what are the sagons best known for?

Answer:

Sundiata Keita

Explanation:

Option D) Sundiata Keita  was the founder and Uniter of the Mali Empire.

Sundiata Keita was the founder of the Mali Empire in West Africa. He ruled from 1235 to 1255 AD, establishing the Mali Empire as the dominant force in the region.

Sundiata was born around 1217 AD. His mother, Sogoron, was the second wife of King Magan of Mali. Growing up, Sundiata was ridiculed as crippled. He was too weak to walk. However, King Magan loved and protected Sundiata. This made the king's first wife, Sassma, jealous of Sundiata and his mother. She wanted to make her son Touman king one day.

                 When Sundiata was three years old, the king died. Sundiata's brother-in-law, Touman, became king. Touman treated Sundiata badly, made fun of him, and constantly chose him.

When Sundiata was a child, Mali was a fairly small kingdom. When he was a child, Soso conquered Mali and took control. Sundiata became a prisoner of Soso and lived with the leader of Soso.

Learn more about Sundiata Keita here: https://brainly.com/question/17193632

#SPJ2

Wouldn't it be all of them? They can all come into use at some point

The Emancipation Proclamation was issued by President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863, as the country was approaching its third year of a deadly civil war.

The declaration said "that all persons held as slaves" in the rebelling states "are, and henceforward shall be free." The North did not prioritize the abolition of slavery until the Civil War had already lasted a full year.

Despite a vociferous anti-slavery campaign in the North, a large majority of people—particularly a large number of soldiers—opposed slavery but opposed emancipation. They anticipated that slavery would eventually end on its own.

Learn more about emancipation here:

https://brainly.com/question/13741805

#SPJ2

Final answer:

Emancipation in the North was carried out through state constitutional bans, legal actions, and laws for gradual emancipation beginning in the 1770s and culminating with Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. However, even after emancipation, the free black community faced discrimination and prejudice.

Explanation:

The emancipation of slaves in the North was a gradual and complex process, influenced by ideological shifts and economic needs. Initially, the revolutionary spirit of the late 18th century, which emphasized freedom and liberty, pushed Northern states to address the contradiction of slavery within their territories. States such as Pennsylvania and Vermont began the movement by including bans on slavery in their state constitutions in the 1770s. Following this, Massachusetts and New Hampshire significantly reduced slavery through court actions, demonstrating a commitment to this ideological shift.

Gradual emancipation laws were then passed in Connecticut and Rhode Island in the early 1780s, with states like New York and New Jersey implementing similar laws by the late 1790s. The Emancipation Proclamation later became a pivotal moment in the fight against slavery, with President Abraham Lincoln declaring all slaves in Confederate states to be free from January 1, 1863. However, this did not immediately apply to the loyal Border States or the new territories. While the proclamation was met with a mix of reactions, it undeniably marked a turning point in the road to full emancipation.

Despite these changes, freed slaves faced continuous prejudice and discrimination in the North. Opposition to slavery was not always driven by moral considerations but also by economic interests and racial biases. For the slaves and free black community, emancipation in the North was only the beginning of a long and challenging path towards equality and true freedom.

Democrats supported government regulation of monopolies, bimetallism, and liberal economic polices to support unskilled workers and farmers.

Democrats in the 1896 election created a coalition with the Populist Party. This move brought the fragmented and less powerful groups of the US together to fight against the Republican Party. William Jennings Bryan led the Democratic Party and was the presidential candidate for the party in 1896.

Despite the overwhelming support from many segments of society, the Democratic Party was over run by the money of the Republican Party. McKinley had the financial backing of the corporate tycoons such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Morgan. The election demonstrated a clear split in the US between northern and far west states supporting Republicans and the South and Plain states supporting Democrats.

In the 1896 presidential election, the Democrats endorsed several key issues. They focused on the following points:

Free Silver: The Democratic Party supported the free coinage of silver at a ratio of 16:1 with gold. This policy was intended to increase the money supply and aid farmers and working-class Americans who were struggling with debt.

Opposition to the Gold Standard: They were against the gold standard, which they believed benefited the wealthy and big business interests at the expense of the common people.

Populist Policies: The Democrats adopted many of the Populist Party's ideas. These included policies aimed at helping farmers and laborers, such as government control of the railroads and other utilities to prevent exploitation by monopolies.

Income Tax: They called for a graduated income tax to ensure that the wealthy paid their fair share of taxes.

Labor Rights: The party supported workers' rights, including the enforcement of the eight-hour workday.

Opposition to Trusts and Monopolies: They sought to break up trusts and monopolies that they believed were stifling competition and exploiting consumers and workers.

These issues were part of their broader platform aimed at addressing economic inequality and protecting the interests of the common man.

The answer is Check for style and tone.

Hope this helps!

The second alternative is correct (B).

Alternatives (A), (C) and (D) are essential in an argumentative essay.

The author needs to have a clear and objective argument that is evidence-based and project completion must be striking.

However, the exercise asks about the review process, which is the time to make sure that the style and the argumentative tone are framed with the evidence and the conclusion, that is, it is a verification of the harmony of the argumentative essay.

Hi, the correct answer is B

Your Answer would be

The Euro is the currency used by 27 countries and is a dominant currency in foreign exchange markets, second to the U.S. dollar.So,option B is correct.

Twenty-seven countries use the Euro as their currency. The Euro is one of the most commonly traded currencies on the foreign exchange markets, being second only to the U.S. dollar in terms of volume. The global economy sees a wide variety of currencies for international economic transactions, with individuals and firms often needing to convert from one currency to another for travel, business, or trade purposes.

Chief of State, Chief Executive, Chief Diplomat, Commander-In-Chief, Legislative Leader, Chief of Party, Guardian of the Economy.

Commander-In-Chief would give a lot of power since it would allow the president to start war with practically any country.

The president has equal power to the other branches of the government. Every decision goes through the government branches and each one has equal say. They are always balanced in power.

Maybe Chief Administrator and Chief Diplomat would come into conflict debating foreign policy regarding federal government’s jurisdiction. Implications? They may not be at odds with each other exactly, but in some way it is very possible.

The president plays seven roles, with the role of Chief Executive giving them the most power. The appropriate balance of presidential power is subjective and depends on various factors. Conflicts between roles can arise, requiring the president to navigate their responsibilities carefully.

The seven roles that the president plays include:

The role that gives the president the most power is the role of Chief Executive. This role allows the president to enforce laws, manage the executive branch, and make important decisions.

Whether the president of the United States has too much power, just the right amount of power, or too little power is a subjective question. It depends on individual perspectives and beliefs. However, one must consider the checks and balances system, the role of Congress, and the constraints of the Constitution in determining the appropriate balance of presidential power.

An example where roles could be at odds is when the president acts as Chief Legislator, proposing and advocating for new policies, while also serving as Chief Diplomat to negotiate treaties and agreements with other countries. This could create tension if the proposed policies conflict with the goals of the diplomatic negotiations.

The implications of such conflicts between roles are that the president must carefully navigate and prioritize their responsibilities to ensure effective governance and avoid conflicts of interest or contradictory actions.

https://brainly.com/question/34824563

#SPJ6

During the Middle Ages, almost all philosophers used to write in Latin- the language of educated and elite class while as Dante wrote his best poem Divine Comedy in vernacular, Italian language-the language of common people.

Dante's decision to write in Italian had a long lasting impact on Italian language. It paved the way for Italian to emerge as a language respect across the European landscape. There were more innovations in this language and more and more people began to write in Italian and ultimately Italian became a cultured and literary language. It is due to the impact of his writing in Italian, he is being called father of modern Italian language.

The correct answer is - A. Romans adopted Greek gods but gave them new names.

The Romans and the Greeks interacted for a long time. The Greeks developed as a civilization earlier than them, so it was natural for the Romans to adopt some traits of a civilization that was more advanced and they were familiar with. They did this with the gods. The Romans adopted the Greek gods, and even though they kept their characteristics, they decided to change their names, so there was a situation where both civilization had the total same gods, but they had different names for them. One of the many examples is the Greek goddess Aphrodite, which the Romans named as Venus.

Answer:

Romans adopted Greek gods but gave them new names

Explanation:

took the test

Taxes were the main cause for the French Revolution. France government taxation regime was excessive and unfair. They had to pay direct taxes, indirect taxes but nobility and clergy were exempt from direct taxes. However, they did not think that no one should pay taxes, taxes had to be collected for the common welfare but they were to be taxed fairly and spent rationally.

Another important cause for the Revolution was that Royalty seemed to enjoy some innate rights while commoners’ were neglected. With the revolution, the idea that there were natural undeniable rights to all human beings such as liberty and, property came forth. The idea that rights should be written in a Constitution was set forth during the French Revolution. People did not feel represented by government but the opposite, they felt exploited and that gave place to the Revolution too.  

how the other lives, i believe

The Constitution of the United States stablishes three different branches of power in a federal government.

Article 1 of the United States Constitution stablishes the Legislative Branch. That is the Congress, which is responsible for creating laws.

Article 2 of the United States Constitution establishes the Executive Branch, the President, that is in charge of approve and carry out the laws.

Article 3 of the United States Constitution establishes the Judicial Branch, which consists of the United States Supreme Court. This is the one that interprets the laws passed by the Legislative Branch.

Francisco Pizarro (1478-1571) was an Spanish colonizer that conquered the Inca Empire, in the current territory of Peru, after killing their emperor Atahualpa and the Inca lands were put under the control of the Spanish Empire.

After that he was named the governor of the Governorate of New Castile.

The answer is: The Peruvians, more specifically, The Incas.

In 1532 he managed to defeat the Incas, their leader being at the time Atahualpa, and conquer Peru, where three years later he founded the new capital city of Lima.

Hope this helps!

Answers:

2. the use of armed forces to spread communism

3. the threat of a communist invasion of Taiwan (Formosa)

4. North Korea’s defiance of UN orders

5. the potential for instability in the Pacific area

Truman was concerned about the events on the Korean Peninsula due to the use of subversive tactics to spread communism, the threat it posed to Taiwan, the defiance of UN resolutions by North Korea, and the overall potential for instability in the Pacific.

President Truman had several concerns regarding the events on the Korean Peninsula. Firstly, the communists' use of subversive tactics was alarming, as it suggested a strategy to expand Communist influence underhandly. Secondly, the use of armed forces to spread communism, demonstrated by the North Korean invasion of South Korea, posed a direct challenge to international peace and the containment policy. Thirdly, the threat of a communist invasion of Taiwan (Formosa) was a significant concern for US foreign policy in Asia. The potential for instability in the Pacific area worried Truman as it could lead to wider conflicts and undermine the security of critical regions like Japan. Lastly, North Korea's defiance of UN orders reflected a disregard for international norms and heightened the potential for conflict.

That they would not stop until they made up a new Constitution.

Hope this helps! Brainliest is always appreciated!

The weapons and battle tactics used by both sides during the Revolutionary War were consistent with those used by European armies for the previous 15 or so years. Both sides used similar weapons and fought using similar tactics.

fifth is your correct

well no because we dont know what the systems are so tell me the systems and i can answer your question

Answer:

Both gerrymandering and the pork barrel systems are not fair in a country that considers itself to be fully democratic.

Everything execpt F. Hope i helped

All of it except for F.

Thats what I think 2

A president or other officers can be impeached for  Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. Hope it helped

A president or other officials can be impeached for 'high crimes and misdemeanors', which broadly refers to serious misconduct. Impeachment requires a majority in the House of Representatives and a two-thirds majority in the Senate. Upon conviction, the impeached official may be barred from future office and may still be subject to further legal consequences.

A president or other officers can be impeached for what the Constitution describes as 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. This terminology refers essentially to serious misconduct by a government official. However, the specific definition of what constitutes such 'high crimes and misdemeanors' is often subjected to political interpretation.

Impeachment is a two-tiered process that involves both chambers of the U.S. Congress. The House of Representatives has the sole power of impeachment. If they decide to impeach, they are essentially bringing formal charges against the official. The official is then tried in the Senate, with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding over the trial. For a conviction, a two-thirds majority in the Senate is necessary.

There have been a few historical instances of impeachment in U.S. history, but removal from office remains a rare event indeed. Upon conviction and removal, the impeached official may be disqualified from holding future office and still be liable for indictment, trial, and punishment according to the law.

https://brainly.com/question/1411922

#SPJ2

During the bonus army 1932, around 43,000 ex-soldiers marched together to Washington D.C in order to obtain compensation that was promised to them for their service during the wars.

Answer:

More Americans joined the Bonus Army.

The social stratification of Muslims was not so rigid in early medieval period. The Quran  repeatedly advocates the concept of an egalitarian society. The social mobility of Muslims in early medieval period was one of the reasons which helped Muslims to establish their empires allover the world and spread the teachings of Islam.

One example of social mobility in Muslim society  in the eighth and early ninth centuries was that the slaves- the bottom class of society could rose to higher ranks in administration. We see during this period there were so many slaves who were great military generals and ministers. They rose to the position of governors of provinces as well. It were the khurasan slaves who helped the Abassids to establish such a great empire. The Muslim rulers even married their daughters to these slaves who later became the emperor of Muslim kingdoms as well.

Social mobility in Muslim society in the eighth and ninth centuries was demonstrated through the conversion of non-Muslims to improve their social standing and chances for upward mobility.

Social mobility in Muslim society in the eighth and ninth centuries can be observed through examples such as the conversion of non-Muslims to improve their social standing and chances for upward mobility. Merchants often converted to Islam to gain access to Islamic trading networks and potential business partners. Non-Muslim men seeking to marry Muslim women were required to convert, providing them with better social connections. These examples highlight how individuals would change their religious affiliation to increase their social mobility within Muslim society during that time period.

The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico.

hope this helps!

The great plains are the largest desert area in the Texas region. Thus, option A is correct.

A desert is a barren land covered in sand that usually has a very high temperature during the day and extremely child temperature at the night, they usually have a scarcity of water and receive a low magnitude of precipitation.

There are four types of deserts:

The Great Plains, sometimes known as the Great American Desert, cover a large part of the western part of Texas in a wide, flat, elevated plain covered in thick layers of sediment material.

They are also one of the largest parts of South Central in America. They are a key producer of agriculture and farm animal. Therefore, option A is the correct option.

Learn more about desert, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2770261

#SPJ6

Between 1820 and 1840 there was a huge growth in immigration. With higher population the demand of homes, jobs and basic necessities also grew causing an out demand of these supplies, making these people to go homeless.

The jobs available for this (pronounced) amount of people paid very small salaries, making the people to become poor. The year 1843 came with the birth of the New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor, which aimed to help people in these conditions.  The Randall’s Island Nursery was very famous. It provided the children with food, water and where to live. These children were mainly orphaned and abandoned by parents who couldn’t afford to provide their children with a better life. The homeless also were assisted by social programs such as asylums. Charles Loring Brace was of huge importance in this and in the creation of the Children’s Aid Society. In the 1870’s a pronounced economic depression hugely affected the society (with the most vulnerable facing the worst part) causing the people to lost homes and jobs. Many families were assisted by the Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor in the years 1873 and 1874.

The second half of 1800, however, was also a period of expansion, population growth and economic prosperity for many. Industrialization and unrestrained capitalism were key factors for American Society’s development. Private Capital and investment shaped economic growth (the low government restrictions were very important for this) and big industries, banks, and corporations were built.  Investors such as John D. Rockefeller (oil), John Jacob Astor (real estate) and J.P Morgan (banking) were key figures of growth in stock market.

The correct options are a, c and d. To evaluate a source's relevance, consider bias, main idea, and author's background.

When evaluating the relevance and importance of a source, your friend should consider the following

a Bias: Evaluating bias helps identify subjective influences that may impact the source's objectivity and credibility, crucial for assessing its relevance.

c Main Idea: Understanding the main idea provides insight into the source's central argument or perspective, aiding in determining its relevance to the topic.

d Author's Background: Examining the author's background offers insights into their expertise, credibility, and potential biases, aiding in assessing the source's relevance and importance.

The incorrect option is B. Assessing generalizations determines the breadth of information presented rather than its relevance to the topic, which is crucial for evaluating its importance. This option may not directly impact the source's relevance or importance to the topic.

The complete question is

Your friend asks for your help examining research documents. You tell your friend it is necessary to determine the relevance and importance of a source to the topic. What should your friend evaluate in each source to begin this process?

A. bias

B. generalizations

C. main idea

D. author’s background

The Stanford Prison Experiment was terminated early due to severe ethical issues and the emotional distress of participants, with prisoners exhibiting severe stress and guards engaging in sadistic behavior. The experiment underscored how powerful assigned roles and situational factors can become, influencing individual behavior.

Why the Stanford Prison Experiment Was Stopped Early

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study involving students from Stanford University. This experiment was designed to observe the behavioral effects of prisoners and guards in a mock prison environment. However, the experiment was halted abruptly after six days due to severe ethical concerns and emotional breakdowns of the participants.

Participants were assigned to play the roles of either prisoners or guards in a mock prison created in the basement of the psychology building at Stanford. The prisoners started exhibiting signs of extreme stress, anxiety, and hopelessness, while the guards began to show increasingly sadistic behavior. Phillip Zimbardo, the leading professor and designer of the study, also realized he had become too absorbed in his role as the prison superintendent, which compromised his objectivity as a researcher.

The 'good' guards did not object to the abusive behavior of other guards, as they felt helpless to intervene, and the group dynamics and allocated roles led to a discouraging environment for resistance. Contrary to appearing weak, student prisoners were essentially trapped in a powerful situational force that pressured conformity and submission, and they began tolerating guards' abuse. This dynamic exemplified how societal roles and situational pressures can influence individuals' behavior profoundly.

Zimbardo himself acknowledged the need to terminate the experiment early: 'We had created an overwhelmingly powerful situation...in which some of the guards were behaving sadistically.' This experiment remains a historical example of the potential ethical issues and psychological impacts of role-playing studies.

Final answer:

The Stanford prison experiment was halted after six days due to extreme and abusive behavior by guards, severe emotional distress among prisoners, and loss of objectivity by the lead researcher, Philip Zimbardo.

Explanation:

The Stanford prison experiment was stopped after only a few days because the simulated prison environment had a profoundly negative impact on all participants. Both 'prisoners' and 'guards' took their roles to extremes, with the guards exhibiting abusive and authoritarian behavior, while the prisoners showed signs of severe emotional distress. The 'good' guards did not stop the abuse, as they seemed to feel powerless within the established dynamic. The architect of the study, Philip Zimbardo, became engrossed in his role as the prison superintendent, compromising his professional objectivity. Recognizing the harmful effects and unethical nature of the events unfolding, the decision was made to terminate the experiment after only six days, despite the original plan for it to last two weeks.