Which of these were common aspect me of war efforts during world war i check all that apply

Answer: C

Explanation:

One of the most revealing parts of the text is this one:

The laws were designed to correct every deficiency revealed in the Lower East Side fire: for example,  it required automatic sprinklers in high-rise buildings. Fire drills became mandatory in large shops.  Factory doors had to be unlocked and had to swing outward.

It's correct to assume that, even thought it was a tragedy, the Shirtwaist Factory Fire was the reason behind a series of measures that were adopted to prevent new disasters.

The legacy left behind after what happened is incalculable and the amount of deaths avoided after this specific disaster is very substantial considering the new safety procedures created to avoid something like that to ever happen again.

The correct answer is:

A. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire was the disaster that brought to attention the need for improved working conditions in America

The statement that best identifies the central idea of the text is: A. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire was the disaster that brought to attention the need for improved working conditions in America.

This sentence is summarizing what the reading is mainly about. It talks about how the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire was important in making people realize that better working conditions were needed in the United States during the early 1900s.

The text probably talks about the events and outcomes of a very sad fire in a lot of detail, focusing on how it led to changes in labor rights and efforts to make workplaces safer for workers.

Learn more about central idea  from

https://brainly.com/question/1914191

#SPJ4

Public opinion polls greatly influence presidential elections by affecting media coverage, campaign donations, voting behaviors of representatives and senators, and even voter turnout. Candidates leading in polls usually experience more media attention and financial support. Also, predictions about race outcomes can impact the number of voters.

Presidential elections are significantly influenced by public opinion polls. These polls impact various aspects of a campaign and the election process. Taking a lead in polls often results in increased media coverage and an upsurge in campaign donations, which can boost a candidate's overall standing in the race.

For instance, during election periods, the larger public's opinion of a candidate can compel presidents to make decisions that align with popular opinions to maintain high approval ratings. These ratings can also empower a president with an electoral mandate to advance policies through Congress.

Moreover, polls influence both the voting behaviors and fundraising efforts of representatives, as they need to keep their constituents and donors satisfied. Senators, though having longer times between elections, can also suffer the consequence of losing reelection due to shifts in public opinion. Public opinion polls not only affect the candidates but also may sway voter turnout. For example, predictions of close races may encourage more people to vote, whereas supposed landslides can deter potential voters.

https://brainly.com/question/31993686

#SPJ12

Hello  CSX

The Peace of Westphalia basically crippled the Roman Empire then making an unproductive and a non-governable conglomerate of principalities. The leaders(emperors) that came behind were weak and held as slaves to overcome traditions and an outdated religion (Catholic) and the Empire just became a broken place

:)

Answer:

what they said

Explanation:

what they said

In the U.S system, the President was ten days to decide what to do with a bill passed by  Congress. If he signs it, it becomes a law. If he vetoes it, it goes back to Congress, which can override the President's decision and still make it a law if two thirds of both houses agree. But if the ten days goes by, the President hasn't make any with the bill and the Congress adjourns before the ten days is up, the bill is vetoed and cannot go back to Congress, so the President can't be overrode.

A pigeonhole is when a bill is put aside for a better time to pass it or to kill it.

Pigeonholing a bill involves deliberately stalling it within a legislative committee, while exercising a pocket veto is when a head of state avoids signing a bill into law by not taking action during a legislative recess. Both tactics delay legislative progress, but pigeonholing is committee based, while a pocket veto involves executive inaction.

Pigeonholing a bill refers to the intentional delay or neglect of a proposed legislation within a legislative committee, preventing its advancement. Conversely, exercising a pocket veto pertains to a situation where a head of state, often the President, refrains from signing a bill into law, letting it remain unsigned during a legislative adjournment, which effectively prevents its enactment. While both actions impede the legislative process, they differ in execution and impact.

Pigeonholing occurs within the committee stage, obstructing the bill's progress, but it can potentially be revisited. A pocket veto occurs after a bill's approval in both legislative chambers, and the lack of the President's signature during a recess ensures its demise, disallowing reconsideration.

Learn more on pocket veto here https://brainly.com/question/11440662

#SPJ6

Jefferson reduced the national debt by cutting government spending.

Jefferson reduced the national debt by cutting government spending.

How did American leaders in Hawaii respond when Queen Liliuokalani announced her plan to restore the power of the Hawaiian monarchy in 1893?

The U.S. minister to Hawaii ordered the marines to surround the royal palace with machine guns and cannons.

American leaders in Hawaii responded when Queen Liliuokalani announced her plan to restore the power of the Hawaiian monarchy in 1893 by agreeing to a new constitution that restored the monarchy that also allowed American businessmen to keep control of the sugar industry.

In 1893, American leaders in Hawaii, particularly American businessmen with interests in the sugar industry, were concerned about Queen Liliuokalani's plan to restore the power of the Hawaiian monarchy.

In response, they supported the overthrow of the monarchy and established a provisional government. This government then proposed a new constitution known as the Bayonet Constitution, which limited the power of the monarchy and gave more political influence to foreign residents, including American businessmen.

While this constitution technically restored the monarchy, it effectively allowed American businessmen to maintain control over the lucrative sugar industry. This was a significant factor in the events leading up to Hawaii's annexation by the United States in 1898.

Learn more monarchy here https://brainly.com/question/3710014

#SPJ4

I believe it called for "an eye for an eye"

Not really sure what your question is, can you expand??

Answer:

What did Hammurabi's Code call for?

Explanation:

Options: (Requires 1 answer!)

A. Specific punishments for each type of violation of the laws

B. Equal punishment for a crime for all classes of people

C. Monetary fines for all offenses

D. Punishment only for crimes against the government

The Atlantic slave trade was beneficial for merchants in Europe they had a new market in West Africa for their manufactured goods. The correct option is A.

Slavery developed into a significant industry because there was a market for it in Europe and traders had access to a supply of it. Many African communities simply disintegrated as more enslaved people were provided by slave traders to European colonies in the Americas.

In the Caribbean and the Americas, where sizable portions of the American continent had been colonized by European nations, the majority of those who were sold into slavery were destined to work on plantations. These plantations produced goods for consumption in Europe, like sugar and tobacco.

Thus, the ideal selection is option A.

Learn more about the slave trade here:

https://brainly.com/question/8667023

#SPJ5

Answer;

The National Negro Business League

Explanation;

-The National Negro Business League (NNBL) was founded by Booker T. Washington in Boston, Massachusetts in 1900.  It strives to enhance the commercial and economic prosperity of the African American community.

-Booker T. Washington believed that solutions to the problem of racial discrimination were primarily economic, and that African American entrepreneurship was vital. Therefore; he founded the league to further the economic development of the African American businesses in order to achieve social equality in the American society.

Answer:

2,3,5

Explanation:

bc yeah

Final answer:

Specialization of labor allows Jamal and Keisha to work more efficiently, leading to trade that maximizes their productivity and minimizes opportunity costs. Comparative advantage ensures even if one person is more skilled overall, specialization still benefits both. Markets facilitate this exchange, allowing each to focus on their strengths and purchase what they need.

Explanation:

Specialization of labor can benefit Jamal and Keisha in several ways. By each focusing on tasks they are most skilled at, they can work more efficiently and produce higher quality results. This arrangement allows for a division of labor, where Jamal and Keisha can trade their specialized tasks to meet each other's needs.

Comparative advantage comes into play when considering specialization and trade. Even if one party is more skilled at both tasks, they benefit from specializing in the task they perform relatively better, minimizing opportunity costs and maximizing productivity. Markets and trade act as the facilitators for this exchange, ensuring that each can purchase what they need with the income earned from their specialized work.

Specialization allows individuals to focus on producing a certain good or service more proficiently, leading to a higher production quality and lower time and resource input. Thus, when Jamal and Keisha specialize and trade, they can both enjoy a greater variety of goods and services than they could produce on their own, illustrating the benefits of a market-based model of exchange.

They all believe in afterlife!!! aka heaven

Answer:    All believe in an afterlife

Explanation:  All three monotheistic faiths, to which Abraham is the founding father, have a common belief in life after death, which will depend on human deeds in this life. The soul after death does not die, and goes to paradise or hell, according to its merits in this world.

The belief that Jesus is the Messiah belongs only to Christians, because the Jews also believe in the Messiah and believe that he is yet to come as the Son of God, while the Muslims consider that Jesus was only a prophet and not a messiah.

Hadith is the holy tradition of the Muslims which contains the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and is one of the sacred texts of Islam except the Qur'an. So, only Muslims believe that Hadith is sacred.

Jamestown island

The English travelers arrived on April 1607 to Jamestown Island, they thought they had arrived to a paradise land after spending four and half months at the sea. They settle in and were eager to extract gold and other treasures to ship back to England, but in their first summer 46 colonists died of mosquito-infestation, hunger and Indian arrows. They are recognized as the first English settlement in North America, but they have been roughly criticized as a group of English men who were looking for money and treasures and found catastrophe. Since Archaeologists found new evidence that says they were more equipped than previously thought and that they had deals with Native Americans (they found a fossil of an Indian woman that seemed to be cooking for an English gentleman). Documents and archaeological records show that they were instructed to make a close relationship with the Indians.

Since the evidence shows that they faced rough climate conditions and a starving time Jeffery Sheler referenced Dennis Blanton (co-author of the tree-ring study ) who suggested that Jamestown colonists have been unfairly criticized and that even the best planned and supported colony would have been challenged under those conditions, they were thought to have poor planning, poor support and indifference to their subsistence. It is now known that Indian reports of lack of food were not strategies but true records of feeding two populations in the drought.

The question discusses the historical interpretations of events at Jamestown, referencing the work of Jeffery Sheer and Dennis Blanton. It likely involves examining different perspectives or new information about early Jamestown history.

The subject of this question centers around the historical interpretations of events that took place at Jamestown. Jeffery Sheer in his work has referenced Dennis Blanton's suggestions in this respect. It's likely these interpretations involve different perspectives or new information about Jamestown's early history, considering the site's importance as the first permanent English settlement in North America. The diverse facets of such interpretations could include settlers' relationships with the native population, the struggles faced by the settlers, the evolution of governmental structures, and economic practices among others.

https://brainly.com/question/13045395

#SPJ3

The answer is D. The king had to accept the religion before it was openly practiced and spread throughout the kingdom.

Answer:

D) Christianity was more tolerated in the Roman Empire.

Explanation:

Although it wasn´t the official religion, it spread widely in the Roman Empire, and the peresecution of Christian cesead in all of the empire, this tolerance added to the powerfull impact that Christianity had on people made for a perfect climate for the Christian population to grow large in the late 200´s.

The "Revolution of 1800" was unique in politics at that time because the transfer of power occurred without violence.

The statement that best describes why the "Revolution of 1800" was unique in politics at that time is option A: The transfer of power from one political party to another occurred without violence. The Revolution of 1800 refers to the peaceful transfer of power from the Federalist Party to the Democratic-Republican Party in the United States. This marked the first time in American history that power shifted from one political party to another through an electoral process, without resorting to violence or armed conflict. It demonstrated the strength and stability of the young democracy and set an important precedent for future peaceful transitions of power.

https://brainly.com/question/5761578

#SPJ1

The progressives tried to help children by limitng maximum hours of labor and in establishing a minimum age for children to be allowed to work.

There were also mandatory laws in different states for children to attend school.

The Progressives believe that government should take an active participation to solve the problems in a society like poverty, education, woman and children rights, job opportunities and best conditions for living.

Answer: Social class essentialism.

The theory of social class essentialism is one that states that people who are able to accomulate more wealth do so because of their natural advantages. Social class essentialism is a revision of social darwinism. It bases its logic on Darwin's idea of natural selection. It states that people are naturally different in their abilities due to genetics, and economic and social success can be attributed to these.

The risk in endorsing this theory is being unable to notice other social factors that affect achievement, such as gender or racial discrimination.

Jackson appealed to many voters who turned out in large numbers..............................................................yuhhhhhh

Jackson appealed to many voters who turned out in large numbers. That is my answer to your question. I hope this helps. :)

the correct choice is huey long.

please leave me a brainliest answer

Answer:

Huey Long

Explanation:

Huey Long supported Roosevelt for the presidency, but was angry with him, saying that he was very attached to high finance. He founded the Share Our Wealth movement in 1932, proposing a rural grant for each American family, an annual income of $ 2,500 and taxing fortunes in excess of $ 5 million, and annual incomes of more than $ 1 million which would be 64.5 million and 84.7 million euros at today's exchange rate). The movement has a fantastic success: one year after its founding, it has 27,000 local groups and more than 7 million members.

Answer:

Providing a safe place for poor residents and to the reformers to work with the poor

Explanation:

The first function of settlement houses was to provide a safe place to the poor residents so they could receive medical care and function as nurseries for kids of working mothers. Besides offering meals they also sponsored lectures and gymnasiums. Gave lectures and trained for jobs.

Second, settlement houses served a purpose for the reformers. These women wanted to not just help the poor but do things with them. Settlement houses allowed them to experience poverty and see it first hand so they could figure out better ways to help them.

Answer:

immigrants

Explanation:

edge 2020

Final answer:

Legalism in ancient China held that strict laws and severe punishments were essential for maintaining social order, and this view was embodied in the governance of the Qin dynasty, emphasizing the need for a strong state power and centralized authority.

Explanation:

I agree with the statement that the Chinese philosophy of Legalism argued that strict laws and severe punishments were necessary to maintain social order. Legalism, a prominent philosophy during the Warring States period of ancient China, emphasized a system of clear laws enforced by harsh punishments, as its proponents, including Han Feizi and Xunzi, held the view that humans are inherently self-interested and only respond to strong legal codes. These philosophies contributed to the establishment of a centralized state power and the formation of the first Chinese empire under the Qin dynasty, exemplifying the practical realization of Legalism's focus on order and authority at the expense of tradition and morality.

Mud would be your answer

In general, the native Indian languages in Latin America were able to survive. This was because the colonial governments were not forbidding the native languages and were not punishing the people for using them. Instead, the politics was, that the language of the colonists is a must-known language for everyday communication between the different people, but they can use their own languages in the communication between themselves and at home. This is why the countries in Latin America nowadays have multiple official languages, most of which are native Indian languages.

Final answer:

Most Latin American countries historically favored colonial languages like Spanish, Portuguese, and French over indigenous languages, leading to a prevalence of these languages and the marginalization of Indian languages.

Explanation:

Historically, the policy of most countries regarding Indian languages in Latin America has been one of linguistic dominance by the colonial languages. After colonization by European powers such as Spain, Portugal, and France, languages like Spanish, Portuguese, and French became dominant in the respective colonies. Despite this, some Native American languages, like Quechua in the Andes, have survived and are spoken in more remote rural areas. Nevertheless, there has been a long-standing cultural imperialism, often conducted through education and media, that has disadvantaged indigenous languages.

Missionary efforts from the colonial period were double-edged, as they documented indigenous languages for Christian proselytization but eventually led to the suppression and loss of many of these languages. In more recent times, there is a complex relationship with indigenous languages as countries grapple with cultural preservation, bilingual education models, and overcoming the historical legacy of linguistic imperialism.

The correct answer is - proto-feudal.

The third Chinese dynasty, the Chou dynasty, was a dynasty that was pastoral in its core. They implemented a proto-feudal social organization in the Chinese society, that was based on families, with administrative bureaucracy. The Chou dynasty also introduced the middle class in the Chinese society.

why hello there

your answer is B

if my answer did help please mark me as brainliest thank you and have the best day ever!

The location of Mesopotamia in the map indicated towards letter B.

Therefore we can conclude that Mesopotamia existed in the Middle East.

Thus option letter B is the correct answer.

Learn more about "Mesopotamia" here:

brainly.com/question/2733505