Answer:
Answer is b
Explanation:
The phrase "Great Britain first abolished the slave trade, but it did not abolish slavery until it did so decades later" best captures the abolition of slavery in the British empire.
Thus, Option B is correct.
How did the British Empire end slavery?In British history, the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 was a law passed by Parliament that outlawed slavery in the majority of British colonies, liberating more than 800,000 enslaved Africans in the Caribbean, South Africa, and a small number of people in Canada.
On August 28, 1833, it was given royal assent, and on August 1, 1834, it became operative.
For more information about British Empire refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2280126
#SPJ5
Which claim is arguable ? A. There are more democrats than republicans in Congress B. The United States has 50 states C. The constitution divides powers between the federal government and state government D. Senators should not have term limits
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Option A. There are more democrats than republicans in Congress contains facts that can be confirmed and it not arguable
Option B. The United States has 50 states contains facts that can be confirmed and it not arguable
Option C. The constitution divides powers between the federal government and state government contains facts that can be confirmed and it not arguable
Option D. Senators should not have term limits is a claim that is arguable because it has been stated in the law that a senator can't use more than two tenure. For them to have more than two tenure, there has to be a debate.
The answer is SENATORS SHOULD NOT HAVE TERM LIMITS.
fear of mutual assured destruction kept the soviets and americans
1. from producing large stockpiles of nuclear weapons
2.on friendly terms throughout the entire cold war
3. from ever using a nuclear weapon against each other
4.from ever officially admitting that they had nuclear weapons.
which nation suffered the fewest casualties in ww1
Final answer:
The United States had the fewest casualties during World War I, totaling 116,000, which was significantly less than the millions of casualties suffered by European nations.
Explanation:
The nation that suffered the fewest casualties in World War I was the United States. With 116,000 Americans losing their lives in the conflict, this was but a fraction compared to the Allied Powers and Central Powers who suffered millions of casualties. For instance, France had over six million casualties, and Germany had over seven million. Despite such losses, citizens in countries uninvolved in the conflict, including those in the U.S. before its involvement, were reluctant to join the war due to the horrific toll it was taking.
Which action prompted british prime minister winston churchill to declare that an iron curtain had fallen across europe?
How do poverty disease and environmental challenges affect people around the world today?
About ________ percent of U.S. senators and U.S. representatives serving in Congress are women.
a ruler who was not well liked but who brought prosperity to china
The correct answer is Empress Wu. I just took the test and got it correct.
Answer:
the correct answer is wu
Explanation:
What were the three reasons W.E.B DuBois suggests that motivated African Americans to leave the south during the Great Migration?
According to W.E.B. DuBois, African Americans were motivated to leave the South during the Great Migration due to better economic opportunities, escaping segregation and racial violence, and the prospect of improved living conditions in the North.
The Great Migration was a significant period in American history when African Americans moved from the rural South to urban areas in the North. According to W.E.B. DuBois, there were three main reasons that motivated African Americans to leave the South:
Economic opportunities: Many African Americans sought better employment prospects. The industrialization of Northern cities offered higher wages and relatively well-paid jobs compared to the limited and often exploitative jobs available in the South.Escape from segregation and racial violence: The pervasive Jim Crow laws in the South enforced strict racial segregation and discrimination. African Americans moved North to escape this legalized racial oppression and the threat of violence.Better living conditions: The North offered not only better job opportunities but also the prospect of improved living conditions. This included better schools, housing, and public services, along with a social environment where African Americans could pursue a higher quality of life.These factors together contributed to a mass movement that reshaped the demographic and cultural landscape of the United States.
What is one way in which southern and northern societies differed in the 1800s?
The Nothern and the Southern societies differ in many ways but the most likely way where they differ from each other was agriculture and industrialization.
What Was the Difference?In the 1800s the northern and southern societies are different in the form of development. Where in that time North become Industrialised but on the other hand south stay as an agriculturalist society.
Due to development in the North societies, slavery is almost prohibited but in the south still slavery in the practice. Due to development North was become a more powerful economy but other hand south still survived.
In the Industrialised economy north was practicing in the manufacturing area or practiced some innovation, on the other hand south focused on farming.
So there were many areas where the south and the north societies are different from each other in the 1800s.
To learn more about What Was the Difference follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/11519954
#SPJ5
Which of the following is the BEST interpretation of this quotation? a. Union workers will not be satisfied until they financially destroy company owners. b. Union workers’ demands for higher wages are unrealistic. c. Union workers should take over the factories in which they work. d. Union workers want only the fair treatment that is their right under the law.
What are three meanings of the word church in christian usage? what is the church's role in the father's plan to save us?
Why did the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion?
The states were not ready to give up all of their independence.
The states believed the Articles of Confederation were adequate.
Each state was looking out for its personal interests and needs.
Each state was certain that cooperation would lead to mutiny.
The great compromise and the three-fifth compromise involve so much debate and discussion because each state was looking out for its personal interest and needs.
The great compromise addresses the issues of representation
The great compromise is also referred to as the Connecticut compromise, Sherman compromise or the great compromise of 1787. It’s an agreement that was made between small and large states as to the number of representatives that each state would have under the US constitution, including the legislature.
The agreement was made in 1787. This compromise was the outcome of the debate among the small and large state delegates as to the number of representatives that should come from each state. As a result of the heated debate, two-chamber congress was created.
The house of representatives was also created and its creation was determined by each states population. The great compromise agreement maintained the bicameral legislature. However, the senators to represent each state at the uppers were changed to two.
The three-fifth compromise sought for more electoral power to the southern states.
At the 1787 constitutional convention, an agreement was reached by state delegates. This agreement is known as the three-fifth compromise. Based on the compromise, for the purpose of taxation and representation, American slaves would be counted as three-fifth of a person.
The three-fifth agreement gave more electoral power to southern states. However, this would not have been the case if the population of slaves were out rightly ignored.
LEARN MORE:
Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise https://brainly.com/question/5339742KEYWORDS:
three-fifth compromisethe great compromisedelegatesamerican slavessouthern stateselectoral powerThe Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion as Each state was looking out for its personal interests and needs.(c)
Further Explanations:
Both the Comprises were presented in the Constitutional Convention of the United States held in 1787 and were centering at the representation of each State in Congress.
“Great compromise” was a compound representative plan that integrated the states through a constitutional convention. The principal motive of the promise was to substitute the “Article of Confederation”. The minor states feared that this would lead to unrestricted dominance of the big states.They emphasized on equal representation of each State. The Compromise created a bicameral legislature in which representation for “House of Representatives”was based on the populace and two Senators from each State.
“Three-Fifths Compromise” was the pronouncement presented in the convention conferring to which it was discussed that the slaves should be counted or not. In the case of tax policy and representation purposes, it was argued whether slaves should be counted in the populace figures or not as they were not measured as the citizens of the nation. The compromise stated that three out of each five slaves will be counted while determining a state's populace and how many seats will receive in the “House of Representatives”.The conclusion was that three out of each five slaves were reckoned a third more seat was granted to Southern States in the Congress.
Learn More
1. How did Alexander Hamilton and James madison view the constitution?https://brainly.com/question/1320793
2. the differences in the economic development of the mid-Atlantic, New England, and southern colonies can best be attributed to the?https://brainly.com/question/10776092
3. what was the main reason joseph Stalin created collective farms? soviet farms were old-fashioned and inefficient. collective farms would create many new jobs. farmland could be turned into industrial land. wasteful crop surpluses would be eliminated? https://brainly.com/question/381562
Answer Details:
Grade: High school
Subject: US History
Chapter: Great compromise
Keywords: Constitutional Convention, United States, Three-Fifths Compromise, tax , bicameral legislature, resident, Southern States, Great compromise, Article of Confederation, Congress,House of Representatives,
During the renaissance period, much surgery and dentistry was performed by
During the Renaissance, and even during the Middle Ages, barbers were known to provide medical skills to wealthy, elite and ruling families of Europe. This seems unusual in contemporary periods; however, barbers were skilled with a sharp blade, making him a good candidate for surgery. Examples of their medical care outside of the ruling classes can be seen in the knightly jousting tournaments, where barbers were expected to care for those injured during the tournament games.
Why was the attack on pearl harbor so successful apush?
Was good leadership the key to Imperial Rome's success?
Because when there existed great leadership Rome had a vast achievement. Like Octavian building the Pax Romana. When they had great heads they won civil combats. They also had bad leads and they did not succeed. They were Aryans who practiced brutality for every difficulty of for pleasure.
The Roman Empire grew a strong ancient amenities first because of location and sources. Also, great heads such as Julius Caesar that began to develop Rome as a vast city and nation by also concentrating on fighting force in sequence for Rome to capture other prominent amenities such as the Ottoman Empire.
ideological differences between the United States and the Soviet Union led to the
Answer:
Cold War on Edge
Which of the following would be an unlikely element in a policy of containment
Final answer:
In the context of the Cold War, containment would involve providing aid and forming alliances to prevent the spread of communism, making boycotts and embargoes against unaligned nations an unlikely element of this policy. Hence, the correct answer is B. boycotts and embargoes against unaligned nations.
Explanation:
The policy of containment was a strategic approach used by the United States during the Cold War to prevent the spread of communism. This policy would likely include economic aid to countries destroyed by war and offers of military aid to nations that become allies to strengthen them against communist influence. Among the options provided, boycotts and embargoes against unaligned nations would be an unlikely element in a containment policy, as containment focused on preventing the expansion of communism rather than punishing nations that remained neutral or unaligned. Hence, the correct answer is B. boycotts and embargoes against unaligned nations.
in 1972 what organization kidnapped and murdered 11 israeli athletes at the summer olympic games in munich west germany
A.Palestine liberation organization
B.Black september
C.Hamas
D.Arab league
The correct answer is B. Black September
Explanation:
"Black September" was the name of Palestinian terrorist group created in 1970, this group began as a resistant movement as King Hussein who reigned in Jordan expulse thousands of Palestine from this territory which also led to a conflict between Palestinians and Israelis. However, the organization was classified as terrorist as it was responsible for different violent acts including the Munich massacre that took place in 1972 in which the members from "Black September" kidnapped and killed 11 Isreali athletes during the Olympic games in Munich, Germany. Considering this, the organization that was responsible for the Munich massacre in which 11 athletes were murdered and kidnapped was the "Black September".
what did the number of Texas farm workers decrease in the mid 1900's?
A. Mechanization
B. Irrigation
C. Migrant Labor
D. The cotton Gin
The number of Texas farm workers decrease in the mid 1900's by mechanization.
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
During the Civil War, the machine development to cut the grains in all work angles used by farmers in the West rapidly. The best lands controlled by wealthy plantation homeowners, were done initially with slave labor.
They grew their own food and targeting a number of crops that might be exported to satisfy the growing demand in Europe, particularly cotton, tobacco, and sugar.
Technology had reached Iow farms in 1900, by means of the hand-crank phonephone, fruit range, and updated farm instrumentation, like the equip plow, planter, hay press, and more. It lowers the man power in farm than the estimated reapers by 1865.
Which speaker is expressing a viewpoint that is most consistent with the principles of laissez-faire economics?
What challenges do you think would face a city divided like Berlin was?
Answer:
The Berlin Wall divided the city in half with no regard to families being split or what would be available on each side of the wall. For decades a wall and guards prevented people from choosing which side they wished to live on and kept families separated. For Berlin, it also meant radically different economic systems. On the Western side, capitalism allowed for up-to-date material objects while the Eastern side was left behind by communistic policies.
Explanation:
A city divided like Berlin faced economic disparities, political tensions, and psychological impacts. The division resulted in population loss, restricted freedom of movement, and created a sense of isolation and division.
Explanation:A city divided like Berlin faced several challenges. The division resulted in economic disparities between East and West, with East Berlin experiencing stagnation while West Berlin prospered. This led to a significant population loss in East Berlin, as skilled laborers and professionals fled to the West. In response, the Soviet Union ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall to prevent further migration.
The division of Berlin also created political and social tensions. The city became a symbol of the Cold War, with the Berlin Wall representing the physical division between the communist and capitalist worlds. It restricted freedom of movement and separated families and friends. The city was also a focal point for international tensions, with conflicts arising over the presence and rights of Western powers in West Berlin.
The division of Berlin also had psychological and cultural impacts. The constant presence of the Berlin Wall and the separation of the city affected the psychology and identity of the people living there. It created a sense of isolation and division, with different ideologies and ways of life existing side by side.
what is a difference between communism and socialism
The fordney-mccumber and hawley-smoot tariff laws had the long-term effect of
Which war started with the assassination of archduke ferdinand? war of 1812 civil war world war i world war ii?
Which statement describes a common feature of the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal?
Answer:
Both caused a large increase of distrust in the government.
Answer:
its b
Explanation:
What factors contributed to american industrial preeminence in 1947?
The hindu deity who was the teacher of the world was (1 point)
Which part of the government, according to the constitution, should be made up of two representatives per state?
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State. [U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 3, clause 1]
During the summer of 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia established equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives. Called the “Great Compromise” or the “Connecticut Compromise,” the unique plan for congressional representation resolved the most controversial aspect of the drafting of the Constitution.
In the weeks before the Constitution’s framers agreed to the compromise, the delegates from the states with large populations argued that each state’s representation in the Senate should correspond to the size of the state. Large-state delegates promoted James Madison’s Virginia Plan, the document that was the basis for several of the clauses in the Constitution. Under this plan, the Senate and the House would base their membership on the same proportional “right of suffrage.” That is, the number of senators in each state would be determined by its population of free citizens and slaves. Large states, then, stood to gain the most seats in the Senate. As justification for this advantage, delegates noted that their states contributed more of the nation’s financial and defensive resources than small states, and therefore, required a greater say in government.
Small-state delegates hoped to protect states’ rights within a confederate system of government. Fearing the effects of majority rule, they demanded equal representation in Congress, as was practiced under the Articles of Confederation and assumed in William Paterson’s New Jersey Plan. In fact, some framers threatened to withdraw from the convention if a proportional representation measure passed.
Other delegates sought a compromise between large-state and small-state interests. As early as 1776, Connecticut’s Roger Sherman had suggested that Congress represent the people as well as the states. During the 1787 convention, Sherman proposed that House representation be based on the population, while in the Senate, the states would be equally represented. Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate except in matters concerning money. The convention’s grand committee reported his motion, with some modifications, to the delegates early in July. Madison led the debates against Franklin’s measure, believing it an injustice to the majority of Americans, while some small-state delegates were reluctant even to support proportional representation in the House. On July 16, delegates narrowly adopted the mixed representation plan giving states equal votes in the Senate within a federal system of government.
Once delegates established equal representation in the Senate, they needed to determine how many senators would represent each state. State constitutions offered some guidance. Several states designated one senator per county or district, while in Delaware there were three senators for each of the three counties. Convention delegates did not refer to the state precedents in debate, however. Instead, they seemed to take a common-sense approach in deciding the number of senators.
According to constitutional commentator Joseph Story (1779-1845), few, if any, delegates considered one senator per state sufficient representation. Lone senators might leave their state unrepresented in times of illness or absence, and would have no colleague to consult with on state issues. Additional senators, moreover, would increase the size of the Senate, making it a more knowledgeable body, and better able to counter the influence of the House. On the other hand, a very large Senate would soon lose its distinctive membership and purpose, and actually decrease its ability to check the lower house or to allow senators to take personal responsibility for their actions.
Given these considerations, delegates had a limited choice regarding the number of senators. During the convention, they briefly discussed the advantages of two seats versus three. Gouverneur Morris stated that three senators per state were necessary to form an acceptable quorum, while other delegates thought a third senator would be too costly. On July 23, delegates filled in the blank in the proposal offered by Morris and Rufus King: “That the representation in the second branch consist of _____ members from each State, who shall vote per capita.” Only Pennsylvania voted in favor of three senators. When the question turned to two, Maryland alone voted against the measure, not because of the number, but because Martin disagreed with per capita voting, which gave each senator, rather than each state, one vote.
The occurrence of Kristallnacht, or the Night of Broken Glass, in Germany in 1938 showed that the Nazi government
A.)fully supported violence against Jews.
B.)needed more support to hold onto power.
C.)had recovered from its economic problems.
D.)could not prevent violence against Jews.
The correct answer is A.)fully supported violence against Jews.
The Kristallnacht also called “The Night of Broken Glass” was a night that anti-Semitic people attacked and vandalized homes, businesses and synagogues. The Nazi Party supported violence against Jews, they passed anti-semitic laws before this event would happen and helped to burn down some workship places. More than a thousand synagogues were burned down, at least 96 people were killed.
Presidents lamar's anti-native american beliefs led to several skirmishes. which conflict occurred on march 19, 1840 and involved the comanches and southern texans?