What was the outcome of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison?
A) The Supreme court won the power to select its own justices.
B) The supreme court rejected the notion of checks and balances.
C) The supreme court ruled that it had jurisdiction in all cases.
D) The supreme court gained the power of judicial review.
When do the different levels of party organization work together most closely?
A) during an election
B) when they are challenged by a splinter party
C) when they hold power at the same time
D) after an election
A) During an Election
in which way does the modern us government similar to the ancient roman government
Which TWO statements explain the basic tenets of Christianity?
Answer:
Christianity was founded by Jesus and his followers.
Christianity believes in the Holy Trinity.
Explanation:
These are the two statements that best describe Christianity. Christianity is a monotheistic religion that believes in the Holy Trinity. The Holy Trinity is composed of the Father (God), the Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit. This religion follows the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, and is one of the most common religions in the world.
Between 1870 and 1920, two major factors reshaped american society:
The two major factors that reshaped American society between 1870 and 1920 is the industrialization and urbanization in which allowed cities to grew in an outward and upward movement making newcomers to be attracted to it and as well as this allowed politics, education, family life and entertainment to be influenced.
Choose all that apply. Overpopulation has led to concerns over _____. the lack of fresh, clean supplies of water increased famine the rise in ocean levels energy shortages
According to charles h. wesley's essay, "the negro has always wanted the four freedoms" in what the negro wants (1944), what has been the relationship between the four freedoms and african americans
During the 1930s, an increase in crime was the result of several things, including
A. a disagreement with the state government.
B. segregation.
C. poverty.
D. unpredictable weather.
One of the long-term effects of the peloponnesian war was __________
President Taft’s foreign policy emphasized a the strength and influence of US businesses and banks. b the strength of US military forces. c careful negotiations with both allies and enemies. d building democracies in all countries.
The correct answer is a. the strength and influence of US businesses and banks
President Taft foreign policy was called Dollar diplomacy and it aimed to further the interests of U.S businesses abroad. It aimed to encourage as well as protect trade with Latin America and Asia
President Taft's foreign policy, known as Dollar Diplomacy, heavily relied on the influence of US businesses and banks, rather than military force. Though it aimed to improve international relations and stability, it often had the opposite effect, as seen in Latin America and Asia.
Explanation:President William Howard Taft's foreign policy, better known as Dollar Diplomacy, emphasized the strength and influence of US businesses and banks. This policy aimed to substitute dollars for bullets, coercing countries into agreements that would benefit the United States using the threat of American economic power. Unlike Roosevelt's threat of military force, Taft's policy relied on the power of the US economy to secure markets and opportunities for American businessmen.
Moreover, President Taft also believed that this policy would help improve relations between the United States, the Caribbean, and South America. However, in reality, it did little to promote job growth or economic stability in those regions, often leaving them more impoverished and unstable than before.
In Asia, Taft tried to continue to support the balance of power, but his efforts alienated Japan. As tensions between the US and Japan increased, this strain would eventually contribute to the outbreak of World War II. Moreover, Taft's policy also created difficulties for the United States, as it fostered resentment among nations towards American interference, and it did not successfully create a balance of power.
Learn more about Dollar Diplomacy here:https://brainly.com/question/7611874
#SPJ12
Who was Machiavelli and why was he significant in the Florentine Republic?
Niccolò Machiavelli was a seminal figure in the Renaissance era, contributing to the evolution of modern political science with his work, especially 'The Prince'. His ideas foregrounded the importance of a pragmatic approach to governance, marking a departure from the theocratic and idealistic views of the time. Machiavelli's influence is evident in the shift towards a more secular and proactive form of republicanism in the Florentine Republic and beyond.
Explanation:Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli was an Italian diplomat, politician, historian, philosopher, humanist, and writer of the Renaissance period, often referred to as the father of modern political science. His tenure as a senior official in the Florentine Republic saw him deeply involved in diplomatic and military affairs, notably during a time when the Medici were out of power. Machiavelli's most famous work, The Prince, penned in 1513, has had a profound impact on political theory, moving the discussion away from theocratic principles toward the secular, pragmatic governance of states.
Machiavelli's ideas were pioneering for their time, promoting a balance of power within the state to prevent tyranny and advocating for a ruler who, while securing his own position, must also ensure the safety and stability of his subjects. This radical shift in thought contributed significantly to the evolution of modern republicanism, making Machiavelli a key figure in Western political thought. His work laid the groundwork for the use of the term "state" in a modern context and emphasized the importance of political action grounded in reality rather than idealized moral principles.
The Florentine Republic, proud of its governance and respect for individual liberty, found in Machiavelli a thinker who, while controversial, deeply understood the complexities of ruling a state amid the challenges of the time. His contributions to political science and his concept of rapacious republicanism, though debated, constitute a significant shift towards early modern republicanism, highlighting his longstanding influence on the nature of political discourse and practice.
What communist country dod not join an alliance during the cold war?
1. Which of the following was a condition placed on American settlers moving to Texas?
A. All of the above
B. Anglo-Texans must become Mexican citizens.
C. Slavery, banned by the Mexican constitution, must be not practiced.
D. Settlers must worship as Roman Catholics.
2. Why did northern workers oppose the abolition of slavery?
A. They believed slave labor was needed in the South.
B. They feared competition from black workers.
C. They believed slave labor was superior to wage labor.
D. They feared the South would develop better industries.
3. Why did some groups living in America give women a significant amount of power?
A. They belonged to progressive reform movements.
B. They were urban, upper-middle-class families.
C. They had entered the industrial workforce.
D. They had a tradition of matrilineal culture.
What drew people to live in cities during the Industrial Revolution?
who helped force Erwin Rommel to surrender in North Africa
What would you say were the advantages and disadvantages of nationalism?
The advantages of nationalism are various like centralization, efficient governance, etc. Whereas, the disadvantages were like creation of groupism leading to crisis situations like wars.
Wars and other crisis situations like economic depressions were the by-products of acceptance of nationalism as form of governance and ruling authoritativeness.
Nationalism advantages Advantages of nationalism include pros like centralization leading to efficiency in governance and planning of social welfare at a large scale. There is also a fair amount of optimum utilization of national reserves if the concept of nationalism is followed. Disadvantages of Nationalism The disadvantages of nationalism are that there is a creation of groups which leads to following and doing welfare of only favorable groups. This can also lead to war situations like nuclear bombings like experienced in the past when USA attacked the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Hence, the advantages and disadvantages of nationalism are as aforementioned.
Learn more about Nationalism here :
https://brainly.com/question/1018147
Most of the readers of the liberator were?
A.free afircan americans
B.southern slaveholders
C.nothern politicians
D.western ranchers
Does it put an unreasonable burden on the ability of voters to pick the most qualified person for presidency
Family farms in the Midwest have been replaced by large farms for all of the following reasons except a. modern machinery. c. pressure from foreign competition. b. push and pull migration factors. d. increase in the yields of the harvest.
Which changes did American occupying forces implement to support democracy in postwar Japan? Select all that apply.
made the educational system available to everyone
reformed land ownership, giving land to tenant farmers
removed the emperor as symbolic head of the nation
restored Japan’s earlier constitution
=Reformed land ownership, giving land to tenant farmers
=made the educational system available to everyone
Between 1776-1778, much of the revolutionary war was fought in new york and new jersey because
Answer:
Due to the strategic importance of the Hudson River as a gateway to the interior of America.
Explanation:
The battles in this period are called New York and New Jersey campaign, and the objective was the control of the Port of New York and the state of New Jersye, due to the strategic importance of the Hudson River as a gateway to the interior of America.
The Revolutionary War was fought in New York and New Jersey due to their strategic importance. The British planned to isolate New England by controlling the Hudson River. The war turned into a stalemate by 1778 and the British revised their strategy to focus on the southern colonies.
Explanation:The Revolutionary War was fought in New York and New Jersey between 1776-1778 due to the strategic importance of these areas. The British forces planned to cut off New England from the rest of the colonies by controlling the Hudson River and isolating New England. They implemented their strategy by taking control of New York City and expanding their control to Philadelphia.
However, the British strategy ultimately failed as the American forces gained control of much of New Jersey and spirits soared among the colonists. The war turned into a stalemate by 1778, leading the British to revise their strategy and focus their military efforts on the southern colonies.
By understanding the strategic importance of New York and New Jersey, we can see why much of the Revolutionary War was fought in these areas.
Learn more about American Revolution here:https://brainly.com/question/5761578
#SPJ3
What is one important similarity between Plato and Aristotle? What was one major difference?
Which of the following best illustrates the concept of total war in world war 1
Propaganda campaigns encouraged people to grow their own food
Artillery shells caused high casualty rates along the western front
The alliance system drew almost every major European power into the war
Millions of young men volunteered to serve when war was declared
Propaganda campaigns encouraged people to grow their own food
Out of the given, 'propaganda campaigns encouraged people to grow their own food' best illustrates the concept of total war in World War 1.
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
The concept of total war that emerged before and during the course of World War I referred to war on all the fronts including that of food supplies.
The campaigns that were knowingly and unknowingly carried out before the war emphasised on having self-sufficient supplies of goods and not relying upon enemy countries for the supplies of any sort of food anymore.
how did trade with European powers affect the Mughal Empire during the 17th century
Final answer:
The Mughal Empire was significantly impacted by European trade in the 17th century, with European powers exploiting political divisions and exerting influence, leading to British dominance and the start of colonial rule.
Explanation:
Trade with European powers significantly affected the Mughal Empire during the 17th century. The arrival of Europeans, such as the Portuguese, English, and French, attempted to dominate the existing trade networks. Forces like the British East India Company formed alliances and exploited political divisions within the Mughal Empire, which, combined with internal strife and military campaigns, made the empire vulnerable to European influence and eventual control.
The increasing influence of European powers disrupted traditional trade systems, while Europeans also drew immense riches from the trade, which helped to establish institutions like the Bank of England. Inevitably, this helped finance the growth of European states and contributed to the establishment of colonization and empire-building in the region.
The slave colony of Saint-Domingue became the free country of _____. Jamaica Cuba Haiti Dominican Republic
reporting false answers (I know a admin I could get you banned)
Answer:
Yeah it is Haiti
Explanation:
What was the American reaction to the launch of the soviet satellite
After the american revolution, who held the balance of power between the appalachian mountains and the mississippi river? shawnee. iroquois. americans. french. british.
The industrial revolution, which began in the eighteenth century, released undreamed-of human productive powers for the second time. what was the first time?
How has Florida's constitution changed the years, from statehood to the present?
Tell the citizens of this imaginary country whether you think their country should have a one-party, two-party, or multiparty political system and why. You must explain the advantages and disadvantages for all party systems.
Consider:
characteristics of a two-party system
characteristics of a multiparty system
advantages and disadvantages of a coalition government
The decision between a one-party, two-party, or multiparty system should consider factors like stability and representation. A two-party system offers simplicity but limited representation, while a multiparty system allows for more viewpoints but can result in less stable governments.
Choosing between a one-party, two-party, or multiparty political system depends on several factors including political stability, representation, and the ability to form governments. Here is an overview of the characteristics and the pros and cons of each system:
Two-Party System
In a two-party system, two major political parties dominate politics, and it's quite difficult for third parties to gain significant power. An advantage of this system is a simplification of politics for voters. The main disadvantage is limited representation, potentially marginalizing diverse views and interests.
Multiparty System
A multiparty system allows for more parties to be represented in government, typically leading to coalition governments. The advantage is a broader representation of political opinions, leading to more creative and diverse policy solutions. However, this often results in less political stability due to the formation of coalitions, which can be fragile and prone to disagreement.Coalition Governments
Speaking of coalition governments, they can encourage compromise and consensus-building. However, they can also be disadvantaged by instability, inefficiency, and complex decision-making processes when there are sharp ideological differences among the coalition parties.
In summary, the choice of the political system must balance the need for stability against the need for broad political representation and responsiveness to citizens' needs.