reflect universal concerns across cultures. These mythemes often feature binary oppositions like good/evil and blood relation/marriage relation, which help process fundamental cultural relations. Thus, the act of the children in the myth can be related to the fundamental cultural values regarding family structure and its pivotal role in society.

Furthermore, as indigenous cultures grapple with the balance of traditional lifestyles and the modern world, stories and myths continue to hold significance for understanding and navigating these cultural dichotomies, reflecting a journey from mythos to logos as described in indigenous philosophy.

M. Loisel recommends replacing the necklace with a replica after a day of the necklace being missing.

In the story The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant, Mathilde Loisel borrows a diamond necklace from her friend Madame Forestier for a ball. After the ball, Mathilde discovers that the necklace is missing. M. Loisel, her husband, suggests that they should replace the necklace with a replica to avoid confessing the loss to Madame Forestier. They spend a significant amount of money and time to find a necklace that closely resembles the original one. This decision leads to a series of financial sacrifices and years of hard work to repay the debt they incurred from purchasing the replacement necklace. The story ultimately reveals the high cost of their choice, both financially and emotionally, and serves as a commentary on the value of authenticity versus appearance.

Hi tyrell,

She quickly changes and becomes angry and starts plotting against Duncan. She persuades Macbeth and pushes him into doing the deed. After the first death, she starts feeling nervous and guilty but Macbeth's desire of power grows stronger.  Lady Macbeth is one feisty character.

mark as brainliest

Explore how Macbeth changes over the course of the play.

Macbeth changes over the story by getting angerier and angerier everytime time something happens so throughout the story here powers become stronger and stronger.

Hope This Helps!

Answer:

use eloquence to spread knowledge for the common good.

Explanation:

Great thinkers, according to Cicero, should leverage eloquence to spread knowledge for the common good. So option B is correct.

According to Cicero, great thinkers should utilize eloquence to spread knowledge for the common good. He believed in the power of persuasive communication to benefit society positively and influence change.

In his time, eloquence was seen as a crucial tool for philosophers and thinkers to engage with the public and effectively convey ideas that could shape society.

I wake up to the feeling of the warm sun shining down on me. I open my eyes to the blue sky, and start to think about how hungry I am. I stretch my wings and launch myself into the air to soar across the green fields in search of a meal.

I could feel the air underneath my wings. It coursed through my newly formed feathers and carried me upward on an unseen dune. It's so hard to describe just how perfect it felt. On the ground, I had felt so fragile and vulnerable. But up here? Up here was a different story. Up here was a different world. A world where I felt strong and that everything was meant to be. The words hung in the breeze, unspoken, but still there: this was meant to be. I saw the earth below me. The blanket of grass moved in slow, lazy waves in the same breeze that carried me aloft. Everything melded into a gradient of colors, like an oil painting that has been smeared. And it was beautiful.

The weather forecaster predicted another day of high (COMMA) scorching temperatures.

Hope this helps!

Answer: B. Darl

Explanation:

A.pex

The character in Faulkner's "As I Lay Dying" who uses the most imagery is Darl. Therefore, option (B) is correct.

Imagery is a literary device that writers use to create sensory experiences by using descriptive language to evoke mental pictures or images in the reader's mind. Imagery is used to convey emotions, moods, and ideas more vividly by appealing to the reader's senses of sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell.

By using sensory details, writers can create a more immersive and engaging reading experience for the audience. Imagery can take many forms, including similes, metaphors, personification, and onomatopoeia. It is often used in poetry, but can also be found in other forms of literature, such as novels, essays, and short stories.

Effective use of imagery can make a piece of writing more memorable and impactful by painting a rich, detailed picture in the reader's mind.

Learn more about imagery, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8344770

#SPJ7

The theme of 'The Outcasts of Poker Flat' is social outcasts and human struggle for redemption.

The theme of the passage 'The Outcasts of Poker Flat' by Bret Harte is the concept of social outcasts and the human struggle for redemption.

The passage portrays a group of characters who have been cast out by society and banished to an isolated town called Poker Flat. The theme explores the idea of how individuals can be judged and marginalized based on their social status and behavior.

Through the story, Harte highlights the human capacity for change and the possibility of finding redemption in the face of difficult circumstances. The characters in the passage, although initially seen as outcasts, demonstrate acts of selflessness and sacrifice, challenging societal prejudices and expectations.

The main themes of "The Outcasts of Poker Flat" by Bret Harte include morality and redemption, illustrated through the complex characters' actions and sacrifices. These themes are set against the backdrop of the harsh American West during the California Gold Rush.

Theme of "The Outcasts of Poker Flat"

"The Outcasts of Poker Flat" by Bret Harte presents several prominent themes, with the most salient being the themes of morality and redemption. The story showcases how individuals who are judged as immoral by society can display profound acts of courage, loyalty, and selflessness under dire circumstances.

Overall, Harte's story is a poignant exploration of the human condition, set against the harsh backdrop of the American West during the California Gold Rush.

The answer is condone. If you google it, that is what you will find.

Condone

Spending money in the fast food industry can be harmful because it supports illegal usage of drugs in food and genetically modified organisms. Say you purchase a burger from McDonald's; the beef used could have been real at the time, but when more and more people begin purchasing burgers, and they don't have enough beef to supply, they will create more. The company may begin using illegal growth hormones to make a cow larger and bulkier, or genetically modifying cows to make them larger. Not only does purchasing items in the fast food industry support illegal activities, but the usage of hormones and drugs could harm you as well. You would never know what happened in the creation of that burger, but you do know that it tastes good.

Answer: Dr. Lanyon becomes very ill, refuses to speak of Dr. Jekyll , Dr. Lanyon dies.

In fact, he tells his butler Utterson that he doen't want to talk about Jekyll ( Utterson informs him that his friend is very ill too). He said that he himself had had a good life. He promises that after his death, Utterson may learn the truth about everything, but for now he will not discuss it.

After the funeral, Utterson finds a letter, with instructions that he should it open ONLY when Jekyll dies

Answer:

What happens to the doctor Lanyon in chapter 6 of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is that he gets ill and dies.

Explanation:

Lanyon, Utterson and Jekyll were great friends. They had begun to meet again and everything in their lives seemed calm.

After having been meeting for two months, the lawyer was denied entry to Dr. Jekyll's house.

Later, he decided to go to Lanyon’s house. He appeared to be mortally ill, and he was really mad at Jekyll. He said he never wanted to hear from him again. After that meeting, Lanyon dies in less than a fortnight.

The reason why Lanyon became ill was because he could not bear to see the transformation of Jekyll, so much so that he internalized his pain becoming a physical illness that led to his death.

The answer above is wrong trust me I got the answer right on plato

The answer is His son had always seemed pathetic to him, and now it was dreadful to see the boy's frightened look of pity.  

I hope this helps

Patient and empathy I believe