Which statement aligns with the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education? A. Separate treatment based on race is inherently unequal. B. Segregated schools provide students with the best opportunity to learn. C. School admissions should always be based on merit. D. Racial segregation is a necessary evil.

Answers:

C. They worked to pass civil rights legislation.

D. They provided legal aid and assistance

higher taxes on foreign imports FOR PLATO B.

Answer:

Lincoln was hesitant since he wanted to keep the border states. Slavery was not a big part of their economy but still many people throughout the border states supported it.

Explanation:

Johnson's Great Society programs sought to tackle poverty and discrimination, and involved a strengthening of federal government powers. In contrast, Nixon's New Federalism aimed to reverse this centralization, focusing on devolving powers back to state and local authorities.

The differences between Nixon’s New Federalism and Johnson’s Great Society lie in their divergent approaches to the role of federal government in domestic programs. Johnson's Great Society aimed to alleviate poverty and discrimination by enhancing the role of the federal government, with policies designed to increase civil rights, improve living standards, and provide healthcare and public education. Programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and expansions to Social Security were milestone achievements of this era.

On the other hand, Nixon’s New Federalism was an attempt to reverse this process of nationalization, favoring instead the decentralization of policies. Nixon aimed to restore the prominence of state and local authorities in policy-making and reduce the size and influence of the federal government. Nixon’s administration introduced general revenue sharing programs that shared federal funds with state and local governments, allowing them more freedom in deciding how to use this funding.

https://brainly.com/question/12768140

#SPJ2

"And now to the leaders of the Communist world, we say: After an era of confrontation, the time has come for an era of negotiation. Where the world's super powers are concerned, there is no acceptable alternative to peaceful negotiation. Because this will be a period of negotiation, we shall restore the strength of America so that we shall always negotiate from strength and never from weakness."

Answer:

d is the correct answer love

Explanation:

Secondary sources provide historians with a general summary of evidence discovered by other researchers, offering broader context and a synthesis of historical analysis. They build upon and interpret primary sources, contributing to the evolution of historical knowledge, and thereby giving a more comprehensive view than primary sources alone.

The correct answer is C) they can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered. Secondary sources, unlike primary sources, do not offer firsthand interpretations or act as hard evidence for the exact practices of ancient cultures. Instead, by synthesizing various pieces of evidence and interpretations from other historians, secondary sources provide a more comprehensive overview of historical research and analysis. These sources are crucial for setting context, understanding the broader scholarly dialogue, and providing access to scholarly research which might be limited by language or geography for some students.

While primary sources are invaluable for their direct connection to historical events, secondary sources bring additional layers of understanding by building upon the work of historians who have previously studied the primary materials. A secondary source adds to historical knowledge by analyzing, summarizing, and sometimes critiquing the primary sources and relevant scholarship. In essence, secondary sources function as an accessible bridge between the nuanced details of primary sources and the broader historiographical conversations within the academic community.

Secondary sources play a critical role in the evolution of historical knowledge and are typically where students begin to form an understanding of past events. Good historical research requires a balanced use of both primary and secondary sources, with a consideration of historiography, or the study of historians' interpretations of the past.

Answer:

becuase the president vetoes them

Explanation:

The ruler from Germany who became a significant figure in Russian history was Catherine the Great. She married into the Russian royal family and ultimately ruled as Empress from 1762 to 1796, remembered for her potent reign and influential reforms.

The ruler who came from Germany to become a major figure in Russian history was Catherine the Great. Catherine's German origin is a significant point as before her rule, she was a German princess related to various European monarchs. Once she married Peter III and subsequently orchestrated his overthrow, she became Empress of Russia. Her contributions to the Russian Empire during her reign from 1762 to 1796 established her as one of the most powerful and long-tenured rulers in the country's history, with direct descendants across European royalty.

It's notable that this German-born figure later known as Catherine the Great is often remembered alongside other eminent leaders such as Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great, who were pivotal in shaping the history and expansion of the Russian Empire. Catherine the Great's rule followed the impactful reign of Peter the Great, who was instrumental in modernizing Russia and establishing Saint Petersburg as its new capital. Her era continued to uphold and expand upon the imperial strength and territorial expanse that had been developed by these former rulers.

One of the main reasons why the United States wanted to continue to participate in the international arena after World War II was because tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union were escalating. The United States was worried that communism was going to spread throughout Western Europe and the world, and they believed their duty was to stop this and instead encourage capitalism and democracy. The only way to do so was to remain active in international affairs.

The Minoan civilization was centered on peaceful trade and lacked fortifications, while the Mycenaean civilization was warlike, with heavily fortified structures and a culture that celebrated military exploits. Mycenaeans had centralized authority and sophisticated graves, while Minoans are known for their art and palatial complexes.

Differences Between Mycenaean and Minoan Civilizations

Two distinct ancient cultures, the Mycenaean civilization and the Minoan civilization, developed during the Bronze Age in the Aegean region. While both were advanced societies known for their engagement with the sea, they differed significantly in their cultural practices, military engagement, and architectural styles.

The Minoans were primarily peaceful traders with an economy based on merchant marine activities. Their palatial structures on the island of Crete lacked fortifications, indicating a secure environment with little concern for invasions, likely due to the island's geographical advantage in the Mediterranean. The Mycenaeans, hailing from mainland Greece, had a significantly more warlike culture, with heavily fortified citadels and palaces that reflected their militaristic nature. This warlike tendency is evident in the epic poems, The Iliad and The Odyssey, which celebrate Mycenaean military exploits.

Mycenaean society was centralized around a single ruler and was characterized by its elaborate graves, like the so-called “Mask of Agamemnon,” and rich finds including pottery, weapons, and jewelry. The Mycenaeans also utilized a syllabic script, known as Linear B, which has been deciphered as Greek. Conversely, the Minoans left behind magnificent artworks and palatial complexes, indicating their wealth and artistic achievements, but much less evidence of military activity compared to the Mycenaeans.

Answer:

organize society and protect its citizens.

Explanation:

This legislation demonstrates the government's effort to fulfill its responsibilities while addressing the influence of interest groups and internal government dynamics. Bills are often altered or blocked by special interests, and citizens play a critical role in monitoring the legislative process.

This legislation reflects the government's attempts to interpret and enforce its perceivably rightful duties, while navigating the complex political landscape shaped by interest groups and the varying objectives of different governmental branches. Proposed legislation or a bill often originates from campaign promises or issues pertinent to legislators’ constituencies. These initiatives can also stem from personal experiences, as exemplified by Senator Strom Thurmond’s sponsorship of a bill following a personal tragedy. Nevertheless, enacting legislation can be particularly challenging when faced with opposition from powerful interest groups, which may lead to the bill being diluted or subject to political compromises that diminish its effectiveness. Lawmakers contend with 'unorthodox lawmaking,' where bills undergo a non-linear process fraught with political and procedural obstacles.

Indeed, several instances of proposed legislation have experienced significant alteration or failure to become law when confronted with controversy or special interest resistance, such as proposals that have not passed despite mentions in major political speeches like President Obama's State of the Union address. Furthermore, the dynamics within the government can further complicate the lawmaking process, especially when branches, such as the legislature, attempt to challenge or undermine policies proposed by the executive, involving tactics such as withholding information or spreading disinformation.

The role of citizens is emphasized in staying informed and vigilant about the legislative process, monitoring the influences exerted by special interests, and holding lawmakers accountable to ensure that the rules and reforms enacted are effective and serve the public interest and not just the goals of the most influential groups.

The sentence is true

The Mercury Program was the first manned space program in the United States, developed between 1961 and 1963 within the framework of the space race. The beginnings of the project go back to October 7, 1958, one year and three days after the Soviet Union put the first satellite in space, in orbit around the Earth, the Sputnik 1.