Answer:
answer is d
Explanation:
It can be deduced that the sentence that compares to things is D. Air travel, like bus travel, is a fun way to get from one place to another.
What is comparison?It should be noted that comparison simply means comparing a thing with something else in order to illustrate a point.
In this case, the sentence that compares to things is that air travel, like bus travel, is a fun way to get from one place to another. This compares the transportation.
Learn more about comparison on:
https://brainly.com/question/904184
In this chapter, what gives moon shadow hope and something to believe in?
Choosing the best way to figure out a word’s meaning is called:
(40 Points !!!)
Which of the following statements is true?
An argument uses logic to show why your stand on an issue is the best choice. Spoken arguments follow a different process than written arguments.
Writing an argumentative essay is the same as writing a persuasive essay.
An argument uses logic to show why your stand on an issue is the best choice. An argument needs evidence and conclusion that convinces the reader or listener and validates the argument's premises.
It is necessary to collect pieces of evidence and logic behind the evidence to convince. it should claim your stand on an issue. Arguments should ignore the hasty generalizations such as pink color is associated with girls and blue to boys.
What does the following line of dialogue reveal? “Even though the boy,” he said, still looking at me, “bears a white man’s name, the medicine bag will be his.” A. Martin is of age. B. Martin is both Sioux and white. C Martin will continue the tradition even though his father is white. D. Martin is of age as a result of possessing the medicine bag.
What is the theme in “The Oilman and His Sons”? How does the theme emerge and develop over the course of the text? Use evidence from the text to support your response. Your response should be at least two complete paragraphs.
the texts
The Oilman and His Sons
There was once an oilman with five sons and they were all married and lived jointly with their father. But the daughters-in-law were discontented with this arrangement and urged their husbands to ask their father to divide the family property. At first the old man refused, but when his sons persisted, he told them to bring him a log two cubits long and so thick that two hands could just span it, and he said that if they could break the log in two, he would divide the property. So they brought the log and then asked for axes, but he told them that they must break it themselves by snapping it or twisting it or standing on it. So they tried and failed.
Then the old man said, “You are five and I make six; split the log into six.” So they split it and he gave each a piece and told them to break them, and each easily snapped his stick. Then the old man said, “We are like the whole log: we have plenty of property and are strong and can overcome attack; but if we separate we shall be like the split sticks and easily broken.”
They admitted that this was true and proposed that the property should not be divided but that they should all become separate. But the father would not agree to this for he thought that people would call him a miser if he let his sons live separately without his giving them their share in the property as their own. So as they persisted in their folly he partitioned the property.
But in a few years they all fell into poverty and had not enough to eat nor clothes to wear, and the father and mother were no better off. Then the old man called all his sons and their wives and said, “You see what trouble you have fallen into? I have a riddle for you, explain it to me. There are four wells, three empty and one full of water. If you draw water from the full one and pour it into the three empty ones they will become full. But when they are full and the first one is empty, if you pour water from the three full ones into the empty one it will not be filled. What does this mean?”
And they could not answer and he said, “The four wells mean that a man had three sons, and while they were little he filled their stomachs as the wells were filled with water; but when they separated they would not fill the old man’s stomach.”
And it was true, that the sons had done nothing to help their father and they were filled with shame and they agreed that as long as their father lived they would be joint with him and would not separate again until he died.
The theme was that there was strength in unity and that family should help one another. When the log was whole, it was difficult for them to break but once it was divided into smaller pieces, it broke easily. When they each had their share of their inheritance, they fell into poverty. The father told his sons that they should help each other. When one person in the family is in need, the others must help.
Answer:
The theme is that family should stay together therefore being stronger that way. The five sons did not want to stay together though due to their wives’ wishes. The father compared their relationship to a log. The Oilman said, “We are like the whole log: we have plenty of property and are strong and can overcome attack; but if we separate we shall be like the split sticks and easily broken.” The sons still separated from their father.
The theme emerges as they all fell into poverty. Once they were all divided it was easy for the “log” to fall apart. The Oilman then compares the family to four wells “The four wells mean that a man had three sons, and while they were little he filled their stomachs as the wells were filled with water; but when they separated they would not fill the old man’s stomach.” The theme stayed the same over the course of the passage. They were all stronger together.
Which details from the excerpt provide more information about Shelley’s idea that poetry "makes immortal all that is best and most beautiful in the world”? Check all that apply. arrests the vanishing apparitions which haunt the interlunations of life sends them forth among mankind, bearing sweet news to those with whom their sisters abide no portal of expression from the caverns of the spirit redeems from decay the visitations of the divinity in man
The poem "A Defense of Poetry" was written by Percy Bysshe Shelley. According to the above excerpt, the main idea of Shelley's poetry is to arrests the vanishing apparitions,bearing sweet news and to redeems the spirits from decay.
What is the main idea of Shelley's poetry?Shelley describe immortality in the story and told that immortality Immortality is never dying or a sense of having an afterlife.
The word interlunation means the period of dark life. The author examine that after the death, the spirit redeems and it is truth behind every after life.
Therefore, correct options are A, C and D.
Learn more about Shelley, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/3873478
Who spoke to Eliezer for, "hours on then about the Kabbalah's revelations and it's mysteries"?
A) His father
B) Tzipora
C) Moishe
D) His mother
Miss Taylor, Please call our office to schedule a follow-up appointment as soon as possible. Tests from your previous physical examination have revealed an abnormality.’ What does the tone of this statement from the passage imply? A) that it is time to schedule her physical examination. B) that test results from a recent exam indicate that she is very healthy C) that she should call the office as soon as possible to update her name and address D) that test results from a recent exam indicate that something is wrong, and she should see the doctor again. Submit
Answer: Your answer should be that "Test results from a recent exam indicate that something is wrong, and she should see the doctor again" which is D. "
This answer sometimes may appear as "Test results from a recent exam indicate an irregularity, and she should see the doctor again".
After reading the following prompt, identify the claim that has effectively restated the prompt, included an opinion, a definite position, and three items to be discussed.
"Patrick Henry and Dr. Martin Luther King both used persuasive rhetoric that was appropriate and successful with their respective audiences. Considering today's political and social climate, which author's style would be most successful in persuading our society to make a drastic change to our beliefs, laws, or ethics? Write a 5 paragraph essay explaining at least three types of persuasive rhetoric used by the author of your choice, giving examples from the text, and how these types of rhetoric would affect today's general audience.
A. Dr. Martin Luther King's style would be better because he uses rhetoric like appeal to emotion, appeal to logic, and the "I am one of you technique".
B. Dr. Martin Luther King's style would be a better fit for people today because he uses things like appeal to emotion, appeal to logic, and the "I am one of you" technique.
C. Dr. Martin Luther King's style would be better because he uses the appeal to emotion and the appeal to logic techniques which are really effective on people today.
D. Dr. Martin Luther King and Patrick Henry used persuasive rhetoric that was appropriate and successful with their respective audiences. However Dr. King's rhetorical style would be more effective when persuading modern audiences to make a drastic change to their beliefs, laws, or ethics because he uses appeal to emotion, appeal to logic, and the "I am one of you" technique.
Final answer:
Option D effectively restates the prompt, expresses a clear opinion favoring Dr. King's rhetorical style, presents a definitive stance, and outlines three rhetorical strategies (appeal to emotion, appeal to logic, and 'I am one of you' technique) for further discussion, making it the correct choice.
Explanation:
The prompt asks to identify the claim that effectively restates the prompt, includes an opinion, a definite position, and three items to be discussed regarding the persuasive rhetoric of Patrick Henry and Dr. Martin Luther King and its applicability in today's society.
The answer is option D: "Dr. Martin Luther King and Patrick Henry used persuasive rhetoric that was appropriate and successful with their respective audiences. However, Dr. King's rhetorical style would be more effective when persuading modern audiences to make a drastic change to their beliefs, laws, or ethics because he uses appeal to emotion, appeal to logic, and the 'I am one of you' technique."
This option effectively restates the prompt by comparing the rhetorical styles of both authors, expresses a clear opinion by favoring Dr. King's style, takes a definite position on which style would be more persuasive today, and outlines three rhetorical strategies for discussion: appeal to emotion, appeal to logic, and the 'I am one of you' technique.
3. Why does Huck give up on prayer? (1 point)A.He doesn’t know what to say.
B.Pap hits him for praying.
C.Some of his prayers have not been answered
Answer:
moses
Explanation:
Which sentence below shows correct use of an email dashes? A if the cat meows one more time I know-he will- I am going to have to get the treats B if the cat-meows one more time, he will- I am going to have to get the treats C if the cat meows one more time-know he will- I am going to have to get the treats D if the cat meows one-more-time I know he will I am going to have to get the treats
"if the cat meows one more time-know he will- I am going to have to get the treats"
Grammatical corrections:
If the cat meows one more time - I know he will - I am going to have to get the treats.
The speaker is interrupting the sentence for a little bit and continuing. Where they interrupt they need to put a dashed line where the interruption begins and ends.
We could’ve made this error. What does the bolded contraction mean? can of can have could have could of
Answer: The contraction "could've" means "could have".
Explanation: A contraction, which is an abbreviated word, takes place when a apostrophe (') replaces one or more letters. For example, "'ve" is the abbreviated version of the word "have". In that way, the contraction "could've" stands for "could have", which is a past modal used to refer to something that could have happened in the past, but it did not happen. Other past modals are "should have" and "would have", whose abbreviated versions are "should've" and "would've" respectively.
What is the best course of action when you find that you agree with the information in a counterclaim to your central argument? A. Leave out information that doesn't support your claim. B. Provide more evidence to support your original claim. C. Modify your own claim to reflect the new information. D. Find a new topic that you agree with completely.
The course of action when you find that you agree with the information in a counterclaim to your central argument is C. Modify your own claim to reflect the new information.
What is a claim?It should be noted that a claim simply means the stance or main argument that can be found in a literary work.
In this case, the course of action when you find that you agree with the information in a counterclaim to your central argument is to modify your own claim to reflect the new information.
Learn more about claim on:
https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ2
Read this newspaper article, which discusses the Endurance Expedition. What differences do you note between the voice and point of view of the newspaper article compared to the chapter “Across South Georgia” from Shackleton's memoir?
While the newspaper report takes a distant view of the incident, the chapter from Shackleton's memoir is a personal account. The report is in third-person point of view, while the memoir chapter is in first person. Also, while the chapter is written by one of the crew members, the reporter’s name isn’t listed. The news account is more objective and impersonal.
The article’s writer is like a passive bystander. There is no emotional attachment or feelings toward the crew members. The chapter’s narrator is the leader of the crew, actively involved in the rescue mission.
Answer:
While the newspaper report takes a distant view of the incident, the chapter from Shackleton's memoir is a personal account. The report is in third-person point of view, while the memoir chapter is in first person. Also, while the chapter is written by one of the crew members, the reporter’s name isn’t listed. The news account is more objective and impersonal.
The article’s writer is like a passive bystander. There is no emotional attachment or feelings toward the crew members. The chapter’s narrator is the leader of the crew, actively involved in the rescue mission.
Many people apply online for jobs sentence or fragment
Romeo: What is her mother? Nurse: Marry, bachelor, Her mother is the lady of the house, And a good lady, and a wise, and virtuous: I nurs'd her daughter, thank you talk'd withal; I tell you he that can lay hold of her Shall have the chinks. Romeo: Is she a Capulet? O dear account! my life is my foe's debt. –Romeo and Juliet, William Shakespeare Which line of dialogue signals that Romeo is a star-crossed lover? “a good lady” “wise, and virtuous” “he that can lay hold of her” “my life is my foe’s debt”
The theme of a story is usually revealed during which part of the plot?
Rising action
Climax
Resolution
Falling action
The theme of a story, being the central idea or message the author wants to convey, is typically revealed gradually throughout the plot, and becomes entirely clear during the resolution of the story.
Explanation:In the structure of a story, the theme is typically established gradually and becomes entirely clear when the story reaches its conclusion or resolution. The theme is the underlying message or the central idea that the author wants to convey. It's generally not explicitly stated; instead, it's revealed through elements such as characters, setting and plot. Therefore, while elements of the theme may become apparent during the rising action, climax, and falling action, it is usually during the resolution that the theme is fully revealed and understood.
Learn more about Theme in Storytelling here:https://brainly.com/question/30126511
#SPJ12
Read this excerpt from Ernest Shackleton's South! Then match each selected word to its meaning.
When we picked ourselves up at the bottom we were not more than 1500 ft. above the sea. The slope was comparatively easy. Water was running beneath the snow, making "pockets" between the rocks that protruded above the white surface. The shells of snow over these pockets were traps for our feet; but we scrambled down, and presently came to patches of tussock. A few minutes later we reached the sandy beach. The tracks of some animals were to be seen, and we were puzzled until I remembered that reindeer, brought from Norway, had been placed on the island and now ranged along the lower land of the eastern coast. We did not pause to investigate. Our minds were set upon reaching the haunts of man, and at our best speed we went along the beach to another rising ridge of tussock. Here we saw the first evidence of the proximity of man, whose work, as is so often the ease, was one of destruction. A recently killed seal was lying there, and presently we saw several other bodies bearing the marks of bullet-wounds. I learned later that men from the whaling-station at Stromness sometimes go round to Fortuna Bay by boat to shoot seals.
Noon found us well up the slope on the other side of the bay working east-south-east, and half an hour later we were on a flat plateau, with one more ridge to cross before we descended into Husvik. I was leading the way over this plateau when I suddenly found myself up to my knees in water and quickly sinking deeper through the snow-crust. I flung myself down and called to the others to do the same, so as to distribute our weight on the treacherous surface.
Tiles- Protruded,Haunt,proximity,treacherous
Pairs- precarious,nearness,extended,place frequented
According to this excerpt from Ernest Shackleton's South! we can infer that the meaning of the words are:
PROTRUDED-EXTENDED: Protruded is used to explain that the rocks extended above the snow.
HAUNT-PLACE FREQUENTED: Haunt is a sort of refuge, thus a frequented place by men.
PROXIMITY-NEARNESS: Proximity is used to express how near humans are.
TREACHEROUS-PRECARIOUS: The surface is treacherous because of its dangerousness and precariousness.
Which sentence is punctuated correctly?
A)
The statue of Saint Teresa, of Avila, attracts thousands of visitors each day.
Eliminate
B)
The statue sculpted by Henry Moore dated 1942 sold for 3 millions dollars.
C)
The sculptures created by Michelangelo are the pinnacle of artistry, creativity, and genius.
D)
All of the statutes, in the school courtyard, were defaced by vandals.
Describe two jobs where proofreading is an important skill.
PROOFREADING is important for all the jobs, but especially those related to writing such as translators, authors, professors, doctors, etc. It is also important for students when delivering an academic essay or written report. Proofreading is the skill that makes your work to produce a professional impact at any field.
“Wailua Falls are about 85 feet high,” our guide said. “they are on the island of Kauai.” Which revision corrects the capitalization error in the sentences? Capitalize guide. Capitalize the. Capitalize they. Capitalize feet.
Answer:
You capitalize they.
Explanation:
100 on gradpoint quiz
But, looking, I presently saw something stirring within the shadow. . . . Then something resembling a little grey snake, about the thickness of a walking stick, coiled up out of the writhing middle, and wriggled in the air towards me — and then another. This passage uses which verb tense? A. Future B. Conditional C. Past D. Present
Answer: C) Past.
Explanation: The tense of a verb shows the time when an action or condition occurred. There are three basic tenses: past, present, and future. They show whether a simple action or condition occurred, occurs, or will occur in the past, present, or future. The given passage uses past tense (corresponding to option C), as we can see in the conjugation of the verbs ("saw," "coiled," and "wriggled").
In thinking about the injustices faced by Tom and other members of the African-American community, Atticus says, “Don’t fool yourselves--it’s all adding up and one of these days we’re going to pay the bill for it. I hope it’s not in you children’s time.” What is his concern/prediction about the future?
Atticus says something that is adding up in his statement. The injustices are becoming more numerous. The African-American community would eventually rise up and demand justice for the injustices done to them, according to his prediction.
What is the culture of African-American community?The term "African-American culture" describes the contributions made by African Americans to American culture, whether they are integrated into or apart from it. The culture is unique and has a significant impact on both American culture and international culture in general.
The traditional African cultures of West Africa and Central Africa are combined with European culture, which has influenced and altered the formation of African-American culture in the American South.
Understanding its place in American society, which in anthropological terms means being aware of its roots as a large-scale fusion of West and Central African traditions.
Although the system of slavery severely limited the ability of Africans to pursue their native cultural traditions, many customs, values, and beliefs persisted. Over time, they were transformed or combined with other cultures, including Native American and European ones.
During the time of slavery, African-American identity developed, creating a vibrant culture that has had a significant impact on American culture as a whole as well as on cultures around the world.
Learn more about African-American community, here
https://brainly.com/question/28898532
#SPJ5
Evaluate the effectiveness of Patrick Henry’s speech. Provide two pieces of textual evidence to support your answer.
Final answer:
Patrick Henry's speech, culminating in the iconic phrase “Give me Liberty, or give me Death!”, was highly effective in both its immediate impact, mobilizing the Virginia House of Burgesses, and its enduring legacy as an expression of American values.
Explanation:
Evaluating the effectiveness of Patrick Henry’s speech, we find it to be profoundly impactful, especially in stirring the American colonies towards independence. Henry’s speech, famously concluding with “Give me Liberty, or give me Death!”, encapsulates the fervent desire for freedom that marked the revolutionary period. Two pieces of textual evidence supporting the effectiveness of this speech are its immediate resonance with contemporaries and its enduring legacy in American history.
First, the historical context in which Patrick Henry delivered his speech, amidst growing tensions between the British Empire and its American colonies, made his words highly resonant. The speech was not only a call for action against British tyranny but also a powerful articulation of the colonies’ will to fight for their rights and freedoms. Henry’s oration was instrumental in convincing the Virginia House of Burgesses to mobilize troops, indicating its immediate effectiveness in galvanizing colonial action.
Second, the legacy of Henry's words, “Give me Liberty, or give me Death!” is integral to American identity and ethos. This line, beyond its immediate impact, has been quoted, taught, and remembered as a seminal expression of the American spirit of independence and resistance. Henry’s ability to capture the essence of the colonial quest for liberty in a single, compelling phrase demonstrates the enduring power and effectiveness of his speech.
Explain how the title The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is appropriate for the play, or propose a new title and explain why it is more appropriate.
The title 'The Tragedy of Julius Caesar' reflects the play's adherence to the classical structure of a tragedy where the protagonist meets a downfall due to a grave error, which is consistent with Aristotle's definition. An alternative title like 'The Fall of the Roman Republic' could also be apt, emphasizing the broader political consequences.
Explanation:The title The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is appropriate for the play as it conforms to Aristotle's theory of tragedy and reflects the play's content and themes. In classical tragedies, the protagonist faces high stakes ethical dilemmas, and often their downfall comes from a great error or frailty, known as hamartia. Julius Caesar, as a play, encompasses these elements, depicting the once celebrated Roman leader who falls victim to assassination due to his rising power and the threat it poses to the republic, sparking a cascade of tragic events.
However, an alternative title such as The Fall of the Roman Republic could also be fitting. This proposed title emphasizes not just the death of a single man but the larger consequence of Caesar's assassination on Roman politics and the societal upheaval that followed. It underlines the play's broader examination of power, loyalty, and the tragic changes that transition Rome from a republic to an empire with the implication of Caesar's dictatorship.
why did dante most likely choose to write his views on christianity in an indirect manner when he wrote the divine comedy
He knew his audience would be larger if he wrote an entertaining story that wasnt too serious.
What item is created by the intersection of a row and a column?
In ______ , Shakespeare wrote his earliest tragedy called ______ .
Answer: In 1596 he wrote Romeo and Juliet.
do you agree that love is for the birds and it is only money that counts?
Which sentences contain a gerund? Check all that apply.
Slithering snakes are common on the trail.
With all the walking, you must be tired.
He asked Veronica to set the table.
My sister likes to jump on the trampoline.
Watching television is my favorite way to relax.
Yawning can be contagious.
Answer:
B). With all the walking, you must be tired.
E). Watching television is my favorite way to relax.
F). Yawning can be contagious.
Explanation:
A gerund is illustrated as the 'ing' form of the verb that is acting as a noun in the sentence. These are often confused with present participles but the basic distinction is that gerunds function as a noun in the sentence while participles play the role of modifiers.
In the given question, the sentences that contain a gerund would be options B, E, and F as they include the 'ing' form of the verbs 'waking', 'watching', and 'yawning' which are functioning as a noun in their sentences. While in option A, 'slithering' is acting like an adjective and options C and D do not include an 'ing' form of the verb. Therefore, this makes us conclude options A, E, and F as answers.
Sentences from the question that posses a gerund are:
B). With all the walking, you must be tired.
E). Watching television is my favorite way to relax.
F). Yawning can be contagious.
A gerund can be regarded as words which serve as a form of a verb and it usually ends with in -ing. It can serve as a noun though it looks like a verb.For instance, in the option B, "walking" there looks like a verb but its acting as a noun, hence its a gerund.Therefore, option B,E,F are correct.
Learn more at:
https://brainly.com/question/11017355?referrer=searchResults