I was running at 25 km/h speed when i arrived the school. Thus, option c) 25 km/h is correct.
To determine how fast you were running when you arrived at school, we need to use the formula that relates initial velocity, acceleration, and time:
v = u + at
Where:
v is the final velocityu is the initial velocitya is the accelerationt is the timeGiven that:
Initial velocity, u = 10 km/hAcceleration, a = 30 km/h²Time, t = 0.5 hours (since 30 minutes is 0.5 hours)We can substitute these values into the formula:
v = 10 km/h + (30 km/h² * 0.5 h)
This simplifies to:
v = 10 km/h + 15 km/h
Thus, v = 25 km/h.
Therefore, you were running at 25 km/h when you arrived at school. The correct answer is c) 25 km/h.
A plane is flying horizontally with speed 167 m/s at a height 4040 m above the ground, when a package is dropped from the plane. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s 2 . Neglecting air resistance, when the package hits the ground, the plane will be:
Answer:
The plane will be 4795.23 meters from where he threw the package.
Explanation:
Data:
v = 167 m/s
h = 4040 m
g = 9.8m/s²
package:
after it is dropped there is no horizontal force, so...
[tex]X - Xo = Vt[/tex]
t = [tex]\frac{X - Xo}{V}[/tex] I
in the vertical we have only [tex]P = mg[/tex]
[tex]Y - Yo = Vot -\frac{gt^{2} }{2}[/tex] but Vo = 0 because the package is dropped
[tex]Y - Yo =-\frac{gt^{2} }{2}[/tex] II
replacing I in II
[tex]Y - Yo =-\frac{g(X - Xo)^{2} }{2V^{2}}[/tex]
[tex]0 - 4040 =-\frac{9.8(X - Xo)^{2} }{2*167^{2}}[/tex]
X - Xo = 4795.23
The distance from where the plane drops the package and where it hits the ground is the same as the plane flies horizontally, as there is no acceleration at x.
A 2-g string that is 0.79 m long is fixed at both ends and is under tension. This string produces a 500-Hz tone when it vibrates in the third harmonic. The speed of sound in air is 344 m/s. The tension in the string, in is closest to __________
Answer:
[tex]T = 175.6 N[/tex]
Explanation:
As we know that string is vibrating in third harmonic
So we will have
[tex]L = 3\frac{\lambda}{2}[/tex]
so we have
[tex]0.79 = \frac{3}{2}\lambda[/tex]
so we have
[tex]\lambda = \frac{2}{3}(0.79)[/tex]
[tex]\lambda = 0.527[/tex]
we know that frequency of the wave is given as
f = 500 Hz
now we know that
speed of the wave is
[tex]v = frequency \times wavelength[/tex]
[tex]v = (500)(0.527)[/tex]
[tex]v = 263.3 m/s[/tex]
now we have
[tex]v = \sqrt{\frac{T}{m/L}}[/tex]
so we have
[tex]263.3 \sqrt{\frac{T}{(0.002/0.79)}}[/tex]
[tex]T = 175.6 N[/tex]
Soon after Earth was formed, heat released by the decay of radioactive elements raised the average internal temperature from 300 to 3000 K, at about which value it remains today. Assuming an average coefficient of volume expansion of 3.2 × 10–5 K–1, by how much has the radius of Earth increased since the planet was formed?
Answer:
97.03%
Explanation:
The equation for volumetric expansion due to thermal expansion is as follows
V/Vo=(1+γΔT)
V=final volume
Vo=initial volume
γ=coefficient of volume expansion=3.2 × 10–5 K–1
ΔT=
temperature difference
assuming that the earth is a sphere the volume is given by
V=(4/3)pi R^3
if we find the relationship between the initial and final volume we have the following
[tex]\frac{V}{Vo} =\frac{ \frac{4}{3} \pi r^{3} }{ \frac{4}{3} \pi ro^{3}}=\frac{r^{3} }{ro^{3}}[/tex]
taking into account the previous equation
r/ro=(1+γΔT)^(1/3)
r/r0=(1-3.2x10-5(3000-300))^(1/3)=
r/ro=0.9703=97.03%
A child, who is 45 m from the bank of a river, is being carried helplessly downstream by the river's swift current of 1.0 m/s. As the child passes a lifeguard on the river's bank, the lifeguard starts swimming in a straight line (Fig. 3–46) until she reaches the child at a point downstream. If the lifeguard can swim at a speed of 2.0 m/s relative to the water, how long does it take her to reach the child? How far downstream does the lifeguard intercept the child?
Answer:
The lifeguard takes 25.9 seconds to reach the child, at 25.9 meters from the start point downstream.
Explanation:
As the image shows, the child trajectory, the lifeguard trajectory and the distance from the bank form a triangle. This triangle is formed by the distances, an we already know the distance from the bank and the speed of child, and the speed of the lifeguard. So we have unknom time in common. Lets see the equations:
Using phitagoras theorem
[tex]45^{2}+(1*t_{1} )^{2} =(2*t_{2} )^{2}\\\\but\\t_{1} =t_{2} , then\\\\45^{2} =3t^{2} \\\\t=\sqrt{\frac{45^{2}}{3} } = 25.9seconds\\and replacing in X1= 25.9 meters[/tex]
Final answer:
The lifeguard takes 22.5 seconds to reach the child, intercepting 22.5 meters downstream due to the river's current. This solution involves calculating relative speeds and distances, showcasing principles of physics.
Explanation:
The question describes a scenario where a lifeguard needs to save a child being carried downstream by a river's current. The lifeguard can swim at a speed of 2.0 m/s relative to the water, and the child is 45 meters away from the riverbank, being carried by a current of 1.0 m/s. To solve for the time it takes for the lifeguard to reach the child and the distance downstream where the interception occurs, we must analyze the relative velocities and distances involved.
Step 1: Determine the Time to Reach the Child
The lifeguard's effective speed towards the child in the direction perpendicular to the current is 2.0 m/s. Since the child is 45 m from the bank and the lifeguard swims directly towards the child, the time it takes will be Time = Distance / Speed = 45 m / 2.0 m/s = 22.5 seconds.
Step 2: Determine the Distance Downstream
During this time, both the child and the lifeguard are being carried downstream by the current. The distance covered downstream can be calculated by the current's speed multiplied by the time: Distance downstream = Current speed × Time = 1.0 m/s × 22.5 s = 22.5 meters.
Therefore, it takes the lifeguard 22.5 seconds to reach the child, and they intercept 22.5 meters downstream from the point directly opposite the lifeguard's starting position.
You are traveling on an airplane. The velocity of the plane with respect to the air is 140 m/s due east. The velocity of the air with respect to the ground is 31 m/s at an angle of 30° west of due north. 1) What is the speed of the plane with respect to the ground?
Answer:
127.36 m/s
Explanation:
velocity of plane with respect to air = 140 m/s due east
velocity of air with respect to ground = 31 m/s 30° west of north
Write the velocities in the vector forms
[tex]\overrightarrow{V_{p/a}}=140\widehat{i}[/tex]
[tex]\overrightarrow{V_{a/g}}=31 \left ( -Sin30 \widehat{i}+Cos30\widehat{j} \right )[/tex]
[tex]\overrightarrow{V_{a/g}}= -15.5 \widehat{i}+26.85\widehat{j}[/tex]
Let velocity of plane with respect to ground is given by vp/g
According to the formula of relative velocities
[tex]\overrightarrow{V_{p/a}}=\overrightarrow{V_{p/g}}-\overrightarrow{V_{a/g}}[/tex]
[tex]\overrightarrow{V_{p/g}}=\overrightarrow{V_{p/a}}+\overrightarrow{V_{a/g}}[/tex]
[tex]\overrightarrow{V_{p/g}}= \left ( 140-15.5 \right )\widehat{i}+26.85\widehat{j}[/tex]
[tex]\overrightarrow{V_{p/g}}= \left ( 124.5 \right )\widehat{i}+26.85\widehat{j}[/tex]
The magnitude of the velocity of plane with respect to the ground is given by
[tex]V_{p/g} = \sqrt{124.5^{2}+26.85^{2}}=127.36 m/s[/tex]
Thus, the velocity of plane with respect to the ground is given by 127.36 m/s.
Please help!! 30 points!!
Describe the Net Force lab and explain what the lab demonstrated. You may use your notes from the lab to answer this question.
Answer:
The net force acting on an object is the sum of all the force acting on it, and the net force of an object is zero. I f the forces acting on it tend to cancel each other. For example you are sit in a chair, the earth's gravity is pulling you down, but the chair is pushing you up with an equal amount of force.
Explanation:
Answer:
The net force acting on an object is the sum of all the force acting on it, and the net force of an object is zero. I f the forces acting on it tend to cancel each other. For example you are sit in a chair, the earth's gravity is pulling you down, but the chair is pushing you up with an equal amount of force.
Explanation:
science teacher helped me
A football is kicked vertically upward from the ground and a student gazing out of the window sees it moving upward past her at velocity U. The window is a height h above the ground. You may ignore air resistance. How high does the football go above ground?
Answer:
[tex]H = \frac{u^2}{2g} + h[/tex]
Explanation:
Let the football is kicked up vertically with some speed given as
[tex]v = v_o[/tex]
now its speed when it will reach to height "h" above the ground is given as "u"
so we will have
[tex]v_f^2 - v_i^2 = 2 a d[/tex]
here we have
[tex]u^2 - v_o^2 = 2(-g)h[/tex]
so we have
[tex]v_o^2 = u^2 + 2gh[/tex]
now we know that when football will reach to maximum height then it will have zero final velocity
So we will have
[tex]v_f^2 - v_i^2 = 2 a s[/tex]
[tex]0 - (u^2 + 2gh) = 2(-g)H[/tex]
so we have maximum height given as
[tex]H = \frac{u^2 + 2gh}{2g}[/tex]
[tex]H = \frac{u^2}{2g} + h[/tex]
The maximum height a football reaches after being kicked upward past a window can be computed by using the kinematic equation and setting the final velocity to zero at the peak. The formula H = h + (U²) / (2g) allows us to find the maximum height by adding the window's height above ground to the kinetic energy at the window level, divided by twice the acceleration due to gravity.
Explanation:Calculating the Maximum Height of a Football Kicked Upward
To find the maximum height a football reaches after being kicked upward past a window at velocity U and height h, we can use the principles of kinematics under constant acceleration due to gravity. Initially, when the ball is kicked, it possesses kinetic energy which gets converted into gravitational potential energy as it ascends. The football reaches its maximum height when its velocity becomes zero.
Using the kinematic equation:
v² = u² + 2gh
Where:
v is the final velocity (0 m/s at the maximum height)u is the initial velocity (U at the window height)g is the acceleration due to gravity (-9.8 m/s²)h is the change in height (maximum height - window height)Let H be the maximum height above ground and h the window height above ground, then:
0 = U² - 2g(H - h)
Solving for H gives us:
H = h + (U²) / (2g)
Plugging in the values for U and h as well as g, we can calculate the maximum height H.
At the beginning of a basketball game, the referee tosses the ball straight up with a speed of 4.6m/s. A player cannot touch the basketball until it has reached maximum height and begins to fall back down. What is the minimum time a player must wait before touching the ball?
Answer:
t=0.47s
Explanation:
the ball has uniformly accelerated movement due to gravity
Vo=initial speed=4.6m/s
g=gravity=-9.8m/s^2
Vf=final speed=0, the player must wait for the ball to stop. so the final speed will be 0
we can use the following ecuation
T=(Vf-Vo)/g
T=(0-4.6)/-9.8m/s^2
T=0.47s
A certain dog whistle operates at 23.5 kHz, while another (brand X) operates at an unknown frequency. If humans can hear neither whistle when played separately, but a shrill whine of frequency 5000 Hz occurs when they are played simultaneously, estimate the operating frequency of brand X.
The unknown frequency of the other whistle (brand x) is either 28.5 kHz or 18.5 kHz. This is because when both are played together, they create a beat frequency of 5000 Hz due to wave interference.
Explanation:The perception of frequency is called pitch. Humans, typically, can distinguish between two sounds if their frequencies differ by roughly 0.3%, but they cannot hear frequencies beyond the 20,000 Hz range. If a 5000 Hz frequency is created when the two dog whistles are played together, it suggests that some form of wave interference is occurring. This particularly seems like a case of beat frequency, which is the resultant frequency produced due to the superposition of two sound waves of different frequencies.
Given that one whistle operates at 23.5 kHz (or 23500 Hz), and the beat frequency when both whistles are played together is 5000Hz, the other whistle (brand x) likely operates at either 23500 + 5000 = 28.5 kHz (or 28500 Hz) or 23500 - 5000 = 18.5 kHz (or 18500 Hz). Either of these frequencies would yield a 5000 Hz difference when superimposed with the 23500 Hz frequency, thereby creating a beat frequency of 5000 Hz when the two are played together.
Learn more about Sound Wave Interference here:https://brainly.com/question/1287906
#SPJ12
The situation described is a phenomenon called beat frequency. Since humans cannot hear the individual sounds of the whistles which must be above 20kHz but only a beat frequency of 5000 Hz, the frequency of the brand X whistle is calculated to be 28.5 kHz.
Explanation:The scenario described in this situation is an example of beat frequency, which is a phenomenon in physics. When two waves of slightly different frequencies interfere with each other, they produce a beat frequency which is the difference of the initial two frequencies. Considering the provided information, we know a shrill whine of frequency 5000 Hz is heard when the two dog whistles are played together. One whistle operates at a frequency of 23.5 kHz (or 23500 Hz).
Since the beat frequency is the difference between the two initial frequencies, the frequency of the whistle brand X (denoted as f) can be calculated by subtracting or adding the beat frequency from the known whistle frequency. This means that the unknown frequency could be either 23500 Hz - 5000 Hz = 18500 Hz, or 23500 Hz + 5000 Hz = 28500 Hz. However, since the upper limit of human hearing is 20 kHz and humans can't hear the shrill whine produced by either whistle individually, the frequency of brand X must be higher than 20 kHz and therefore is 28500 Hz.
Learn more about Beat Frequency here:https://brainly.com/question/29428851
#SPJ12
A member of the marching band tunes their trombone inside their school. When they walk out to the field the instrument goes out of tune. What is the best explanation for this?
The trombone becomes out of tune when moving from indoors to the field because of the temperature change affecting the air density and speed of sound within the instrument's tubing, thus altering the pitch.
When the marching band member tunes their trombone indoors and then finds it out of tune upon moving to the field, the primary cause is likely due to a change in temperature. Brass instruments, like trombones, are sensitive to temperature changes because they directly affect the air's density inside the instrument's tubing. Warmer air makes the instrument sound sharper, while colder air will cause it to sound flatter. Since the trombone changes its pitch by varying the length of the tube through its slide mechanism, a change in outdoor temperature can significantly alter its tuning. This is because the warmer or colder air affects the speed of sound in the air column, changing the resonant frequencies of the tube and thus the pitch produced.
A combination of 0.250 kg of water at 20.0°C, 0.400 kg of aluminum at 26.0°C, and 0.100 kg of copper at 100°C is mixed in an insulated container and allowed to come to thermal equilibrium. Ignore any energy transfer to or from the container and determine;a. The final temperature of the mixture.b. The change in the entropy of the universe in this experiment.
Answer:
23.63 degree.
Explanation:
Specific heat of water = 4186 joule / kg degree
Specific heat of aluminium = 900 joule / kg degree
Specific heat of copper = 386 joule / kg degree
Let equilibrium temperature be T.
Heat will be gained by water and aluminium and lost by hot copper.
Heat gained or lost = mst , where m is mass , s is specific heat and t is rise or fall of temperature.
Heat gained by water = .250 X 4186 X ( T - 20 )
= 1046.5 ( T-20)
Heat gained by aluminium = .400 x 900 x ( T - 26 )
= 360 ( T - 26 )
Heat lost by copper = .100 x 386 x ( 100 - T )
38.6 ( 100 - T)
Heat gained = Heat lost
1046.5 ( T-20) + 360 ( T - 26 ) = 38.6 ( 100 - T)
T ( 1046.5 + 360 + 38.6 ) = 3860 + 9360 +20930
1445.1 T = 34150.
T = 23.63 degree.
Change in the entropy of the universe will be zero because no heat is exchanged with the universe. The container is insulated from outside .
Inside the container, entropy will be increased.
Final answer:
The student's question about thermal equilibrium and entropy change is a physics problem related to calorimetry in an adiabatic process. It requires calculating the final temperature using heat exchange equations and determining the total entropy change using the formula for entropy change.
Explanation:
The student's question involves the thermal equilibration of three different materials in an insulated container, a common scenario in calorimetry problems within physics. We assume no heat loss to the container or surroundings (adiabatic process), which simplifies the calculations.
Final Temperature Calculation
To find the final temperature, we need to set the heat lost by the warmer substances equal to the heat gained by the cooler substance:
∀Q = 0 = mcΔT (water) + mcΔT (aluminum) + mcΔT (copper)Here, m is mass, c is specific heat capacity, and ΔT is change in temperature.
For water, c = 4186 J/(kg°C), for aluminum, c = 900 J/(kg°C), and for copper, c = 387 J/(kg°C). Solving the equation ∀Q = 0 with the given masses and initial temperatures will yield the final equilibrium temperature.
Entropy Change
The change in entropy is calculated via:
ΔS = mc ln(Tx_{final} /Tx_{initial} )We apply this formula separately for each substance, summing the changes to find the total entropy change of the universe in the experiment.
A steel ball is dropped from a building's roof and passes a window, taking 0.14 s to fall from the top to the bottom of the window, a distance of 1.20 m. It then falls to a sidewalk and bounces back past the window, moving from bottom to top in 0.14 s. Assume that the upward flight is an exact reverse of the fall. The time the ball spends below the bottom of the window is 2.22 s. How tall is the building?
Answer:
The building is 20.68m high.
Explanation:
In order to solve this problem we must first do a drawing of what the situation looks like. (Look at the attached picture). Then, we determine what was the velocity of the ball when it reached the top of the window (let's call this [tex]V_{0A}[/tex] and when it reached the bottom of the window (let's call this [tex]V_{0B}[/tex]. We can start by finding the velocity the ball has at the top of the window [tex]V_{oA}[/tex] when it's falling.
In order to do so, we can use the following equation:
[tex]\updelta y=V_{0A}t+\frac{1}{2} at^{2}[/tex]
We can now solve this equation for [tex]V_{0A}[/tex] so we get:
[tex]v_{0A}=\frac{\updelta y-\frac{1}{2} at^{2}}{t}[/tex]
or when simplified we get:
[tex]v_{0A}=\frac{2\updelta y-at^{2}}{2t}[/tex]
now we can substitute values in the formula so we get:
[tex]v_{0A}=\frac{2(-1.20m)-(-9.8m/s^{2})(0.14s)^{2}}{2(0.14)}[/tex]
and solve:
[tex]v_{0A}=-7.886m/s[/tex]
Once we got the first velocity, we can proceed and find the second velocity.
We can find that by using the following formula:
[tex]a=\frac{V_{f}^{2}-V_{0}^{2}}{2y}[/tex]
So now we can solve for [tex]V_{f}[/tex]
When solving for [tex]V_{f}[/tex], we get the following formula:
[tex]V_f=\sqrt{2ya+V_{0}^{2}}[/tex]
So we can now substitute some values.
[tex]V_{0B}=\sqrt{2(-1.20m)(-9.8m/s\{2})+(-7.885m/s)^{2}}[/tex]
When solving this equation we get an answer of:
[tex]V_{0B}=-9.257m/s[/tex]
Once we got those velocities, we can use them to find the distance from the roof to the highest part of the window and the distance between the
lowest part of the window and the floor.
Let's start with the top portion of the window:
[tex]y=\frac{V_{f}^{2}-V_{0}^{2}}{2A}[/tex]
in this case, the initial velocity is 0 because we are dropping the ball from the roof. So we can now substitute values so we get:
[tex]y=\frac{(-7.885m/s)^{2}-(0)^{2}}{2(-9.8m/s^{2}}[/tex]
when solving this for y we get:
y=-3.17m
Now, we can find the height between the lowest part of the window and the floor, so we get:
[tex]\updelta y=V_{0B}t+\frac{1}{2} at^{2}[/tex]
In this case the time is 1.11s because it's half of the total time the ball is beneath the window when it's falling. So when substituting values we get:
[tex]\updelta y=(-9.257m/s^{2})(1.11s)+\frac{1}{2} (-9.8m/s^{2})(1.11s)^{2}[/tex]
When solving that expression we get that:
[tex]\updelta y=-16.31m[/tex]
so now we have enough information to solve the problem, notice that the heights appear as negative. This is because the bal is falling at this time. Since we only care about the magnitud, we can make them positive.
So in order to find the height of the building, we must ad the three lengths we just found, so we get:
h=3.17m+1.20m+16.31m=20.68m
So the building has a height of 20.68m
From January 26, 1977, to September 18, 1983, George Meegan of Great Britain walked from Ushuaia, at the southern tip of South America, to Prudhoe Bay in Alaska, covering 30 600 km. In meters per second, what was the magnitude of his average velocity during that time period?
Answer:
0.146 m/s
Explanation:
We can see it in the pic.
Name two physical properties that characterize matter
Answer:
Matter have two essential types of properties, those are physical properties and chemical properties.
Explanation:
A speedboat starts from rest and accelerates at - 2.01 m/s2 for 7.00 s. At the end of this time, the boat continues for an additional 6.00 s with an acceleration of +0.518 Following this, the boat accelerates at 1.49 m/s2 for 8.00 s (a) What is the velocity of the boat at t = 21.0 s? (b) Find the total displacement of the boat.
Answer:
(a) 52.724 m/s
(b) Total displacement, d = 551.25 m
Solution:
As per the question:
Initial acceleration of the speed boat, a = - 2.01 [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex]
Time duration, t = 7.00 s
Additional time, t' =6.00 s
Acceleration for additional time, a' = 0.518 [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex]
The followed up acceleration, a'' = 1.49 [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex]
Time duration, t'' = 8.00 s
(a) Now, to calculate the velocity of the boat at timer, t = 21.0 s, we have:
After the initial 7.00 s, the velocity of the boat, from eqn-1 of motion:
v = u + at
v = 0 - 2.1(7.00) = - 14.7 m/s
After t + t' = 13 s:
v' = v + at
v' = 14.7 + 0.518(13) = 21.434 m/s
Now, velocity of the boat after t = 21 s:
v'' = v' + a''t
v'' = 21.434 + 1.49(21) = 52.724 m/s
(b) Now, the total displacement, d:
For the first case:
d = ut + [tex]\frac{1}{2}at^{2} = 0 - 0.5\times 2.1\times 7^{2} = - 51.45 m[/tex]
For the second case:
d = v't' = 21.434(6) = 128.6 m
For the third case:
d = ut + [tex]\frac{1}{2}a't'^{2} = 0 + 0.5\times 0.518\times 6^{2} = 4.65 m[/tex]
For the fourth case:
d = v''t'' = 52.724(8) = 421.79 m
For the last case:
d = ut + [tex]\frac{1}{2}a't'^{2} = 0 + 0.5\times 1.49\times 8^{2} = 47.68 m[/tex]
Total displacement, d = -51.45 + 128.6 + 4.65 + 421.79 + 47.68 = 551.25 m
Which of the following is a statement of the first law of thermodynamics?
[A] Ek = ½ mV2
[B] A negative ΔH corresponds to an exothermic process. [C] ΔE = Efinal -Einitial
[D] Energy lost by the system must be gained by the surroundings.
[E] 1 cal = 4.184 J (exactly)
Answer:
Option D.
Explanation:
The first law of thermodynamics is a law of conservation of energy. This automatically tells us that energy lost by a system won't dissapear, but it will be gained by the surroundings.
Mathematically is stated this way:
ΔU=Q-W
Where ΔU is the change in the internal energy of a closed system, Q is the amount of heat supplied and W the amount of work done by the system on its surroundings. It means that if the internal energy U decreases, then that energy lost must have been converted to work W in the surroundings.
The first law of thermodynamics is best represented by the statement: Energy lost by the system must be gained by the surroundings.
Explanation:The first law of thermodynamics, also known as the law of energy conservation, states that energy cannot be created or destroyed but it can be transformed from one form to another. The most accurate representation of the first law of thermodynamics from the provided options is [D] Energy lost by the system must be gained by the surroundings. This statement effectively communicates the balance of energy transfer which is fundamental to understanding the concept of first law of thermodynamics.
Learn more about First Law of Thermodynamics here:https://brainly.com/question/9614649
a vector points 1280 units along the x-axis, and -847 units along the y-axis. Find the magnitude and direction of the vector
Answer:
The answer to your question is: magnitude: 1534.9 units
direction: 326.5°
Explanation:
Data
x = 1280 u
y = -847 y
Then as x is positive and y is negative this vector is quadrangle
To find the magnitude, we use the pythagorean theorem
c2 = a2 + b2
c2 = 1280² + (-847)² = 1638400 + 717409 = 2355809
c = 1534.9 units
to find the direction we use the tangent function
tanФ = os/as = -847/1280 = -0.661
Ф = 33.49
But it is in the 4th quadrangle, then
Ф = 360 - 33-49 = 326.5°
Answer:
1530 units, -33.5°
Explanation:
Given the x-component and the y-component, the magnitude can be found with Pythagorean theorem:
v² = vx² + vy²
And the direction can be found with trigonometry:
θ = atan(vy / vx)
Given that vx = 1280 and vy = -847:
v² = (1280)² + (-847)²
v ≈ 1530
θ = atan(-847 / 1280)
θ ≈ -33.5° or 146.5°
θ is in the fourth quadrant, so θ = -33.5°.
The horizontal surface on which the block (mass 2.0 kg) slides is frictionless. The speed of the block before it touches the spring is 6.0 m/s. How fast is the block moving at the instant the spring has been compressed 15 cm? k = 2.0 kN/m
Answer:3.67 m/s
Explanation:
mass of block(m)=2 kg
Velocity of block=6 m/s
spring constant(k)=2 KN/m
Spring compression x=15 cm
Conserving Energy
energy lost by block =Gain in potential energy in spring
[tex]\frac{m(v_1^2-v_2^2)}{2}=\frac{kx^2}{2}[/tex]
[tex]2\left [ 6^2-v_2^2\right ]=2\times 10^3\times \left [ 0.15\right ]^2[/tex]
[tex]v_2=3.67 m/s[/tex]
A chair of mass 15.0 kg is sitting on the horizontal floor; the floor is not frictionless. You push on the chair with a force of 60.0 N that is directed at an angle of 40.0° below the horizontal, and the chair slides along the floor. Use a free-body diagram and Newton’s laws to calculate the normal force that the floor exerts on the chair.
Answer:
[tex]F_n = 185.72 N[/tex]
Explanation:
As per FBD we can say that net downward force perpendicular to contact plane must be counterbalanced by the net upward Normal force
So here we will say
[tex]F_n = F sin40 + mg[/tex]
now we have
[tex]F = 60.0 N[/tex]
[tex]m = 15 kg[/tex]
now we have
[tex]F_n = 60 sin40 + 15(9.81)[/tex]
[tex]F_n = 185.72 N[/tex]
The normal force that the floor exerts on the chair is approximately 185.72 N.
First, let's draw a free-body diagram for the chair.
The forces acting on the chair are the force you apply (60.0 N) and the weight of the chair (mg), where m is the mass of the chair (15.0 kg) and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s^2).
Now, since the chair is sliding along the floor, there must be a frictional force opposing its motion. However, the problem doesn't provide the coefficient of friction or any information about it. Therefore, we cannot consider the frictional force in this calculation.
Next, let's break down the force you apply into its components. The force you apply is directed at an angle of 40.0° below the horizontal. We can resolve this force into two components: one perpendicular to the floor and one parallel to the floor.
The component perpendicular to the floor is given by F * sinθ, where F is the magnitude of the force (60.0 N) and θ is the angle (40.0°). This component contributes to the normal force.
The component parallel to the floor is given by F * cosθ. This component contributes to the frictional force, but since we are not considering friction in this calculation, we won't use this component.
Now, let's calculate the normal force. The normal force is the net force acting perpendicular to the contact plane. We can find it by adding the force component perpendicular to the floor (F * sinθ) and the weight of the chair (mg).
So, the normal force (Fn) is given by Fn = F * sinθ + mg.
Substituting the given values, we have:
Fn = 60.0 N * sin(40.0°) + 15.0 kg * 9.81 m/s².
Evaluating this expression, we find that the normal force is approximately 185.72 N.
Therefore, the normal force that the floor exerts on the chair is approximately 185.72 N.
Know more about normal force,
https://brainly.com/question/35157912
#SPJ3
An object of mass m is sliding with speed vi at some instant across a level tabletop, with which its coefficient of kinetic friction is µ. It then moves through a distance d and comes to rest. Which of the following equations for the speed vi is reasonable?vi = v2µdvi = v2µmgdvi = v-2µmgdvi = v-2µgdvi = v2µgd
Answer:
√2µgd = vi
Explanation:
Given that the mass of object is m
Sliding speed of object is vi
coefficient of kinetic friction is µ
Distance covered is d
Final speed, vf is 0
Equation to apply will be;
v²f=v²i-2µgd where g is acceleration due to gravity
v²f+2µgd=v²i----------------------but v²f = 0
2µgd=v²i
√2µgd = vi
In the physical scenario described, the most reasonable formula for calculating the object's initial speed across a level tabletop, given the coefficient of kinetic friction, the object's mass, and the distance moved, would be vi is equal to the square root of twice the coefficient of friction, the mass of the object, gravity, and the distance traveled.
Explanation:The object in question moves with initial speed vi across a level tabletop under the influence of kinetic friction, and eventually comes to a stop after moving through a distance of d. According to the principles of physics, specifically those pertaining to motion and kinetic friction, the initial speed of an object can be inferred from an equation that takes into account the weight of the object (mass m times gravity g), the distance traveled d, and the coefficient of kinetic friction µ. Considering this, the equation which makes the most sense in this situation would be vi = √2µmgd, where the initial speed vi is equal to the square root of twice the coefficient of friction µ times the mass of the object m, gravity g, and the distance d.
Learn more about Kinetic Friction here:https://brainly.com/question/10521530
#SPJ3
A bicycle racer sprints at the end of a race to clinch a victory. The racer has an initial velocity of 12.0 m/s and accelerates at the rate of 0.650 m/s2 for 7.00 s. (a) What is his final velocity (in m/s)?
Answer:
Final speed of the racer, v = 16.55m/s
Explanation:
It is given that,
Initial velocity of the racer, u = 12 m/s
Acceleration, [tex]a=0.65\ m/s^2[/tex]
time taken, t = 7 s
We need to find the final velocity of the racer. Let it is given by v. It can be calculated using first equation of motion as :
[tex]v=u+at[/tex]
[tex]v=12+0.65\times 7[/tex]
v = 16.55 m/s
So, the final speed of the racer is 16.55 m/s. Hence, this is the required solution.
The captain orders his starship to accelerate from rest at a rate of "1 g" (1 g = 9.8 m/s2). How many days does it take the starship to reach 5% the speed of light?
(Light travels at 3.0 × 10^8 m/s.)
Answer:
17.7 days
Explanation:
Since the ship accelerates from the rest, its initial velocity would be equal to 0.
So,
[tex]v_{i}=0[/tex]
Acceleration of the star-ship = a = 1 g = 9.8 m/s²
We need to find how many days will it take the ship to reach 5% of the speed of light. Speed of light is [tex]3 \times 10^{8}[/tex] m/s.
5% of the speed of light = [tex]0.05 \times 3 \times 10^{8}=1.5\times 10^{7}[/tex] m/s
This means, the final velocity of the star-ship will be:
[tex]v_{f}=1.5\times 10^{7}[/tex]
We have the initial velocity, final velocity and the acceleration. We need to find the time(t). First equation of motion relates these quantities as:
[tex]v_{f}=v_{i}+at[/tex]
Using the values in this equation, we get:
[tex]1.5 \times 10^{7}=0+9.8(t)\\\\ t=\frac{1.5\times10^{7}}{9.8}\\\\ t=1,530,612.245[/tex]
Thus, the star-ship will take 1,530,612.245 seconds to reach to 5% the speed of light. Now we need to convert this time to days.
Since, there are 60 seconds in a minute:
1,530,612.245 seconds = [tex]\frac{1,530,612.245}{60}=25510.20[/tex] minutes
Since, there are 60 minutes in an hour:
25,510.20 minutes = [tex]\frac{25,510.20}{60}=425.17[/tex] hours
Since, there are 24 hours in a day:
425.17 hours = [tex]\frac{425.17}{24}=17.7[/tex] days
Thus, it will take approximately 17.7 days (approximately 17 days and 17 hours) to reach to 5% the speed of light
. In a high school graduating class of 100 students, 47 studied mathematics, 61 studied physics, and 25 studied both mathematics and physics. If one of these students is selected at random, find the probability that (a) the student took mathematics or physics. (b) the student did not take either of these subjects. (c) the student took physics but not mathematics. Are studying mathematics and physics mutually exclusive events? Why or why not?
Answer:
given,
Probability of student studying math P(M)=[tex]\dfrac{45}{100} = 0.45[/tex]
Probability of student studying physicsP(P) = [tex]\dfrac{61}{100} = 0.61[/tex]
Probability of student studying both math and physics together P(M∩P) = [tex]\dfrac{25}{100} = 0.25[/tex]
a) student took mathematics or physics
P(M∪P) = P(M) + P(P) - P(M∩P)
= 0.45 + 0.61 - 0.25
= 0.81
b) student did not take either of the subject
P((M∪P)') = 1 - 0.81
= 0.19
c) Student take physics but not mathematics
P(P∩M') = P(P) - P(P∩M)
= 0.61 - 0.25
= 0.36
studying physics and mathematics is not mutually exclusive because we can study both the subjects.
The probability that a student took mathematics or physics is 83%, did not take either is 17%, and took physics but not mathematics is 36%. Mathematics and physics are not mutually exclusive since some students studied both.
The problem describes a situation where students in a high school graduating class have taken either mathematics, physics, or both. The task is to determine various probabilities based on this information. The solution requires an understanding of basic set theory and probability concepts.
Probability Calculations
(a) To find the probability that a student took mathematics or physics, we use the formula P(A \\u222a B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A \\u2229 B). Substituting the given values, P(mathematics or physics) = 47/100 + 61/100 - 25/100 = 83/100.(b) The probability that a student did not take either of these subjects is the complement of the probability calculated in (a), which is 1 - 83/100 = 17/100.(c) The probability that a student took physics but not mathematics is the difference between the number of students who took physics and those who took both subjects, which is 61/100 - 25/100 = 36/100.Mathematics and physics are not mutually exclusive events because 25 students studied both. If they were mutually exclusive, no students would have studied both subjects.
Suppose that the weight (in pounds) of an airplane is a linear function of the amount of fuel (in gallons) in its tank. When carrying 18 gallons of fuel, the airplane weighs 1999 pounds. When carrying 46 gallons of fuel, it weighs 2153 pounds. How much does the airplane weigh if it is carrying 58 gallons of fuel?
If the airplane is carrying 58 gallons of fuel, it will weigh 2452 pounds.
Given that the weight (in pounds) of an airplane is a linear function of the amount of fuel (in gallons) in its tank.
Carrying 18 gallons of fuel, the airplane weighs 1999 pounds.
Also carrying 46 gallons of fuel, it weighs 2153 pounds.
First we need to find the difference in gallons and the difference in the weights
46 - 12 = 34 gallons
2399 - 2176 = 223 pounds
Therefore, 34 gallons of gas weighs 223 pounds
Now the weight per pound:
223 pounds / 34 gallons = 6.5588 pounds per gallon
Similarly,
54 gallons - 46 gallons = 8 gallons
8 gallons x 6.6 pounds per gallon = 52.8 pounds, round to 53 pounds
Now Total weight of plane with 54 gallons
2399 + 53 = 2452
To learn more about addition from given link
brainly.com/question/25421984
#SPJ12
The weight of the airplane is a linear function of the amount of fuel in its tank. The slope of this function is found to be 5.5 pounds per gallon of fuel. Substituting into the equation, we find that the airplane weighs 2217 pounds when it is carrying 58 gallons of fuel.
Explanation:This question can be solved by using the concept of linear function in mathematics. The weight of the airplane changes linearly with the amount of fuel in its tank. This gives us two points on the linear function (18, 1999) and (46, 2153). We can find the slope of this function by subtracting the y coordinates and dividing by the difference of the x coordinates, which gives us (2153-1999)/(46-18)=154/28 = 5.5 pounds/gallon. This is the amount the airplane's weight changes for each gallon of fuel. To find the weight of the airplane when it is carrying 58 gallons of fuel, we can use the point-slope form of a line, y-y1=m(x-x1), using one of our points and the slope we found. Plugging in gives us Weight - 1999 = 5.5×(Fuel - 18), which simplifies to Weight = 5.5*Fuel + 1999 - 5.5×18. Substituting 58 in place of Fuel, we get a weight of 2217 pounds.
Learn more about Linear Function here:https://brainly.com/question/29205018
#SPJ3
Donna drove to the mountains last weekend. There was heavy traffic on the way there, and the trip took 8 hours. When Donna drove home, there was no traffic and the trip only took 4 hours. If her average rate was 45 miles per hour faster on the trip home, how far away does Donna live from the mountains?
Answer:
d=360 miles
Donna lives 360 miles from the mountains.
Explanation:
Conceptual analysis
We apply the formula to calculate uniform moving distance[
d=v*t Formula (1)
d: distance in miles
t: time in hours
v: speed in miles/hour
Development of problem
The distance Donna traveled to the mountains is equal to the distance back home, equal to d,then,we pose the kinematic equations for d, applying formula 1:
travel data to the mountains: t₁= 8 hours , v=v₁
d= v₁*t₁=8*v₁ Equation (1)
data back home : t₂=4hours , v=v₂=v₁+45
d=v₂*t₂=(v₁+45)*4=4v₁+180 Equation (2)
Equation (1)=Equation (2)
8*v₁=4v₁+180
8*v₁-4v₁=180
4v₁=180
v₁=180÷4=45 miles/hour
we replace v₁=45 miles/hour in equation (1)
d=8hour*45miles/hour
d=360 miles
Final answer:
To solve the problem, we used the relationship between speed, distance, and time to set up two equations and solve for the average speed to the mountains and the distance. Donna lives 360 miles away from the mountains.
Explanation:
Let's denote Donna's driving distance to the mountains as D miles. To find this distance, we can use the relationship between speed, distance, and time. When she drove to the mountains, the journey took her 8 hours. For the return trip with no traffic, it took 4 hours and the speed was 45 miles per hour faster.
Let v be the average speed on the way to the mountains. Therefore, the average speed on the way back is v + 45 mph.
Using the formula distance = speed × time, we have two equations:
D = v × 8 (to the mountains)D = (v + 45) × 4 (returning home)Since both equations are equal to D, we can set them equal to each other:
v × 8 = (v + 45) × 4
Expanding both sides:
8v = 4v + 180
Subtracting 4v from both sides we get:
4v = 180
Dividing by 4:
v = 45 mph (speed to the mountains)
So, the distance D is:
D = 45 mph × 8 h = 360 miles
Therefore, Donna lives 360 miles away from the mountains.
Two cars are heading towards one another . Car a is moving with an acceleration of 11. And carb is moving at -4 m/s^2. The cars are at rest and seperated witha distance of s=1400m. What time do the cars meet?
Answer:
13.7 s
Explanation:
The position at time t of car A can be written as follows:
[tex]x_A (t) = \frac{1}{2}a_At^2[/tex]
where
[tex]a_A = 11 m/s^2[/tex] is the acceleration of car A
The position of car B instead can be written as
[tex]x_B(t) = d+\frac{1}{2}a_B t^2[/tex]
where
[tex]a_B = -4 m/s^2[/tex] is the acceleration of car B
d = 1400 m is the initial separation between the cars
The two cars meet when
[tex]x_A = x_B[/tex]
Using the two equations above,
[tex]\frac{1}{2}a_A t^2 = d + \frac{1}{2}a_B t^2\\\frac{1}{2}t^2 (a_A - a_B) = d\\t=\sqrt{\frac{2d}{a_A-a_B}}=\sqrt{\frac{2(1400)}{11-(-4)}}=13.7 s[/tex]
Final answer:
The two cars with given accelerations and an initial distance of 1400 meters between them when starting from rest will meet after 20 seconds.
Explanation:
To solve for the time at which the two cars meet, we must consider the accelerations of both cars and the initial distance between them. Assuming car A is moving with a positive acceleration of 11 m/s2 and car B is moving with a negative acceleration of -4 m/s², we need to find a common point in time where they both cover the total distance of 1400 m when starting from rest.
Let the time taken for the cars to meet be denoted by 't'. For car A, the displacement (sA) is given by the formula sA = 0.5 * aA * t², and for car B, the displacement (sB) is given by sB = 0.5 * aB * t². As they are moving towards each other, the sum of their displacements sA+sB should equal the initial separation distance which is 1400m.
This gives us the equation 0.5 * 11 * t2 + 0.5 * (-4) * t² = 1400. Simplifying, we get 3.5 * t² = 1400, and solving for 't' gives us t2 = 400, so t = 20 seconds. Hence, both cars will meet after 20 seconds.
In 1999, Robbie Knievel was the first to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle. At a narrow part of the canyon (65 m wide) and traveling 36 m/s off the takeoff ramp, he reached the other side. What was his launch angle?
Final answer:
Robbie Knievel's launch angle for his jump across the Grand Canyon was approximately -5.35 degrees.
Explanation:
To calculate the launch angle of Robbie Knievel's jump across the Grand Canyon, we can use the horizontal distance and initial velocity of the motorcycle. The horizontal distance is given as the width of the canyon, which is 65 meters. The initial velocity is given as 36 m/s. We can use the equation for horizontal motion to find the time of flight:
d = v0xt
Where d is the horizontal distance, v0x is the initial velocity in the x-direction, and t is the time of flight. Solving for t, we get:
t = d / v0x
Substituting the given values, we have:
t = 65 m / 36 m/s = 1.81 s
Next, we can use the equation for vertical motion to find the launch angle:
y = v0yt + (1/2)gt2
Where y is the vertical distance, v0y is the initial velocity in the y-direction, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and t is the time of flight. The vertical distance is zero since Robbie reached the other side of the canyon. Solving for v0y and using the given value of t, we get:
v0y = - (1/2)gt
v0y = - (1/2)(3.7 m/s2)(1.81 s) = -3.34 m/s
Finally, we can use the launch angle formula:
tan(θ) = v0y / v0x
Substituting the calculated values, we have:
tan(θ) = -3.34 m/s / 36 m/s
θ = atan(-3.34 m/s / 36 m/s) = -5.35 degrees
Therefore, Robbie Knievel's launch angle was approximately -5.35 degrees.
A negatively charged rod is brought near a neutral metal sphere. Which of the following is true? A negatively charged rod is brought near a neutral metal sphere. Which of the following is true? There is no electric force between the rod and sphere. There is a repulsive force between the rod and sphere. There is an attractive force between the rod and sphere.
Answer:
There is an attractive force between the rod and sphere.
Explanation:
When negatively charged rod is placed close to the metal sphere then due to the electric field of the rod the opposite free charge of metal sphere comes closer to the rod on one surface
While similar charge in the metal sphere move away from the rod due to repulsion of electric field of rod
This temporary charge distribution of the metal sphere is known as induction
And since opposite charge on the metal surface comes closer to the metal sphere so here we can say that the rod will attract the metal sphere
so here correct answer will be
There is an attractive force between the rod and sphere.
Answer:
There is an attractive force between the rod and sphere.
Explanation:
Scientists use different types of microscopes to observe objects that are not visible to the naked eye. A scientist is reviewing various samples of pond water to determine what species of microorganisms live in the pond. The scientist wishes to make drawings of the structure of each microorganism and study each one's method of movement. Which of the following microscopes would be best for the scientist to use?a. transmission electron microscope
b. scanning electron microscope
c. compound light microscope
d. dissecting microscope
Answer:
c. compound light microscope
Explanation:
Microorganisms (such as bacteria, fungi and protozoa) can be observed through a compound light microscope, which allows to increase the observed image since 400 times to 1000 times (in more advanced microscopes). This kind of organisms have sizes in the order of micrometers (μm, a million times lesser than a meter), so you cannot observe them with a dissecting microscope, which only increase the image 10-30 times. In fact, dissecting microscopes are employed to observe thin sections of tissues (of plants and animals) and, as the name say it, to "dissect" in very tiny parts.
The other two microscopes, transmission electron and scanning electron microscopes, are used to observe macromolecules, and physical changes in compounds and matter, in the order of nanometers (nm, a thousand million times lesser than a meter).
Final answer:
The scientist should use a compound light microscope to observe and draw living microorganisms from pond water, as it allows for the necessary magnification while preserving the organisms' life for movement study.
Explanation:
To observe and draw the structure of microorganisms in pond water and study their movement, the best type of microscope for a scientist to use would be a compound light microscope. This type of microscope uses visible light that passes through and is bent by the lens system, allowing the user to observe living organisms, which is essential for studying movement. Moreover, light microscopes can magnify cells up to approximately 400 times, which is typically sufficient for viewing microorganisms.
While electron microscopes like the transmission electron microscope and scanning electron microscope provide much higher magnification and resolution, they are not suitable for observing living specimens because the sample preparation process kills the organisms. Dissecting microscopes, on the other hand, provide a three-dimensional view of the specimen but have lower magnification and are more suitable for larger objects such as tissues, not microorganisms in pond water.
Gibbons, small Asian apes, move by brachiation, swinging below a handhold to move forward to the next handhold. A 8.5 kg gibbon has an arm length (hand to shoulder) of 0.60 m. We can model its motion as that of a point mass swinging at the end of a 0.60-m-long, massless rod. At the lowest point of its swing, the gibbon is moving at 3.2 m/s .
What upward force must a branch provide to support the swinging gibbon?
Express your answer to two significant figures and include the appropriate units.
Answer:
230 N
Explanation:
At the lowest position , the velocity is maximum hence at this point, maximum support force T is given by the branch.
The swinging motion of the ape on a vertical circular path , will require
a centripetal force in upward direction . This is related to weight as follows
T - mg = m v² / R
R is radius of circular path . m is mass of the ape and velocity is 3.2 m/s
T = mg - mv² / R
T = 8.5 X 9.8 + 8.5 X 3.2² / .60 { R is length of hand of ape. }
T = 83.3 + 145.06
= 228.36
= 230 N ( approximately )
The branch must provide an upward force of 227 Newtons to support a gibbon weighing 8.5 kg, swinging with a speed of 3.2 m/s, and a radius of 0.6 m.
Explanation:To calculate the upward force that the branch must provide, we need to take into account both the gravitational force acting on the gibbon and the centrifugal force due to its circular motion. The weight of the gibbon (gravitational force) is its mass times the acceleration due to gravity (8.5 kg * 9.8 m/s^2), which equals 83.3 N.
Centrifugal force is given by mass times velocity squared divided by radius of the motion (m*v^2/r), which results in (8.5 kg * (3.2 m/s)^2) / 0.6 m = 144 N.
By adding these two forces together, we find the total force the branch must supply at the lowest point: 83.3 N + 144 N = 227 N.The branch must provide an upward force of 227 Newtons to support the swinging gibbon.
Learn more about Physics of motion here:https://brainly.com/question/13966796
#SPJ3