In the us, which has done the most to speed the assimilation of immigrant groups
True or false as First Lady of the United States, Eleanor Roosevelt was an advocate for gender and racial equality?
Final answer:
True, Eleanor Roosevelt was a true advocate for gender and racial equality during her tenure as the First Lady of the United States. She actively championed civil rights, supported women's journalism, and was influential in advancing human rights on a global scale after World War II. Her contributions are remembered as groundbreaking for the role of the First Lady.
Explanation:
True, as First Lady of the United States, Eleanor Roosevelt was indeed an advocate for gender and racial equality. She used her influential position to champion civil rights by taking a firm stand against racial discrimination, such as when she flew with an African American pilot to counteract racism in the military. Moreover, her advocacy extended to women's rights, where she created more opportunities for women in journalism by choosing to only admit female reporters to her press conferences.
Eleanor Roosevelt was not only a supportive political partner to her husband, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, but also a significant political figure in her own right. She worked tirelessly for the end of discrimination and poverty, and after World War II, she became an active diplomat internationally.
She inspired the writing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and held a six-day-a-week newspaper column titled My Day, amplifying her influence on national and international stages. Eleanor Roosevelt’s involvement in civil rights and efforts to push the Army Nurse Corps to allow Black women exemplify her dedication to leveling the playing field for all.
Is the u.s. border patrol a public or private good? how about satellite tv?
What event finally prevented americans from maintaining military isolationism in the period between 1914–1941?
que elementos favorecieron o limitaron el desarrollo de mexico despues de la revoluci??n?
The primary goal of the Mexican Rebellion was purely the takeover of the Díaz tyranny, but that comparatively simple politically aware movement widened into a foremost economic and social turmoil that foretold the vital character of Mexico’s 20th-century experience. During the lengthy struggle, the Mexican people established a sense of individuality and determination, perhaps unparalleled by any other Latin American nation. Many reforms had been developed by 1940 when the goals and purpose of the revolution were established as guiding principle for future Mexican policies and procedure. The viciousness of 1910 presented a clear start to the Mexican Revolution, but scholars contradict on an end, as a resolution mostly use the year 1920, but some end it with the 1917 constitution or measures in the 1920s, and still, others debate that the insurgency slowly tattered until 1940.
In Spanish,
El objetivo principal de la Rebelión mexicana fue simplemente la toma de posesión de la tiranía de Díaz, pero ese movimiento relativamente simple y políticamente consciente se amplió hasta convertirse en la mayor confusión económica y social que predijo el carácter vital de la experiencia mexicana del siglo XX. Durante la larga lucha, el pueblo mexicano estableció un sentido de individualidad y determinación, quizás sin paralelo en ninguna otra nación latinoamericana. Se habían desarrollado muchas reformas para 1940, cuando se establecieron los objetivos y el propósito de la revolución como principio rector de las futuras políticas y procedimientos mexicanos. La brutalidad de 1910 presentó un claro comienzo para la Revolución Mexicana, pero los académicos contradicen el final, ya que una resolución usa principalmente el año 1920, pero algunos lo terminan con la constitución de 1917 o medidas en la década de 1920, y aún otros debaten que el la insurgencia se rasgó lentamente hasta 1940.If the communists had lost the chinese civil war how might later events in korea have been different
The outcome of the Korean War might have been quite different had the communists lost the Chinese Civil War. A Nationalist victory leading to the non-communist control of mainland China could have weakened support for North Korea and changed U.S. military strategies in the region.
If the communists had lost the Chinese Civil War, later events in Korea might have been significantly different. Without a communist victory in China, the geopolitical landscape of East Asia would have changed, potentially affecting the dynamics of the Korean War. The People's Republic of China (PRC), led by Mao Zedong, was a crucial ally to North Korea during the Korean War. Had the nationalists under Chiang Kai-Shek retained control over mainland China, they likely would not have supported North Korea in the same manner.
This could have led to a less confident North Korean invasion or possibly deterred it altogether, altering the course of the conflict. In contrast, Chiang's Republic of China (ROC), based in Taiwan, was allied with the United States. If ROC controlled the mainland, the U.S. might have had a stronger regional ally, potentially discouraging Soviet and North Korean aggression. Additionally, the United States under General Douglas MacArthur's advisement might not have considered expanding military operations into China during the Korean War, considering such expansion could have led to a broader conflict with the Soviet Union, which was the biggest fear amid the Cold War tensions.
The germans believed that the allies would land in ____ the area of france closest to britain
Why did industrialization spread to other countries?
A. Britain lost their industrial secrets due to espionage.
B. Other countries wanted to industrialize like Britain.
C. A British man brought the ideas to other countries.
D. Britain traded their industrial information for other knowledge.
Industrialization spread to other countries as they sought to emulate Britain's economic success and capitalize on the opportunities for increased power and wealth that industrialization offered, employing new sources of power and technological innovations.
Explanation:Industrialization spread to other countries mainly because other nations wanted to replicate the economic success that Britain had achieved through its industrial revolution. This diffusion of industrial processes was influenced by several factors including the need for nations to produce goods cheaply, seek new markets for their products, and acquire inexpensive sources of raw materials. Great Britain aimed to maintain its competitive edge through measures such as banning the emigration of skilled workers and took advantage of its advanced banking system, political stability, and natural resources to invest in production. However, as Britain, France, Belgium, Germany, and the United States embarked on the Second Industrial Revolution, other nations followed suit, recognizing the economic power and wealth that industrialization could bring. These countries began developing their own industries, creating a demand for new sources of power, such as electricity and the internal combustion engine, as well as improvements in transportation and communication.
) lee's smaller army defeated mcclellan's larger force and kept union troops out of richmond because
The likely reason as to how Lee small army troops defeated the Mcclean’s larger force and kept the union troops out of Richmond because Mcclean was being too cautious though it was only on the first day that they won because the following day, Lee’s army lost the battle.
Lee's smaller army defeated McClellan's larger force and kept union troops out of Richmond because McClellan was too cautious.
Further Explanation:
The Battle of Antietam which was also called as Battle of Sharpsburg took place in year 1862. The army of Confederate general Robert E. Lee’s army was pitted against general McClellan's army of Potomac and it was Lee’s last attempt to invade North. The outcome of this battle was important for shaping America’s future and this battle still remains among the deadliest battles every fought in American history. Majority of the troops that Lee had for this battle were hungry and sick. They were using wait and watch tactic of McClellan's army to assemble in creek’s east side. McClellan's army outnumbered Lee’s army and that too by two to one but McClellan's thought that Lee had larger forces. The troops from both sides faced each other and the deadliest battle in American history started with just 15000 causalities in just eight hours of battle. As the night came, thousands of injured and dead-bodies were lying in the battlefield with majority of soldiers from both sides wounded and badly injured. Next morning, Lee begin the painstaking job and moved his troops back to Virginia but on the other hand McClellan did nothing. He kept union troops out of Richmond because McClellan was too cautious.
Learn more:
1. Why were civil rights supporters disappointed with the supreme court’s 1896 decision in Plessey v. Ferguson? https://brainly.com/question/2306255
2. Which statement describes the majority party’s power when it comes to senate committees? https://brainly.com/question/1017368
Answer details:
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: The Battle of Antietam
Keywords: The Battle of Antietam, McClellan, Robert E. Lee, Injuries, Wounded, Virginia, Richmond, Battlefield, America, History, Battle.
Describe Buddhism and explain how it began and by whom. Explore the concepts of the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path. Explain the purpose of both. What is the ultimate goal of a Buddhist?
Why did Jefferson send Robert Livingston and James Monroe to France in 1802?
Answer:
ensure that peole could use the misssipi river
Explanation:
A major cause of antagonism toward the "new immigrants" who came to the united states after 1880 was the belief that they
Which of the following best describes the northern and western portions of the state? high elevations and limited vegetation slow flowing rivers and abundant precipitation fertile fields and flat lands plentiful vegetation and low valleys
please help fast How did the Platt Amendment differ from the Teller Amendment? How did Cubans react to the Platt Amendment?
Answers should resemble, but not limited to the following: Although the Teller Amendment had stated that the United States had no intention of taking over Cuba, the Platt Amendment limited Cuba’s right to make treaties with other nations, required Cuba to sell or lease land to the United States for naval stations, and authorized the U.S. intervention in Cuban affairs. Cuban leaders disliked the Platt Amendment. Given no choice, however, Cubans reluctantly accepted it.
the form of pierrot lunaire
through-composed is the form (no repeating sections), with some use of imitation.
A pact between the president and the head of foreign country is called _____. a treaty a diplomatic solution an executive agreement an executive solution
Executive agreement my fellow fiends. Like if your day is going well!
Explain why westward expansion created a clash between sectional interests in Missouri
List five North American and European countries in the non communist bloc
PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! Why was democracy not established in Latin America after former Spanish and Portuguese colonies had gained their independence?
why did some people oppose internment camps during world war 2?
a. the camps were overcrowded
b. the camps tortured people as prisoners of war.
c. there were too many children held in the camps.
d. the camps held people who had done nothing wrong.
Independence for the diverse ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary would most likely result in the collapse of the empire. the Germans taking over the empire. the end of nationalist movements. the formation of a strong alliance.
Independence for the diverse ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary would most have likely resulted in the collapse of the empire. Therefore, the option A holds true.
What is the significance of independence of Austria-Hungary?At the near end of the nineteenth century and until the beginning of the twentieth century, the European politics was instable, as the entire European Empire in the west was facing multiple series of conflicts, one of which was the independence of Austria-Hungary.
Austria-Hungary was made up of small parts of different minorities collectively living as a society. If each of these groups had opted for their independence, it would have led to the collapse of the European Empire, and another conflict in the society.
Therefore, the option A holds true regarding the significance of the independence of Austria-Hungary.
Learn more about the independence of Austria-Hungary here:
https://brainly.com/question/3216632
#SPJ5
Independence for Austria-Hungary's ethnic groups would likely collapse the empire, not ensure German takeover, end nationalist movements, or immediately form strong alliances.
Independence for the diverse ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary would most likely result in the collapse of the empire. This is because Austria-Hungary was a multi-ethnic state comprising various nationalities such as Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians, Romanians, Poles, Ukrainians, and others.
These groups had longstanding grievances and aspirations for self-determination. Granting independence would trigger a domino effect as other ethnic groups would seek the same, leading to the dissolution of the empire.
The collapse of Austria-Hungary would not necessarily result in the Germans taking over the empire, as other powers might seek to influence or control the newly independent states.
Additionally, the end of nationalist movements would be unlikely as the granting of independence would likely embolden nationalist sentiments, leading to further demands for autonomy or sovereignty.
The formation of a strong alliance is also improbable immediately following the dissolution of Austria-Hungary, as the region would likely be characterized by instability and power struggles as newly independent states establish their identities and borders.
Overall, independence for the diverse ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary would most likely lead to the collapse of the empire and the subsequent emergence of numerous independent states in Central and Eastern Europe.
Complete question ;
Independence for the diverse ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary were most likely to result in:
A. Formation of independent nation-states
B. Continued conflict and instability
C. A stronger Austro-Hungarian Empire
D. Peaceful coexistence within the empire
E. Greater influence from neighboring countries
Please help
The land bridge and coastal crossing theories concern the earliest human migration from
Asia to South America.
South America to Asia.
Asia to North America.
North America to Asia.
The correct answer is “Asia to North America”
The Land Bridge Theory is a theory that defends the possibility of a wide plain that connected Asia and North America. This is supported by evidence of human occupation in Chile by 14,500 years ago, because of this scientists think that humans went from Alaska to South America, spreading across the continent.
Now, the last scientific DNA studies show that the population from the Americas did not originate from Asia Mongolians, in fact, they are a separate and distinct race.
Despite the drama of the summer, atticus win an unopposed re-election to the state legislature in the fall. give two possible meanings that could be taken from this.
PLEASE I REALLY NEED HELP IF I DONT DO THIS MY MOM IS GONNA SEND ME TO BOOT CAMP FOR A YEAR :( PLEEAASEEE HELP I KNOW ITS ALOT BUT I REALLY DNTT UNDERSTAND)How did the United States change between 1776 and 1870
How had the size of the United States changed?
How had the population make-up of the United States changed?
What new innovations changed life in the United States?
What key events changed the United States?
How was citizenship defined during each time period? How was enfranchisement (the right to vote) defined?
An exaggerated loyalty to a particular region of the country is called??
a.
abolitionism.
c.
Free-Soil Party.
b.
fugitive slave law.
d.
sectionalism.
Answer:
Option D.
Explanation:
Sectionalism , is the correct answer.
The term Sectionalism is used to describe the loyalty or assistance of a special area or division of the country, preferably a nation as a whole. In the sectional issue, slavery can be taken as an example, which divided the United States into two parts known as the North and the South to the degree that it commenced to the Civil War in America, for the reason that while the northerners opposed slavery the southerners supported it.
1) Which of these is the MOST LIKELY punishment for a person found guilty in a civil court case?
A: execution
B: incarceration
C: fine paid to the government
D: reimbursement of the plaintiff
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The First Great Awakening in the American colonies
featured traveling preachers that drew large audiences.
led to the formation of exclusive social groups in cities.
consisted of small crowds of government officials.
created harmony within most religious groups.
Answer: featured traveling preachers that drew large audiences.
The First Great Awakening or the Evangelical Revival was a series of Christian revivals in the Thirteen colonies between the 1730s and the 1740s. This movement established Anglo-American evangelicalism as a movement within American Protestant Churches.
This was mostly distinguished by a new way of preaching the doctrine of Christianity. The preachers were able to gather enormous crowds. Preachers such as Whitefield, Tennent and Davenport travelled around the country, and their meetings were distinguished by the enthusiastic response of people. Attendants often became emotional and some even had mystical visions.
Answer:
The correct answer would be A.
Explanation:
Why did the south have trouble raising money for the war effort?
Answer:
Gradually, the investment required by the war and the lack of resources were devastating the South. Hoping for European support in the war, the Confederate authorities, instead of exporting cotton and enjoying profits, canceled sales, thinking that they could force, for example, the entry of England at his side against the Union troops. But the English had a year of stock of the product and the French refused to help the southerners without English support. Besides, Lincoln prohibited the entry and exit of southern states, making it difficult for goods to arrive. Those goods were needed for both the population of the South and the troops.
Looking at each other without weapons, clothes, and on the verge of starvation, the departure from military service was intense (about one-third of the southern troops left the battlefield in 1863). Some Southern masters gathered slaves to form their army.
What European political leader was the source of much instability on the European mainland in the early 1800’s
Answer:
the answer is Napoleon I don't know is this from usatestprep tho
Which conclusion can be drawn from this image to support the argument that Europeans were economically exploiting their American colonies
Answer:
For Europeans to produce finished goods they used monopolies to force their colonies to supply them with raw materials
Explanation: