Why was japan’s attack on hawaii a strategic move?a)hawaii was a tourist destination, not an important military post.b)hawaii was where a large portion of the pacific fleet was sheltered.c)hawaii was where us naval power was the weakest.d)hawaii was where us land troops awaited battle.

The government did little to nothing to disturb or regulate the rising power of the railroads and other big business monopolies in the south, which is the corner stone of lassiez-faire ideology. The unchecked growth of the industries' power created resentment toward this ideology as many people thought it trampled over the common citizen. Resulting in the creation of The Granger Movement, small groups of farmers mainly in the South and West, demanding the end of lassiez-faire policies and the intervention and regulation of the government in business affairs. The pressure created by these movements resulted in the increased regulation of railroads and firms controlling the storage and distribution of corn and wheat.

Laissez-faire policies spurred West's growth but led to abuses. Granger movement arose to advocate government intervention for fairer economic practices.

let's break down the role of laissez-faire policies in the development of the American West and the subsequent emergence of the Granger movement into detailed steps:

1. Expansion and Settlement: In the 19th century, the United States experienced a significant period of westward expansion. Settlers moved across the continent, seeking opportunities for land ownership, economic prosperity, and a new way of life. This expansion was facilitated by various factors, including government policies such as the Homestead Act of 1862, which provided land to settlers willing to cultivate and improve it.

2. Laissez-faire Policies: As settlers moved westward, the federal government generally adopted a laissez-faire approach to economic regulation. Laissez-faire, a French term meaning "let do" or "leave alone," refers to the idea that the government should minimize its intervention in economic affairs and allow markets to operate freely. This approach was influenced by classical liberal economic theories that emphasized individual liberty and limited government interference in private enterprise.

3. Economic Growth and Development: The laissez-faire policies of the time facilitated rapid economic growth and development in the American West. Entrepreneurs and businesses were able to exploit natural resources, establish industries, and build infrastructure with relatively little government regulation or interference. This led to the expansion of industries such as mining, agriculture, ranching, and transportation, which formed the backbone of the region's economy.

4. Challenges and Inequities: However, the laissez-faire approach also gave rise to various challenges and inequities. As economic activity intensified, powerful interests, such as railroad companies and corporate monopolies, began to emerge. These entities often engaged in monopolistic practices, unfair pricing, and exploitation of workers and consumers, leading to social and economic tensions within communities.

5. Emergence of the Granger Movement: In response to these challenges, farmers in the Midwest and Great Plains began organizing themselves into grassroots movements, such as the Grange, also known as the Patrons of Husbandry. The Granger movement emerged in the late 19th century as a response to the unfair practices of railroad companies and other economic monopolies.

6. Advocacy for Government Intervention: The Grangers advocated for government regulation of railroad rates and other economic policies to address the inequalities and abuses of the laissez-faire economic system. They argued that government intervention was necessary to ensure fair treatment, protect the interests of ordinary citizens, and promote the common good.

7. Legislative Reforms: The efforts of the Granger movement eventually led to the passage of various legislative reforms aimed at regulating railroad rates and curbing the power of monopolies. For example, the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 established the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), the first regulatory agency in the United States, tasked with overseeing railroad rates and practices.

In summary, laissez-faire policies played a crucial role in the development of the American West by fostering economic growth and expansion. However, they also contributed to social and economic tensions, which ultimately led to the emergence of movements like the Granger movement, advocating for government intervention to address inequities and regulate key industries for the benefit of ordinary citizens.

The ELASTIC clause is another name for the NECESSARY AND PROPER clause.

The "elastic" character of the "necessary and proper" clause is that it grants Congress  implied powers beyond the specifically stated ones in the Constitution..  After enumerating a number of the powers of Congress, including borrowing money, coining money, regulating commerce, etc, Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution closes by saying Congress shall have power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."  That's a quite broad and "elastic" statement, which goes beyond specifically delegated powers and gives Congress additional implied powers.  

An example of the implementation of such implied powers in the Constitution occurred when Alexander Hamilton, as our nation's first Secretary of the Treasury, argued in favor of establishing a national bank.  Hamilton believed that anything that is not strictly forbidden in the Constitution is allowable.  A national bank was not strictly listed as something Congress could establish, but there was nothing in the Constitution to prohibit it.  And the "necessary and proper" clause gave leeway to create it, by the implied powers given to Congress.

Mercy Otis Warren might have published her plays anonymously because, first of all, she was a woman. A woman talking about politics in a time when only men were allowed to participate openly in politics. Also, as in her works she called for a revolution breaking ties with England, what she was doing was greatly dangerous for the early beginnings of the Revolution. So, she probably published anonymously to protect herself.

Answer:

James Warren, her husband, was elected to the Massachusetts Legislature in 1766. He encouraged her to pursue writing. This led her to keep a low profile by the satirical nature of her plays but to be open as a citizen with her political activity.

Explanation:

As a patriot, Warren "began writing political dramas that denounced British policies and key officials in Massachusetts, notably Governor Thomas Hutchinson. Her 1772 satire, “The Adulator" (published anonymously in the Massachusetts Spy newspaper), criticized the British colonial governor’s policies a full four years before Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence. Warren also published two additional plays skewering British colonial leaders, Defeat (1773) and The Group (1775.) She supported the Boston Tea Party and boycotts of British imports and urged other women to follow suit."

Reference: Michals, D. (2015). Mercy Otis Warren. [online] National Women's History Museum.

Jim Crow laws, which were a system of laws meant to discriminate against African Americans, spread across the U.S.

Plessy v. Ferguson allowed 'separate but equal,' also known as segregation, to become law in the United States.

They are complete and polar opposites. Jim Crow Laws were suppose to be made TO discriminate against African Americans. Plessy v. Ferguson was to tell the U.S. that African Americans are separated, but should be treated as equals.

The Plessy v. Ferguson decision in 1896 reinforced Jim Crow laws by establishing 'separate but equal' as a constitutional doctrine, which legitimized racial segregation and inequality until being overturned in 1954 by Brown v. Board of Education.

The Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision in 1896 had a profound effect on Jim Crow laws by constitutionally validating racial segregation. This ruling established the doctrine of "separate but equal", which argued that as long as the separate facilities for blacks and whites were ostensibly equal, segregation did not violate the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. This legally upheld the socio-political environment that allowed for Jim Crow laws to flourish, perpetuating a system where African Americans were denied many rights and opportunities, and were segregated in virtually all public spaces. Jim Crow laws reinforced inequality despite the ideals of American democracy, often resulting in facilities for African Americans that were inferior in quality. These laws controlled aspects such as education, housing, and public accommodation, and until the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954, the "separate but equal" doctrine remained the legal justification for racial segregation.

Answer: C. The provision of military support to countries fighting communism.

Detail:

The Truman Doctrine was first stated by President Truman to Congress in 1947, and was mostly about providing economic aid.  Truman stated:  "It must be the policy of the United States to support free people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures."  Essentially, the Truman Doctrine pledged American aid elsewhere in the world to check the spread of communist and Soviet influence.  The policy was first put into action in 1948 by providing economic support to Greece and Turkey to stave off communist movement in those countries.

The Eisenhower Doctrine was proclaimed by President Eisenhower in 1957.  Eisenhower pledged to provide economic or also military aid, as needed, to any Middle Eastern country needing help in resisting communist aggression.  This was in response to Soviet and other communist support to Egypt, and as a warning to the USSR in regard to the Suez Crisis of 1956.

Answer:

The answer is C. on edginuty

Explanation:

Just checked my answer and it was correct

A. weak role in people's daily lives and is more likely to support the Republican Party

The painting referred to here is the famous "The Lictors Bring to Brutus the Bodies of His Sons" (French: Les licteurs rapportent à Brutus les corps de ses fils) painted by the French artist Jacques-Louis David. It was presented in 1789 in the Paris Salon. This was in a time that there was the political instability in France, the era of the French Revolution. The painting is about the roman leader Brutus, who was contemplating to sacrifice his own sons, who had betrayed the republic in favor of the monarchy. The artist wanted to let the French citizens see what a great leader has to choose for in order to hold the fort of his own nation.

A.) one must be prepared to sacrifice their own children to preserve France.

Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

The correct answer is Buffalo Soldiers confirmed.

The Buffalo Soldiers, who were African American regiments in the U.S. Army, are most similar to Indian Scouts as both groups served in the U.S. military during the westward expansion after the Civil War.

In the context of historical entities in the United States, the term most similar to Indian Scouts would arguably be the Buffalo Soldiers. Both were essential components of the frontier forces responsible for maintaining order and peaceable relations during the westward expansion. Indian Scouts refers primarily to Native Americans who worked for the US Army as guides, translators, and informants. They also helped the military during conflicts. Similarly, Buffalo Soldiers refers to African American U.S. Army regiments deployed to the Wild West after the Civil War. Both groups operated under US Army oversight and played integral roles in the country's westward expansion during the late 19th century. None of the other options - Indian Agents, the 9th Calvary, or freedmen - held similar roles within the context of the US Army.

https://brainly.com/question/38530043

#SPJ3

Native American tribes saw their way of life affected by the invasion of white colonists. Some people, like the Cherokee, adopted many of the characteristics of colonists:

These efforts were meant to show the colonists that the Cherokee people were far from the "savages" they were often labeled as. They also wanted to maintain peaceful relations with the white population and for their lands to be respected. Their efforts, however, were useless, as they were removed from their lands anyway during what became known as the "Trail of Tears."

The Cherokee tried to conform to European ideas of civilization by adopting a government modeled on the American system, embracing Christianity, and becoming literate.

The Cherokee, in an attempt to conform to European ideas of civilization, took several steps to acculturate to American society. In 1827, the Cherokee adopted a government structure modeled on the American system, which included a written constitution with a three-branch system: a principal chief, a two-house legislature, and an independent judiciary.

They also embraced aspects of European culture by dressing like Americans, converting to Christianity, becoming literate through the development of a written Cherokee syllabary, and publishing their own newspaper, The Cherokee Phoenix.

Additionally, the wealthiest Cherokee owned plantations and slaves, grew cotton, and built infrastructure such as grist mills, saw mills, blacksmith shops, and tanning yards, much like their European American counterparts. This acculturation was largely a strategy for survival and to prove their capability to integrate into American society. Unfortunately, these efforts had the opposite effect, intensifying the desire of white settlers for Cherokee land, which eventually led to increased pressure for their removal.

The relationship between the Native Americans and the settlers at Jamestown was a mixed one. When the settlers first arrived, the Native Americans weren't happy. They had a previous experience with the Spanish that was negative. Thus, they attacked the settlers when they first arrived.

The unfortunate cycle concerning the relationship of settlers and Indians refers to the historical conflicts, displacement, and marginalization of Native Indian tribes by European settlers during colonization. This cycle involved forced removals, broken treaties, and the erosion of Native Indian cultures.

The unfortunate cycle concerning the relationship of settlers and Native Indians is a historical phenomenon that occurred during the colonization of the Americas. It involved a pattern of conflict, displacement, and marginalization of Native Indian tribes by European settlers. The settlers often sought to acquire land and resources, leading to violent clashes, forced removals, and the erosion of Native Indian cultures.

One example of this cycle is the Indian Removal Act of 1830 in the United States, which resulted in the forced relocation of thousands of Native Indians from their ancestral lands to designated Indian territories in the west. This act and similar policies had devastating effects on Native Indian communities, leading to loss of lives, land, and cultural traditions.

The cycle is also characterized by broken treaties and promises made to Native Indians, as well as the establishment of reservations that confined them to limited territories. Despite efforts towards reconciliation and justice in recent years, the historical relationship between settlers and Native Indians remains a complex and unresolved issue.

https://brainly.com/question/32303912

#SPJ2

A common statement which is wrong about the Puritans is that "they rejected the doctrine of predestination".

The Puritans were a gathering of religious reformers who developed inside the Church of England amid the center of the 16th century. Many a doctrines separated Puritans from other Christians. The first was their belief in pre-destiny. Puritans trusted that faith in Jesus and cooperation in the ceremonies couldn't the only one influence one's salvation; one can't pick salvation, for that is the privilege of God alone.  

Answer:

The Mongol Empire covered many present-day countries. For example, the Khanate of the Great Khan occupied most of present-day Mongolia. The Golden Horde Khanate occupied a large part of present-day Russia. The Il-Khan Khanate occupied most of the Persian and Turkish countries.

Explanation:

The Mongol Empire was the second largest empire in history and the largest empire constituted by continuous territories. It was founded by Genghis Khan in the year 1206 and had its peak when it reached 24,000,000 km² in area. It came to encompass a territory from the Korean peninsula to the Danube River, to host a population of more than 100 million inhabitants and to include some regions as rich and important as China, Mesopotamia, Persia, Eastern Europe, Russia, among others.

Answer:

china, russia, middle eastern

Explanation:

A) Federalist

I just did the quiz

Answer:

A) Federalist

Explanation:

Anti-Federalists- this is a group of individuals who were against constitution ratifying. This is because they had a fear that if they established a stable government, the individual would not be protected, and their rights will be misused. While the federalist is the group that was in favor of the establishment of a constitution that active in the national government and who worked towards ratifying the American constitution without minding of its consequences not the freedom of others living in the government.

Hamilton wanted representation. He was a federalist and he believed in stronger government. Please make sure that my answer is correct.

Answer:

Hamilton wanted representation. He was a federalist and he believed in stronger government. Please make sure that my answer is correct.

Explanation:

The Framers were visionaries that contributed to the American Constitution. They established the foundations to built America.

Self-government for the Framers was one where citizens would be the principal source of ruling authority and would have the possibility to make their voices heard, in opposition to a strong central government that could coerce people's liberties.

The Framer's wanted to create a government with certain legal limits in the use of power. Freedom was of the utmost importance for the Framers.

The Framers of the Constitution had until that moment realized that the Articles of Confederation did not work as good as everyone imagined. The strong states and a weak central government lead the nation into chaos and caused a series of dysfunctions. With that, a new Constitution had to be written.

They aimed then to find the right balance between self-government and a strong central government that could unite the nation without killing the autonomy of the states. With that, a Central government was created but with limits - the bill of rights - at the same time states had the autonomy that was needed.

The Full Faith and Credit clause is included in Article IV, Section 1 of the US Constitution. It establishes the duties of the states regarding the respect of public acts, records, and judicial proceedings conducted by other states within the Union.

According to the Supreme court there is a distinction about the credit owed to laws and to judgements. The latter are usually entitled to a greater respect than laws. Nowadays, the clause has little effect in the choice of law process. The choice of law takes place when there is a conflict between several legal systems and there is a need for reconciliation of legal documents from different jurisdictions, as it the case of the different legal systems of the federated states of the US.

This clause has be generarally applied in family law, for the issuing of orders of protection, to prevent violence against women and enhance children support.

Answer: A

States must recognize all legal documents issued by another state, such as a driver’s licence.

Explanation:

Answer:  Iraq

Context:

The Bush Doctrine was the idea that the best defense against terrorism in the world was to use American power to spread democratic values in countries that were potential breeding grounds for terrorist activity.  Iraq was perceived as a threat in that way, and so the US pursued a "pre-emptive strike" against terrorism by going to war in Iraq.

This sort of policy agenda was part of the "neoconservative" view of a number of  President George W. Bush's advisers -- especially some who had also served in the administration of his father, President George H.W. Bush.  In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, there was a desire to push American values and not be shy about doing so with the use of American military might.  Sometimes referred to as the "Bush Doctrine," the core ideas were that the United States could pursue this goals on its own (without need for United Nations partnerships), that preemptive strikes were allowable against countries that harbored terrorists, and that regime change for the sake of promoting democracy was a good strategy.  

Things in Iraq haven't worked out as favorably as the Bush administration had hoped.

saying for short would say it is B

the second option B is correct

the answer is 46, sorry if I am wrong. pls let me know!!

Answer:

24 books

Explanation:

The Hebrew canon contains 24 books, one for each of the scrolls on which these works were written in ancient times. The Hebrew Bible is organized into three main sections: the Torah, or “Teaching,” also called the Pentateuch or the “Five Books of Moses”; the Neviʾim, or Prophets; and the Ketuvim, or Writings.

A) Millions were left without families of homes.

1) The British took several steps between 1763-1774 that alienated its American colonies. The biggest steps taken were the taxes implemented by the British parliament. Laws like the Stamp Act, Townshend Act, and the Tea Act were all laws passed without the colonists consent.

2) Britain felt justified in passing these laws and taxes without the colonists consent because they felt that the reason their government was in debt was due to protecting America during the French and Indian War. From 1754-1763, the British sent soldiers, ammunition, and other resources to North America to help the colonists fight the French. This war caused the British government to go into debt, so they turned to the Americans for assistance since they just protected them from the French.

3) The colonists rebelled against the taxes and laws. They boycotted British goods, attacked tax collectors, and protested until the laws were repealed.

4) The colonists stated that the laws and taxes implemented by the British parliament were unfair because they were passed without their consent. This is the first time that the colonists were taxed by someone other than their colonial legislature. This prompted the rallying cry of "no taxation without representation."

That would be 'C' Jacobins and the Conservatives.

The Jacobins and the Conservatives were the two factions that disagreed on the revolution’s path. Thus, option C is correct.

Revolution is termed as when the populace rebels against the authorities, generally because of perceived tyranny or political incapacity, a revolution—a fundamental and comparatively sudden change in political power and political organization—occurs.

Jacobins and the Conservatives abandoned the path of revolution as they believed that the liberty of their people won't be found out after what they have done and all the heritage and all the people will lose their background of being citizens.

But then they were a big part of the French Revolution and had some radical thoughts. Therefore, option C is the correct option.

Learn more about revolution, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13385345

#SPJ6

The elasticity of the Constitution means that it will affect everyone the same and equally, without discrimination. If we didn't have elasticity in the Constitution we would have an unfair life because everything could be biased.

New York City's trajectory was forever altered by the connection it provided between the massive population centers of Brooklyn and Manhattan. Greater New York was formed in 1898 when the city of Brooklyn officially merged with New York City, Staten Island, and a few farm towns.

The Brooklyn Bridge is a suspension bridge that connects Manhattan and Brooklyn in New York City and spans the East River. The Brooklyn Bridge was an amazing feat of engineering in the 19th century. It was the first bridge to use steel for the cable wire, and during its construction, explosives were used for the first time inside a pneumatic caisson. Since its development, the extension has turned into a fundamental milestone of New York City — a remarkable building achievement that is as yet adored across the world.

As a result, the United States National Park Service has designated it as a National Historic Landmark. The Brooklyn Bridge, John Augustus Roebling's masterpiece, was constructed from 1869 to 1883 despite enormous challenges. One of the most important constructional components of Roebling's bridge designs was his own method for weaving wire cables. Roebling was an engineer.

Learn more about Brooklyn Bridge here:

https://brainly.com/question/29547339

#SPJ2