Answer: If the market price of an I-Pod is $220, there will be a surplus of I-Pods.
Explanation:
Given :
[tex]Q_{S}[/tex] = 10×P
[tex]Q_{D}[/tex] = 3,000 - 5×P
The equilibrium will occur where supply is equal to demand
i.e. [tex]Q_{S}[/tex] = [tex]Q_{D}[/tex]
10P = 3000 - 5P
15P = 3000
P = $200
∴The equilibrium price is $200
Hence, If the market price of an I-Pod is $220, there will be a surplus of I-Pods
The correct statement is a. If the market price of an I-Pod is $220, there will be a shortage of I-Pods.
To determine whether there will be a shortage or a surplus of I-Pods at a given price, we need to compare the quantity supplied with the quantity demanded at that price.
First, let's find the quantity demanded (QD) and the quantity supplied (QS) at the market price of $220 using the given equations:
For the demand equation QD = 3,000 - 5P, we substitute P = $220:
QD = 3,000 - 5(220) = 3,000 - 1,100 = 1,900 I-Pods.
For the supply equation QS = 10P, we substitute P = $220:
QS = 10(220) = 2,200 I-Pods.
Now, we compare QD and QS at $220:
QD = 1,900 I-Pods (demanded),
QS = 2,200 I-Pods (supplied).
Since QD < QS at $220, there will be a surplus of I-Pods. The surplus is the excess of quantity supplied over quantity demanded, which is 2,200 - 1,900 = 300 I-Pods.
Next, let's check the market price of $200:
For the demand equation QD = 3,000 - 5P, we substitute P = $200:
QD = 3,000 - 5(200) = 3,000 - 1,000 = 2,000 I-Pods.
For the supply equation QS = 10P, we substitute P = $200:
QS = 10(200) = 2,000 I-Pods.
Now, we compare QD and QS at $200:
QD = 2,000 I-Pods (demanded),
QS = 2,000 I-Pods (supplied).
Since QD = QS at $200, the market for I-Pods is in equilibrium, and there will be neither a shortage nor a surplus of I-Pods.
Therefore, the only true statement among the options is that if the market price of an I-Pod is $220, there will be a shortage of I-Pods. However, this is contradictory to the calculation we performed, which showed a surplus at $220. Let's re-evaluate the calculations:
At $220:
QD = 3,000 - 5(220) = 3,000 - 1,100 = 1,900 I-Pods (demanded),
QS = 10(220) = 2,200 I-Pods (supplied).
Since QD < QS at $220, there will indeed be a surplus, not a shortage. This means that the initial conclusion was incorrect.
At $200:
QD = 3,000 - 5(200) = 3,000 - 1,000 = 2,000 I-Pods (demanded),
QS = 10(200) = 2,000 I-Pods (supplied).
At $200, QD = QS, so the market is in equilibrium.
The correct conclusion is that if the market price of an I-Pod is $220, there will be a surplus of I-Pods, which is not listed among the options. However, since we are to correct inaccuracies and provide the answer based on the given options, we must choose the best possible answer from the ones provided. Given that none of the options correctly describe the situation at $220, we must select the option that is closest to the truth, which is option b: If the market price of an I-Pod is $220, there will be a surplus of I-Pods. This is the closest approximation to the correct calculation, despite the initial incorrect conclusion.
Barlow Company manufactures three products: A, B, and C. The selling price, variable costs, and contribution margin for one unit of each product follow: Product A B C Selling price $ 300 $ 400 $ 300 Variable expenses: Direct materials 36 90 45 Other variable expenses 144 110 150 Total variable expenses 180 200 195 Contribution margin $ 120 $ 200 $ 105 Contribution margin ratio 40 % 50 % 35 % The same raw material is used in all three products. Barlow Company has only 4,500 pounds of raw material on hand and will not be able to obtain any more of it for several weeks due to a strike in its supplier’s plant. Management is trying to decide which product(s) to concentrate on next week in filling its backlog of orders. The material costs $9 per pound. Required: 1. Compute the amount of contribution margin that will be obtained per pound of material used in each product.
Answer:
Contribution margin per pound
Product A = $30
Product B = $20
Product C = $21
Explanation:
Products A B C
Direct Material $36 $90 $45
Provided cost of raw material per pound is $9
Pounds of raw
material used in a unit $36/9 = 4 $90/9 = 10 $45/9 = 5
Contribution per unit $120 $200 $105
Contribution margin per pound = Contribution per unit/ Pounds per unit
= $120/4 = $30 $200/10 = $20 $105/5 = $21
Highest contribution margin per pound is of Product A = $30
Contribution margin per pound
Product A = $30
Product B = $20
Product C = $21
By dividing the contribution margin of each product by the weight of the raw material used (determined by dividing the direct material cost by the cost per pound of $9), we find that Product A generates $30 per pound, Product B generates $20 per pound, and Product C generates $21 per pound. Hence, Product A should be prioritized for highest profitability.
Explanation:The amount of contribution margin per pound can be calculated by dividing the contribution margin of each product by the amount of raw material used in each. As for Barlow's products, we first need to determine the weight of the raw material used in each product. Since the material costs $9 per pound, we can find the weight by dividing the direct materials cost by $9.
For example, the weight of the raw material in Product A is $36 / $9 = 4 pounds. Hence, the contribution margin per pound for Product A is $120 / 4 = $30 per pound. Similar calculations can be repeated for Products B and C.
Product B: Raw material = $90 / $9 = 10 pounds, Contribution margin per pound = $200 / 10 = $20 per pound.
Product C: Raw material = $45 / $9 = 5 pounds, Contribution margin per pound = $105 / 5 = $21 per pound.
Based on these figures, it would be most profitable for Barlow to concentrate on manufacturing Product A, as it generates the highest contribution margin per pound of raw material.
Learn more about Contribution Margin here:https://brainly.com/question/29534784
#SPJ3
When Coca-Cola carries a different price depending on whether the consumer purchases it in a fine restaurant, a fast-food restaurant, or a vending machine, then this form of price discrimination is known as ________ pricing.
Answer:
The correct answer is Channel pricing.
Explanation:
In the industry, the Channel Pricing is used with the purpose of setting the prices depending on the means of delivery of goods or services. Coca-cola used the channel pricing to offer different prices depending on the location the people usually buy the products.
Final answer:
Coca-Cola's different pricing in various settings is an example of product differentiation pricing, which is part of a broader strategy within monopolistic competition where firms have some power to set prices based on product differentiation.
Explanation:
When Coca-Cola carries a different price depending on whether the consumer purchases it in a fine restaurant, a fast-food restaurant, or a vending machine, then this form of price discrimination is known as product differentiation pricing. This strategy involves setting different prices for the same product in different venues to reflect varying consumer preferences, costs of selling, and perceived value. For instance, a consumer might be willing to pay more for a Coca-Cola at a fine restaurant due to the ambience and service quality, while expecting to pay less from a vending machine.
The pricing strategy is not only about differences in venues but also capitalizes on monopolistic competition. This arises where you have a market filled with goods that are similar but differentiated from one another in some way, such as by brand, quality, or location. These differences allow firms to have some degree of market power to set prices above marginal cost. However, the market remains competitive due to the variety of choices available to consumers.
What is the primary difference between income and wealth? A. Income is earned by households; wealth is gained by inheritance. B. Income is a flow variable; wealth is a stock variable. C. Income reveals net worth; wealth is a stock variable. D. Income is the value of what a household owns minus its debt; wealth is a measure of net worth.
Answer: the correct ianswer is B. Income is a flow variable; wealth is a stock variable.
Explanation:
A stock is measured at one specific time, and represents a quantity existing at that point in time (say, December 31, 2004), which may have accumulated in the past. A flow variable is measured over an interval of time. Therefore, a flow would be measured per unit of time (say a year).
Consider the markets for mobile and landline telephone service. Suppose that when the average income of residents of Plainville is $55,000 per year, the quantity demanded of landline telephone service is 12,500 and the quantity demanded of mobile service is 28,000. Suppose that when the price of mobile service rises from $100 to $120 per month, the quantity demanded of landline service increases to 11,000. Suppose also that when the average income decreases to $50,000, the quantity demanded of mobile service decreases to 26,000. What is the income elasticity of demand for mobile service? Show calculation and interpret the result.
Answer: Income elasticity of demand for mobile services = 1.885
Explanation:
Given :
Income 1 = $55000
Income 2 = $60000
Demand 1 = 28000
Demand 2 = 33000
Formula for income elasticity as per mid point method is as follow:
[tex]\left ( \Delta \left ( Quantity demanded/2 \right )\div \Delta \left ( Income/2\right ) \right )\\[/tex]
i.e. [tex]\left ( (33000-28000)/(33000 + 28000)/2 \right )\div\left ( (60000-55000)/(60000+55000)/2\right ) \right )[/tex]
= 1.885
Since income elasticity of demand is positive and greater than 1 therefore mobile service is considered as a superior goods.
The income elasticity of demand of mobile service in this case is -0.7857, indicating it is an inferior but necessary good.
Explanation:The income elasticity of demand for mobile service can be calculated with the formula that divides the percentage change in quantity demanded by the percentage change in income. In this case, the change in quantity demanded is from 28,000 to 26,000, which is a decrease of 2,000. As a percentage, this is a decrease of about 7.14% (2000/28,000). The change in income is from $55,000 to $50,000, a decrease of $5,000. As a percentage, this is a decrease of about 9.09% (5000/55,000). The income elasticity of demand is then 7.14 / -9.09 = -0.7857.
A negative income elasticity of demand indicates that mobile service is an inferior good within this income range meaning as income decreases, the demand for the good increases. However, the negative value is less than 1 which means it's a necessary good, even though it's considered inferior. The quantity demanded decreases with decreased income but not to a very large extent.
Learn more about Income Elasticity of Demand here:https://brainly.com/question/31293339
#SPJ3
The fact that the marginal product falls as the number of workers increases illustrates a property calleda. diminishing marginal product. b. supply and demand. c. labor theory. d. utility maximization.
Answer: The fact that the marginal product falls as the number of workers increases illustrates a property called "a. diminishing marginal product".
Explanation: The law of diminishing returns is an economic concept according to which increasing the amount of a productive factor in the production of the good or service in question, causes the production yield to be lower as we increase this factor. As long as all other factors are maintained at a constant level (ceteris paribus).
A firm has a machine it can sell for $40,000. The book value of the machine is currently $20,000. If the firm sells the machine, what are the net proceed from the sale? Assume that the tax rate is 40%. Round to the nearest penny. Do not include a dollar sign in your answer.
The cost paid for the bond or debt purchase is called book value while, when the whole volume of the assets is sold during the base period is called sales value.
The answer is 12,000 dollars.
This can be calculated by:
The organization will have to pay expenses for the difference between the sales and the book value.
Given,
The amount at which the company can sell = $40,000The book value of the machine = $ 20,000The Tax rate = 40%= 40000 - 20000 × 40%
= 20000 × 40%
= 8000 tax income.
Total proceed 20,000 (gross profit) - 8,000 (tax income)
= 12,000 net proceed
Therefore 12,000 is the net proceed from the sale.
To learn more about book and sale value follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/20436978
The ledger of Tamarisk, Inc. at the end of the current year shows Accounts Receivable $109,000; Sales Revenue $830,000; and Sales Returns and Allowances $23,700. Prepare journal entries for each separate scenario below. (a) If Tamarisk, Inc. uses the direct write-off method to account for uncollectible accounts, journalize the entry at December 31, assuming Tamarisk, Inc. determines that L. Dole’s $1,500 balance is uncollectible. (b) If Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has a credit balance of $2,500 in the trial balance, journalize the adjusting entry at December 31, assuming uncollectible accounts are estimated to be 11% of accounts receivable. (c) If Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has a debit balance of $205 in the trial balance, journalize the adjusting entry at December 31, assuming uncollectible accounts are estimated to be 9% of accounts receivable.
Answer:
(A)
bad debt expense 1,500 debit
account receivable 1,500 credit
(B)
bad debt expense 9,490
allowance for doubtful accounts 9,490
(C)
bad debt expense 10,015
allowance for doubtful accounts 10,015
Explanation:
(A)
Direct write-off doesn't use allowance,
bad debt is done directly to account receivable.
(B)
allowance = 11% of AR = 11% of 109,000 = 11,990
balance (2,500 credit)
11,990 - 2,500 = 9,490
(C)
allowance = 9% of AR = 9% of 109,000 = 9810
balance 205 debit
9,810 + 205 = 10,015
Comments: the allowance is expected to be 9% or 11% of AR
so the goal for B and C is to reach a final balance of 9% or 11% of AR
so we have to subtract the balance from the expected allowance to knwo the adjustment.
The journal entries for Tamarisk, Inc. are different depending on the scenario. For direct write-offs, uncollectible amounts are directly subtracted from the Account Receivable. For Allowance methods, the amount of bad debt is estimated based on a percentage of total receivables.
Explanation:For scenario a, Tamarisk, Inc. determines that L. Dole's $1,500 balance is uncollectible under the direct write-off method. The journal entry would be as follows:
Debit: Bad Debt Expense $1,500Credit: Accounts Receivable – L. Dole $1,500In scenario b, if
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
has a credit balance of $2,500, and uncollectible accounts are estimated to be 11% of accounts receivable, the journal entry is:
Debit: Bad Debt Expense $9,490Credit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $9,490In scenario c, if Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has a debit balance of $205, and uncollectible accounts are estimated to be 9% of accounts receivable, the entry would be:
Debit: Bad Debt Expense $9,810Credit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $9,810In both scenarios b and c, the estimation of uncollectible accounts is calculated as a percentage of the total existing Account Receivables, 11% and 9% respectively.
Learn more about Journal entries here:https://brainly.com/question/33762471
#SPJ3
This problem has been solved!
See the answer
Peroni Company paid wages of $170,900 this year. Of this amount, $114,000 was taxable for net FUTA and SUTA purposes. The state's contribution tax rate is 3.1% for Peroni Company. Due to cash flow problems, the company did not make any SUTA payments until after the Form 940 filing date. Compute the following; round your answers to the nearest cent.
a. Amount of credit the company would receive against the FUTA tax for its SUTA contributions
$
b. Amount that Peroni Company would pay to the federal government for its FUTA tax
$
c. Amount that the company lost because of its late payments
$
a. (Taxable wages x SUTA rate x 90%) + [Taxable wages x (5.4% -SUTA rate)] = Total FUTA tax credit
b. (Taxable wages x FUTA rate) – Total FUTA tax credit (part a above) = Net FUTA tax
c. Net FUTA tax – FUTA tax without penalty = penalty
hey there!:
1)
a) Amount of credit the company would receive against the FUTA tax for its SUTA contributions = 2896.21
(56900*3.1%*90%)+(56900*(5.4%-3.1%)) = 2896.21
b) Amount that Peroni Company would pay to the federal government for its FUTA tax = 517.79
(56900*6%)-2896.21 = 517.79
c) Amount that the company lost because of its late payments = 176.39
=517.79-(3414-1763.9-1308.7) = 176.39
Hope that helps!
To find the total FUTA tax, calculate the credit received for SUTA contributions first, then use that to calculate the net FUTA tax. Then, the penalty can be calculated as the difference between the net FUTA tax and the FUTA tax without penalty.
Explanation:To calculate a), the amount of credit the company would receive against the FUTA tax for its SUTA contributions, we use the formula: (Taxable wages x SUTA rate x 90%) + [Taxable wages x (5.4% -SUTA rate)]. Plugging in the provided numbers gives: ($114,000 x 3.1% x 90%) + [$114,000 x (5.4% - 3.1%)]. For b), the amount that Peroni Company would pay to the federal government for its FUTA tax, we use the formula: (Taxable wages x FUTA rate) - Total FUTA tax credit. Calculate the FUTA rate (generally it is 6.0%), then substitute the FUTA tax credit obtained in a). For c), the amount the company lost due to its late payments, we use the formula: Net FUTA tax – FUTA tax without penalty, which gives the penalty.
Learn more about FUTA and SUTA Tax Calculation here:https://brainly.com/question/33720518
#SPJ3
Mart's Boutique has sales of $820,000 and costs of $540,000. Interest expense is $36,000 and depreciation is $59,000. The tax rate is 21 percent. What is the net income? $146,150 221,200 105,000 139,050
Answer:
$146,150.00
Explanation:
Net income is net of taxes.
Here,
Sales = $820,000.00
Less: Costs = -$540,000.00
Gross profit = $280,000.00
Less: Finance Costs
Interest = -$36,000.00
Depreciation = -$59,000.00
Net profit before Tax = $185,000.00
Less: Tax @ 21% of $185,000.00 = - $38,850.00
Net Income (after tax) = $146,150
Net income is always computed after tax.
$146,150.00
Final answer:
To find Mart's Boutique net income, subtract the costs and depreciation from sales, then subtract interest expense and taxes. The boutique's net income is $146,150.
Explanation:
To calculate the net income for Mart's Boutique, we begin with sales and subtract the costs:
Sales: $820,000Costs: $540,000Depreciation: $59,000Interest Expense: $36,000The operating profit is calculated as Sales minus Costs and Depreciation. Then we subtract the Interest Expense to get the pre-tax income:
Operating Profit = Sales - Costs - DepreciationOperating Profit = $820,000 - $540,000 - $59,000Operating Profit = $221,000Pre-tax Income = Operating Profit - Interest ExpensePre-tax Income = $221,000 - $36,000Pre-tax Income = $185,000Finally, we calculate the net income by subtracting the tax, which is 21% of the pre-tax income:
Tax = Pre-tax Income × Tax RateTax = $185,000 × 0.21Tax = $38,850Net Income = Pre-tax Income - TaxNet Income = $185,000 - $38,850Net Income = $146,150Mart's Boutique has a net income of $146,150.Acton Corporation, which applies manufacturing overhead on the basis of machine-hours, has provided the following data for its most recent year of operations. Estimated manufacturing overhead $132,440 Estimated machine-hours 2,800 Actual manufacturing overhead $128,600 Actual machine-hours 2,750 The estimates of the manufacturing overhead and of machine-hours were made at the beginning of the year for the purpose of computing the company's predetermined overhead rate for the year. The overhead for the year was:
Answer:
The overhead for the year was $130,075
Explanation:
GIVEN INFORMATION -
ESTIMATED ACTUAL
Manufacturing overhead $132,440 $128,600
Machine hours 2800 2750
Here for calculating the overhead for the year we will use the following formula =
\frac{Estimated Manufacturing Overhead}{Estiamted Machine Hours}\times Actual Machine Hours
= \frac{\$132,440}{2800}\times 2750
\$47.3\times 2750 = \$130,075
Therefore the overhead for the year was $130,075
Answer:
The overhead for the year was: $130,075.
Explanation:
We have the following formula to determine overhead for the year:
+ Overhead for the year = Predetermined overhead rate ($ per machine hour) x Actual machine hours;
in which:
+ Predetermined overhead rate = Estimated manufacturing overhead / Estimated machine-hours = 132,440 / 2,800 = $47.3/machine hour.
+ Actual machine hours is given at 2,750 hours.
=> Overhead for the year = Predetermined overhead rate ($ per machine hour) x Actual machine hours = 47.3 x 2,750 = $130,075.
So, the answer is $130,075.
The larger the standard deviation of returns of an investment, _____. a. lesser is the chance that the realized return will differ significantly from the expected return b. greater is the chance that the realized return will be negative c. greater is the chance that the realized return will differ significantly from the expected return d. lesser is the chance that the realized return will be negative e. greater is the chance that the investment will outperform the market
Answer:
c. greater is the chance that the realized return will differ significantly from the expected return
Explanation:
The standard deviation is used as a measure of risk, it measures the dispersion of data relative to its mean. The expected return is measured by the mean, therefore if the standard deviation is large it will be more difficult to be accurate calculating the expected return as the values can differ significantly.
When you graduate from college, your mother plans to give you a gift of $70,000 to start you on your way. However, to determine what you learned in business school, your mother presents you with four options on how to receive the gift. Which of the four options presented by your mother will yield the greatest present value to you? A. A lump sum of $70,000 after grad school (2 years) assuming a 7% discount rate. B. A lump sum of $70,000 after grad school (2 years) assuming a 2% discount rate. C. A lump sum of $70,000 today. D $35,000 per year for the next 2 years using a 2% discount rate.
Answer:
C. A lump sum of $70,000 today.
Explanation:
C.- Because the if the cash is received today then you will don't have to discounted at all.
The other option puts the 70,00 in the future, so the present value will always be lower than 70,000 today under normal condition.
Final answer:
The mother's gift option that yields the greatest present value is Option C, the immediate lump sum of $70,000, since it does not need to be discounted and retains its full value.
Explanation:
To determine which option presented by the mother yields the greatest present value, we need to account for the time value of money. The present value (PV) is the current value of future sums of money at a specific discount rate. The discount rate is a percentage that represents the time value of money and the risk of the investment.
Option A is to receive $70,000 after 2 years at a 7% discount rate. The present value is calculated: PV = $70,000 / (1 + 0.07)^2 = $61,320.56.
Option B is also to receive $70,000 after 2 years, but at a 2% discount rate. The present value is calculated: PV = $70,000 / (1 + 0.02)^2 = $67,645.92.
Option C, which is $70,000 today, has no need for discounting as it's already in present terms, so PV = $70,000.
Option D is $35,000 per year for the next 2 years using a 2% discount rate. The present value is calculated as the sum of the PV of two payments: PV = $35,000 / (1 + 0.02) + $35,000 / (1 + 0.02)^2 = $34,313.73 + $33,641.89 = $67,955.62.
Comparing these options, we can see that Option C, which is the immediate lump sum of $70,000, has the highest present value and is therefore the best choice financially.
Suppose demand for a product is highly elastic. What will likely happen to a company's total revenue if it raises the price of that product?a. total revenue will riseb. total revenue will fallc. total revenue will remain the samed. total revenue will fluctuate
Answer:
The correct answer is b. Total revenue will fall.
Explanation:
The equation for the price elasticity of demand (PED) is ε = [tex]\frac{dQ/Q}{dP/P}[/tex]
where Q represents the quantity, P represents the price and d represents variation.
If the demand for a product is highly elastic, mathematically it means that the PED in absolute value is greater than 1.
|ε| > [tex]\frac{dQ/Q}{dP/P}[/tex] ⇒ |ε| > 1
Economically that means that the quantity demanded of that product will decrease more than proportionally to the increase in price of that same product. In other words, the company will experience that a increase in price of its product raises the revenue for each unit sold, but given that the PED is highly elastice an increase in price reduces the number of units actually sold to the extent the company's total revenue actually falls.
Which of the following is NOT characteristic of very large organizations? Select one: a. They can become increasingly bureaucratic. b. Levels are added to keep spans of control from becoming too small. c. Jobs are more specialized. d. Rules, procedures and paperwork are introduced. e. All of the above ARE characteristic of larger organizations.
Answer:
Adding up of levels to keep spans of control from becoming too small is not a characteristic of a very large organization.
Explanation:
Span of control is also known as management ratio. It refers to the number of subordinates working under a superior. In a large organization number of employees is also high, so the span of control generally tend to be large not small. Levels are added to make them small and effective. A large organization can become bureaucratic. The jobs here can also be specialized with skilled workers performing their specialized works. A lot of procedures and paperwork is involved as every task is performed officially according to a set procedure. All these options will not be correct answer.
A basket of goods for a given consumer includes two goods, X and Z. Consumer income is equal to $1,500 and the prices of these two goods are as follows: Px = $50 Pz = $50 This consumer is consuming 10 units of good X. Suppose that over the course of a year, the price of good X changes by -20% and the price of good Z changes by 25%.
How much income would be required for the consumer to afford the same quantity of goods X and Z with the new prices?
What is the rate of inflation?
Given this change in prices, is it possible for our consumer to buy the original bundle of goods?
Answer:
Costumer will need $1650 to afford the same quantity of goods
Rate of inflation=2.5%
Is not possible for our consumer to buy the original bundle of goods
Explanation:
Income = $1,500
First year Px = $50
Pz = $50
10 units of good X is 50x10=500,
Consumer could buy $1000 in product Z (Income-cost of product Z=1500-500)
qz=Product Z is $50 each so customer could buy 20 units(1000/50).
Prices of Second year
Px' = $50*(1-0.20)=40
Pz' = $50*(1+0.25)=62.5
Cost=Px'*qx+Pz'*qz=40*10+62.5*20=400+1250=1650
Costumer will need $1650 to afford the same quantity of goods
Rate of inflation=
RI=(sum price of x and z in second year-sum price of x and z in first year)/100
RI=(40+62.5)-(50+50)/100=102.5-100/100= 2.5/100=0.025=
RI=2.5%
Is not possible for our consumer to buy the original bundle of goods with the same budget
Final answer:
After the price changes, the consumer requires $1,025 to purchase the same quantity of goods X and Z, which is less than the original income of $1,500. Therefore, it is possible for the consumer to afford the original bundle of goods.
Explanation:
The question involves a consumer whose income and the prices of two goods, X and Z, change over a given period. Initially, both goods are priced at $50 each, and the consumer can buy 10 units of good X with a total income of $1,500. Over the course of a year, the price of good X drops by 20%, making its new price $40 ($50 - 20% of $50), and the price of good Z increases by 25%, making its new price $62.50 ($50 + 25% of $50). To calculate the income required for the consumer to afford the same quantity of goods X and Z with the new prices, we multiply the new prices by 10 units (since the original quantity purchased is 10 units for X and assuming the same for Z for simplicity): 10 units * $40 for X = $400 and 10 units * $62.50 for Z = $625, totalling $1,025. Therefore, the consumer now requires an income of $1,025 to afford the same quantity of goods at the new prices. The rate of inflation is a measure of the overall increase in prices over a given period. While this example does not provide sufficient data to calculate a broad rate of inflation, the significant price change in goods X and Z demonstrates individual price inflation and deflation respectively. Given the new prices, it is indeed possible for our consumer to buy the original bundle of goods due to the decreased price of X, despite the increased price of Z, especially since the total new required income ($1,025) is less than the original income ($1,500).
In 2010, the co-chairmen of President Obama’s deficit reduction commission proposed curtailing or eliminating many tax deductions such as the one for mortgage interest. Economists who favor the proposal argue that it would (i) correct a misallocation of resources because too much of the economy’s capital stock is tied up in residential housing and too little is invested in corporate capital. (ii) cut both spending and taxes. (iii) encourage private philanthropy.
Answer:
(i) correct a misallocation of resources because too much of the economy’s capital stock is tied up in residential housing and too little is invested in corporate capital.
Explanation:
Among the options, the only one that makes sense is the first one. Cutting deductions from a sector - such as real estate - means that the government will be raising tax revenue - fiscal policy. In fact, historically the mortgage industry is a beneficiary of tax deductions.
The fiscal budget is limited and is allocated in sectors where the government deems it necessary. Therefore, withdrawing the tax deduction of the mortgage industry is a way of reallocating these resources to other areas, such as to stimulate some productive sector of the private sector.
Companies that manufacture identical items through a series of uniform production steps use ________ to determine the cost per unit produced. a) a job order costing system b) a process costing system c) both of these systems d) neither of these systems
Companies that manufacture identical items through a series of uniform production steps use to determine the cost per unit produced a process costing system.- b)
Companies that manufacture identical items through a series of uniform production steps use to determine the cost per unitproduced a process costing system.
The following information is from the records of Mountainview Camera Shop: Accounts receivable, December 31, 2018 $80,000 (debit) Net credit sales for 2018 160,000 Accounts written off as uncollectible during 2018 16,000 Cash sales during 2018 42,000 The company uses the direct writeminusoff method for bad debts. What is the amount of bad debts expense?
Answer:
The amount of bad debts expense is $16,000
Explanation:
Bad debt : The Bad debt is that amount in which the chances of payment receive is very less. Thus, the bad debt amount is deducted in the balance sheet under debtors account and also it is shown in Profit and loss Account in debit side.
Under direct write minus off method for bad debts, the bad debt amount is recognized irrespective of whatever information is given.
Since in the question, the non-collectible amount is given which is $16,000.
So, the amount of bad debts expense is $16,000
Bradford Services Inc. (BSI) is considering a project that has a cost of $10 million and an expected life of 3 years. There is a 30 percent probability of good conditions, in which case the project will provide a cash flow of $9 million at the end of each year for 3 years. There is a 40 percent probability of medium conditions, in which case the annual cash flows will be $4 million, and there is a 30 percent probability of bad conditions and a cash flow of $1 million per year. BSI uses a 12 percent cost of capital to evaluate projects like this. Find the project's expected cash flows and NPV.
The project's expected cash flows are $4.6 million and its NPV is $3.80 million.
Explanation:To calculate the project's expected cash flows, we need to calculate the expected cash flow for each condition and then multiply it by the probability of that condition occurring. For the good conditions, the cash flow is $9 million for 3 years, so the expected cash flow is $9 million times 0.30, which equals $2.7 million. For the medium conditions, the cash flow is $4 million for 3 years, so the expected cash flow is $4 million times 0.40, which equals $1.6 million. For the bad conditions, the cash flow is $1 million for 3 years, so the expected cash flow is $1 million times 0.30, which equals $0.3 million. Adding up these expected cash flows, we get $2.7 million + $1.6 million + $0.3 million = $4.6 million.
To calculate the project's NPV (Net Present Value), we need to discount the expected cash flows back to their present value. Using a 12% cost of capital, we can discount each year's cash flow individually. The present value of $2.7 million at a 12% discount rate for 3 years is $2.7 million / (1 + 0.12) + $2.7 million / (1 + 0.12)² + $2.7 million / (1 + 0.12)³ = $2.17 million. By the same calculation, the present value of $1.6 million is $1.43 million, and the present value of $0.3 million is $0.20 million. Adding up these present values, we get $2.17 million + $1.43 million + $0.20 million = $3.80 million. Therefore, the project's expected cash flows are $4.6 million and its NPV is $3.80 million.
Learn more about Expected cash flows and NPV here:https://brainly.com/question/29345754
#SPJ3
Which of the following activities are credits? The impact on accounts receivable from a $10 million collection from a customer. The impact on treasury stock from a company repurchasing $32 million in shares. The impact on inventory from a company recognizing $15 million in cost of goods sold expense. The impact on debt from a $15 million principal paydown.
Final answer:
Credits are recorded for the collection from a customer (decreasing Accounts Receivable) and the principal paydown on debt (decreasing liability). Both activities decrease respective accounts, which are naturally debit accounts, so a credit is used to record the decrease.
Explanation:
Among the given activities, the following represent credits: collection from a customer impacting accounts receivable and principal paydown impacting debt. Additionally, the repurchase of shares affects treasury stock but represents a debit rather than a credit. Recognizing cost of goods sold expense affects inventory and also results in a debit instead of a credit.
Explanation:
Collection from a Customer: When a company collects $10 million from a customer, this decreases Accounts Receivable (an asset) and increases Cash (another asset). The decrease in Accounts Receivable is credited because it reduces the asset account.
Principal Paydown: On payment of a $15 million loan principal, the liability account (Debt) decreases. Since liabilities have a credit balance, to reduce them, we debit the account and credit the Cash account to represent the outflow of cash.
A well-known conglomerate that manufactures a multitude of noncompeting consumer products instituted a corporatewide initiative to encourage the managers of its many divisions to share consumer demographic information. However, since the initiative was implemented, the CEO has noticed that less information is available than ever. Why do you think the CEO’s plan backfired?
Answer: Because of misperception by the managers.
Explanation: Every target group in case of business studies has many of its subsets and the managers of the conglomerate did not took this into consideration. They gave only the demographic information of consumers and failed to provide other relevant information necessary to support it.
The CEO's plan likely faltered because of cultural differences across divisions, increased management complexity and information overload problems, and a shift towards formalized information structures as the firm grew.
Explanation:It seems that the CEO's plan for encouraging the sharing of consumer demographic information backfired due to a combination of factors related to the complexities inherent in managing a large, diverse conglomerate. First, there's a challenge in synchronizing different business cultures. A manufacturer of consumer goods may have a vastly different culture from a tech startup, making it difficult to standardize the flow of information.
Furthermore, management complexity increases disproportionately as more layers of communication are added within a conglomerate. This often leads to information overload, where sharing becomes inefficient, and critical information fails to reach the intended recipients in a timely manner. Thus, the initiative may have inadvertently created a counterproductive environment where managers are less inclined to share information than before.
Lastly, as a firm grows and information about its products and financials becomes more widely available, managers may rely less on personal relationships and more on formal structures for sharing information. This shift can reduce the immediate perceived need to share information actively among divisions, especially if managers do not see a direct benefit to their specific operations.
Better Buy, Inc. has 7 units in inventory on December 31. The units were purchased in November for $160 each. The price lists from the suppliers indicate that the same items would now cost the company a total of $1,155. What would be the amount reported as Ending Merchandise Inventory on the balance sheet?
Answer:
$1,120
Explanation:
Ending Merchandise Inventory is value of closing inventory in hand, to be valued at lower of cost or net realizable value or replacement value
Here, cost of closing inventory = 7 units X $160 each = $1,120
Since current realizable/ replacement value = $1,155
Cost is less than realizable value, therefore cost will be considered.
Thus ending merchandise inventory will be valued at total of $1,120.
A bond with a coupon rate of 7% makes semiannual coupon payments on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The Wall Street Journal reports the ask price for the bond on January 30 at 100.125. What is the invoice price of the bond? The coupon period has 182 days.
To calculate the invoice price of a bond, you need to consider the ask price and the accrued interest. The accrued interest is calculated based on the coupon rate and the number of days since the last coupon payment. In this case, the invoice price is approximately $177.045.
Explanation:The invoice price of the bond can be calculated by using the formula:
where:
Ask Price is the quoted price of the bond, which is 100.125 in this case.Accrued Interest is the interest that has accumulated since the last coupon payment date, which is January 15 in this case.Since the coupon period has 182 days and the interest payments are made semiannually, the number of days since the last coupon payment can be calculated as 15 days + 182 days = 197 days.
Given that the coupon rate is 7%, the coupon payment can be calculated as 7% of the par value of the bond (which is typically $1,000). Therefore, the coupon payment is $70.
Substituting the values into the formula:
Solving for the accrued interest gives approximately $76.92.
Finally, substituting the values into the invoice price formula:
Calculating the sum gives the invoice price of approximately $177.045.
Learn more about Invoice price of a bond here:https://brainly.com/question/32006294
#SPJ12
The invoice price of the bond is calculated by adding the clean price ($1001.25) and the accrued interest ($2.88), resulting in approximately $1004.13.
To calculate the invoice price of the bond, we need to consider both the clean price and the accrued interest. The clean price, given as 100.125, is the price without accrued interest. Bonds with a coupon rate of 7% that pay semiannually will pay 3.5% every six months.
Step-by-Step Explanation:
Calculate the semiannual coupon payment: Face Value of Bond = $1000 (assuming standard face value)Semiannual Coupon Payment = 7%/2 * $1000 = $35Calculate the accrued interest up to January 30: Accrued Interest = (Number of Days Since Last Coupon Payment / Total Days in Period) * Semiannual Coupon PaymentNumber of Days Since Last Coupon Payment = 15 (from January 15 to January 30)Total Days in Period = 182Accrued Interest = (15 / 182) * $35 ≈ $2.88Add the accrued interest to the clean price to get the invoice price: Clean Price = 100.125% of Face Value = 1.00125 * $1000 = $1001.25Invoice Price = Clean Price + Accrued Interest = $1001.25 + $2.88 ≈ $1004.13Therefore, the invoice price of the bond on January 30 is approximately $1004.13.
Which of the following entries would record the application of overhead cost correctly? A. Manufacturing Overhead XXX Accounts Payable XXX B. Work in Process XXX Accounts Payable XXX C. Work in Process XXX Manufacturing Overhead XXX D. Manufacturing Overhead XXX Work in Process XXX
The right entry to record the application of overhead cost is 'C. Work in Process XXX Manufacturing Overhead XXX'. Overhead costs are encompassed in the cost of goods in progress, which is reflected in the 'Work in Process' account. The applied overhead cost lessens the balance in the 'Manufacturing Overhead' account and augments the 'Work in Process' account.
Explanation:The correct entry to record the application of overhead cost in accounting would be: C. Work in Process XXX Manufacturing Overhead XXX. This is because overhead costs are absorbed into the cost of goods that are in production, which is monitored under the Work in Process account. The Manufacturing Overhead is an account where indirect costs associated with manufacturing are accumulated. If we apply an overhead cost, it decreases the balance in the Manufacturing Overhead and increases the amount in Work in Process account, reflecting that overhead costs are being utilized in the production process.
Learn more about Overhead cost application here:https://brainly.com/question/32502155
#SPJ2
The correct entry to record the application of overhead cost is D. Manufacturing Overhead XXX to Work in Process XXX, representing the allocation of indirect costs to goods in production within a manufacturing accounting system.
When overhead costs are allocated to production, the Manufacturing Overhead account (which accumulates indirect manufacturing costs) is debited to reflect the actual costs incurred. These costs are then credited to the Work in Process account, increasing the cost of goods being manufactured. This entry does not involve Accounts Payable because the allocation is an internal process rather than an external transaction.
Variable Costing Marsich Company has the following information for February: Sales $490,000 Variable cost of goods sold 220,500 Fixed manufacturing costs 83,300 Variable selling and administrative expenses 53,900 Fixed selling and administrative expenses 34,300 Determine the following for Marsich Company for the month of February: a. Manufacturing margin $ b. Contribution margin $ c. Operating income
Answer:
a. Manufacturing margin = $269,500
b. Contribution margin = $436,100
c. Operating income = $318,500
Explanation:
The formula of Manufacturing margin , Contribution margin & operating income is shown below. Along with it, the computation is also made.
Manufacturing margin = Sales - Variable cost of goods sold
= $490,000 - $220,500
= $269,500
Contribution margin = Sales - Variable selling and administrative expenses
= $490,000 - $53,900
= $436,100
Operating income = Contribution margin - (Fixed manufacturing costs + Fixed selling and administrative expenses )
= 436,100 - $(83,300 + 34,300)
= $318,500
Thus, a. Manufacturing margin = $269,500
b. Contribution margin = $436,100
c. Operating income = $318,500
The manager at Vertical Wire Productions reported total sales revenue of $800,000. The variable expenses were $600,000, and there were $125,000 of total fixed expenses. Use the contribution margin shortcut formula to predict the breakeven point in dollars.
Answer:
[tex]BEP_{dollars} = 500,000 [/tex]
Explanation:
The first step will be get the contribtuion margin:
[tex]Sales\: Revenue - Variable \:Cost = Contribution \:Margin[/tex]
800,000 - 6000,000 = 200,000
This is the amount after variables cost used to pay the fixed cost and make a gain.
Second, we calcualte the contribution margin ratio
[tex]\frac{Contribution \:Margin}{Sales\: Revenue} = Contribution\: Margin\: Ratio[/tex]
200,000/800,000 = 0.25
Per dollar of sales 25 cents are available to pay the fixed cost.
Now, we calculate the break even point in dollars
[tex]\frac{Fixed\:Cost}{Contribution\: Margin \:Ratio} = Break\: Even\: Point_{dollars}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{125,000}{.025} = 500,000[/tex]
The statement of cash flows explains changes in a firm’s: A) Cash on hand and cash in the bank B) Cash and cash equivalents C) Cash, cash equivalents, and accounts receivable D) Working capital
Answer:
C Cash and cash equivalents
Explanation:
For Cash equivalent, you must understand that is less than 90 days short term-investment which must be readily for convertible to a known amount of cash and practically no risk, again, within 90 days
Source: IFRS IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows—identification of cash equivalents
The statement of cash flows details changes in a firm's Cash and cash equivalents (B). It lists cash inflows and outflows related to the company's operations and investment activities, but does not directly report on accounts receivable or working capital.
Explanation:The statement of cash flows explains changes in a firm’s B) Cash and cash equivalents. The statement of cash flows is a financial statement that provides aggregate data regarding all cash inflows a company receives from its ongoing operations and external investment sources, as well as all cash outflows that pay for business activities and investments during a given period. Changes in accounts receivable are reflected on the balance sheet and can influence the cash flow statement indirectly, but they are not included in the definition of cash and cash equivalents. The statement does not provide information directly on the firm's working capital, which includes current assets and current liabilities, other than cash and cash equivalents.
Learn more about Statement of Cash Flows here:https://brainly.com/question/32731828
#SPJ6
Dim Corporation purchased 1,000 bonds of Witt Corporation in 2015 for $790 per bond and classified the investment as securities available for sale. The value of these holdings was $272 per bond on December 31, 2016, and $404 on December 31, 2017. During 2018, Dim sold all of its Witt bonds at $490 per share. In its 2018 income statement, Dim would report:
Answer:
In the income statemnt for 2018
Gain on Sale of Bonds 86,000
Explanation:
This securities available for sale will be measurement at fair value, through profit and loss
2018 Beginning Valuation
1,000 bonds x 404 = 404,000
Value at sale
1,0000 x 490 = 490,000
Gain on Sale of Bonds 86,000
Unemployment occurs:
A. for a variety of reasons.B. regionally when businesses or factories close.C. nationally when a recession hits.D. All of these are true.
Answer:
option D) is correct
Explanation:
The reason for unemployment are variable and there can be many reasons for unemployment.
Unemployment results from closing of factories and business breakdown as many workers or the firm employers are rendered jobless with nothing to do.
When there is recession nationally, then unemployment rates increase as the nation or the economy suffers from a breakdown, and is not able to serve its people. Due to recession everything suffers as a result of economy contraction - GDP drops, income drops, retail, sales and hence employment, everything suffers.
Therefore, all the mentioned points are true
Daniel Corporation had net income for 2018 of $ 74 comma 000. Daniel had 12 comma 000 shares of common stock outstanding at the beginning of the year and 17 comma 000 shares of common stock outstanding at the end of the year. There were 12 comma 000 shares of preferred stock outstanding all year. During 2018, Daniel declared and paid preferred dividends of $ 25 comma 000. On December 31, 2018, the market price of Daniel's common stock is $ 46.00 per share and the market price of its preferred stock is $ 68.00 per share. What is Daniel's price/earnings ratio at December 31, 2018? (Round any intermediate calculations and your fin
Final answer:
Daniel Corporation's price/earnings ratio at the end of 2018 is calculated by dividing the market price of its common stock ($46.00) by its earnings per share ($3.38), which after subtracting preferred dividends and adjusting for the weighted average number of shares, results in a ratio of approximately 13.61.
Explanation:
To calculate Daniel Corporation's price/earnings ratio at the end of 2018, we begin with its net income for the year, which is $74,000. Preferred dividends are then subtracted from this amount since they are not available to common shareholders. Daniel Corporation paid $25,000 in preferred dividends, leaving $74,000 - $25,000 = $49,000 for the common shareholders.
We then use the weighted average number of common shares outstanding to determine the earnings per share (EPS). Since the company had 12,000 shares at the beginning of the year and 17,000 at the end, we calculate the weighted average as follows: (12,000 shares for 1/2 year) + (17,000 shares for 1/2 year) = 6,000 + 8,500 = 14,500 weighted average shares.
Next, we divide the adjusted net income by the weighted average shares to get the EPS: $49,000 / 14,500 shares = approximately $3.38 EPS. The market price of common stock is given as $46.00 per share. Therefore, the price/earnings ratio is $46.00 / $3.38 = approximately 13.61.
Final answer:
Daniel Corporation's price/earnings ratio at December 31, 2018, can be found by dividing the market price per share ($46.00) by the earnings per share ($3.38), resulting in a P/E ratio of approximately 13.61.
Explanation:
The price/earnings ratio, or P/E ratio, is calculated by dividing the market price per share by the earnings per share (EPS). In Daniel Corporation’s case, the EPS is the net income minus preferred dividends, divided by the weighted average of outstanding shares during the year. To compute the weighted average, you would consider that 12,000 shares were outstanding for the whole year and an additional 5,000 shares ((17,000 - 12,000) for a part of the year).
To calculate the P/E ratio, first, we find the EPS for common stockholders. This is calculated by subtracting the $25,000 in preferred dividends from the $74,000 net income to get $49,000. Next, we need to determine the weighted average shares. If we assume that the additional 5,000 shares were outstanding for half the year, the calculation would be (12,000 shares × 12 months + 5,000 shares × 6 months) / 12 months, which equals 14,500 shares. Therefore, the EPS is $49,000 / 14,500 shares = $3.38 per share.
Finally, the P/E ratio is the closing market price divided by the EPS: $46.00 per share / $3.38 per share = approximately 13.61. Therefore, Daniel’s price/earnings ratio at December 31, 2018, would be 13.61, assuming a rounding to two decimal places.