Cri minal Law determines which actions are considered a crime.
What is Cri minal Law?Cri minal Law is the body of law that establishes the definition of criminal offences, governs the detention, accusation, and trial of suspects, and specifies the punishments and forms of treatment that apply to those who are found guilty.
A court of law determines whether or not an accused person is guilty after they have been arrested. The Constitution mandates that any person accused of a crime get a fair trial.
Even if the immediate victim is an individual, crim inal law deals with conduct that is or could be interpreted as an offence against the general populace, society, or the state. Mur der, violence, theft, and drun ken driving are a few examples.
Hence, correct option is C.
To learn more about Crim inal law here:
https://brainly.com/question/1205493
#SPJ2
Why do you think countries desire empires? Explain
Answer:
Because countries profits from their empire.
You see, with a vast territory all around the world (e.g. British Empire) they’ll have a lot of men power, farmlands, natural resources, and manipulation over the World’s trade routes. For example, China (modern and older Qing Dynasty). It’s large farming territories mean that they won’t suffer famines even they had the largest number of population. It’s also improves it’s population, for example is the German Empire; the largest industry player in Europe, with a high life expectancy and one of the wealthiest nation in the World, who formerly known as Kingdom of Prussia; a highly militarized nation, with poor civilian government. Few smaller nations, that consist of Netherlands, could actually be a colonial superpower, only because it’s colony in Netherlands Indies, without actually conquering lands in Europe. In the other hand, Russian Empire before the time of Tsar Alexander I, were pretty backward, with small wealth and poor citizens.
Explanation:
How did the beliefs held by Mohandas Gandhi and H0 Chi Minh compare? A. Both believed armed conflict was the only way to establish a new government. B. Both believed their country should be divided up along religious lines. C. Both believed communism should be spread to neighboring countries. D. Both believed colonial powers were exploiting the citizens of their country.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Both of them, believed colonial powers were exploting the citizens of their country.
The correct answer is D. The beliefs held by Mohandas Gandhi and H0 Chi Minh compare as both Mohandas Gandhi and HoChi Minh believed that colonial powers were exploiting the citizens of their country.
Mohandas Gandhi, also known as Mahatma Gandhi, was a leader of the Indian independence movement against British rule. He was a proponent of nonviolent civil disobedience, which he called Satyagraha. Gandhi believed that the British were exploiting India's resources and people for their own benefit, and he worked tirelessly to end British colonial rule in India through peaceful means.
HoChi Minh, on the other hand, was a Vietnamese communist revolutionary leader who became the prime minister and president of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam). He was a key figure in the Vietnamese struggle for independence from French colonial rule. Like Gandhi, HoChi Minh believed that the French were exploiting Vietnam's resources and oppressing its people. He fought for Vietnam's independence and unity, although his methods included both peaceful political activities and armed struggle.
Comparing their beliefs:
A. Gandhi did not believe that armed conflict was the only way to establish a new government. In fact, he was known for his commitment to nonviolence. HoChi Minh, while he did engage in armed conflict to achieve his goals, also engaged in diplomacy and political activism.
B. Gandhi did not believe that his country should be divided up along religious lines. He advocated for a united India that included people of all religions. HoChi Minh's primary focus was on national independence and unity rather than religious division.
C. HoChi Minh was a communist and sought to establish a communist government in Vietnam. However, there is no evidence that he aimed to spread communism to neighboring countries as a primary goal. Gandhi, meanwhile, was not a communist and did not advocate for the spread of any particular economic system.
D. Both leaders believed that the colonial powers (Britain in the case of Gandhi and France in the case of HoChi Minh) were exploiting their countries. This shared belief in the need to end colonial exploitation and achieve national self-determination is a key similarity between the two.
Therefore, the most accurate statement regarding the comparison of their beliefs is that both believed colonial powers were exploiting the citizens of their country, which aligns with option D.
what was the major influences of the french revolution
The French Revolution was profoundly influenced by the ideas of the Enlightenment, economic turmoil, and the emergence of movements like Romanticism. It marked a pivotal shift towards modern notions of rights, governance, and society.
Explanation:The major influences of the French Revolution were vast and multi-faceted, reflecting a period of change underpinned by profound social, economic, and intellectual transformations. Central to these influences were the ideas of the Enlightenment, which fueled demands for equal rights and opposed the exclusive privileges of the aristocracy. Economic turmoil, particularly due to poor harvests and the near-bankruptcy of the French Crown, exacerbated social tensions. The revolutionary movement also drew inspiration from Enlightenment ideals, emphasizing liberty, equality, and justice. Furthermore, the revolution significantly influenced artistic and intellectual movements, such as Romanticism and the Counter-Enlightenment, shaping modern notions of human rights and civil society. Finally, the Church's role and authority were profoundly altered, reflecting broader shifts towards secular governance and individual rights.
What was the British policy of refusing to enforce British laws in American
colonies?
Answer:
salutary neglect
Explanation:
I got it right on A P E X
what colonial city had the largest population
Philadelphia was the colonial city with the largest population. In 1776, Philadelphia had the most population. There were 40,000 residents there at the time. With 25,000 residents, New York was the second-largest city.
Around 2.5 million people were residing in the colonies that would eventually become the United States of America in 1776. New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Charleston, and Newport were the biggest cities. A merchant class offering a wide range of goods and services developed in these cities.
Due to the region's extensive woods, the northern cities had a significant shipbuilding industry. The fur trade was quite profitable for New York City as well. The southern colonies made the major plantation owners very rich by trading cash crops like tobacco and indigo.
Learn more about merchants here:
https://brainly.com/question/30724112
#SPJ6
Read the quote delivered by the Consulate on November 12, 1799. People of France: Swear with us to be true to the Republic one and indivisible, founded on equality, liberty, and the representative system. What is the problem with this quote? France was not founded on equality and liberty. This was uttered not by the Consuls, but only by Napoleon. A representative system wasn’t created—a dictatorship was. The year the statement was made was 1789.
Answer:
A representative system wasn’t created—a dictatorship was.
Explanation:
Read the quote delivered by the Consulate on November 12, 1799. People of France: Swear with us to be true to the Republic one and indivisible, founded on equality, liberty, and the representative system.
The problem with this quote above is, a representative system wasn’t created—a dictatorship was.
A representative system wasn’t created—a dictatorship was the problem with this quote. Hence, option C is correct.
What is dictatorship?Dictatorship is the type of government where there is only one leader, and they rule over the years as there is no role of election and selecting other candidate.
If one rule is ending their dictatorship then next member who is eligible for the president, it takes the seat of the ruler.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more details about Dictatorship, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/24849300
#SPJ5
Which of the following correctly describes a similarity among followers of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam?
A. All observe a holy day of prayer and worship on Sundays
B. All believe in the resurrection of Jesus, the messiah
C. All have a sacred text that records their beliefs and laws
D. All believe that the food they eat should be kosher
What conclusion can be drawn about the people of
Athens based on the chart?
Only men were allowed to become citizens,
Only about half the population were citizens,
Free non citizens outnumbered enslaved persons and
citizens combined
Compared to the whole population, a small number
could vote
Answer:
The athens were sexist
Explanation:
Based on the chart, the conclusion that can be drawn about the people of Athens was that only men were allowed to become citizens, which pointed towards how people of Athens were gender biased.
What is the significance of the people of Athens?The largest and most powerful of the Greek city-states was Athens. It was called after the goddess of knowledge and war, Athena, and had many beautiful buildings.
Democracy was a brand-new form of governance that the Athenians created, allowing every citizen to cast a vote on crucial decisions like whether or not to go to war.
What is meant by gender biased?When someone is treated differently because of their actual or perceived gender identity, this is referred to as gender prejudice.
Sexism is the cause of gender bias. Prejudice or discrimination based on sex or gender is referred to as sexism. Men historically have had more influence and authority than women and other oppressed genders in many societies due to sexism.
To learn more about gender bias here:
https://brainly.com/question/5319093
#SPJ2
Which factor most contributed to the United States' decision to enter World
War ?
O
A. The Allied powers' victory in the Battle of the Somme
O
B Mexico launching attacks on U.S. territory with the help of
Germany
O
a. The Ottoman Empire beginning a campaign of genocide against
the Armenian people
D. Germany attacking merchant ships that carried American civilians
Answer:
D. Germany attacking merchant ships that carried American civilians
D). Germany attacking merchant ships that carried American civilians
Explanation:The reason why answer choice "D). Germany attacking merchant ships that carried American civilians " would be the correct answer because this is the reason why United States decided to get enter the World War.
The Germans sent out submarines into the seas and destroyed merchant ships, in which it carried American citizens/civilians. The Germans were using the submarines as a "warfare" that's in the ocean. These boats were called "U-boats." More than 100 Americans that were on the merchant ships died because of the German attacks. The Germans sank a couple of merchant ships that had american civilians in it, in which made the U.S out raged.
The United States was all about its people, and if a country were to ever do something to its people, they would take action upon that. That's what the U.S did, they decided to enter World War because of the attacks on their people. The United States entered the war in the allied side.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!Several senators ask Kavanaugh questions about his beliefs and opinions on issues like presidential power and abortion laws. What Supreme Court power
allow it to affect acts and laws put forth by other branches of government?
Answer:
Judicial review
Explanation:
The Supreme Court has a power called "judicial review". What this means is that the Supreme Court can take a law and interpret it. They can decide whether a law violates the Constitution or not. And if it is indeed unconstitutional, they can strike that law down.
What did most delegates from the southern states at the constitutional convention believe about slavery
Southern delegates at the Constitutional Convention believed slavery was essential for their economy and societal structure, leading to compromises in the Constitution that protected slavery and allowed its continuation.
Explanation:Views of Southern Delegates at the Constitutional Convention on Slavery
During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, most delegates from southern states regarded slavery as an essential part of their economic system and societal structure. They believed slavery, despite its moral discrepancies, should be accommodated by the Constitution. When the issue of representation arose, southern delegates insisted that enslaved individuals be counted in determining state populations for legislative representation, leading to the infamous Three-Fifths Compromise. This compromise allowed southern states to count each enslaved person as three-fifths of a free inhabitant for both representation and taxation purposes. James Madison, among others, facilitated compromises that did not address the morality of slavery but rather sought a functional national union. The Constitutional protections for slavery were a result of these compromises, cementing the institution's legality and contributing to future sectional divides over the issue within the United States.
Furthermore, the importation of slaves was a critical economic factor for southern states, which led to the dirty compromise wherein New Englanders agreed to a constitutional provision safeguarding the foreign slave trade for twenty years to ensure the support of South Carolina and Georgia for federal fiscal legislation. The international slave trade eventually came to an end in 1808 for various reasons, including the moral stance taken by other nations like Britain and the impact of slave uprisings exemplified by the Haitian Revolution.
Learn more about Constitutional Convention and Slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/33909256
#SPJ11
analyze the numberline below and answer the question that follows. where could point e be if bc=de and d is between e and b?
Answer:
The answer is positive 2.
Point E must be positioned to the left of point B on the number line, at a distance equal to the length of the segment BC, since DE equals BC and D is between E and B.
Explanation:The question relates to an analysis of a number line, where it is given that the segment BC is equal in length to DE, and that point D is located between points E and B. In order to determine the possible location of point E, one should consider that point D being between E and B implies that E must be to the left of B on the number line if we consider a left-to-right orientation. Additionally, since BC = DE, point E must be at the same distance from point D as point C is from point B. Therefore, we can conclude that point E should be positioned to the left of point B, at a distance which is equal to the length of the segment BC.
Compare the Chicano, women’s rights, American Indian rights, or disability rights movement to the African American civil rights movement, and identify their similarities and differences. Be sure to discuss strategies used by both groups to enact change.
Answer:
The Chicano Rights Movement was a social and political movement inspired by prior acts of resistance among people of the Mexican descent, especially of Pachuchos in the 1940s. The African American Civil Rights Movement was a social movement that protested against racial discrimination in 1954. The Chicano Rights Movement and the Civil Rights Movement were both made to give rights to the people they were made for. Both movements used non-violent protests to get their points across that the people had unequal rights, and they needed the rights like others needed. On the other hand, The Chicano Rights Movement protested for Mexicans, and the Civil Rights Movement protested for African Americans, then again, they protested for the same rights.
Explanation:
Its right on edge as of may 2022
What is Baker v. Carr ?
Baker v. Carr is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court regarding the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and legislative apportionment.
The case was brought by Charles Baker, a Tennessee resident who argued that the state's legislative districts were malapportioned, meaning that they did not provide equal representation for equal numbers of people. This malapportionment had occurred because the state had not redistricted since 1901, despite significant population shifts during the intervening years. As a result, rural districts with much smaller populations had the same representation as more populous urban districts, leading to a dilution of the urban vote.
Baker and other plaintiffs claimed that this situation violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law. The Supreme Court agreed, holding that federal courts could hear and decide cases challenging the constitutionality of legislative apportionment. The decision marked the first time the Supreme Court ruled that malapportionment could be reviewed by the judiciary under the Equal Protection Clause, thus opening the door to the principle of one person, one vote.
The ruling led to a series of subsequent decisions that required states to redraw their legislative districts to achieve a fairer and more equal system of representation. This had a profound impact on American politics, leading to more equitable representation in state legislatures and Congress, and it remains a cornerstone of American electoral law.
Why did English settlers colonize New England in the mid-1600s?
Answer:
English colonies popped up along the eastern seaboard for a variety of reasons to escape religious persecution and because they had very fertile soil for farming.
Explanation:
The New England Colonies were founded to escape religious persecution. The middle colonies were also called 'Breadbasket colonies" because of their fertile soil, idea for farming.
Answer:
to convert the native people to Christianity
Explanation:
ASAP!!PLS
Both the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts resulted in:
A. British changes to the Quartering Act.
B. colonial boycotts of British goods.
C. British alliances with Native Americans.
D. colonial shortages of paper goods.
Answer:
B. Colonial boycotts of British goods
Explanation:
Increases in taxes in basic things like paper caused British civilians to boycott British goods.
A popular method of protest was to boycott, during which people refused to shop for British goods.
The correct option is B that is the colonial boycotts of British goods resulted in both the stamp act and townshends acts.
The Stamp actThe stamp Act of 1765 which taxed colonies for every piece of paper they used were met in widespread protests in America.
The Townshend actsThe Townshend Act were a series of measure, passed by the British parliament in 1767. the taxed goods imported to the American colonies.
Therefore, the colonial boycotts of British goods is the result in both Stamp acts and townshends act.
To know more about the stamp acts and townshends act follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/5964400
How long have sharks been around for?
Answer:
400 million years
Explanation:
Sharks have been around for 400 million years. That is longer than most animals and humans!
Sharks have been around for about 400 million years.
What policy did the United States decide to use to combat the spread of Communism?
Answer:
a policy to stop the spread of communism was containment
Explanation:
What are some of the benefits of a country taking an isolationist what could be so negative
In what way did the Second Continental Congress begin to act like a government?
The Congress took steps to expel people who were loyal to Britain from the colonies.
The Congress took steps to pay for its army by printing paper money.
The Congress sent petitions to King George.
The Congress met to discuss issues relating to Britain.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Is the Illinois conceal carry law consistent with the social contract theory
Answer:
no i do not think so
Explanation:
How did President Jackson restrict the power of the Second Bank of the United States prior to the end of its charter?
Match the presidential candidates with the parties they represented
Abraham Lincoln
John Breckenridge
Stephen Douglas
John Bell
Answer:
Stephen Douglas - Northern Democratic
John Breckinridge - Southern Democratic
John Bell - Constitutional Union
Abraham Lincoln - Republican
What are some of the different ways in which governments are formed
There are many different forms of governments across the world, with numerous different political views and ideologies. There are usually two main ways through which the governments are formed though. One of those ways is through the electoral vote, and the other is the hereditary principle. The countries where the electoral vote decides about the formation of the government are the countries where the people have their say in the politics, thus they determine who will lead them. The countries where there is a hereditary principle involved in the government are the countries where the people don't have any say in the formation of the government, but instead, the governments is passed on in the family as the generations pass by.
How did technological advancements change manufacturing methods during
the Industrial Revolution?
O
A. People went from manufacturing one object at a time by hand to
manufacturing many objects in factories.
O
B. People went from manufacturing objects for other countries to
manufacturing objects for their own families.
O
C. People went from manufacturing objects for use by the
government to manufacturing objects for use by the people.
D. People went from manufacturing objects solely for religious
purposes to manufacturing objects for all purposes.
Answer:
A. People went from manufacturing one object at a time by hand to
manufacturing many objects in factories.
How did the Vietnam war effect the United States politically and culturally
Answer:
The United States was affected by the Vietnam War in many ways. The Vietnam War led to veterans coming home ill from the exposure to agent orange, ptsd, and addictions. The country as a whole was affected by a negative economy.
Beyond policy changes, the U.S. also paid a high political cost for the Vietnam War. The long and traumatic conflict saw a mounting mistrust of government and its officials. A chain of unexpected events starting in mid 1960s – such as the way President Johnson obtained the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution to send troops to Vietnam, revelations of secret bombings of Cambodia, the My Lai massacre and Kent State tragedy under Nixon administration – put America into a crisis of confidence and faith. On the eyes of American people, government leaders were no longer credible. The abrupt end of Nixon’s presidency with the Watergate scandal only confirmed this sentiment.
The Vietnam conflict totally changed the attitudes of a generation. More and more American citizens became suspicious, skeptical and cynical about the government and public institutions in the wake of the Vietnam War. The military, in particular, was discredited for years after the conflict.
The Vietnam War impacted the United States by damaging trust in government and triggering political and cultural shifts, including a rise in conservatism and the counterculture movement, along with widespread protests.
The Vietnam War had profound effects on the United States, both politically and culturally. Politically, it reshaped domestic politics and severely damaged Americans' trust in their government, given the misleading information and veiled activities related to the war effort. Culturally, it contributed to the counterculture movement of the 1960s, with widespread protests and a significant shift toward conservatism among those who opposed the anti-war demonstrations and feared the rapid social changes of the period. The war's heavy cost, with over 58,000 U.S. troop fatalities and more than 1.5 million Vietnamese casualties, exacerbated the national trauma and skepticism towards the government's role in international affairs. The engagement in Vietnam, marked by the deployment of more than half a million U.S. soldiers by 1965 under President Johnson, led to a divided nation, where college campus protests were as common as public support for the war.
European counties went to war with France partly to stop ____ from spreading
European countries went to war with France partly to stop revolutionary ideas from spreading.
As a result of political unrest, many people called for a return to a monarchy.
At this time, Napoleon began to rise to power as a military leader.
European counties went to war with France partly to stop revolutionary ideas from spreading.
What are Revolutionary Ideas?Revolutionary concepts and inventions fundamentally alter how something is produced or done.
Political or social change is referred described as being revolutionary. The term "Revolutionary War," which refers to the conflict fought to liberate the colonies from British authority, is an example of a revolutionary employed as an adjective.
What is War?Between states, governments, societies, or paramilitary groups like mercenaries, insurgents, and militias, there is an intense armed confrontation known as war.
Extreme violence, aggressiveness, devastation, and mortality, whether committed by conventional or irregular military troops, are typically its defining characteristics.
The term "warfare" describes the typical actions and traits of particular war types or of wars in general.
Total war is defined as warfare that extends beyond solely military objectives and is capable of causing significant suffering and casualties among civilians and other non-combatants.
To learn more about Revolutionary Ideas here
https://brainly.com/question/22394441
#SPJ2
How do monopolistic competitors try to make their products stand out?
Answer:
Advertise to create a stronger loyalty to their goods.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is “They use non-price competition such as advertising”
Explanation:
Monopolistic competition takes place when an industry has multiple firms that offer products that are alike but not equal and these firms have a little influence to restrict supply or raise prices to growth profits. These firms involved in the competition always try to stand out, so this is why advertising and marketing play a key role among them.
Mexican War to write a brief persuasive article that supports or opposes US actions against Mexico.
Answer:
Explanation:
Alright lemme throw down this knowledge , to make it simple the US president at the time believed in conquering land , and believed that god wanted him to do so. He took over a majority of mexico , such as California , Colorado , Nevada , Arizona , new mexico and more . which wad the treaty of Guadalupe hidalgo in 1848. even though the Mexican territory was theirs to begin with and was simply taken away because the Americans became accustomed to the land and wanted to be treated fairly and revolted which brought the idea to just conquer the land.
The Mexican-American War is a subject open to debate in a persuasive article, with one standpoint arguing the U.K.'s actions were justified by Manifest Destiny, and the opposite standpoint viewing the U.K.'s actions as aggressive and detrimental to Mexican sovereignty.
Explanation:The Mexican War, also known as the Mexican-American War, occurred between 1846-1848 and was a significant conflict driven by the idea of Manifest Destiny and the U.S. desire to expand its territories. There are many angles from which this topic can be approached when writing a persuasive article. On one hand, some may argue that the U.S. actions were justified given the prevalent belief in Manifest Destiny. Others, however, could argue that the war represented an unjust aggression against Mexico and its sovereignty.
Learn more about Mexican War here:https://brainly.com/question/34603746
#SPJ11
Where were many Japanese Americans forced to live during World War II?
Answer:
They were forced to live in concentration camps in the western interior of the country.
Answer:
They were kept in interment camps
Explanation:
I got it right on the test