While criminal law concerns the punishment of those who break the law, which of the selections listed below is the system in place for adjudicating compensation for injury and settling contractual disputes?

Answer: D. all of the above

Explanation:

The sketch type is B. Rough sketch.  

Crime scenes can be significant wellsprings of physical proof that is utilized to partner or connection of suspects to scenes, exploited people to scenes, and suspects to unfortunate casualties. Anything found at the crime scene can be physical proof. In the logical examination of the crime scene, the principal exercises at the scene are basic for the effective safeguarding of the physical proof.

Rough sketch are the first pictorial sketching of the crime scene which contains the details of the full scene along with the evidence, which can be considered as one of the most trusted reference material for the crime.

Answer:

The answer is income taxes.

The federal government relies mostly on revenue from income taxes.

Hope this helps

Answer:

it's the official account what happened

Answer:

A. It is the official account of what happened.

Explanation:

People think that it is unnecessary to file a complaint after a car accident. But if you want to seek compensation for the injuries and other damages to your vehicle, you must file a complaint immediately after the accident. It makes your case stronger. Personal injury attorneys asks for a copy of the police report when you decide to file lawsuit for getting compensation. Police report is helpful in other circumstances as well.

Answer: B) could not be incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Explanation:

The 14th Amendment introduced the equal protection clause and expanded the due process clause to the states. Both of these provisions are designed to ensure that all individuals are treated equally and fairly under the law. This applies to all individuals, not just citizens, and has been affirmed through key court cases.

It seems the question you are asking concerns the subject of due process and equal protection as it relates to the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The 14th Amendment introduced the equal protection clause and expanded the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment to the states. The purpose of these provisions is to guarantee that all individuals are treated equally and fairly by the law, which is a principle enshrined in both amendments.

Equal protection and due process are two key principles that are designed to ensure that all individuals, not just citizens, are treated fairly and impartially by government officials. This was clearly highlighted in cases like Sherbert v. Verner, where states were restrained from denying unemployment benefits to an individual who declined a job due to religious reasons. Or in the case of Lawrence v. Texas, where the court ruled that anti-sodomy laws violated due process rights.

In other words, the due process clause prohibits the federal government and the states from denying any person 'life, liberty, or property without due process of law'. It implies that there are certain fundamental liberties that cannot be denied by the states and this includes equal treatment under the law as required by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

https://brainly.com/question/34235248

#SPJ2

Answer:

Revocation

Explanation:  

Answer: The fedral government is here becuase they want power and do local laws and state laws and usa laws there kind of the same but other than that they are diffrent

Explanation:

Answer:

Below

Explanation:

To impeach a president you have to have two-thirds of a majority vote. The process starts in the house, and individual members can introduce impeachment resolutions. They must committed a high crime, misdemeanor, bribery, or treason. I trail is held, and must have two-thirds of a vote. He must be tried in court, and proven guilty. After the president is removed from office, the vice president takes over until the next scheduled election.

The House of Representatives starts the impeachment process by bringing charges and if a majority agrees, the President is impeached. The Senate then holds a trial to determine guilt, with removal from office requiring a two-thirds majority vote.

The process of removing a president from office, known as impeachment, involves both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The process begins in the House of Representatives, which decides whether to bring charges against the president. If a majority of the House members agree, articles of impeachment are drafted which detail the charges against the president.

The House then votes on these articles, and if a simple majority votes in favor, the president has been impeached. The process then moves to the Senate. In the Senate, a trial is held to determine if the president is guilty of the charges. The Senators consequently serve as the jury, with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding over the trial.

If two-thirds of the Senate votes in favor, the president is removed from office. So while the House decides whether to bring charges, the Senate decides whether those charges warrant removal from office. Overall, it's an involved and serious process that requires a high level of agreed-upon evidence and consensus among Congress members.

https://brainly.com/question/1411922

#SPJ6

Answer:

Letter A

Explanation:

Miranda v. Arizona was a significant Supreme Court case that ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless the defendant has been informed of their right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything they say will be held against them.

Answer:

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court decided that confined criminal suspects, preceding police addressing, must be educated regarding their established right to a lawyer and against self-implication.

That most TV agreeable of Supreme Court cases, Miranda v. Arizona, was chosen in 1966.

Under Chief Justice Earl Warren, the court decided 5 to 4 that the police needed to pursue certain systems to guarantee the insurance of a criminal presume's Fifth Amendment benefit against self-implication.

Explanation:

Some dangers that are involved in hand-free phone use while driving may be that you are distracted from the road. When using the hands-free feature, you have to pay attention to the right buttons to press and make sure that you're really using the proper thing.

While 80% of drivers in the U.S. think utilizing a without hands gadget while driving is more secure than utilizing a hand-held telephone. But it is wrong as studies have, tragically, demonstrated it as an invalid and dangerous habit.

As indicated by the National Safety Council, most of all road accidents are caused due to the distraction caused by usage of the hand free devices while driving. Truth be told, some exploration even recommends that chatting on the telephone through a without hands gadget is more risky than driving with alcohol in hands.

Answer:

The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.

The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused.

The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding, unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding.

The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding.

The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case.

The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law.

The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.

The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy.