Answer: A network of independent, educated people who were not totally reliant on either the state or the church
Explanation: The Renaissance, as a revival of classical philosophy and humanism in ancient Greece, contributed to the spread of new ideas, art and education, though many more. The possibility of printing books and spreading scientific ideas and achievements contributed to the edification of many and their independence, especially at a time when there were more or less old models of government in the states. Church teachings by these intellectuals were rejected.
Final answer:
The Renaissance led to the rise of independent, educated individuals and nurtured a spirit of inquiry and intellectual freedom. It contributed to the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, which challenged traditional authority and governance. This period also saw advancements in arts, science, philosophy, and the structure of government that paved the way for modern nation-states.
Explanation:
Major Consequence of the Renaissance
One of the major consequences of the Renaissance was the emergence of a network of independent, educated people. This development was not rooted in a singular pursuit to emulate Athenian democracy, but in a broader cultivation of arts, literature, science, and more participatory forms of government. Independent city-states flourished, ending the medieval dominance of the feudal lords and beginning a shift toward modern nation-states.
The Renaissance stimulated advances in many areas, especially fostering the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment. These movements encouraged fresh perspectives on human existence and the natural world, leading to questioning of traditional forms of authority and governance. Intellectual curiosity was further fueled by the accessibility of ancient texts and the invention of metal movable type.
Although peasant revolts did occur, they were not a direct consequence of the Renaissance; rather, they were more a result of long-standing feudal tensions. The church's power did not return to pre-Black Death levels but transformed, partly due to the wealth and power of influential families and their courts, and the subsequent Reformation movements which challenged ecclesiastical authority.
As part of her speech preparation, Janelle sit in her chair, closes her eyes, and imagineswatching herself giving her speech from beginning to end. She sees herself giving her speechconfidently and successfully. Which communication apprehension reduction strategy is Janelleusing?a. Deep breathingb. Relaxationc. Practice, practice, practiced. Visualize success
Answer: d. Visualize success
Explanation:
Communication apprehension refers to the anxiety caused by expected or actual interaction with people, something usual for public speakers.
Visualizing success is one of many strategies that can be used to reduce communication apprehension. It involves closing one´s eyes and visualizing that interaction going well, that speech being told confidently and effectively.
New values of self-fulfillment have brought change to American culture, economic decisions, and government policies. Describe how you think the new values of your generation will affect economic decisions.
Values of Millennial and Generation X are very difficult from what was normal 30 years ago.
Today, relationships have become more casual and there are most instances of single-parents and free choices. Religion is gradually playing a lesser role which has meant legalization of gay marriage and opening up of alternative culture and genders.
There is also a surge in environmental awareness and a need to protect the environment and reduce wastage.
The values of the new generation would mean less spending on plastics, non-recyclable products and shunning of fossil fuels. Electric cars will become more popular and people would want to drive smaller cars.
We have already seen shifts in clothing as people rejected animal-derived fur. We might also see more spending on vegetarian and vegan food as that becomes popular.
Values of Millennials and Generation X are very difficult from what was normal 30 years ago. Relationships have become more casual and there are most instances of single-parents and free choices. Religion is gradually playing a lesser role which has meant the legalization of gay marriage and opening up of alternative cultures and genders.
Affect of economic decisions on the new values of our generation:
There is also a surge in environmental awareness and a need to protect the environment and reduce wastage.
The values of the new generation would mean less spending on plastics, non-recyclable products, and the shunning of fossil fuels. Electric cars will become more popular and people would want to drive smaller cars.
We have already seen shifts in clothing as people rejected animal-derived fur. We might also see more spending on vegetarian and vegan food as that becomes popular.
To know more about the effect of the economic decisions, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15726972
Which of the following involves a change in behavior resulting from the person’s expectation of change rather than from the experimental manipulation itself?
a) Cross-generational effect
b) Double-blind control
c) Placebo effect
d) Cohort effect
Answer:
C. Placebo effect
Explanation:
The placebo effect is a suggestive effect in which the person reflects a positive change because they have faith or confidence in the treatment they are receiving when they are receiving a product without any active substance.
The placebo effect has been found in treatments administered with drugs, therapies, surgical procedures, and even in medical claims that are transmitted to the patient. It is used in scientific research to analyze the effectiveness of drugs or medical treatments.
When the person realizes that the process has a placebo effect, it ends, and the patient feels the symptoms of his illness again.
I hope this information can help you.
The ________ is the most important U.S. federal statute regarding conditions for handling information regarding credit reporting and financial records.
Fair Credit Reporting Act is the correct answer.
The FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act) is an important federal law in the United States that regulates credit reporting agencies and protects consumers against misinformation being used to harm them. It contains the rights of debtors and the creditor's responsibilities. It deals with the granting of credit and information regarding credit and financial records.
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
What does David believe influences his children’s development?
David strongly believes that BLANK influences the development of his young twins, Alice and Jack. He fosters a close and caring relationship with his children and does not believe genetic factors play a significant role in their development.
David is certain that environmental and nurturing variables influence the development of his baby twins, Alice and Jack.
David emphasises the relevance of his close and caring relationship with his children while dismissing the importance of hereditary influences in their development.
David's viewpoint is consistent with the notion that a supportive and nurturing environment, as well as pleasant interactions and experiences, can influence a child's growth and development.
Therefore, David is certain that environmental and nurturing variables influence the development of his baby twins, Alice and Jack.
Learn more about environmental, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32254548
#SPJ3
Answer:
David strongly believes that their environment influences the development of his young twins, Alice and Jack. The environment affects a child or children that are being raised in a good environment and will be known to have a healthy brain development. The healthy development is because they would have all that they need and that would help them grow and develop in the best way possible.
Explanation:
Relativism
a) makes it impossible for us to correctly criticize other cultures' customs and values
b) makes it impossible for us to correctly criticize our own societies' customs and values
c) can lead to conflicting moral duties
d) all of the above
Answer:
option D
Explanation:
The correct answer is option D
Relativism state that morality is relative it depends on the culture. Whether the action is right or wrong it depends up on the society norms.
So, the options given justifies relativism because you cannot criticize other culture, customs and values.
Even Relativism does not allow anyone to criticize it's own society.
It is correct that relativism can lead to conflicting moral duties.
When Sammy had to learn the names of all the planets, as well as their relative sizes, he made up sentences to help him create meaningful links between the concepts. For example, "Eartha ate the Mars candy bar" helped him remember that Earth is larger than Mars. Sammy was using a memory strategy called ________.
Answer:
Elaboration
Explanation:
Elaboration is a form of strategy that people can use in learning process. This can be done by using small combinations of words that might not mean anything for other people, but each individuals could use those words as a simpler form to remember an information that they read/heard in the past.
For example,
Sammy use this sentence in his learning tricks:
"Earth ate the Mars candy bar"
That sentence might not mean anything for any other people. But for Sammy personally, that sentence can be translated Earth is larger in size compared to Mars, which is why Earth can eat it.
Making a sentence that is unique and personal to him make it easier for Sammy to remember the information regarding the planet's size.
Using mnemonic devices in learning helps create meaningful links between concepts for easier recall.
When Sammy had to learn the names of all the planets, as well as their relative sizes, he made up sentences to help him create meaningful links between the concepts. For example, "Eartha ate the Mars candy bar" helped him remember that Earth is larger than Mars. Sammy was using a memory strategy called mnemonic device.
Some organizations are buying sections of forestland. Once purchased, forests within the sections will not be cut down. What is the primary goal of protecting these forest sections
Answer:
protection from extinction
Explanation:
Protecting forest land and natural habitat is of outmost important. Several government and State laws and regulations are framed to protect these extinct natural lands.
Many organisations are buying many sections of these forestland and preserving them. They are not destroying these forest or cutting down the tress. This is part of CSR activities. CSR stands for Corporate Social Responsibility.
By doing this, they are preserving the rich and resourceful heritage of the planet. It is a positive and good deed
Final answer:
The primary goal of purchasing and protecting sections of forestland is to preserve habitats for old-growth forests, maintain ecological integrity, and support sustainable forestry, which ensures the protection of biodiversity and the environment for the future.
Explanation:
Organizations that purchase sections of forestland and commit to not cutting down trees within these sections are primarily focused on conservation efforts. The main goals associated with these conservation efforts include:
Preserve habitat for mature and old-growth forests and related species, which are essential for maintaining biodiversity and ecological balance.Restore and maintain the ecological integrity of watersheds and aquatic ecosystems to ensure that water sources remain clean and robust for all forms of life that depend on them.Support sustainable forestry practices that balance and integrate multiple uses of forest resources, including recreation and employment opportunities for local communities, while ensuring that the forest ecosystems continue to provide a wide array of ecosystem services.By safeguarding sections of forests, these organizations are contributing to the long-term health of our environment, protecting the primary forest that remains unspoiled by deforestation. This action also aids in the prevention of further loss of forests, which has occurred significantly since European settlement began.
Elizabeth would like to conduct a study to determine how women define spousal abuse and the meanings they attach to their experiences. What research method will Elizabeth most likely use?
Answer:
qualitative
Explanation:
According to my research on different research methodology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Elizabeth will most likely use a qualitative approach. This is an approach that focuses on measuring the quality of the subject or results being analyzed rather the the quantity of the subject in question.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Final answer:
Elizabeth will most likely use qualitative research methods, specifically in-depth interviews or participant observation, to study how women define spousal abuse and understand their experiences due to the subjective and complex nature of the topic.
Explanation:
Elizabeth is interested in understanding how women define spousal abuse and the meanings they attach to their experiences. Considering the depth and subjectivity of such experiences, Elizabeth would most likely use qualitative research methods such as in-depth interviews or participant observation. These methods are preferred when the research aims to delve into the complex symbolic and subjective dimensions of human experiences, especially from a perspective that emphasizes the importance of personal narratives and the meanings individuals attach to their experiences. In-depth interviews, in particular, would allow Elizabeth to gather rich, detailed accounts of experiences and perceptions directly from the women involved, providing valuable insights into the personal and social dimensions of spousal abuse. Such a qualitative approach aligns well with studies utilizing the symbolic interactionist perspective, emphasizing the significance of understanding the symbolic worlds in which individuals live.
After complaining about parking accommodations at your office, you have been asked by your boss to propose a simple solution that will satisfy your coworkers. The best informal information gathering technique for this situation would be to: _______________
- Look in the files
- Conduct an informal survey- Talk with your boss
Answer:
- Conduct an informal survey
Explanation:Informal survey will assist you to ask questions in a non formal way which will allow people to truly pore out their real opinions about the situation.
When this happens you will mostly get genuine concerns that most employees have concerning the parking issue .
What do they think can be suitable or accommodate everyone , what do they think is causing serious issues at the moment and they will open speak in a casual environment where they don't feel like they are backed up at the corner.
This will allow you to gather as much responses and be able to analyse them to see what can be the best solution .
Bottled water consumption was reported to be 29.0 gallons per person in the U.S. in 2007. This is equivalent to how many 0.500−L bottles per week? Round up to the nearest whole bottle.
Answer:220
Explanation:
Given
Bottled water consumption reported to be 29 gallons per person
Considering it to be weekly
And 1 gallon is equivalent to 3.78 Liter
So 29 gallons is 109.77 Liter
1 Bottle is of 0.5 L
So 109.77 water is stored by
[tex]n=\frac{109.77}{0.5}=219.54\approx 220 Bottle[/tex]
So 220 Bottle is used by a person in a week
Note: Bottled water consumption is 29.0 gallons per person.
1 bottle = 0.5 liter = n
1 gallon = 3.78
Asked: How many bottles are used per person per week
Answer: - first multiply the amount of bottled water consumption by 1 gallon of water
= 29 x 3.78 = 109.62 liters = x1
- then the total number of liters per week divided by 0.5 liters in 1 bottle
= x1 / n = 109.62 / 0.5 = 219.24 = 219 bottles
So, the average total of bottles consumed by one person in a week is 219 bottles.
note: because the data shown is only 1, so the formula is directly adjusted to x = x1 / n.
Further ExplanationStatistics is a branch of applied mathematics which consists of theories and methods on how to collect, measure, classify, calculate, explain, synthesize, analyze, and interpret data obtained systematically. Thus, it consists of a set of procedures on how to:
Collecting data Summarize the data Processing data Present data Draw conclusions and interpretations of data based on the data set and the results of the analysis.Statistics Formulas Looking for Mean (Average Value)
The meaning of the Mean itself is the average value of the count and in the Mean, Formula can be done by dividing the Amount of Value data by the amount of data. Then the Statistics Formulas Looking for Calculate Average has three formulas which are divided, among others
1. Mean Formula Calculate from a Single Data
x = x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + ..... xn / n
Learn more
Definition of Statistics https://brainly.com/question/13342687
Statistics Formulas Looking for Mean https://brainly.com/question/13342687
Details
Grade: High School
Subject: Social studies
keywords: Statistics
The photographic technique in which a scene is photographed clockwise, with the first picture showing a specific object on one side of the photograph and the next picture showing the same object on the opposite side of the photograph, is called:
Answer:
Overlapping
Explanation:
Overlapping in photography in a composition is how all elements are overlapped in picture, drawing, graphs. These overlaps each other to create the illusion of the third dimension. Generally, you can see the phi phenomena overlapping of the subjects. If the elements find ti close it destroy the depth and space for the viewer to create the illusion in pictures, design, and graph.
There is five compositions in photography:
The rule of third The rule of odd Leading lines The golden rectangle section IntuitionMartha Stewart was convicted of obstruction of justice after lying to the FBI during an investigation of her sale of ImClone Systems stock, whose value dramatically fell immediately after she sold it. Her conviction was unusual, as this sort of white collar crime is much more likely to be dealt with in civil, rather than criminal, court. How does the tendency to deal with white collar criminals in civil court bias our understanding of the demographics of crime?
Answer:
It leads us to overestimate the relationship between poverty and crime.
Explanation:
Since Martha lied to FBI not during the investigation of her sale of ImClone Systems stock and it's value dramatically fell immediately after selling it.Since it is considered a white-collar crime.
It will lead us to overestimate the relationship between crime and poverty.
Which stage of crime scene reconstruction is this: "After scene examination and observation, physical evidence such as fingerprints or impression pattern evidence is used to create a working idea of how the crime happened."
Answer:
Hypothesis formation
Explanation:
"After scene examination and observation, physical evidence such as fingerprints or impression pattern evidence is used to create a working idea of how the crime happened."
This is the Hypothesis formation stage in crime investigation scenes. By the definition of 'Hypothesis formation' a hypothetical assumptions or conclusions are made based on the limited evidence resource made from the crime scene. This is made as the starting evidence for the later further investigations of the crime.
Thus the answer is Hypothesis formation.
A town in West Virginia needs to choose a jury for a trial. They create slips of paper with the names of each of the adults in the county and place the slips in a large box. They then draw twelve names from the box. What sampling method has been used?
Answer:
This is a random sampling.
:
The jury selection method described involving drawing names from a box is an example of simple random sampling.
The sampling method used by a town in West Virginia to select a jury for a trial, where they place slips of paper with the names of each of the adults in a large box and draw twelve names from it, is known as simple random sampling. This method ensures that every adult in the county has an equal chance of being selected to serve on the jury. Simple random sampling is a foundational concept within the field of statistics and is commonly used in scenarios where an unbiased and representative sample is required.
The incident action plan is prepared by general staff from which section?
Answer:
The general staff prepares the incident action plan from the planning section.
Explanation:
A incident action plan is an organized course of events that shall address an incident within a specified time.The plan contains, the objectives during an incident and generally how to handle an incident in case it occurs.This plan acts as a tool for incident management in order to reach the incident management objectives in a clear and organized manner.The incident action plan is prepared by the general staff from the Planning Section.
The incident action plan is prepared by the general staff from the Planning Section.
the general staff readies the episode activity plan, as a team with the Arranging Segment, by looking into the circumstance examination and targets given by the Arranging Segment and deciding the fitting methodologies and activities to address the occurrence.
Learn more about incident action plan here:https://brainly.com/question/14409299
#SPJ11
Before conducting a study with human research participants, an institutionally designated authority, other than the investigator, should determine that proposed studies are exempt from regulatory requirements.True / False.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Before doing a study or conducting a research study with human research participant, it is important for an institutionally designated authority or a body authorized to make decisions to determine whether the proposed study made on the human participant comes under the regulatory requirement or not.
There are several restrictions and laws to be followed when such research studies are made. Therefore it is important for the investigator as well as the institutionally designated authority to check whether such studies comes under the exemption from the regulatory requirements or not.
Hence the answer is true.
Drake has hypothesized that more freshman engage in "head scratching" than seniors. In order to test this hypothesis, he has to provide a specific description of the behavior which he would count as "one head scratching." Would scratching the ear or the forehead be included? What if the student "scratched his head" against a book or door? Would these also be counted in the study? This specific description of the behavior to be counted is called:
Answer: operational definition.
Explanation:
An operational definition is the description of the set of processes that must be performed to determine the absence or presence of each variable in an investigation. That is, it specifies what activities will be carried out to measure the variables being investigated.
In an investigation, it is imperative to make the operational definition as detailed as possible. You must include all the necessary variables to obtain reliable research results.
I hope this information can help you.
An operational definition specifies exactly what is to be measured and how to measure it, which is necessary for Drake's study on head scratching behavior among different school grades.
Drake's hypothesis that more freshmen engage in "head scratching" than seniors requires a specific description of behavior to ensure reliable and consistent data collection. This necessary detailed description is known as operational definition. It specifies exactly what is to be measured and how to measure it. In Drake's study, he should decide whether actions like scratching the ear or forehead, or using an object like a book or door to scratch the head, should be counted, considering his research question's focus. Establishing clear operational definitions allows Drake to observe and record behavior effectively, directly impacting the quality of his research and the validity of his conclusions.
Bertina, a Native American, believes that Navajo customs and traditions provide the most effective responses to every day issues. She rejects Westernized medicine when she is sick and refuses to be cured by anyone but a traditional healer. Bertina is probably in the _____ stage of minority identity development.
A. conformity
B. unexamined identity
C. integration
D. resistance and separatism
Answer:
D. resistance and immersion
Explanation:
According to my research on the stages of minority identity development, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bertina is most likely in the resistance and immersion stage. This stage is defined as embracing and holding a positive attitude toward and preference for his/her own race and cultural heritage while rejecting dominant values of society and culture.
**The correct name of this stage is resistance and immersion not seperatism**
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The following is (are) true about family interactions and communication:
Both of these
Critical nonverbal communication may involve any number of seemingly petty behaviors
None of these
What one family member might say in words to another member may not be what that sender really means
Answer:
Both of these.
Explanation:
In family interactions and communication critical nonverbal communication may involve any number of seemingly petty behaviors and what one family member might say in words to another member may not be what that sender really means.
Now that you have read excerpts from the Citizens United case, think about the role that money plays in politics. Should corporations and organizations be more or less restricted in their campaign donations? Provide an answer of three to four sentences.
Answer:
Following the excerpt from the citizens United case, I think corporations and organisations should be more restricted in their campaign donations.
Explanation:
At this moment, money plays a huge role in politics: companies use donations to help raise attention to problems the want to be taking care of, while at the same time avoiding others that could potentially be affect there own business.
This is a huge problem because there are many issues that politics should talk about, but they are not doing it because companies that pays money prefer that those subject are not talking about, like climate change and social injustice, for example.
Money in politics, especially when it comes for companies that have their own agenda, is dangerous because it put companies interested above public interest.
Answer:
I think companies and groups should be more restricted in their campaign funding practices. Powerful and wealthy organizations can have too much influence over voters and the voting process. OR I think corporations and organizations should be less restricted in how they spend their money for political purposes. As the Supreme Court ruled in the Citizens United case, groups have the right to use their money to express their opinion. I believe this is protected by the First Amendment.
Explanation:
In a suit against Ethan, Francisco obtains an award of damages. This is
a. the cancellation of a contract.
b. an order to do or to refrain from doing a particular act.
c. a payment of money or property as compensation.
d. an order to perform what was promised.
Answer:
In a suit against Ethan, Francisco obtains an award of damages. This is c. a payment of money or property as compensation.
Explanation:
At common law, damages are awarded for breach of contract in order to compensate the injured party in the suit. Damages are a remedy in the form of monetary compensation that is paid to the claimant as compensation for loss or injury, that can include damage to property, mental injury or physical injury.
Which statement best describes the logic of the process of science? a. If I generate a testable hypothesis, experiments and observations will support it. b. If my prediction is correct, it will lead to a testable hypothesis. c. If my observations are accurate, they will support my hypothesis. d. Test results may or may not support my hypothesis.
Answer:
d. Test results may or may not support my hypothesis.
Explanation:
The logic process of science is a series of steps that help scientists reach a conclusion, this process includes the formulation of a question after an observation, the formation of a hypothesis, an experiment to test this hypothesis, an analysis of this experimentation and a conclusion.
A hypothesis is an educated guess about what you expect of the outcome of an experiment, this hypothesis could or could not be the right explanation, it's just a possibility that we can test to see if it is likely correct, or if we need to make a new hypothesis. After the experimentation we reach a conclusion based on the analysis, this conclusion leads to either support or contradict the hypothesis. If the results support the hypothesis it's likely to be correct. On the other hand, if results contradict a hypothesis, that hypothesis is probably not correct and we can discard it and look for a new one.
Based on this information the correct answer is d. Test results may or may not support my hypothesis.
I hope you find this information useful and interesting! good luck!
The correct statement describing the logic of the scientific process is (d) "Test results may or may not support my hypothesis." This reflects that in science, a hypothesis is a testable prediction that can be either supported or refuted by experimental data.
Explanation:Understanding the Scientific Process
The question, "Which statement best describes the logic of the process of science?" is best answered with the understanding that the process of science involves making observations, formulating hypotheses, and conducting experiments. A hypothesis is a tentative, testable, and falsifiable statement that makes a prediction about the outcome of research. Options (a), (b), and (c) imply that hypotheses or predictions will always support your experiment or observations, which is not necessarily true. The most accurate answer is (d) "Test results may or may not support my hypothesis," which aligns with the scientific method's principle that experimental results can either confirm or contradict the proposed hypothesis.
To elaborate, when a scientist conducts an experiment, the results will either agree with the hypothesis or not. If the results do not support the hypothesis, it must be discarded or revised, and alternative hypotheses should be considered. This process demonstrates that scientific inquiry is an ongoing cycle of proposing, testing, and refining hypotheses, and not a linear path where every prediction or hypothesis is correct.
According to the textbook, what three things make people especially difficult to study?
a) shyness, moodiness, and unpredictability b) complexity, reactivity, and unpredictability c) variability, reactivity, and complexity d) reactivity, variability, and stubbornness
Answer:
c) variability, reactivity, and complexity.
Explanation:
According to the textbook, the three things that make people especially difficult to study are variability, reactivity, and complexity. Moreover, people are very difficult to study because there are ethical issues when observing and measuring other human beings. Variability makes people difficult to measure because there are many differences between people, and also people are complex beings. Reactivity makes people act differently when they know they are being observed.
The three characteristics that make people difficult to study are complexity, reactivity, and unpredictability. These traits represent the diverse emotional and behavioral attributes of individuals, their varied responses to situations, and their inherent ability to act in an unexpected manner respectively.
Explanation:According to the textbook, the three characteristics that make people especially difficult to study in a social context are complexity, reactivity, and unpredictability. Human complexity refers to the intricate and diverse mental, emotional, and behavioral attributes that individuals possess. Reactivity relates to how humans respond to situations, which is often affected by emotions, conditions, and other individuals. Finally, unpredictability is the inherent ability of humans to act in unexpected ways due to the vast number of factors involved in decision-making. These traits combined make the study of individuals a highly challenging yet intriguing aspect of Social Studies.
Learn more about Studies of Human Behavior here:https://brainly.com/question/1172835
#SPJ3
When the going gets tough, the tough get going." This saying encourages resilience. With respect to the flower metaphors in the textbook's discussion of differential susceptibility, the saying exhorts people to be:When the going gets tough, the tough get going." This saying encourages resilience. With respect to the flower metaphors in the textbook's discussion of differential susceptibility, the saying exhorts people to be:"
Answer:
This saying encourages people to be strong and resilient.
Explanation:
The saying is a word game that refers to the fact that people get stronger when difficult situations arise. As was said in the question the saying is referring to the feeling of resilience, because it says that when things get tough people must harden, get stronger to face these things. In short, the saying urges people to be strong, resilient and not to give up without a good fight.
The saying "When the going gets tough, the tough get going" is emblematic of the psychological concept of hardiness, which enables individuals to transform adversity into personal growth, embodying resilience and optimism.
Explanation:The saying "When the going gets tough, the tough get going" encourages resilience and relates closely to the concept of hardiness in psychology, as discussed by Suzanne Kobasa and her colleagues. Hardiness is an attribute that enables individuals to withstand stress and adversity, embodying traits like commitment, control, and challenge that transform potentially stressful situations into opportunities for personal growth. This concept is analogous to the flower metaphor about differential susceptibility, suggesting that like certain flowers which thrive in harsh environments, individuals with a high level of hardiness can rise above adversity, cope when things look bleak, tap into hope, and ultimately transform unfavorable situations into wisdom, insight, and compassion. These resilient individuals not only endure but also learn and grow from their experiences, showcasing a dynamic blend of optimism, self-efficacy, and effective coping strategies that enhances their well-being despite the challenges they face.
How were Mississippian Indian societies in Georgia organized when Europeans first came to the region? Group of answer choices The Mississippian Indians lived in small villages of a few hundred people and grew much of their food on farms. The Mississippian Indians were nomadic, did not have permanent villages, and relied entirely on hunting and gathering. The Mississippian Indians lived in cities of thousands of people, relied entirely on hunting and gathering, and did not farm. The Mississippian Indians were nomadic during hunting seasons and lived in small groups of a few families during winter.
Answer:
The Mississippian Indians lived in small villages of few hundred people and grew much of their food on farms.
Explanation:
The Mississippian society consists of a central plaza surrounded by small villages built near the river Ohio. The central plaza is the place where the administrative works of the Mississippian were performed.
They like to do hunting as games and they used to hunt wild animals and wild plants but their main jobs is to do farming. They used to farm in front of their houses in every small village which contains less than hundred peoples.
As the farmlands are facing towards the river, the flooding caused by the river fertilises the farmland which helps them to cultivate their crops.
Answer:
The Mississippian Indians lived in small villages of a few hundred people and grew much of their food on farms.
Explanation:
The internal part of strategic analysis (elements within the project team's control) consists of asking what opportunities and threats are posed by competitors, suppliers, customers, regulatory agencies, technologies and so on. True or False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The internal part of the strategic analysis consists of the strengths and weaknesses inside of the compny. The external analysis consists of asking what opportunities and threats are posed by competitors, suppliers, customers, regulatory agencies, technologies and so on.
Meghan is a member of a group that raises money for a homeless shelter. She feels that the group spends too much time arguing the merits of different fundraisers and needs to make a decision. She calls for a vote at today’s meeting. Meghan has taken on the role of ______________.
a) energizer
b) evaluator
c) elaborator
d) initiator
e) recorder
Answer: The answer is this is C
Explanation: The reason for this is because it succeeds in the participants goals and helps with interactions with those goals, such a voting among them selves.
Sue, a resident of Somerset County, Maryland, and David, a resident of Broome County, New York, are fighting over land located in Sussex County, Delaware. Under traditional rules of venue, the trial to determine ownership would take place in _____
Answer:
Sussex County
Explanation:
Venue is a legal terminology which means the place where one can properly file law suit.
There are venue rules which are used to determine which type of the courts hear which kinds of the cases.
Thus, choosing venue is very important because if one cannot establish proper and accurate venue in the court, then court has power not to hear the case.
Venue rules are complex but typically the places where:
Defendant lives Defendant does business Dispute or Accident took place Contract was performed or executedThus, the land belongs to Sussex County, the trail should happen there according to above rules.
Sue, a resident of Somerset County, Maryland, and David, a resident of Broome County, New York, are fighting over land located in Sussex County, Delaware. Under traditional rules of venue, the trial to determine ownership would take place in Sussex County, Delaware.
The reasoning behind this can be broken down as follows:
Venue rules: Traditional rules of venue typically require that disputes involving property be tried in the jurisdiction where the property is located.Location of the property: Since the land in dispute is situated in Sussex County, Delaware, this is the appropriate venue for the trial.Jurisdiction and fairness: Trying the case in the location of the property ensures that the court has proper jurisdiction and that it is fair to both parties since evidence and witnesses are likely to be located there.This ensures the trial can be conducted efficiently and justly with all relevant local evidence considered.
During an Institutional Review Board (IRB) meeting, any IRB member who may have a potential COI with a study under review should:
A. Disclose their potential COI and not participate in any action
B. Disclose their potential COI, but not answer any questions about the study
C. Disclose their potential COI and may answer questions, but recuse themselves from voting
D. Leave the meeting immediately
Answer: C. Disclose their potential COI and may answer questions, but recuse themselves from voting
Explanation:
IRB members with a potential COI should disclose it and may answer questions about the study under review, but they must recuse themselves from voting to maintain integrity in the review process.
During an Institutional Review Board (IRB) meeting, any IRB member who may have a potential Conflict of Interest (COI) with a study under review should:
C. Disclose their potential COI and may answer questions, but recuse themselves from voting.
This is because it is important for the member to disclose any potential conflict to maintain the integrity of the IRB's decision-making process. While they can provide information that might be relevant to the study's assessment, they should not influence the final decision if their impartiality is compromised. This upholds the ethical standards crucial for the protection of human subjects involved in clinical studies and ensures the credibility of the research being conducted.