Answer:
Oregon
Explanation:
Many of the Eastern Woodland tribes like the Iroquois traced the family lineage
through the clan
through the mother
through the father
through the social status.
Through the mother
Explanation:
Society was matrilineal, origin was established by mother - they had clans: Turtle, Bear, Wolf, Beaver, Snipe, Heron, Deer and Hawk .... and If the mother was, for example, a member of the bear clan, the child was a bear. If the father was from a wolf clan, and the mother did not have a clan, then the child did not have a clan), and women were also in charge of making choices about who would become the leader of a tribe.Learn more on Iroquois on
https://brainly.com/question/6555989
https://brainly.com/question/10617381
https://brainly.com/question/579837
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
b:the mother
Explanation:
What is Imperialism?
Definition of imperialism
imperial government, authority, or system
the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation especially by direct territorial acquisitions or by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas
broadly : the extension or imposition of power, authority, or influence
Hope that helps!!!
Which of the following is true in a command economy?
A. Consumers have many economic choices
OB. The government makes no economic decisions.
C.
The government decides which goods are produced.
D.
Business owners decide which goods to produce.
Answer:
According to command economy, the government decides which goods are produced is true.
Option: (C)
Explanation:
In command economy, government determination made by central planners what product will be produced, how much of goods and services to be produced and what cost to the consumers. Each and every decision is made by the controllers government and all business are controlled by control planners of government. The supplies and even the demands is also be determined by the government.According to great Britain how does the new sugar act of 1763 benefit the colonies?
Answer:
The Sugar Act reduced the amount of tax that colonists had to pay on molasses by half but increased the enforcement of the law. This made smuggling of illegal molasses from non-British territories a lot harder. The tax on molasses under the Sugar Act was 3 cents per gallon
one fact about world war one that is very unusual. (a fact that isnt well known)
In World War 1 a fake Paris was built to fool the German pilots. Railways and road were built and were lit in mid-night to make an impression of the real Paris so that once any bomber may hit the Paris. i.e the fake one there may not happen any life loss, instead only fake buildings and railway lines may get hit.
One unusual fact about World War I is the British blockade on Germany, which caused severe food shortages and the deaths of about 760,000 German civilians. The blockade continued even after the Armistice in 1918 until the Treaty of Versailles in 1919.
Unusual Fact about World War I:
One unusual and not well-known fact about World War I is the length of the British blockade on Germany. The British blockade, which aimed to cut off supplies to the Central Powers, caused significant food shortages in Germany, resulting in the deaths of about 760,000 German civilians due to starvation and related diseases. This blockade continued even after the Armistice was signed in 1918, extending into 1919 until the Treaty of Versailles was implemented.
This blockade showcased the concept of 'Total War,' which involved every level of society, not just combatants.
What led to the case of Marbury v. Madison?
A. The Midnight Judges Act eliminating key federal positions
B. Adams quickly appointing federal positions at the end of his term
Answer:
The answer is B.
What are the two types of democracies?
a representative and sharing
b. direct and representative
c.indirect and sharing
d direct and sharing
There are two types of democracy: direct and representative. There are three systems of democracies: parliamentary, presidential, and mixed. Parliamentary systems are distinct because of the power that they place in the hands of the legislative branch.
The two types of democracies are direct and representative. Direct democracy involves citizens voting on all decisions, while representative democracy allows elected officials to make decisions on behalf of the citizens.
Explanation:The two types of democracies are direct democracy and representative democracy. In a direct democracy, all citizens participate in making decisions by voting on issues themselves, rather than by electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf. An example of this would be some ancient Greek city-states. A representative democracy, on the other hand, is where citizens elect representatives to make laws and decisions on their behalf. A familiar example of this would be the United States government.
Learn more about Types of Democracy here:https://brainly.com/question/18463802
#SPJ12
Why did many fascist governments form following World War One?
Answer:
Rise of poverty, lost trust for traditional governments, painful reperations, desire for vengeance, and the rise of nationalism. These are just a few of the many reasons why fascism grew to prominance following world war one.
Explanation:
does the fact that Britain and Japan are islands enable or deterred migration to and from those places? explain
No it does not affect the migration.
Explanation:
The countries of Britain and Japan are two of the most wealthiest island nations of the world. The islands even though do not have much land route for going to other countries but still it did not affect these countries of the world.
People in huge number migrated to these two nations because of the availability of jobs and employment opportunities in these countries. More over the living standards were also high in this country which attracted a lot of people.
Final answer:
Britain and Japan, as island nations, have been both helped and hindered by their geography in terms of migration. The isolation of islands can be a defense mechanism but also creates barriers for people looking to migrate.
Explanation:
The fact that Britain and Japan are islands has both enabled and deterred migration to and from those places. Being islands provides a natural barrier to movement, inherently making both countries easier to defend and control access to. This has occasionally been beneficial, as during the COVID-19 pandemic, when island nations had the potential to block all travel to contain the spread of the virus. Conversely, it has been a barrier to those seeking to migrate or invade.
Historically, Britain's island status enabled it to become a powerful maritime nation with a formidable navy, allowing it to reach distant lands and establish colonies during the colonial era. However, Japan, while also being an island nation, was more isolated due to its lack of natural resources such as coal and iron ore, unlike Britain, which had these resources in abundance, contributing to its industrial revolution and colonial expansion.
Imagine you are an educated African American who moves to a northern city in the early 20th century. What might you do to establish yourself as an important member of the local black community?
A. start raising funds to bring Booker T. Washington to the city for a speech
B. seek out membership in a local African American social club
C. seek out the most prominent wealthy white philanthropists in the city
D. begin to organize African American strikebreakers
Answer:
A. start raising funds to bring Booker T. Washington to the city for a speech
If i'm correct.
Why did Russia want to put missiles in Cuba ?
Moving existing nuclear weapons to locations from which they could reach American targets was one." A second reason that Soviet missiles were deployed to Cuba was because Khrushchev wanted to bring West Berlin, controlled by the American, British and French within Communist East Germany, into the Soviet orbit.
The Soviet Union wanted to put missiles in Cuba as a defensive measure against US nuclear missiles in Turkey and to gain increased status in the region. It also sought to protect Cuba from US threats and other revolutionaries in Latin America.
Explanation:The Soviet Union wanted to put missiles in Cuba in response to the United States' decision to install nuclear weapons in Turkey, which is on the Soviet Union's southwestern border. By placing missiles in Cuba, the Soviet Union sought to deter any further US plans of invading or destabilizing Cuba, while also gaining increased status in the region and thwarting their Cold War rival. The presence of Soviet missiles in Cuba also offered a strategic base near the Florida coast, providing a defensive measure against the presence of US nuclear missiles in Turkey and other American military bases near leading Soviet cities.
Learn more about The reason why the Soviet Union wanted to put missiles in Cuba. here:https://brainly.com/question/12363292
#SPJ12
Describe three ways that the U.S could benefit from their WW1 success?
Answer:
The impact of WWI on the US is significant. There are long-term and short-term effects. In the short-term, we can name 3 benefits: one, the US economy grew in the buildup to the conflict and during it; two, US companies expanded throughout the world; three, domestic consumption rose.
Explanation:
(Answer quick!)How did the Ottomans and Mughals each treated non-Muslims?
Answer: The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Empires all reached their peaks between the 16th and 17th centuries. Combined, the empires spanned from Egypt, across the Middle East and Persia, all the way to India. Each empire controlled areas with distinct physical, ethnic, and religious environments, yet were similar in many ways. The leaders of each of the empires had Turkic ethnic backgrounds and Islamic roots, and all of the empires developed strong military forces (because of this, they are collectively referred to as the Gunpowder Empires). Each of the empires had to contend with religious divisions within their empires, and were able to overcome these differences and please the various groups within their empires. I will focus on the similar way that each of the empires dealt with religious divisions, as well as the status of women in each of the Gunpowder Empires.
The three Muslim Empires are similar in that they each ruled over subjects with diverse religious and ethnic backgrounds. Although each situation was different, the Empires separately came around to using very similar methods of dealing with religious differences.
In the Ottoman Empire, non-Muslims were incorporated as “millets” (communities), with their own leadership, legal systems, and education systems [1]. Both the subjects and the ruling class grew more and more diverse, and it was important that the Ottomans could maintain their legitimacy in the eyes of each of the various groups. Later Ottoman rulers followed Sunni Islam, and encouraged, but did not force, Jews and Christians to convert to Islam [2].
The Safavid Empire mainly united Persian speaking areas, but still faced religious clashes in multiple facets: Muslim vs. non-Muslim, Sunni vs. Shii, as well as various other mystical Muslim beliefs [3]. The Empire patronized Shii Islam, and, like the Ottomans, encouraged Jews, Christians, and Zorastrians to convert. Unlike the Ottomans, the Safavids went farther, persecuting non-Muslims. However, these persecutions, which were supported by the Safavid ulama, never lasted long [4].
The Mughals faced the largest religious divide, between the Muslims and the large number of Hindus within the Empire. Early Mughal rulers, such as Akbar, focused on promoting universal religious tolerance. Akbar did not wish to pick sides and incur the distrust of the large Hindu population, and thus chose to follow a new religion of his own creation. There was no religion-based hierarchy in the ruling class; people proved their loyalty to the ruler by serving him, not by following a certain religion [5]. Later Mughal rulers, most notably Aurangzeb, emphasized “the need to preserve and purify Islam and to establish a society in which Islam will flourish” [251]. Aurangzeb was a believer in Shari Sunni Islam, and recast the Mughal Empire in accordance with Shari restrictions. Aurangzeb did not force conversion to Islam, but nonetheless followed the pattern of confessionalization enacted by the Ottoman and Safavid Empires [7].
Although all three empires faced different religious divides, they ended up dealing with them in much the same way. All three empires ended up at least encouraging, if not enforcing, conversion to Islam (it took an extra century or so for the Mughals, but the outcome was the same). However, none of the empires went so far as to severely harm other religious groups.
Palace women were placed in essentially the same positions in all three of the Islamic Empires. From the beginning of the Ottoman Empire, sultans had children with concubines rather than with their wives. The reason for this was political: the wives of sultans were usually nobly born of other dynasties, and “to deny these women access to motherhood . . . was to diminish the status of the royal houses from which they came” [8]. The loss of power from the sultan’s wife made room for concubines who gave the sultan a son to gain power. After having a son, concubines would usually no longer be in contact with the sultan. A concubine would leave to raise her son, and when he was given land to govern as a prince, she would go with him and act as his main protector, advisor, and manager of his household [9]. And if her son became the ruler, she would have a large amount of influence over his decisions. Extensive study has not been done on the role of Safavid royal women, but it is evident that royal mothers had significant influence in the Safavid Empire as well. Streusand gives two examples of influential Safavid women: Pari Khan Khanum and Mahd-i Ulya. Mughal women played similar roles [10].
Explanation:
Final answer:
The Ottomans used the millet system to govern non-Muslim subjects who were given religious autonomy but had to pay the jizya tax. The Janissary system converted Christian boys into Muslim soldiers or administrators. The Mughals also granted religious autonomy to their subjects, with conversion to Islam being a mix of voluntary and strategic choices.
Explanation:
Treatment of Non-Muslims by the Ottomans and Mughals
The Ottomans and Mughals each had distinct approaches to governing their non-Muslim subjects. The Ottoman Empire implemented the milletsystem, which allowed non-Muslim communities, or dhimmis, such as Christians and Jews, to govern their own affairs and practice their religion freely in exchange for paying the jizya tax. Moreover, the Ottomans' utilization of the Janissary system involved taking Christian boys, converting them to Islam, and training them for military or administrative roles.
The Mughal treatment of non-Muslims was also characterized by a degree of tolerance, with the empire allowing autonomy in matters of religion and customs to its diverse subjects. Conversion to Islam occurred through various influences, but there were instances where conversions were discouraged to maintain the tax base from non-Muslims.
Islamic states like the Ottomans recognized 'people of the book' or ahl al-kitab, who were non-Muslim communities with recognized prophets and scriptures, allowing them to continue their religious practices and community functions within the greater Islamic context, with certain rights and obligations different from Muslims.
What was similar about the conquests of Mexico ad Peru during the European Age of Discovery?
(Think about their conquistadors, size of their armies)
Both areas were conquered by the Spanish conquistadors and both conquistadors used the modern warfare they had in battling the Natives. They used internal problems of Incas and Aztecs and also created alliances with their enemies.
Explanation:
Cortés with this small force he managed to occupy the Aztec Empire, which had between 2 and 8 million inhabitants. His victory is due to his ability to form alliances with the Aztec enemies. He allied himself with the them and succeeded in getting their chief to rebel against the Aztecs and expel the Aztecs from that part of the Yucatán. Cortés learned that Montezuma II an Aztec emperor based in the city of Tenochtitlan. Initially, the Aztecs resisted the advancement of the conquistadors, and later considered Cortés Quetzalcoatl, the legendary king-god, a feathered dragon, who controls lightning and who, according to prophecy, would return one day. When he reached Tenochtitlan, Cortés captured Montezuma II and demanded a large ransom for him. The Aztecs had already begun to rebel, were astonished at the king's obedience, and intended to expel the Spaniards. The first attempt was while Cortés was away. Many Aztec nobles were then killed. The people of Tenochtitlan rebelled and elected a new leader. They besieged the palace, which housed Spaniards and Montezuma. Cortés ordered Montezuma to reason with the people and persuade them to let the Spaniards to the coast. The people did not listen to Montezuma, but mocked and threw stones at him. He was severely injured and Montezuma died a few days later. Cortés occupied one after another the Aztec city.Pizarro was a Spanish conquistador. From Panama, where he sailed with D. de Almagro in 1522, he undertook 1524-27. two expeditions to the Peruvian coast. Named previously by the King of Spain and Roman-German Emperor Charles V. Habsburg as Governor of the lands he conquers, Pizarro departs in 1531 with his brothers Gonzalo, Hernando and Juan and D. de Almagro and a total of 183 people to conquer Peru. Owing to the internal weakness of the Inca state, he conquered Peru in 1533, where he founded the city of Lima two years later. After the suppression of the Incas uprising (1537), a struggle for power ensued among the conquistadors. Pizarro, who killed D. de Almagra in these fights in 1538, fell alone three years later at the hands of his supporters.Learn more on Conquistadors on
https://brainly.com/question/544943
https://brainly.com/question/640204
https://brainly.com/question/11890242
#learnwithBrainly
Which phrase best matches the Republican Party's view of government?
O
A. Open our borders to more immigrants
O
B. Regulate businesses to protect citizens
O
C. Set strict rules for immigration
O
D. Support same-sex marriage rights
Set strict rules for immigration is the phrase which best matches the Republican Party's view of government
Explanation:
Republicans are the people who favor the elected representatives in a government and they do not support a government which is ruled by a crown. As per the republicans, the immigration laws must be in such a way that it ensures national safety. It also believes that the crime rate in America is high due to the criminals who immigrate into the country.
It ensures that the immigrants who entered the country illegally are not provided with the same benefits as that of the citizens who reside in the country. Biometric data of every immigrant is collected as a safety measure so that it keeps a check on the illegal intruders inside the country.
Answer:
so I do not know the answer but the other that said c its wrong I have all the other choices just not option c so I am pretty sure that is wrong...
Explanation:
What was the Constitutional issue in Gideon v. Wainwright?
Answer:
The issue at stake here was a US citizen´s right to a due process even if he or she doesn´t have the means to pay a lawyer.
An indigent man, Clarence Earl Gideon, was charged with a felony for alledgedly burglarizing a pool hall in Panama City, Florida, in June 1961. At the beginning of the trial he requested a court-appointed attorney, but the request was denied. He was found guilty. The case made it to the US Supreme Court. On March 18, 1963 , the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the denial of an attorney was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment , which guarantees due process. There was a new trial and he was acquitted.
Explanation:
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Constitutional issue was whether felony defendants in state courts have the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gideon, establishing that the Constitution guarantees legal representation for those facing felony charges. This landmark case has had a significant impact on the criminal court system.
Explanation:The Constitutional issue in Gideon v. Wainwright was whether the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel in criminal cases extends to felony defendants in state courts. Clarence Gideon, who was charged with a felony, argued that the denial of a lawyer by the trial judge violated his constitutional right to representation. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Gideon's favor, establishing that the Constitution requires the appointment of a lawyer for those facing felony criminal charges, even if they cannot afford one.
15.
Which list shows the numbers below in
order from greatest to least? (8.18, 8.17)
1 1/ 0.7, 14%, 10
100 3.0.7, 14%
6 14%, 5.0.7.12
At least separate your answers to make it more understandable.
which statement best describes the effect of the articles of confederation on the government
Answer:
The sentence "it granted sovereignty to each state " best describes the effect of the articles of confederation on the government .
Explanation:
Each state reserve its independence, sovereignty jurisdiction and every power, rights. The principle of the article is to conserve sovereignty and the independence of each state. The central government has no power for trading and levy taxes. It leads a friendship among states for their defense and mutual welfare.Which statement best explains how the sinking of the Lusitania contributed to the
eventual entry of the United States into World War I?
It increased the American public's support of war against Germany.
Explanation:
The loss of civilian lives led many Americans to support involvement in the conflict. The Lusitania was a luxury cruise ship of America that was carrying almost 3046 passengers and crew to England.
When the ship was approaching the island of Ireland, it was attacked by the Germans. Germany has already warned America that it would attack any ship that traveled to England because Germany was using submarines and had already declared the seas around Britain a war zone.
When the submarine also known as U-boat released that a ship had entered the war zone it attacked the Lusitania which began to sink immediately and resulted in the loss of 1198 lives.
· Provide Specific Contributions by the following groups (Make sure to give specific examples from the lesson)
o Women
o Native Americans
o African Americans
o Children
Answer:
Native American women not only took care of their household work and children but also contributed in the upliftment of the society. They were warriors, hunters, builders. The men understood the importance of women in their life.
They shared their work like if a man did the hunting the wife not only assisted him but did the skinning, cleaning, cutting and cooking.
The women were treated with respect as they took shoulder to their men prepared hunting tools took care of the men and the children.
They were swift enough to handle things and they also prepared medicines to heal. The women were multitasking with great inner strength.
which state had the smallest representation in the hoise of representative? how many?
Answer:
Wyoming had the smallest representation in the house of representative with only 60 members.
Explanation:
It is a state in the mountain region of the Western America. Wyoming State's Legislature comprises a House of Representatives with only 60 members and a Senate with 30 members. The Constitution of Wyoming includes three branches of government: the branches of the executive, the legislative and the judiciary.
In 2018, the state's population was estimated at 577,737, which is less than 31 of the USA's most populous states. This state is the 10th biggest state by population, the least populous state, and the second thinly populated state in the United States.
what is the difference between government and politics
Answer:
Government refers to the group of authorized people who governs a country or a state. State refers to the organized political community living under a single system of government. The main difference between state and government is that state is more or less permanent whereas government is temporary.Oct 5, 2018
Explanation:
Government refers to the system or group of people who have the authority to make laws and govern a society. Politics deals with the activities and actions involved in the acquisition, exercise, and distribution of power within a government or society.
Explanation:Government: Government refers to the system or group of people who have the authority to make laws, implement policies, and govern a society or country. It is responsible for maintaining order, protecting citizens' rights, and providing public services. Examples of government institutions include the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
Politics: Politics, on the other hand, deals with the activities and actions involved in the acquisition, exercise, and distribution of power within a government or a society. It refers to the decision-making processes, competition, conflicts, and compromises among various individuals and groups in order to gain influence and control over resources and policies.
The key difference between government and politics is that government focuses on the structure and functioning of the institutions that maintain order and provide governance, whereas politics focuses on the processes and actions involved in acquiring and exercising power within that government.
Learn more about the Difference Between Government and Politics here:https://brainly.com/question/17410994
#SPJ6
How did third estate react to the living condition in France
They were unsatisfied with the conditions in the state and have started a Revolution
Explanation:
At the top of the social rankings of the Third estate was the so-called bourgeoisie or civic middle class, which included the more affluent members of the Third Estate. This group included bankers, wealthy merchants, manufactory owners, lawyers, doctors, journalists, professors. The largest group of the Third Estate was the peasants. Some were even more affluent, so they could afford to hire workers to work for them, but most of the peasants were represented by peasants. The poorest part of the Third Estate consisted of city workers. There were various apprentices, hired workers and others who worked in industrial plants, but these were the "lucky" ones who work and get some kind of pay. Much of the city's poor were unemployed, and in order to survive, they turned to petition or crime. Whether rich or poor, members of the Third Estate were dissatisfied with the privileges enjoyed by members of the first two ranks.Learn more on Third Estate on
https://brainly.com/question/1057334
https://brainly.com/question/2850394
https://brainly.com/question/1767837
#learnwithBrainly
The queen who led the fight against the Muslim invasion of her country
1. Dahia al-Kahina
2. Nzinga
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
Al-Kahina was a Berber warrior queen that resisted Arab conquest of the Mahgreb (northern Africa) in the 7th century.
The Answer is: A. Dahlia al-Kahina
Explanation:
how did napoleón become the supreme leader of france
Answer:
Taking advantage of his huge popularity for his services to the republic, Gen. Napoleon organized and sucessfully carried out a coup d´etat with the support of the army in 1799. First, there was a triumvirate. He later become the First Consul for life. In 1804 , he crowned himself emperor of France.
Explanation:
What was a major reason for conflict between Native Americans and colonists?
Answer:
North American Indian tribes and white colonists often clashed over lands, access to water bodies and trade, for example, control of fur trade.
Explanation:
Answer:
Forced assimilation of Native Americans and the stealing of their land.
Explanation:
Most of the Native Americans' actions were retaliative. The colonists landed in the 'New World' not realizing it was already populated, and upon discovering it was already populated, they attempted to assert their power of the Native Americans whom they perceived as 'savages' because of the differing religious beliefs. The colonists seized land for their settlements and took advantage of the Native Americans at every turn. Once colonists fully had the upperhand in society and no longer relied on Native Americans to help maintain their settlements, the colonists forced the assimilation of the Native Americans, making them worship as the colonists did and live as the colonists expected them to.
Jefferson's political party was the...
A. Federalists
B. Independents
C. Republicans
D. Democrats
Answer:
Republican
Explanation:
Although it says that it is Democratic-Republican on most cases (so they would pick democratic option), it is certainly proven that it is republican in origin and exist partly of the present standards.
True or false? Benedict Arnold and Ethan Allen attacked the British at Fort Ticonderoga.
Answer:
true
Explanation: Benedict Arnold was the British commander at Fort Ticonderoga
Final answer:
It is true that Benedict Arnold and Ethan Allen attacked and captured Fort Ticonderoga from the British in May 1775, securing important artillery for the Continental Army.
Explanation:
True, Benedict Arnold and Ethan Allen attacked the British at Fort Ticonderoga. In May 1775, immediately following the battles of Lexington and Concord that signaled the start of the Revolutionary War, Ethan Allen, leading the Green Mountain Boys, and Colonel Benedict Arnold joined forces to capture Fort Ticonderoga in New York from the British. This success was significant as it enabled the rebels to secure vital artillery for the Continental Army.
The capture of Fort Ticonderoga was a crucial early victory for the American forces during the Revolutionary War. The cannons obtained from Ticonderoga were later transported and used to fortify positions around Boston, contributing to the British evacuation of the city in March 1776. The fort's strategic location also helped control key routes between Canada and the Hudson River Valley.
Should corporations and organizations be more or less restricted in their campaign donations
Answer:
depends on your personal view
Explanation:
Sample Answer:
I think companies and groups should be more restricted in their campaign funding practices. Powerful and wealthy organizations can have too much influence over voters and the voting process. OR I think corporations and organizations should be less restricted in how they spend their money for political purposes. As the Supreme Court ruled in the Citizens United case, groups have the right to use their money to express their opinion. I believe this is protected by the First Amendment.
What rights did the Egyptian women have and how did they differ from the Mesopotamian women?
Answer:
Women in ancient Egypt were the equals of men in every area except occupations. Historians Bob Brier and Hoyt Hobbs note how women were equal to men in almost every area except for jobs. In terms of being different from the Mesopotamian women, they Egyptian women could work outside of the home and build wealth. While Mesopotamian Women could not exercise much personal sovereignty in ancient Mesopotamia.
- I hope I helped you :)