Answer:
When the narrator tapped on the wall, the cat began to cry out, for it had been trapped inside the whole time. This eventually led to the arrest of the narrator for the murder of his wife.
Explanation:
In Edgar Allen Poe's short story "The Black Cat', an unknown unnamed narrator tells of how he ended up being in jail waiting execution.
In the story, the narrator tells us that he used to have a favorite cat named Pluto who used to be his constant companion. Even when he's angry with everyone, the cat never leaves his side. But on one instance of anger in his drunken state, he removed one eye of the cat. Feeling that he is completely ignored by Pluto now, he sought revenge and under the influence of alcohol, he hung the cat from a tree. With this, their house mysteriously caught fire and burned the whole house, except a wall with an imprint of an image of an outline of a massive cat hanging from a tree.
Later, he acquired another cat which strangely resembles Pluto with one eye. But as like before, he began to resent this cat too. On one occasion, he almost tripped over the cat. Enraged, he tried to hit it but was defended by his wife. In anger for her defending of the cat, he killed her. Then he tried to conceal his crime by putting the corpse on a wall and building another layer on it. The cat was also locked in with the body, though unintentional. Later, when the police came to investigate the mysterious disappearance of his wife, he showed them the house. Just before they left, in his eagerness to show that he is innocent, he tapped on the wall to show off, but the imprisoned cat gave a loud cry. This made the policemen take down the wall to check it. Finally, the corpse was discovered and thus, that's how he ends up in prison.
Discuss the place of morality in Huckleberry Finn. In the world of the novel, where do moral values come from? The community? The family? The church? One’s experiences? Which of these potential sources does Twain privilege over the others? Which does he mock, or describe disapprovingly?
Twain values personal conscience and the ability to think for oneself over the strict adherence to traditional moral values. He also satirizes and mocks the hypocrisy and narrow-mindedness of those who blindly follow societal rules without considering the moral implications of their actions.
What is Huckleberry Finn?In "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn," morality is a central theme and Huck struggles throughout the novel with his own personal moral code. The novel takes place in a time and place where traditional moral values, such as those taught by the church and upheld by the community, are not always in alignment with Huck's own sense of right and wrong.
Throughout the novel, Huck grapples with the expectations of society and the expectations of his own conscience. He is constantly torn between what he has been taught is right and what he personally believes to be right. For example, he is conflicted about whether or not to turn in his friend, Jim, who is a runaway slave. On the one hand, he knows that it is his duty to turn Jim in according to the laws of the time and the values of his community. On the other hand, he has come to see Jim as a friend and does not want to betray him.
In the end, Huck decides to follow his own conscience and helps Jim escape to freedom, even though it goes against the moral code of his society.
Learn more about Huckleberry Finn, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29786244
#SPJ5
do japanese often to send money to bereaved friends as an expressions of sympathy is it true or false?
Sundiata
What is Djata, sogolon, nare Maghan, gnankouman doua, Sassouma, Balla Fasséké archetypes and the reason why?
So give the archetype for each character and the reason why?
Answer:
Specific Numbers Letters or anything?
Explanation:
The Knights of the Round Table express their solidarity by wearing a green girdle as Gawain does. Why does Gawain wear the green girdle?
A. as a symbol of his courage
B. as a mark of honor
C. to show his love for nature
D. as a symbol of his weakness
Answer:
i think it would be b ,but not sure
Explanation:
Gawain wear the green girdle as a symbol of weakness .
Answer: D
Explanation
Gawain had previously wore the green girdle as a symbol of survival as directed by his lover.
However, after he fails, Gawain wore the green girdle with the purpose to own his weaknesses and misdemeanour.
The green girdle was a reminder to him and everybody else that one can only forget his/her iniquities but cannot erase them.
The Knights however wore the green girdle to commemorate Gawain as a symbol of honor.
From the knight's perspective the girdle won in remembrance of Gawain doesn't symbolize failure as it did before.
After Gatsby's death, Nick answered a long distance call about?
Answer:
Nick answered a long-distance call about Gatsby's criminal business.
Explanation:
The novel "The Great Gatsby" was written by American author F. Scott Fitzgerald. The story is narrated by Nick, who gets involved with Gatsby due to his being Daisy's cousin. Jay Gatsby has been in love with Daisy for many years, and has gone from poor to millionaire in an effort to conquer her back and offer her the life he thinks she deserves.
Throughout the book, Gatsby throws grand parties that are attended by all sorts of people, none of them really acquainted with him. They are simply strangers who enjoy drinking and eating for free while, at the same time, whispering all types of gossip about Gatsby's past and how he made his fortune.
In the end, when Gatsby ends up killed, Nick is the only person by his side. When the phone rings, Nick picks it up thinking it might be Daisy. To his surprise, it is one of Gatsby's shady partners. It turns out people weren't completely wrong in their rumors about him. Gatsby was indeed a bootlegger and the long-distance calls Nick saw him answer before concerned his criminal business. Gatsby sold illegal liquor and traded stolen securities.
Which word BEST describes the speaker’s tone in lines 17-20?
Answer: c.
Explanation:
How would you define a title for a discussion paper?
Never divideA the last word on a pageB a word less than two syllablesC a contractionD all the above.
Answer:
D: all the above
Explanation:
Following what the rules for word division recommend, we shouldn't divide: the last word on a page (this will make difficult for the reader); a word less than two syllables (we can´t divide words that have only one syllable. Example: through)); a contraction (this is the case of a syllable that doesn't have a vowel, it's not possible to divide. Example: could- n't (wrong)
According to the lesson, what part of speech is often stressed in iambic pentameter?
Answer:
Nouns such as "love" or "truth"
Explanation:
The number of syllables in a line of poetry as well as the stress placed on those syllables, determmine ianbic pentameter. It is considered as the famous meters in English poetry.
"Nouns"
Iambic pentameter is a poetic form associated with Shakespeare. Every other syllable is stressed in iambic pentameter, which is a ten-syllable statement or phrase. The focus on the nouns is usually high. The word pentameter describe a line of five feet.
To know more about iambic pentameter, refer to the link:-
ttps://brainly.com/question/3332264
The philosophical position known as constructivism views knowledge as a human construction. The various perspectives within constructivism are based on the premise that knowledge is not part of an objective, external reality that is separate from the individual. Instead, human knowledge, whether the bodies of content in public disciplines (such as mathematics or sociology) or knowledge of the individual learner, is a human construction. References: Gredler, M. E. (2001). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. People have asked me about my philosophy of teaching and learning. I would associate myself with the philosophical stance called constructivism that sees knowledge as something constructed by people. Constructivism is founded on the idea that knowledge and truth does not come from an external reality that is objective and that exists apart from a person. I tried explaining constructivism to my brother and he thought the idea was crazy. References: Gredler, M. E. (2001). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Which of the following is true for the Student Version above? Word-for-Word plagiarism Paraphrasing plagiarism This is not plagiarism
In the given case, the student's version exemplifies word-for-word plagiarism. They have copied from the text verbatim, even though the source has been properly credited. In terms of the concept discussed, constructivism stresses that humans create knowledge based on personal experiences and socio-cultural interactions.
Explanation:It seems that the student's version is an example of word-for-word plagiarism. Even though they have included the source of their information, the student has copied and pasted the text into their work without making any significant changes or rephrasing the information in their own words. Constructivism, as is described in the references, is the philosophical viewpoint that knowledge is individually constructed and subjectively interpreted based on personal experiences and interactions.
This concept is often used to analyze what is considered deviant or norm within a society, with different societies constructing different meanings for such terms. The principles of constructivism also underlie social epistemology, which examines the social nature of knowledge and its justification. The pursuit of knowledge is not viewed as an individual effort but as a collective one. The reliability of others plays a central role in our belief formation process, making this task complex and challenging.
The traditional understanding of knowledge as justified true belief is often juxtaposed against the backdrop of constructivism. One's social position, credibility, and the validation of one's experiences markedly influence an individual's epistemic position. This perspective is denoted as standpoint theory. In general, constructivism underscores that our perceptions and shared understandings of the world are central to how we define reality and acquire knowledge.
Learn more about Constructivism here:https://brainly.com/question/33569956
#SPJ11
Constructivism regards knowledge as constructed by learners through personal engagement and interaction with their experiences. It encompasses psychological constructivism, which focuses on the individual's mental organization, and social constructivism, emphasizing social contexts and relationships in learning. In practice, constructivist teaching fosters active discovery and connects new knowledge to learners' existing understandings.
The philosophical approach known as constructivism suggests that knowledge is actively constructed by learners, rather than passively absorbed from an external, objective reality. This theory emphasizes that learning is a personal process of mental organization, integrating new experiences with previously acquired knowledge. The precise process of knowledge construction can vary, with psychological constructivism focusing on how individuals independently build knowledge, while social constructivism highlights the influence of social contexts and interactions with more knowledgeable others, such as through instructional scaffolding provided by teachers.
According to constructivism, effective teaching strategies engage learners actively, allowing them to explore and discover new concepts. For instance, in a constructivist classroom, teachers might facilitate learning by providing resources, guidance, and opportunities for students to connect new ideas with their existing knowledge. Educators who embrace constructivism often incorporate techniques such as problem-based learning and encourage metacognition to help learners understand their own thought processes.
Discuss why does Macbeth end with a dim cloudy day?
Answer:
Shakespeare's Macbeth is kind of a tragedy, and as he typically does with his tragedies he tends to restore the perception of political order, so killing Macbeth kind of offsets his previous brutal actions; the dim cloudy day is a simile to describe the story more vividly and emphaticly, since the plot although simple, it has many layers to unfold throughout, and it leaves the audience with a bittersweet aftertaste, with the feeling of: "it doesn't end with a sunny day but at least is not a thunderstorm"; for continuity sake.
Explanation:
When communicating with friends or peers, which view of communication (transmissional, constitutive, or ritual) do you engage in most frequently? Which view is used most frequently with family? Explain both.
Answer:
I am actually Transactional
Explanation:
When I am with my peers, I'm usually the type who engages the "transactional" view of communication wherein I could interact and build interpersonal relationships, the everyday talk and face-to-face communication with them.
The same goes to families, as a basic source of unit, the transactional view is most commonly used wherein members should always maintain the reciprocal interaction both verbal and non verbal between a mother, father, children and all other members of the family.
Although we live with different environment where other families engage other views such as transmission, constitutive, ritual and others, there are always private talks happening between the members which also defines the "transactional" view of communication.
what are the three articles in English grammar.please be elaborate.
Answer:
The, a and an
Explanation:
An article is a part of speech used before nouns or noun equivalents and are a type of adjective. They are words that define a noun as specific or unspecific. The three articles in English are: the, a, an.
"The" is considered the definite article, is used before a noun to indicate that the identity of the noun is known by the reader. Example: The apple is incredibly juicy. (talking about a specific and known apple)"A" and "an" are indefinite articles used before a noun that is general or when its identity is unknown. This article can be used for cont nouns only. Example: An apple is incredibly juicy. (talking about a generic apple)
I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!
What comic tale does the Phaeacian bard tell to lighten the mood?
The bard tells the story of Ares and Aphrodite. He explained how Aphrodite, the goddess of love, was unfaithful to her husband. He was Hephaestus, a goldsmith and the god of war.
The Phaeacian bard tells a comic tale to lighten the mood in 'The Odyssey' through a humorous retelling of the wooden horse trick. Alcinous shifts the focus to athletic sports to uplift Ulysses and the group after a sorrowful moment.
The comic tale that the Phaeacian bard tells to lighten the mood in Homer's 'The Odyssey' is the story of how the wooden horse tricked the Trojans. The bard narrates the tale with a humorous twist, focusing on the cleverness of the Greeks in deceiving the Trojans, which brings laughter and entertainment to the listeners.
After Ulysses expresses his grief and sheds tears during another bard's sad song, Alcinous suggests moving on to athletic sports to lift the heavy atmosphere, showing the importance of storytelling and entertainment in ancient Greek culture.
what is the metaphorical meaning of the poem "the lifeguard" by james dickey?
What’s a good simile for “A dog barking at a bird in a tree”
And “A farmer milking his cows”
Answer:
A dog barking at a bird in tree:
like a hungry child looking into a candy store.
A farmer milking his cow:
as an elderly person may type on a cell phone.
Explanation:
The development of early Greek culture occurred over a period of approximately how many years after the end of the Mycenaean Civilization?
400
1200
1800
2200
The answer is 400 y. after the end of the Mycenaean Civilization
A ____________ is an underlying assumption or inference that the writer takes for granted.
Answer:
warrent
Explanation:
ksadlasd
a warrant is an underlying assumption or inference that the writer takes for granted.
Suttee, the funeral practice of having the widow of a deceased man burned to death on his funeral pyre, is found in branches of which religious culture?
Answer:
Hindu religion.
Explanation:
"Suttee" or more easily known as "Sati" is the Hindu religious practice of burning a widow alive along with the corpse of her husband. This practice was prevalent mostly during the early modern Mughal period.
The Hindu religion believe in the burning or lighting of funeral pyre along with the dead body. Hindus don't bury their dead but rather burn them. And in ancient times, to show how faithful a woman is to her man, a widow is burned alive alongside the body of her dead husband. This cruel practice was predominant especially in the elite Hindu Rajput clans. But it is not confined to just them, with some others also practicing it.
The literal meaning of the word "sati" means "faithful woman" or "chaste woman". By the self immolation of the wife, she exhibits her faithfulness and respect for her husband, even in death. This barbarous practice was brought to an end when the Christian missionaries began to start coming in India. Christian evangelist William Carey and even Hindu reformer Raja Ram Mohan Roy opposed this act, thus bringing forth the introduction of the Bengal Sati Regulation of 1829. This allows the criminalizing of the practice of Sati, eventually decreasing the incidents of Sati practice.
What do you say to a coworker who does not share your moral or religious views concerning abortion?
Answer:
Validate them! The best thing you could do is validate that person (your coworkers) view. All because you do not agree, that does NOT give you the passage to put down those persons views. That is the worst thing you could do. That just causes conflict, and that is something we would all like to avoid. Especially in a work setting. Like politics, present your side. Don't be afraid and shy away from sharing your opinion just because your coworker doesn't agree. Voice your opinion loud and proud (and respectfully). Let them know that there are better opinion instead of abortion. Or if you are PRO abortion, then let them know why you believe it. Just make sure you stay true to yourself while remaining respectful.
Hope my advice helps! :))
Why would a writer leave an assumption tacit or implicit?
Answer:
A writer leaves an assumption tacit or implicit.
Explanation:
The writer could leave an assumption tacit or implicit. The reason might lie down in the writer's intention to give space to readers to figure out why the assumption of this specific is implicit.
The writer might want readers to read more carefully and discover why some characters or why some actions are happening. Also, some assumption is a trigger for some actions or motivation for characters.
If a writer doesn't write a novel or fictional book, the assumption might be a sign for readers to figure out or conclude some experiments or natural law or biological order in nature. The assumption makes the reader thinks about it and tries to find a solution for it.
Final answer:
Writers leave assumptions tacit or implicit to make arguments more succinct, engage readers by encouraging them to fill in the gaps, protect their arguments from easy critiques, and allow for a broader interpretation of the text. This approach enhances the rhetorical effect of writing and fosters deeper reader engagement but requires a careful balance to avoid misunderstanding.
Explanation:
Writers often choose to leave an assumption tacit or implicit for several practical and rhetorical reasons. By not stating every premise explicitly, they can make their arguments more succinct and avoid overwhelming the reader with unnecessary information. This technique relies on the shared understanding and background knowledge between the writer and the audience. When assumptions are left unsaid, it encourages readers to engage more deeply with the text as they fill in the gaps, making the reading experience more interactive and thought-provoking.
Identifying arguments and the missing premises can be crucial for understanding the strength and validity of an argument. Readers are often challenged to spot argumentative gaps, which can sharpen critical thinking skills. However, there's a balance to be struck; too many omissions can lead to misunderstandings or a lack of clarity. Writers, therefore, navigate the trade-off between being concise and being thorough.
Moreover, by not outright stating certain assumptions, writers protect their arguments from easy critiques. An argument can appear stronger if its more contentious assumptions are not explicitly exposed. Additionally, leaving out certain details can allow for a broader interpretation of the text, enabling it to resonate with a wider audience. This strategy is not without risks, as it might lead to accusations of omission or misleading the reader, particularly if relevant information that could undermine the writer's position is omitted.
Overall, the choice to leave assumptions tacit often reflects a strategic decision aimed at enhancing the rhetorical effect of a text, fostering a deeper engagement from the reader, and navigating the delicate balance between clarity and brevity.
In the Great Gatsby was Gatsby a hero or an anit hero?
Final answer:
In The Great Gatsby, Jay Gatsby can be seen as both a hero and an anti-hero due to his determination and ambition, but also his shady business dealings and morally questionable actions.
Explanation:
In The Great Gatsby, Jay Gatsby can be seen as both a hero and an anti-hero.
On one hand, Gatsby can be considered a hero due to his determination and ambition in pursuing his dreams. He rose from a poor background and became a wealthy man, all in order to win back the love of his life, Daisy. His love for Daisy is so strong that he is willing to go to great lengths to impress her and make her happy.
On the other hand, Gatsby can be seen as an anti-hero because of his shady business dealings and morally questionable actions. He amasses his wealth through illegal activities such as bootlegging and is involved in the corrupt world of organized crime. Furthermore, his obsession with Daisy leads him to pursue her at all costs, even if it means disrupting her marriage and causing pain to those around him.
There are ____________________________ views on the issue of giving bonus to the employees.
Answer:
There are divergent views on the issue of giving bonus to the employees.
Explanation:
The word divergent is an adjective that implies two or more things are different from each other or take different directions. In this case, it perfectly applies to the noun 'views', indicating that there are people who have different or even opposite views about giving bonus to the employees.
what is the difference between buying an item and purchasing an item?
Answer:
buying is refer for small products
Purchasing is refer for contracts and big products
Explanation:
buying and purchasing are considered as synonyms and both term that are often used interchangeably, these both terms meaning to acquire something against money
Buying an item is considered general term and very commonly used to refer to everyday goods and buying is refer for small products
example ; I bought a new phone
and
Purchasing an item is considered to be more formal word than the buying an item and Purchasing is refer for contracts and big products
example ; I purchased a piece of land
in the book othello , why does emilia not stand up too iago at first ?
Answer:
Emelia did not stand up to her husband Iago for she believes that a wife is supposed to be the helper of her husband, and that she wants to keep her wedding promise of staying faithful to one's spouse.
Explanation:
William Shakespeare's "Othello" tells the story of a black moor Othello who is married to a beautiful white woman Desdemona. Iago serves in Othello's army but still hates Othello and would do anything to smear his name. So, he hatched a plan to with Roderigo, a very rich man who loves Desdemona. Together, they planned to accuse Othello of stealing Desdemona using witchcraft. But their plan backfired. Emelia, the wife of Iago, is the attendant of Desdemona.
When Othello had to go to Cyprus for some urgent matter, they all go to meet him. When Roderigo tells him that he stands no chance of breaking apart their marriage, Iago advises him to wait for Desdemona will get bored of Othello. And when she's on the lookout for something fresh, Roderigo will be the man. Iago has been receiving gifts meant for Desdemona from Roderigo which he kept for himself. Even to this part, Emelia did not say anything against her husband. She thinks he's doing it for the good of both of them. She did not suspect any dishonesty on his part and she dutifully obeys whatever Iago asks her to do, keeping intact the nuptial promise.
But later, towards the end of the story, when Iago actually kills Desdemona, she repels him and accuses him of doing the most villainous act. She exclaims that she will expose his crime, even if it means she'll be killed twenty times over. Gone is the wife who listens to her husband's every biding. She is now fully aware of the torturous and demeaning treatment she has suffered, and the full extent of her husband's evil nature. And in the end, before she could manage to fully reveal anything, she was killed herself. Her rebelling of her husband's villainy leads o her death.
Final answer:
Emilia does not stand up to Iago immediately due to the gender norms of the Elizabethan era, her loyalty to her husband, and fear of potential consequences.
Explanation:
In the book Othello, Emilia does not stand up to Iago at first largely due to the social and gender dynamics of the time, her loyalty to her husband, and possibly fear of the consequences. Women during the Elizabethan era, in which the play is set, had significantly less power and autonomy than men, and as Iago's wife, Emilia would likely have felt compelled to obey him, despite any personal misgivings. Additionally, standing up to Iago could result in severe repercussions for her, as he is manipulative and unscrupulous, and could easily turn her life more miserable or even harm her. Emilia's complex loyalty and the real risk of retaliation help to explain why she hesitates to confront Iago initially.
In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button.
STUDENT VERSION
Frick (1991) claims that systems, including both business systems, and educational systems, are actually very simple. The main idea is that systems "have parts that fit together to make a whole" (The nature of systems in education section, para. 1). What is further interesting to Frick is how those parts are connected together.
ORIGINAL VERSION
The concept of systems is really quite simple. The basic idea is that a system has parts that fit together to make a whole; but where it gets complicated - and interesting - is how those parts are connected or related to each other. There are many kinds of systems: government systems, health systems, military systems, business systems, and educational systems, to name a few.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
(A) Word-for-Word plagiarism
(B) Paraphrasing plagiarism
(C) This is not plagiarism
Answer:
C. This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
The student's version is not plagiarism, because he didn't just copy the text from the original work without mentioning the author. He mentioned the author at the beginning of the passage as well as mentioned the year of publishing - Frick (1991) claims that systems, including both business systems, and educational systems, are actually very simple.
He didn't paraphrase the text and put it as his work, he cited the author's words, even mentioning the paragraphs where he had taken them from - The main idea is that systems "have parts that fit together to make a whole" (The nature of systems in education section, para. 1).
To prove my answer, there are needed definitions:
Word-for-Word plagiarism - a text or parts of a text are copied literally from the original work without mentioning the author. The missing quotation marks in the passages, or indention of an author.
Paraphrasing plagiarism - a text paraphrased in your own words without acknowledging the author.
I hope it helped you :)
The student's work is an example of paraphrase plagiarism because the student did not sufficiently rephrase the original material and used a phrase verbatim without correct quotation marks.
Explanation:The example provided in the student work is a case of paraphrase plagiarism. Although the student has rephrased some parts of the original text, the overall idea and structure are too closely aligned with the source material to be considered original work. Additionally, there is a phrase that is used verbatim without quotation marks, which should have been inside quotation marks to be proper paraphrasing. Furthermore, the student did not bring originality or a personal understanding into the paraphrased content, which is crucial to avoid plagiarism and to maintain one's own voice when integrating information from different sources.
Fearing that young boys might not read a book written by a woman, her publishers demanded that she use two initials, rather than her full first name. Who is this successful writer?
Answer:
Joanne K. Rowling.
Explanation:
Joanne Rowling, or more famously known as J. K. Rowling, is the writer of the very famous book series Harry Potter. Her books are also already made into a movie which succeeded tremendously.
When she first wrote "Harry Potter", she simply put her full name "Joanne Rowling" in the author's space. But her publishers fear that the targeted young boys may not like to read a book written by a woman. So, they advised her to use two initials as a pen name, rather than use her full name. As she doesn't have a middle name, she had to take her paternal grandmother's name as her middle initial pen name. So, the initial K stands for Kathleen, thus becoming J. K. Rowling instead of Joanne Rowling. She didn't even use her husband's name Murray.
What is promulgate ?
Answer:promote or make widely known (an idea or cause).
"these objectives have to be promulgated within the organization
Explanation:
Final answer:
The word 'promulgate' means to officially announce or publicly declare something, often used in the context of laws or decrees. In a literary sense, it can also mean the spread or influence of conditions or ideas, such as the metaphorical use in poetry where conditions 'promulge' their influence.
Explanation:
The term promulgate means to proclaim, to make known officially, or to publicly declare something, especially a law or decree. It can also imply the idea of promoting or propagating specific information or ideas. In literature, the term can sometimes be used more abstractly to signify the spreading or passing on of qualities, conditions, or influences. For example, in the lines from poetry provided, 'Every condition promulges not only itself, it promulges what grows after and out of itself, And the dark hush promulges as much as any,' the word promulges suggests that every state or condition announces and spreads its influence onto what comes after it. The use of promulgate here is metaphorical, implying that even silence or a 'dark hush' can disseminate or communicate a profound sense of itself.
Using Romans 6:6 "our old man was crucified" as an example of historical-cultural context How would you explain that by understanding the historical-cultural context you can shed light on the meaning of that verse.
Answer:
Crucifixion and Resurrection
Explanation:
The writer of the Espistle to the Romans, in this chapter 6, verse 6, is refering to the historical event of the Crucifixtion of Jesus Christ , which was an act of intercession/atonement for mankind's sake. By saying "our old man was crucified" he is alluding to the symbolic death of carnal body in order to give way to the new creature in likeness of Jesus's resurrected eternal body.
The poem is a dramatic monologue because it consists entirely of the words of a speaker (persona) who reveals in his speech his own nature and the dramatic situation in which he finds himself. The dramatic monologue reveals its own place and time as it proceeds to uncover the psychology of the speaker at a significant moment in his or her life. Browning's Duke has been labeled (despite his apparent cunning) as "witless"--why?
Answer:
Lurking Sin, Indifferent Behavior and Over Acting of the Duke
Explanation:
The poem 'My Last Duchess' is a monologue based on 16th century Duke of Ferrara, Alfonso, who is a widowed speaker. He tells that he means entertainment to the visiting emissary who is there to negotiate his marriage. While the Duke goes on a walk through with visitors of his palace, he deliberately stops in front of a portrait of the late Duchess, who appears young and lovely. Now the Duke reminisces about the Duchess. But Duke's musings turn out to be a diatribe on her disgraceful behaviour. The Duke reveals the Duchess flirted with everyone and brought disgrace to his 'nine-hundred-years- old name'. As the monologue progresses, the readers do understand that the Duke was the culprit behind the Duchess’s early death. After revealing the chilling fact, the Duke returns to the normal behaviour as nothing has happened. The Duke’s musings show that the supposed evil actions took place only in his mind. With lurking fear of sin, the Duke is quite an actor with a poor sense of wit. He mimics others’ voices, creates hypothetical situations, and uses the force of his personality to make horrifying information seem merely colourful. Bu all appears lacklustre.
Final answer:
Browning's Duke in "My Last Duchess" is labeled as 'witless' for his lack of self-awareness and extreme sense of entitlement, which his dramatic monologue inadvertently reveals.
Explanation:
Robert Browning's dramatic monologues, such as "My Last Duchess," are renowned for revealing the psychology and inner workings of complex characters. In this particular poem, the Duke's monologue uncovers his personality at a significant moment, wherein his speech outlines not only the dramatic situation but also his nature. Despite his social status and apparent cunning, Browning's Duke is often labeled as 'witless' due to his failure to recognize the impact of his own actions and his misguided sense of entitlement that leads him to murder his wife. His self-incriminating speech, filled with dark humor and grotesque revelations, exemplifies how dramatic monologues can unveil character flaws through their own words.