31. Which sentence uses commas correctly?
Tick one.
Realising, she had forgotten her purse Sandie had to
go back home,
Realising she had forgotten her purse, Sandie had to
go back home.
Realising she had forgotten her purse Sandie, had to
go back home,

Answer: True

Explanation:

You did not write down the question that are you asking and that is considering this sentence. Since I could not find it on the internet, I only found that it might be True or False question.

Answer:

The author means that now the tools are more important that the message itself.

Explanation:

The excerpt belongs to Small Change: Why the Revolution Won't Be Tweeted, an article written by Malcolm Gladwell, a Canadian journalist and writer. There, he discusses the impact of social media and other new tools in different movements across the world.

In this sentence, Gladwell means that the vehicle the message uses to travel is more important than the message itself. He uses as an example the case of Iran, where people got enough courage to uprise because of social media like Twitter. Even though it is an interesting idea, I don't totally agree with this. I think how the message travels is important, otherwise it could be really important but sterile. There's where the tools take more relevance; sometimes, due to different factors, the tools are faster and more efficient to use communication, but if the message is not relevant, then there are no good reasons to use the tools.

The statement made by Malcolm Gladwell emphasizes a shift in focus away from issues and toward advocacy tools, particularly social media. This perspective may provoke different opinions regarding the relative importance of causes vs tools.

Malcolm Gladwell, in his essay, states, "Where activists were once defined by their causes, they are now defined by their tools" (para. 7). This statement highlights a shift in how activism is perceived: from the primary focus on the causes they champion to how they advocate for these causes, especially with the advent of digital platforms.

In my view, while tools are undeniably crucial in modern activism, they should be seen as complementary to, rather than defining, the causes they support. The cause remains the core driver of activism, and tools are the facilitators that help reach the broader goals more effectively.

Complete Question

Complete the questions in DETAIL in conjunction with Gladwell's Monday essay.

What does he mean when he writes, "Where activists were once defined by their causes, they are now defined by their tools" (para. 7)? Do you agree or disagree with this idea? Explain why.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

These words are all unhappy words so the one that would best fit that set would also have to be unhappy.

flannel: Typical clothing for farm life

generous: that is helpful and giving

selfish: caring only about ones' self

wholesome: feeling conducive to or suggestive of good health and physical well-being

the only one that follows the unhappy set is selfish

Answer:

it is C. selfish

Ralph Waldo Emerson is using a 'metaphor' in his poem 'Days' by describing 'Days' as the 'Daughters of Time'. He personifies days and time, presenting the concept that each day is created or given birth by time.

Ralph Waldo Emerson, in his phrase 'Daughters of Time' from the poem 'Days', is using a form of figurative language known as a metaphor. A metaphor is a figure of speech that describes an object or action in a way that isn't literally true, but helps explain an idea or make a comparison. In this case, Ralph Waldo Emerson portrays 'Days' as 'Daughters of Time', comparing days as the offspring of time, personifying both 'days' and 'time'. It's like indicating time delivering each day or giving birth to each day.

https://brainly.com/question/9879484

#SPJ12

Answer:

You would put it in ".  You only use ' if there is dialogue inside the sentence ur quoting

Explanation:

The sentence 'Therefore drivers of large vehicles need to be especially aware of their environment.' should be added after sentence 2. This is due to the natural transition from the context in sentence 2 about larger vehicles having larger blind spots to the need for drivers of these vehicles to be more alert.

The most effective location for the sentence 'Therefore drivers of large vehicles need to be especially aware of their environment.' would be Option B, after sentence 2. This is because sentence 2 provides a context that larger vehicles have larger blind spots. It then naturally flows into the additional sentence stating that drivers of such vehicles need to be more aware of their environment due to these larger blind spots. Here is how it would fit:

All Vehicles Have Blind Spots

In the case of a backover incident, the blind spot is the place behind your vehicle that you cannot see in the rear or side view mirrors — or even by craning your neck out the driver’s side window.

Generally speaking, the larger the vehicle, the larger the blind spot.

Therefore, drivers of large vehicles need to be especially aware of their environment.

Learn more about Blind Spots here:

https://brainly.com/question/31559507

#SPJ6

The sentence should be inserted after sentence 2, where it can effectively convey the additional advice regarding the need for cautious driving for large vehicles, which corresponds to the context of the larger blind spots mentioned.

When considering where to insert the sentence “Therefore drivers of large vehicles need to be especially aware of their environment,” it is most effective to place it after sentence 2. This is because the initial sentences set the context about blind spots and their relation to vehicle size, and the proposed sentence adds a consequential piece of advice directly linked to the information provided earlier about larger vehicles having larger blind spots. This helps maintain a coherent flow and reinforces the caution needed for larger vehicles.

Answer:

B) The entry provides two pronunciation guides is the correct answer.

Explanation:

Letter A is incorrect because etymology refers to the origins of the word and how the meaning has changed.

Letter C is also incorrect because when a word is identified in a dictionary, the category appears next to it, such as verb, noun, adjective, and the definition doesn't provide this categorization.

Letter D i also incorrect because the definition comes before the synonyms.

Letter B is the correct answer because there are two pronunciation guides, one for the United States (US) and another one for the United Kingdom (UK) so it is the correct answer.

Final answer:

The accurate statement about the word 'languidly' is that the entry provides two pronunciation guides, one for UK English and one for US English.

Explanation:

The correct statement about the dictionary entry for the word languidly is that the entry provides two pronunciation guides. This is evident from the presence of both UK and US phonetic transcription (UK /ˈlæŋ.ɡwɪd.li/ US /ˈlæŋ.ɡwɪd.li/). Additionally, synonyms are provided along with a definition, which states that the word means 'slowly and with little energy', thus contradicting option D which falsely claims that no definition is provided. It is incorrect to claim that the entry identifies the word as an adjective (option C), as languidly is actually an adverb, which is a word that modifies a verb, an adjective, or another adverb and often ends in '-ly'. Option A is also incorrect because no etymology, or origin of the word, is given.

Answer:a situation in which what happens is the opposite of what was expected to

Explanation:

It should be noted that the definition of situational irony is A. situation in which an author makes fun of human flaws and imperfections.

It should be noted that irony simply means a situation where an action has an effect that is different from what was expected.

In this case, the definition of situational irony is a situation in which an author makes fun of human flaws and imperfections.

Learn more about irony on:

https://brainly.com/question/11821145

Answer:

No, not in my opinion. Technology helps with efficiency, ease of use, capabilities, and provides for much more comprehensive learning experiences then classrooms without it.

Explanation:

Final answer:

Schools might consider limiting technology in the classroom to prevent distraction and ensure equitable access, while still embracing its benefits for enhancing education. Careful consideration and tailored policies are needed to balance technology's advantages and potential drawbacks.

Explanation:

The question of whether schools should limit the amount of technology used within the classroom is multifaceted and depends on various factors. While technology can enhance learning by providing access to abundant resources and interactive tools, it also has the potential to distract students if not used responsibly. For instance, research indicates that students who refrain from screen usage during class tend to achieve better grades. Moreover, the disparities in technology access, known as the digital divide, suggest that while technology can offer greater opportunities, its uneven distribution across socio-economic backgrounds can exacerbate inequality.

An educational leader face with discrepancies in study findings about technology’s effectiveness could carefully consider the context in which the technology is applied and the specific needs of the student population. For instance, while a smartphone app may be beneficial for surgery students, excessive use of technology might negatively impact the sleep, communication, and time management of undergraduates. Leaders must weigh the benefits and potential hindrances to craft policies that ensure responsible and equitable use of technology.

In controlling technology use, schools might follow specific guidelines, like prohibiting the use of smartphones in class while encouraging the use of educational software in controlled settings. The key is to enhance learning experiences without causing a distraction or widening the gap between students with varying levels of technology access.

Answer:

I think it is A.

Explanation:

I'm in a college english course, but I could be wrong.

To correct the run-on sentence, we should use option D by adding a semicolon, a transition word such as 'however', and a comma to accurately combine the two independent clauses, resulting in a cohesive sentence that highlights the connection between the student completing the exam and subsequently failing because they did not study.

To correct the run-on sentence "the student completed the exam they failed because they did not study", we should look at option D which suggests adding a semicolon, a transition, and then a comma between the two independent clauses. Therefore, the correct way to rewrite the sentence is: "The student completed the exam; however, they failed because they did not study." This approach not only fixes the run-on sentence but also clearly shows the relationship between the two independent thoughts of completing the exam and failing.

Using a semicolon in this manner is appropriate as it combines two closely related independent clauses that are strong enough to stand alone as sentences but are connected in meaning. Including a transitional word like 'however' helps accentuate the causality between the two clauses.  It's important to remember that a semicolon should only be used when both parts of the sentence can stand alone as complete sentences.

It has no meter nor rhyme is characteristic of the meter and rhyme in free verse poetry. Therefore option A is correct.

Free verse poetry is known for its freedom from traditional poetic constraints, such as regular meter and rhyme.

Unlike traditional forms of poetry, which follow specific rhythmic patterns and rhyme schemes, free verse allows poets to create their own unique rhythms and structures. It embraces a more natural and organic flow of language, without the restrictions of a predetermined meter or rhyme scheme.

Therefore, option A is the characteristic that best describes the meter and rhyme in free verse poetry.

Know more about verse poetry:

https://brainly.com/question/30276747

#SPJ2

Final answer:

Free verse poetry is characterized by having no regular meter nor rhyme, relying instead on other forms of structure such as thematic and syntactic repetition.

Explanation:

The characteristic of the meter and rhyme in free verse poetry is that it has no regular meter nor rhyme. Free verse allows the poet to use metrical patterns and rhyme sporadically for emphasis or to enhance the poem's thematic elements, but it does not adhere to a consistent, structured pattern of meter or rhyme throughout the entire poem. Instead, free verse often relies on thematic, syntactic, or semantic repetition to create a sense of structure and coherence, which differs from the traditional form that is characterized by a regular pattern of meter and rhyme.

The answer is myelination

Answer:

A). Paying attention to what the negative is saying.

B). Identifying important pieces of evidence that the negative uses.

E). Thinking about a possible counterclaim.

Explanation:

As per the question, when the negative or opponent is presenting claim with along with the evidence one is required to 'pay complete attention to what he/she says' as it would help in preparing the counterclaim accordingly and more efficiently to rebut or neglect his ideas. Then, 'Identification of important pieces of evidence that the negative uses' as it help produce sufficient rebuttal evidence to counter it efficiently. Next, would be 'Thinking about a possible counterclaim' to deny his claim and establish the credibility of his claim. Thus, options A, B, and E are the correct answers.

In argumentative statements and essays, the positive and opposing are presented to address certain issues and topics.

The things which a person should be doing while the negative is presenting a claim and evidence are options A, B and E.

Therefore, options A, B and E are correct.

Learn more about negative and claims here:

https://brainly.com/question/15860520

Answer: A. She thinks that animals are  smarter than humans. Hope i helped!

I took the test and you can find out by looking at the paragraph

Answer: What do you need help on ?

Answer:

C. They set aside land and money for affordable land-grant colleges

Explanation:

The Morrill Land-Grant Acts are United States statutes that allowed for the creation of land-grant colleges in U.S. states. The Morrill Act of 1862 was enacted during the American Civil War and the Morrill Act of 1890 expanded 1862 Act.

By this act, each eligible state received 30,000 acres for establishing and funding educational institutes. The eligibility criteria for states to qualify for this land grant was that there should be no rebellion or insurrection in the state against the government of the United States.

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

hey set aside land and $$$ for affordable land-grant colleges

Answer: Attraction to the land versus the sea  and  importance of following one's dreams

Explanation:

I could not find the excerpt that is missing in your question but I have found the answers that can help you. Those are two important themes that are moving trough this play so try to connect them with your excerpt from the play.

''Beyond the Horizon'' is a play by Eugene O'Neill and it had premiere in 1920 and the same year if won Pulitzer Prize for Drama.

The setting of the play is on the Mayo farm and the surrounding countryside. That is why those two themes are most common ones.

It is describing one family portrait and two brothers are the most exposed ones.

Answer:

4 or D because

Explanation:

boy's confidence in the doctor's expertise lines 47 through 53 5 Lines 47 through 53 reveal the

(1) traveler's acceptance of the change in the

situation

(2) boy's misunderstanding of his grandfather's

illness

(3) traveler's resentment about delaying his

appointments

(4) boy's confidence in the doctor's expertise

Answer:

she speaks differently when she is around the blacks vs when she is not with them. when she is with the blacks she talks like them,even though she can read. Outside of church she uses proper English

Final answer:

Scout is surprised by Calpurnia's different manner of speaking at the Negro church compared to how she speaks at the Finches' home, using AAVE instead of Standard English.

Explanation:

Scout finds it unusual that Calpurnia speaks differently when they visit the Negro church because Calpurnia adjusts her language to match the way the members of the church speak. In this environment, Calpurnia uses an African American Vernacular English (AAVE), which is distinct from the Standard English she speaks at the Finch's household. This change in Calpurnia's manner of speech is surprising to Scout, as it reveals a new aspect of Calpurnia's identity and the way she navigates between different cultural environments.

Answer:

Describe the confrontation between Atticus and Mr. Ewell.

As Miss Stephanie Crawford described (chapter 23), Bob Ewell publicly confronted Atticus at the post office by threatening his life, cursing at him, and even spitting in his face. This did not upset Atticus, whose only reaction was cleaning his glasses. Irritated by his calmness, Mr. Ewell asked Atticus if he was too proud to fight, while Atticus replied: "No, too old" and left.  

How serious do you think Mr. Ewell is?

At this point of the novel, it is hard to tell whether Mr. Ewell's threats are serious. Atticus seems not to be intimidated by them. As he tells Jem, he believes this is Ewell's natural reaction to the trial, and that he cannot be blamed for that. At the end of the novel, however, Bob Ewell will attack Jem and Scout, and prove that he is a dangerous man indeed.

How did Atticus respond to him?

Atticus remained calm. He walked away and did not want to get further involved in the argument. He decided to rise above the situation. He was, of course, aware that Ewell's reaction was not right, but as he later confessed to his children, if the act of spitting in his face prevented Mayella Ewell (Mr. Ewell's daughter) from getting beaten up by her father, it was all worth it.

Do you think Atticus made the right choice in the way he responded?

We could say that he probably did. Bob Ewell insulted him, but he showed genuine compassion even in such circumstances. Atticus later explained to his children that one should not just judge other people, but instead try to see the world through their perspective. By understanding Mr. Ewell's devastation at that moment, he proved to be a good man, and certainly a loving father.

In 'To Kill a Mockingbird', after Atticus discredits Mr. Ewell in the trial, Ewell threatens him. Atticus reacts calmly and politely, believing in the good in everyone. He protects his family during this confrontation, upholding his values of respect and dignity.

The confrontation between Atticus Finch and Mr. Bob Ewell from Harper Lee's novel 'To Kill a Mockingbird' reveals the tense atmosphere in Maycomb due to the racial prejudice and ignorance, and highlights the characters of these men. After the trial of Tom Robinson, wherein Atticus proves beyond doubt that Bob Ewell is lying about his daughter Mayella being raped by Tom, Ewell feels humiliated and threatens Atticus. He vows revenge, which he later tries to exact on Atticus's children, Jem and Scout. His seriousness is evident in his actions later in the novel and the fact that he feels his reputation has been destroyed.

Atticus responds with characteristic calm and patience, dismissing Ewell's threats politely. He doesn't retaliate with aggression, understanding that Ewell has been publicly exposed as a liar. Atticus's response, though noble, might be seen as naive given the danger Ewell posed. Yet, his belief in the good in everyone and his resiliency demonstrate his strength and character.

Many may argue that Atticus made the right choice in response to Mr. Ewell's threats. His silence and patience deterred an immediate confrontation, thereby protecting his family in the immediate situation. It also reinforced Atticus's values of respect for all people, regardless of their actions or reputation.

https://brainly.com/question/14011831

#SPJ11

Answer:

A. The colonists are cruel to the Africans.

Explanation:

Option A is correct. The theme of colonialists’ cruelty resonates throughout the novel. Mr. Kurtz shows no mercy in killing the Africans to plunder the resources. Natives' heads are erected on the poles where Mr. Kurtz is staying. At one point Mr. Kurtz says “Exterminate all brutes,”

Option B is not correct because it is just one result of many reasons, and is least important because it is colonialists’ decision to be there and face the dangers there. They are not invited by Africans to help them.

Option C is not correct. Although this does describe the situation, yet this is not the major theme of the novel.

Option D is not correct because there is hardly any mention of this concept in the novel.

Answer:A

Explanation:

Answer:

Fables are typically short.

Fables typically have animal characters.

Fables typically teach a lesson.

Explanation:

Answer:

Fables are typically short.

Fables typically have animal characters.

Fables typically teach a lesson.

Explanation:

A fable is a short story, which uses characters that are usually animals to tell a story and through this story leave a teaching.

The characters in the fable can also be objects that are given human characteristics.

Children often like children very much because being so short and with such striking characters they are very well perceived by them, however the lessons they leave are applicable in most cases at any age.

In 'Journey to the Center of the Earth', Harry was upset because he thought the mountain was collapsing, causing him great fear and anxiety.

Harry was upset at the end of chapter 21 in Journey to the Center of the Earth because he thought the mountain was collapsing on them. This climactic moment is tense and filled with uncertainty for the characters, especially Harry, as their venture reaches a critical point. Feelings of anxiety and fear likely consumed Harry as the stability of the mountain, which they were relying on for their safety, seemed to be compromised.

Mrs. Pearce speaks the line to Professor Henry Higgins, cautioning him about his disregard for Eliza Doolittle's future while pursuing his phonetic experiment.

The quote "Of course I know you don't mean her any harm; but when you get what you call interested in people's accents, you never think or care what may happen to them or you." is spoken by Mrs. Pearce in the play 'Pygmalion' by George Bernard Shaw. Mrs. Pearce is addressing Professor Henry Higgins and warning him about the potential consequences of his experiment with Eliza Doolittle's accent and manners. She expresses concern over Higgins's lack of consideration for Eliza's well-being beyond his academic interest.

Answer:

recommended tire pressure

Explanation:

The dashboard typically displays the vehicle speed, engine temperature, and amount of fuel remaining. It does not usually display the recommended tire pressure, which is generally found in the vehicle owner's manual or on a sticker on the vehicle.

The information you can find on a vehicle dashboard typically includes details like the vehicle speed, the engine temperature, and the amount of fuel remaining in the vehicle. These are core data that are essential to effectively operate and monitor the status of a vehicle while driving.

However, the recommended tire pressure is not usually displayed on the dashboard. Tire pressure recommendations are typically found in the vehicle owner's manual or on a sticker placed somewhere on the vehicle such as the door jam, glove box door, or fuel door.

https://brainly.com/question/33641165

#SPJ3

Answer:

The answer is sentence number one.

Explanation:

Every word in a sentence has a meaning. Some of them modify the main word. Misplaced modifier is, as its name suggests, such a word modifying not the word its meant to, but a completely different word. Therefore it is misplaced in a sentence. This changes the meaning of a whole or a part of a sentence.

Having this in mind we see that phrase a gold man's watch from the first sentence has illogical meaning. So looking at this phrase we could interpret it as  a watch that belongs to a gold man, which is highly unlikely. Usually a misplaced modifier is corrected by simply changing the order of the words, which means that in this case the phrase should say: man`s gold watch.

Other sentences from the text do not have ambiguous meaning such this.

Answer:

Which sentence contains a dangling modifier?

sentence 4

Which sentence contains a misplaced modifier?

sentence 1

Which sentence contains a troublesome modifier?

sentence 5

Carrie and Harriet are the new friends Rebekah made in her school.

Carrie and Harriet are the two girls who became Rebekah's new friends on the first day of her school as a [tex]7^{th}[/tex] Grade student. Rebekah was a shy girl who didn't like loud people. She found Carrie a tall, loud-speaking girl at the beginning of the school in the locker room.

Later that day, Carrie invited Rebekah for a sleepover at Harriet's house. Harriet was a short girl with a round face. The three of them enjoyed that night and also played a game "What's For Dinner?" in which they drank weird drinks made by each other from corn syrup, veggies, etc and became close friends by the end of the night.

Final answer:

Carrie and Harriet are characters from a reading passage titled "I'm not eating that" found on the ReadWorks educational platform.

Explanation:

In the passage "I'm Not Eating That" from ReadWorks, Carrie and Harriet are characters in the story. Carrie is the narrator's sister, and Harriet is her friend. They are both picky eaters who refuse to try new foods. Throughout the passage, the narrator discusses their reluctance to try unfamiliar dishes and their strategies for avoiding certain foods. Carrie and Harriet serve as examples of individuals who struggle with expanding their culinary preferences beyond their comfort zones.

In a school election for class president, I had to make a decision between emphasizing my experience and qualifications or showcasing my innovative ideas for improving the school.

A situation in which I had to make a decision between two or more options was during a school election. I was running for class president, and there were two other candidates. I had to decide whether to focus on my experience and qualifications or to emphasize my plans for improving the school. After careful consideration, I decided to highlight both, showcasing my experience and qualifications, and also presenting my innovative ideas for making positive changes.

https://brainly.com/question/36589599

#SPJ2

Answer:

The person backs up opinions with evidence.

The person explains why the opposing side is wrong.

Explanation:

Answer:

They are all right and so is the second question

Explanation:

Just took it. Edg 2020. Hope this helps :)

Answer:

If there were no Iran-Iraq war, Iraq would never have invaded Kuwait, and there would have been no Gulf War and punishment of Iraq now.

I feel the least learnt is that PEACE is the best state in all countries.