Why might a socialist society have a less rigid command economy than a communist society?

Answer:

perspective-taking skills (role taking skills)

Explanation:

Perspective or role-taking skills refers to the capacity of oneself to understand the own and the other's feelings, thoughts and motivations.

As the ability enables to comprehend how someone experiences different mental states, it is a social ability key in many areas like Human Resources, Psychologic consulting or Teaching, among others.

Being able to put in the shoes of others helps us deal better with situations that involve feelings, and beliefs, that we may not always agree with but enhances the communication and dealing with people in everyday life and work situations.

The ability to understand others often leads to having better relationships with other groups of people or colleagues and then leads to avoid conflicting or stressful situations as a component of emotional intelligence.

Answer:

I Agree

Explanation:

Following the advent of globalization, when information technologies changed the forms of consumption and production of economies, the competitive advantages of countries became more volatile. This is because technology is rapidly expanding and countries specialize faster, increasing competition. For example, until recently only US and Korean companies had the know-how to produce quality smartphones. However, not long ago, and very quickly, China began to produce high quality smartphones, changing the pattern of smartphone consumption around the world, previously dominated by the two major American and Korean companies.

Explanation:

We say something is subjective when it's based on personal opinions, interpretations, points of view, emotions and judgment. On the other hand, when something is objective it's based on fact-based, measurable and observable data.

Some differences are how subjective views are commonly found in editorials, blogs, comments on the internet, the objective is found in textbooks, news reporting, and scientific journals, another difference is on what both views are based on.

Another difference from a philosophical view is that our reality cant be seen objectively, only subjectively because our perception of the world is governed by our senses.

I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!

Final answer:

A subjective view of reality is based on personal opinions and perspectives, while an objective view is based on factual information and evidence. Subjective views can vary from person to person, while objective reality exists independent of personal beliefs.

Explanation:

A subjective view of reality is based on personal opinions, beliefs, and perspectives. It is influenced by individual experiences, emotions, and biases, and can vary from person to person. An objective view of reality, on the other hand, is based on factual information, evidence, and logical reasoning. It seeks to understand reality as it is, independent of personal beliefs or opinions.

For example, let's consider the question of whether ghosts exist. A subjective view would be someone's belief that ghosts exist based on personal experiences or cultural beliefs, even if there is no scientific evidence to support it. An objective view, however, would rely on scientific investigation and evidence, which currently does not support the existence of ghosts.

Answer:

Marketing in general is the methodology by which a company is able to convince customers of purchasing their products and/or services, instead of those of another company. Because the purpose of marketing is basically to convince the public about a product, or service, and lead a customer to buy, they use marketing techiques to reach this goal.

However, there are two types of marketing: product marketing and services marketing.

Product marketing is a pretty concise marketing strategy basically because products are tangible, visible objects that a customer can easily relate to and compare. Therefore, promoting a product only requires using marketing strategies in which the customer is shown what the product is, looks like, and offers for the benefit, or pleasure, of the buyer.

But in service marketing, given that we do not have a tangible, visible object, or something that can be easily experienced through one of the physical senses, it requires the engagement of different factors so that buyers will give their trust to the company offering the service. Basically, in service marketing, a company will use strategies to convince the client to asign their trust to the service being offered over that of another potential provider and thus acquire the service.

I am part of an African descent cultural group. It is a collective group in which people have the same ancestors from Africa and who fight for the same ideals as race equality. It is a large group, but it is considered a political minority because it is not represented proportionally on the political scene: there are few black deputies and senators. In my cult group there are people of both sexes, male and female, and people who do not identify with any gender. I am from the male group, but I work together with women to combat gender inequality as well. For example, I am writing a manifesto with a black friend for a seminar that will discuss the role of black women in the educational process in order to improve their social inclusion in teaching.

Answer: Explanation:

I think, therefore I am  or Cogito ergo sum  was the conclusion the phylosopher René Descartes arrived after a process of meditation and some eliminaton in order to find evidence for existence. By the time he perceived that "I" (and ability to think) could be the starting point that would lead to other evidences, he no longer dreaded doubts because this is also a consequence of 'I think', and evidence that 'I am'.

"The denial of "Cogito ergo sum" (I think, therefore I am) is not contradictory because the statement is not structured as a logical syllogism where a contradiction would violate the principles of formal logic. Instead, "Cogito ergo sum" is an intuitive insight into the nature of existence and consciousness offered by Renna Descartes.

When Descartes asserts "Cogito ergo sum," he is not presenting a deductive argument in the form of "If P, then Q; P, therefore Q." Rather, he is offering an immediate inference from the act of thinking to the existence of the thinker. The statement is meant to be self-evident and indubitable; the very act of doubting one's own existence serves as proof of the existence of the self, since one must exist to perform the act of doubting or thinking.

If one were to deny the "Cogito ergo sum," they would be attempting to refute an experiential fact rather than a logical proposition. The denial might go as follows: "I think that I am not." However, this denial does not result in a logical contradiction but rather in a performative contradiction. The act of thinking the thought "I am not" actually affirms the existence of the self that is performing the act of thinking.

In essence, the "Cogito ergo sum" is not a statement that can be simply true or false in the way that empirical claims can. It is a foundational philosophical claim about the certainty of one's own existence based on the undeniable fact that one is conscious and capable of thought. The denial of the cogito does not lead to a contradiction in the logical sense but rather undermines itself by affirming the existence of the self in the very act of denial.