What drew people to live in cities during the Industrial Revolution?

Some critics argue that the Miranda rule 'puts criminals back on the street' because it can result in the dismissal of evidence obtained without proper advisement of rights, potentially allowing guilty individuals to avoid conviction.

The Miranda ruling requires law enforcement to inform suspects of their rights before questioning. This procedural safeguard aims to protect against self-incrimination and abuse during interrogations.

If law enforcement fails to provide the Miranda warnings, any statements made by the suspect may be excluded from evidence. This exclusionary rule can weaken the prosecution's case, sometimes leading to the release of suspects due to insufficient admissible evidence.

Critics believe this rule occasionally results in guilty individuals evading justice because critical evidence obtained without proper warnings is inadmissible in court. They argue this compromises public safety and undermines the effectiveness of law enforcement.

However, the Miranda rule also ensures that confessions are given voluntarily and safeguards individual rights, crucial in a balanced legal system.

Answer:

b. It is a series of islands

Explanation:

The fact that Japan consists of a series of islands is the main factor why the country has remained in relative isolation. Although Japan had some early contact with the cultures of China and Korea, this contact was very limited, and for much of its history, Japan remained quite isolated. When the West wanted to establish trade with the nation, Japan was originally quite reluctant. However, Japan was eventually forced to open its borders and engage in international trade during the 19th century.

Final answer:

Hyperbole is an exaggeration used for emphasis or effect within figurative language, not meant to be taken literally, such as William Wordsworth describing 'ten thousand' daffodils to indicate their plentifulness.

Explanation:

Hyperbole is a figurative language technique that involves exaggeration for the purpose of emphasis or rhetorical effect. It is not meant to be taken literally, but instead, to create a striking impression and convey strong emotions or create a dramatic effect. For example, when an author says, "I was so embarrassed I could have vanished into thin air," they do not literally mean they could disappear, but are emphasizing the discomfort felt. Hyperbole is commonly used in poetry and prose to add color and depth to the language.

Examples of Hyperbole

One literary example is by William Wordsworth in I wandered lonely as a cloud, where he describes seeing "ten thousand" daffodils, likely not an actual count but an exaggeration to illustrate their vast number. Another instance is the common expression "I'm so hungry I could eat a horse," which emphasizes extreme hunger rather than an actual intention to consume such a large animal.

Answer:

d. Ronald Reagan

Explanation:

Ronald Reagan was the U.S. president who ushered in the tax revolt and the deregulation of many government policies in the 1980s. Reagan was elected president in 1980 and 1984. His domestic policy was focused on lowering taxes to stimulate growth, implementing a monetary policy that was anti-inflationary, deregulating the economy and reducing government spending. He was also strongly anti-communist.

The executive branch is composed of the executive office of the president, the executive departments, and independent agencies.

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Answer:

He co-founded and edited a universal encyclopedia titled Encyclopédie

Explanation:

Diderot co-founded and edited an enormous project. This was a universal encyclopedia, with entries on science, the arts, government, religion, and philosophy. The Encyclopédie, as it was known in French, took more than 20 years to produce. When it was finished, in 1772, it contained 28 volumes, 75,000 entries, and about 20 million words. The Encyclopédie was the Enlightenment forerunner of the Encyclopedia Britannica and of today's Wikipedia.

Answer:

b) Its local governments cannot be abolished by the central government

Explanation:

In a federation what usually happened is that several different states realized that they were stronger together, like the 13 colonies, that saw an opportunity that by uniting they could grew stronger and defend themselves from future invasions and attacks, but prior to their union they already had a government and local governments so they all keep their governments and local administration while creating a new government above all of them with global jurisdiction but not unlimited power, in a unitary system all obbey a single unit so they unit appoint and abolishes new local governmment that are actually just branches of the unitary government, like in United Kingdom where Ireland and Wales have their own government but have only the powers that the British parliment is willing to give them.

Answer:

b) Its local governments cannot be abolished by the central government.

Explanation:

Both federal and unitary systems of government have small, local governments that work in conjunction with the federal government. These local governments also carry out duties that the central government cannot adress. However, the relationship between these different levels of government is different in each system. In a federal system, local governments enjoy more independence than in a unitary one. Moreover, in a federal system, the local governments cannot be abolished by the central government.

Answer:

The fear of foreigners increased the stereotypes and created an urgency to resolve the case as fast as possible, only considering the ethnic background of the accused, and supporting the idea that because of this cultural and political background inherited from their country, they were automatically guilted.

Explanation:

The Sacco and Vanzetti prosecution and the outcomes of this trial are considered one of the most controversial in America History. Because of the fear of the anarchism which became strong and popular in Europe in the 1920s, many Americans began to fear foreigners, especially the ones from Italy, Germany, and Eastern Europe (Russia). Not only the anarchism but the communism which was spreading across Europe fastly with the victory of the Bolsheviks in Russia. Sacco and Vanzetti were Italians, and one way or another, they were aligned with these political views, especially the anarchism, but during their trial, the cultural and ethnical background was more considered, falling on stereotypes and preconceptions ideas.

There are some similarities between the events surrounding the annexation of Hawaii and the ways that Texas and California came into the Union, but there are also some significant differences.

In all three cases, there was a significant power imbalance between the United States and the region in question. In the case of Hawaii, the United States had  significant economic and political influence over the islands, and many American business interests were invested in the region. Similarly, in Texas and California, American settlers had established a significant presence and were pushing for annexation.

However, there are also some key differences. In the case of Texas and California, there was at least some level of consent from the local population.

In Texas, there was a movement for independence from Mexico, and the annexation by the United States was seen as a way to achieve that goal. In California, the population was more diverse, but there was still a sense that joining the United States was preferable to remaining under Mexican rule.

In contrast, the annexation of Hawaii was far more contentious. Many Hawaiians opposed the takeover, and there was significant resistance to American influence on the islands. The eventual annexation was accomplished through a combination of American military force and political maneuvering.

Overall, while there are some similarities between these events, the annexation of Hawaii was far more controversial and marked by more significant resistance from the local population than the annexation of Texas and California.

Learn more about revolt here

https://brainly.com/question/1132765

#SPJ2

Strikes often grew violent.

Striking workers often lost their jobs.

Strikes were often opposed by the public.

Striking workers could be injured or killed.

Strikes did not always work.

Strikes hurt union goals by:

Strikes are one of the tools that trade unions in the 1800s used to get their needs met and their voice heard. But sometimes, these strikes could be counter productive.

Some of the disadvantages of these strikes were:

Leads to acts of violence:

Sometimes these trade union strikes start off peacefully in the form of peaceful protests. But a few elements could do something that might lead to violence and destruction. When this happens properties and lives are destroyed.

By leading to job losses:

Some employers may decide to give out the jobs of those that are on strike. By the time the strike is over their position has been filled by someone else.

read more on https://brainly.com/question/2924493

Answer choice are:

A wreath

A blade of grass

A maple leaf

A daisy

Correct answer choice is:

A maple leaf.

Guinness Canada has created a elementary, if not directly noticeable, mistake with its OOH ads promoting St Patrick’s Day. The four leaf herb on the opposite hand represents good luck, however isn’t coupled with the festival.

Answer: B

Explanation:

Britain entered World War I primarily due to Germany's invasion of neutral Belgium. This violated the terms of Belgium's neutrality and invoked Britain's treaty obligation to protect Belgium, hence causing Britain's official entry into the war.

The main reason that Britain entered World War I was because Germany invaded neutral Belgium. In the early 20th century, Europe was divided and governed by a series of alliances and treaties to maintain balance. Britain was part of an alliance known as the Triple Entente, along with France and Russia, and had commitments to protect smaller nations, including Belgium. When a Bosnian Serb assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary in June 1914, it caused a series of alliances and treaties to activate, resulting in multiple nations entering the war. Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, drawing in Russia and subsequently Germany, Austria-Hungary's ally. Germany's invasion of Belgium, however, was a clear violation of Belgium's neutrality, which invoked Britain's treaty obligation to protect Belgium, prompting Britain's official entry into the war on August 4, 1914.

https://brainly.com/question/19783353

#SPJ6

Teddy Roosevelt, also known as Theodore Roosevelt, was actually the uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Teddy was born in 1858 and was the 26th President of the United States, serving from 1901 to 1909.

Franklin, on the other hand, was born in 1882 and served as the 32nd President of the United States, from 1933 until his death in 1945.

Despite the significant age difference between the two, Teddy and Franklin were related through their shared family lineage. Teddy was the younger brother of Franklin's father, James Roosevelt. This made Teddy Franklin's uncle and an influential figure in his life.

Although the two Roosevelts came from the same family, their political ideologies were quite different. Teddy was a Republican and believed in conservative policies, while Franklin was a Democrat who supported progressive policies. Nevertheless, both men made significant contributions to American history and left a lasting impact on the country's political landscape.

Learn more about Franklin Roosevelt here

https://brainly.com/question/13714244

#SPJ2

Final answer:

Fighting in Africa posed different challenges for American forces due to vast deserts, guerrilla tactics, and terrain harshness that impacted supply lines and mobility, unlike in Europe.

Explanation:

The landforms in Africa presented unique challenges for the American armed forces during combat, contrasting significantly with the fighting terrain in Europe. In Africa, vast deserts and a substantial coastline, along with the involvement of African soldiers and resistance from local peoples, made warfare complex. Unlike the more predictable warfare in Europe with established fronts, in Africa, the American armed forces had to contend with guerrilla tactics, desert warfare, and the vastness and harshness of the terrain which affected supply lines, mobility, and strategies.

The Ohio River Valley was a crucial factor in the French and Indian War as it was contended by both the French and British due to its value in trade and strategic location, leading to military confrontations and subsequent conflicts like Pontiac's War.

The Ohio River Valley was a significant factor in the French and Indian War because it was an area rich in resources and of strategic importance, claimed by both the French and the British. This region was the site of the initial conflicts of the war, sparked by the competing interests of British colonists and French forces, as well as native allies. When Virginia colonists, under leaders like George Washington, attempted to assert claims to the region, the French reinforced their position by building forts in the disputed territory. The subsequent struggle for control over the Ohio Valley escalated into the full-blown military conflict known as the French and Indian War.

After the war, the Ohio Valley continued to be a point of tension, most notably in Pontiac's War, where Native American tribes, dissatisfied with British policies post-war, resisted British control of the region. The underlying factor was the desire for control of the land, backed by economic motives such as the tobacco trade, and political aspirations of maintaining and expanding colonial empires.

The correct answer is the war powers resolution that occurred in the year 1973. This has not only intended to give congress a greater voice but has also allowed presidents to consult to congress before having to use military force, mandate or withdraw forces unless congress declares the war.

The result of the Spanish-American War is that "The United States gained territory in the Pacific Ocean."

This is evident after the war, where Spain lost much of its territory to the United States.

Some of these territories lost to the United States include the following:

Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines.

The Spanish-American war occurred between April to August 1898.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that a correct answer is an option. A. "The United States gained territory in the Pacific Ocean."

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/17869155

The influence of indigenous populations, notably the Mayan and Aztec civilizations, is evident in art and architecture that features a fusion of indigenous techniques and European influences. This blend can be found in sculptures, codices, and buildings that have absorbed and integrated the cultural legacy of these ancient civilizations.

The influence of indigenous populations such as the original Mayan and Aztec civilizations would most likely be seen in the works of artists and architects who integrate pre-Hispanic elements with European influences. These works would demonstrate a unique blend of culture and artistry, showcasing indigenous techniques and symbols alongside colonial styles. The Mayan and Aztec civilizations were particularly known for their complex stone sculptures, masks, and impressive architecture, which also included intricate written records like codices that preserved a wide range of knowledge from calendars to genealogical data. After the arrival of Europeans, particularly the Spanish, there was an era where indigenous art forms underwent a transformation, resulting in a distinct fusion that became emblematic of the New World's evolving cultural identity. During the post-conquest era, indigenous creators adopted European materials such as paper, and their work began to exhibit a mixture of indigenous and European influences, including imagery, glyphs, and language.

Answer,

B. Br'er Rabbit

Explanation,

Br'er Rabbit was somwhat of a trickster.  He succeeded through his wittiness rather than by his strength. Enslaved families would tell their children these stories to teach them their values when they were not working.

Hope This Helps :-)

Answer:

The Answer is B. Br'er Rabbit

Hope This Helps!

The answer is C.Progressivism

Answer:

C.Progressivism

Explanation:

Progressivism is a political tendency -not a definite ideology- where ideas considered "advanced" are defended, especially those oriented towards the development of a welfare state, the defense of civil rights and a certain redistribution of wealth. It is commonly considered that these currents agglutinate forces opposed to conservatism. In progressivism as a political subspectrum converge diverse philosophical, ethical and economic doctrines of liberalism and democratic socialism.