Answer:
relative independence
Explanation:
A relative independence of the federal reserve system occur when members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System report to the speaker of the House once a year and not the president who appointed the members.
A Federal Reserve System is categorized as an autonomous central bank because it's monetary policy doesn't require the approval of either the President, Executive or the Legislative arm of government
The Federal Reserve System which is also refer to as the Fed was founded on December 23, 1913 from the enacted of the Federal Reserve Act.
Their primary objectives are:
1) Maximizing employment
2) Stabilizing prices
3) Stabilizing and moderating of long term interest rate.
The psychological phenomenon in which an individual loses self-awareness and self-restraint due to the anonymity and arousal of being in a group is known as
Answer:
D: deindividuation
Explanation:
Answer:
D. is correct
Explanation:
Hope that this helps. Please mark me the brainliest. Peace and Love
First: Analyze and evaluate Descartes’ two proofs of God's existence. How are they different? Is one more convincing than the other? And secondly: How does Descartes explain how we humans make mistakes (errors)? Do not just state that a perfect creator made imperfect humans, this is NOT his answer. Descartes has several ideas on why we make mistakes and how we go wrong. Are Descartes' arguments convincing to you? Why or why not?
Answer:
Check Explanation
Explanation:
Rene Descartes, a French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist, provided two great proof of God's existence which is known as "Two Proof of God’s Existence"
The first proof was that everything and beings In this world was created, and that a living or non living thing can't not be created on there own.
The second proof is that there is a power that is presserving human and no human being possess such powers except a divine being
The DIFFERENCE between the two proof stated above is that one stated that humans don't have powers on there own for preservation while the first stated that humans can not be created on there own. He made futher clarification that every object is created by someone. So, humans have Creator. The first proof talks about how Humans can not be created on it own which mean God is supreme and he his perfect while the second proof is that there Is a POWER behind human creation,means that in studying humans philosophy Which concerned Humans Attribute, such powers can't be control by humans Both proofs look alike but are different in meaning.
Both proof supports each other. The first proof, talking about human having a Creator directly talks about God powers and if the second proof supports it by looking at human philosophy, that is; if any humans study his or her attribute, the truth will be seen that humans being don't possess the powers to be created on it own.
Humans beings Made ERRORS according to Descartes, he said that the idea of perfectness was necessary because humans must exist has imperfect beings and only by that can humans knows that God is the Creator. If humans can only knows that there is creator behind them,if they made mistakes as imperfect beings. So, that the idea of perfectness will always be on humans mind
Furthermore, he said finite intellect is the source of human errors, many humans taught that they can achieve things without the creator,so they made ERRORS
DESCARTES argument are convincing Enough. The reason is that DESCARTES also proof this using the philosophy of humanity Which concerned human attribute. In human philosophy, powers
that preserve can't be possess by Humans and he also made use of "nothing comes from nothing" .In the philosophy of humans, it supports this as well.
Descartes presents the cosmological and ontological proofs for the existence of God, focusing on the world's imperfection and the concept of a perfect being, respectively. He explains human error as arising from the discrepancy between the breadth of human will and the depth of human intellect. The arguments are subject to criticism, especially the ontological proof, which is challenged by thinkers like Kant.
René Descartes presents two proofs of God's existence: the cosmological proof and the ontological proof. The cosmological proof seeks to establish God's existence based on the imperfection and transitory nature of the world, suggesting that there must be a first cause, or a non-contingent being, which is God. On the other hand, the ontological proof, which stems from the human intellect, posits that because we conceive of God as an absolutely perfect being and perfection entails existence, this being must necessarily exist.
Descartes' explanation for human error focuses on the two kinds of created substances: mind and body, with the key to understanding error lying in the interplay between the will (which is part of the essence of the mind) and the intellect. He argues that errors occur not because God created us to err, but because our will extends further than our intellect; thus, we sometimes make judgments without clear and distinct understanding, leading to mistakes. The misalignment between our will's capacity to affirm or deny things and the limited scope of our clear and true knowledge is the root cause of error. This demonstrates that while God has created us with the capacity for correct judgement (intellect), it is our misuse of our freedom (will) that leads to error
Your Life Plan is__________.
a. a road map showing the way to your college and life destinations.
b. a career path leading to your dreams.
c. open to change as your life roles and goals change.
d. all of the choices.
e. none of the choices.
Answer:
for me it is (b) but is is kinda your choice
Your Life Plan is a career path leading to your dreams. Thus, option
(b) is correct.
The term career is related to the experience and knowledge gain in person life. The career are set is beneficial for person in future life. Career are built with the help of different courses. The career built with the help of good education, developed skills, and more experience of work life. A person career are create good personality.
According to the Life Plan, the work route was chosen to achieve the dream. A person does not stay in one place; instead, they move about and encounter new problems. In life, a person can easily gain information, experience, and build talents. Your Life Plan is a career route that will bring you to your dreams.
As a result, your life plan is a career path leading to your dreams. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on career, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8825832
#SPJ2
During the colonial period of American Education, the thinking of some European philosophers such as Locke, Rousseau and Pestalozzi began to influence education. Which of the following is the most accurate description of their influence?
a. These philosophers emphasized memorization and recitation as "training for the mind."b. These philosophers emphasized the importance of first-hand experiences for children as the foundation for their education.c. These philosophers emphasized education for all citizens instead of reserving education for the wealthy elite.d. These philosophers emphasized differences between religion and education that contributed to establishing the principle of separation of church and state.
Answer:
b. These philosophers emphasized the importance of first-hand experiences for children as the foundation for their education.
Explanation:
European philosophers such as John Locke, Rousseau, and Pestalozzi's influence on American Education focused on the importance of first-hand experiences for children as the foundation for their education.
In classical conditioning, the conditioned stimulus naturally triggers a response. is a naturally occurring response. is initially neutral, and then comes to trigger a response. prompts spontaneous recovery. is a reward offered for completing a behavior.
Answer:
Is initially neutral, and then comes to trigger a response.
Explanation:
In classical conditioning the conditioned stimulus is a previously neutral stimulus which gradually comes to cause a conditioned response after being associated with the unconditioned stimulus. Classical conditioning is a type of learning in which a conditioned stimulus is combined with an unrelated unconditioned stimulus to elicit a behavioral response known as a conditioned response. A response occurs with more regularity in a well-specified, stable environment. One of the key components of conditioning is a conditioned environment.
A conditioned stimulus in classical conditioning is one that initially has no effect but comes to trigger a response when repeatedly paired with an unconditioned stimulus. Spontaneous recovery, on the other hand, is the reappearance of the conditioned response after a pause.
Explanation:In the context of classical conditioning, a conditioned stimulus is an originally neutral stimulus that, after being repeatedly paired with an unconditioned stimulus, eventually comes to trigger a conditioned response. This means it does not naturally trigger a response until after conditioning has occurred. An example would be the sound of a bell (conditioned stimulus) that has been paired with the sight of food (unconditioned stimulus), which then leads a dog to salivate (conditioned and unconditioned response). As for spontaneous recovery, it refers to the reappearance of the conditioned response after a rest period or a lapse of time.
Learn more about Conditioned Stimulus & Spontaneous Recovery here:https://brainly.com/question/31730241
#SPJ6
Suppose someone devises a new IQ test and we discover that tall people get higher test scores than short people do. What, if anything, should we do to determine whether or not this test is biased against short people? A. Interview short people who took the test to see if they felt the test was biased against them.B. Statistically analyze the results to see if, in fact, the two groups did get different scores.C. Look at school performances to see if the test accurately predicts performances of both short and tall people.D. Nothing else needs to be done: The mere fact that the test reports a difference between short and tall people is evidence of test bias.
Answer:
C. Look at school performances to see if the test accurately predicts performances of both short and tall people.
Explanation:
In this case, the best way to prove if the test is valid or not, is to contrast it with another set of data, and a good set is school performance.
If the test does predict school performance for tall and short students, then, the test can proven correct. If the experiment results otherwise, the test could be discarded, or reevaluated.