What is the correct way to write 1/4% as a decimal

The first plant produces 5x + 26 more items daily than the second​ plant

Given that , A company has two manufacturing plants  

The daily production levels of one company is 7x + 19 items  

And daily production levels of another company is 2 x - 7 items

To find the number of items first plant produce more than the second plant, wed need to subtract the number of items produced by second plant from the the number of items produced by first plant.

Extra items produced by 1st plant = daily production of 1st plant - daily production of 2nd plant

Extra items produced count = 7x + 19 – (2x – 7)

= 7x + 19 – 2x + 7  

= 7x – 2x + 19 + 7 = 5x + 26  

Hence, the 1st plant produces 5x + 26 items more than 2nd plant

Answer:

I believe the answer is false because there is no facts that say true.

Answer:

believe the answer is false because there is no facts that say true.

Step-by-step explanation:

The mistake he made was that he did not consider units of measurement while comparing the lengths

He has to convert the both quantities into the same unit to compare the lengths either centimeters to meters or meters to centimeters

Step-by-step explanation:

Length of desk  =  1 meter

Henry's name tag = 8 cm

Henry says that his name tag is 7 cm longer than the desk. The mistake he made was that he did not compare the units of both quantities. He just subtracted 1 from 8 and got 7. Meter is a larger unit and centimeter is a smaller unit. In order to compare the lengths of the desk and his name tag the units have to be same.

Hence

The mistake he made was that he did not consider units of measurement while comparing the lengths

He has to convert the both quantities into the same unit to compare the lengths either centimeters to meters or meters to centimeters

Keywords: Measurement

Learn more about measurement at:

#LearnwithBrainly

Final answer:

Henry mistakenly claimed his nametag was 7 centimeters longer than his desk due to a unit conversion error. His desk is 100 centimeters long, and his nametag is 8 centimeters long, making the nametag 92 centimeters shorter than the desk. The error is corrected by accurately comparing lengths in the same unit.

Explanation:

The question asks to identify the error Henry made in stating that his nametag is 7 centimeters longer than his desk and to explain how to correct it. Henry's desk is 1 meter long, which is equivalent to 100 centimeters, and his nametag is 8 centimeters long. The error Henry made is in the comparison of the lengths in different units and misunderstanding of the concept of length comparison. To correct this error, both lengths should be in the same unit, and then we compare or subtract to find the difference or relation.

The correct comparison is as follows:

Desk length in centimeters: 100 cm

Nametag length: 8 cm

So, rather than the nametag being 7 centimeters longer, it is 92 centimeters shorter than the desk. The correction is understanding unit conversion and accurately comparing lengths.

Answer:

x=26/5

Step-by-step explanation:

first you would multiply both sides by 2

then you woud end up with 6x- 14 = x+12

then combine like terms subtract x on both sides

5x=26 then divide both sides by 5

x=26/5

Tim ran a total of 3000 meters, which is three times the distance that Eric ran. By dividing Tim's distance by three, we find that Eric ran 1000 meters.

To solve for the distance Eric ran, we need to first determine the total distance Tim ran and then divide that by three as Tim's distance is three times longer than Eric's.

Tim's speed is 300 meters per minute, and he ran for 8 minutes before having 600 meters left to run. To calculate the distance Tim ran:

Therefore, the distance that Eric ran was 1000 meters.

There are 9240 possible ways in which a president, a secretary and a treasurer can be selected from the 22 members on the board of directors.

Give that the board of directors of a corporation must select a president a secretary and a treasurer.

Need to calculate in how many possible ways this can be accomplished if there are 22 members on the board of directors

Here we are assuming that one person can hold only one position means one if get selected for president he is out of the race for remaining positions that are secretary and treasure

Lets for sake of understanding, we simplify our question.

Lets say there are 3 members A , B and C  . In how many ways two positions of Secretary and  treasurer can be filled .  

So for selecting secretary  we have three option that are A , B or C.

And once secretary is selected , number of option for selecting treasure  is two.

So it is found that number of selecting 2 positions  for  3 members is product of option available for selecting first position that is secretary  multiplied by option available for selecting second position that is treasurer   = 3 x 2 = 6

So now applying same logic for selecting members for 3 positions  from 22 menbers  we get

For selecting president members available = 22

Once president is selected, then option available for selecting a Secretary = 21

And one secretary is also selected, then option available for selecting a treasure = 20

So number of ways in which three positions can be filled by 22 member = 22 x 21 x 20 = 9240

Hence there are 9240 possible ways in which a president , a secretary and a treasurer can be selected from the 22 members on the board of directors.

Answer:

Personal emails = 274 emails.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

Business and personal emails = 578

Therefore, there are two types of emails. Again, there are 30 fewer emails in personal emails.

The total number of emails after deducting the fewer personal emails = (578 - 30) = 548 emails.

Therefore, each type of email, according to the question = (548/2) = 274 emails

So, personal emails are 274. Business emails = (274 + 30) = 304 emails.

The problem involves setting up and solving an equation based on the information given: that the number of personal emails is 30 fewer than the number of business emails, and the total is 578. By doing this, we deduce that there are 274 personal emails.

The problem tells us that there is a total of 578 emails, both business and personal combined. Furthermore, we know that there are 30 fewer personal emails than business emails. We can use this information to create an equation and solve for the number of personal emails.

First, we can represent the number of business emails as 'x'. So, the number of personal emails would be 'x - 30'. The sum of the business and personal emails is 578, so our equation is x + (x - 30) = 578.

Solving this equation gives us: 2x - 30 = 578, 2x = 608 and finally x = 304. This is the number of business emails. To get the number of personal emails, you subtract 30 from the total business emails (as the question states). So, there are 304 - 30 = 274 personal emails.

https://brainly.com/question/14410653

#SPJ12

Answer:

a) $19,023.63

b) $19,046.02

c) $19,061.13

d) $19,068.74

Step-by-step explanation:

P = 15000

t = 6

r = 0.04

a) Compounded semiannually means 2 times per year, so n = 2.

A = 15000 (1 + 0.04/2)^(2×6)

A = 19023.63

b) Compounded quarterly means 4 times per year, so n = 4.

A = 15000 (1 + 0.04/4)^(4×6)

A = 19046.02

c) Compounded monthly means 12 times per year, so n = 12.

A = 15000 (1 + 0.04/12)^(12×6)

A = 19061.13

d) Compounded continuously means we use the continuous equation:

A = 15000 e^(0.04×6)

A = 19068.74

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) To find the household income of the top 4%, we can use the standard Normal distribution table or calculator to find the Z-score associated with the 96th percentile.

The Z-score corresponding to the 96th percentile is approximately 1.75. We can then use the Z-score formula to find the income value:

Z = (x - mean) / standard deviation

1.75 = (x - 69953) / 90000

x - 69953 = 1.75 * 90000

x - 69953 = 157500

x = 227453

Therefore, the household income of the top 4% is about $227,453.

b) The answer in part a should be taken with some caution as the Normal model assumes that the incomes follow a bell-shaped distribution, which may not be the case for all income distributions.

c) The Normal model may not be a good one for incomes because incomes often have a skewed distribution with a long tail to the right, meaning there are a small number of individuals with very high incomes that can greatly affect the mean and standard deviation. In addition, incomes may have outliers or gaps that are not well captured by a Normal distribution.

Answer: 8*5≥c  

sorry if wrong! Not my strong suit !

Final answer:

Scott spends at least $40 on candy if buying a minimum of 5 pounds at $8 per pound.

Explanation:

Scott buys candy at $8 per pound and will buy at least 5 pounds. Let's use c for the amount he will spend on candy. The possible amounts he will spend on candy can be expressed as:

5 pounds x $8/pound ≤ c would mean $40 ≤ c

Therefore, the inequality solved for c is $40 ≤ c.

Answer:

The Answer is [tex]\frac{3657}{1000} \ or \ 3.657[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]3\times1+\frac{6\times1}{10}+\frac{5\times1}{100}+\frac{7\times1}{1000}\\[/tex]

Now Solving Above using PEDMAS rule we get;

[tex]3+\frac{6}{10}+\frac{5}{100}+\frac{7}{1000}[/tex]

Now we will make take LCM we get;

[tex]\frac{3\times1000}{1000}+\frac{6\times100}{10\times100}+\frac{5\times10}{100\times10}+\frac{7\times1}{1000}\\\\\frac{3000}{1000}+\frac{600}{1000}+\frac{50}{1000}+\frac{7}{1000}\\\\\frac{3000+600+50+7}{1000}\\\\\frac{3657}{1000} \ or \ 3.657[/tex]

Hence the answer is  [tex]\frac{3657}{1000} \ or \ 3.657[/tex]

Add 6 on both sides, canceling out that -6

3x = 21

Divide both sides by 3 to isolate that variable and get your answer

x = 7.

Answer:

x=7

Step-by-step explanation:

3x-6+6=15+6

3x=21

3x/3=21/3

x=7

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes

First you add 7 to both sides b/c the 7 would be negative. Then your left with 6x=18. Then you divide both sides by 6 and get 3

Answer:

Yes 3 is a solution.

Step-by-step explanation:

6(3) - 7 = 11 6 times three equals 18 so then 18 minus 7 equals 11 so yes.

Answer: 40,320

Step-by-step explanation: Let's say that there is person A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H. and 8 chairs. For the first chair, 8 different people could potentially sit in it, making 8 different possibilities. No matter who sits there, the logic follows the next table. However, since one person is sitting in the first chair, there are 7 different possibilities about who would be sitting in the second chair. If you multiply the two together, there are 56 different possibilities just for the first and second chair. For the third chair, there are 6 different possibilities about whom could sit. Multiply 56*6 and you get 336 possibilities. Keep multiplying out and you get a grand total of 40,320 different arrangements!

Answer:

5040

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is (8 - 1)!

The reason is that the first person is fixed. Any place is the same as any other place. After that there are 7! choices for the next position.

Answer: 5040

Answer:

Total savings  = $63  +  12 ( m)  

: m  = number of driveways shoveled

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, the money earned for each road David shovels = $15

The number of driveway shoveled by David = 12

The total money saved  David has after he is done with his work = $243

Now, The number of money saved by shoving 12 driveways  

= 12 x ( Money earned by shoveling 1 driveway)

= 12 x ( $15) = $ 180

Total savings  = His previous savings  + Money earned from Shovel work

⇒  $243  =   His previous savings + $ 180

⇒ His previous savings = $243  - $180 = $63

Now, we can write his total savings as:

Total savings  = $63  + 12 ( m)  

: m  = number of driveways shoveled

Answer:

€960

Step-by-step explanation:

€800 + VAT at 20%

€800 + 20% of €800 =

= €800 + 20% * €800

= €800 + 0.2 * €800

= €800 + €160

= €960

Answer:

From fourth month onwards, the growth rate of [tex]f(x)[/tex] is greater than that of [tex]g(x)[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

The growth rates of both bank accounts are given as:

[tex]f(x)=3^x\\g(x)=5x+25[/tex]

Now, as per question, we need to find the value of 'x' when the value of [tex]f(x)>g(x)[/tex]. Or,

[tex]3^x>5x+25[/tex]

Now, we can do this by checking the values of 'x' by hit and trial method.

Let [tex]x=1[/tex]. The inequality becomes:

[tex]3^1>5(1)+25\\3>30(False)[/tex]

Let [tex]x=2[/tex]. The inequality becomes:

[tex]3^2>5(2)+25\\9>35(False)[/tex]

Let [tex]x=3[/tex]. The inequality becomes:

[tex]3^3>5(3)+25\\27>40(False)[/tex]

Let [tex]x=4[/tex]. The inequality becomes:

[tex]3^4>5(4)+25\\81>45(True)[/tex]

Therefore, the value of 'x' for which [tex]f(x)>g(x)[/tex] is 4.

So, from the fourth month onwards, the balance in [tex]f(x)[/tex] becomes greater than [tex]g(x)[/tex].

The graphical solution is shown below to support the same.

From the graph, we can conclude that after the 'x' value equals 3.4, the graph of [tex]f(x)[/tex] lies above of [tex]g(x)[/tex]. Hence, [tex]f(x)>g(x)[/tex] for [tex]x>3.4[/tex]

Consecutive even integers are -8, -6 and -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Let  be the first even integer then the next two integers will be: x+2 and x+6

According to given property, we get

[tex]x - 2(x+2) = (x+4)+8\\x-2x-4 = x+4+8\\-x-4 = x+12\\-x-x = 12+4\\-2x = 16[/tex]

Dividing both sides by -2

[tex]\frac{-2x}{-2} = \frac{16}{-2}\\x = -8[/tex]

The two next integers are:

x+2 = -8+2 = -6

x+4 = -8+4 = -4

Verification:

[tex]-8-2(-6) = -4+8\\-8+12 = +4\\4 = 4[/tex]

Hence, Consecutive even integers are -8, -6 and -4

Keywords: Linear equation, Variables

Learn more about linear equation at:

#LearnwithBrainly

he collected a total of $5,772 from selling all the cans.

Mr. Smith collected $5,772 from selling all the cans.

He sold 340 cans at full price for a total of $5,100.

He sold the remaining 39 cans at a discount of 20% each, for a total of $672.

Therefore, he collected a total of $5,772 from selling all the cans.

for such more question on discount

https://brainly.com/question/23865811

#SPJ3

Answer:

For the given function, Slope is [tex]\frac{7}{9}[/tex] and y-intercept is -2.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given function in x is :

    [tex]k(x)=\frac{7}{9}x-2[/tex]              .....1

Since, we know that the general form of equation of a line is :

     [tex]y=mx+c[/tex]                             .....2

where, y is the dependent variable, x is independent variable, m is the slope and c is the y intercept of the line.

On comparing equation 1 and 2, we get :

[tex]k(x) = y[/tex];

[tex]m = \frac{7}{9}[/tex]; and

[tex]c=-2[/tex];

Thus, we can conclude that

slope of function is [tex]\frac{7}{9}[/tex] and y-intercept is -2.

Answer:

3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

1 / (1/3) = 3

1/4 * 3 = 3/4

Answer:

4 bags of okra

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the unit rate: multiply the numerator by the reciprocal of the denominator.

unit rate =

1/2 divided by 1/4

= 1/2× 4/1

=4/2

= 2 bags per gallon

Therefore, double the recipe: 2 × 2 = 4 bags of okra

Answer:

Infinitely many solutions.

Step-by-step explanation:

x-2y=-3

14y-7x=21

-------------

simplify 14y-7x=21 into 2y-x=3

x-2y=-3

2y-x=3

--------------

x=2y+(-3)

x=2y-3

2y-(2y-3)=3

2y-2y+3=3

0+3=3

infinitely many solutions

Answer:

Odds in against the team winning is 5 : 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the provided information.

The odds against is the ratio of how many ways an outcome can't take place compared to how many ways it can take place.

Here the probability of winning its next match is 3/8.

That means total number of outcomes are 8.

Favorable outcomes are 3.

Therefore, the unfavorable outcomes are 8-3=5.

We need to find the odds against the team winning its next match.

Therefore, odds in against the team winning is 5 : 3

The probability of odds against the team winning is [tex]\frac{5}{8}[/tex]

To find the odds against the rugby team winning, subtract the probability of winning from 1 to get the probability of not winning and form a ratio of these probabilities, resulting in odds of 5:3 against the team winning.

The student is asking about the calculation of odds against a rugby team winning its next match given a certain probability of winning. First, we need to understand the probability of the team not winning (losing or drawing) because the odds against the team winning would be the ratio of it losing to it winning. Since the probability of winning is given as 3/8, the probability of not winning is 1 - 3/8 = 5/8. The odds against the team winning are therefore expressed as the ratio of the probability of not winning to the probability of winning, which is 5/8 to 3/8, or simply 5:3 when converted into odds format.

https://brainly.com/question/31742431

#SPJ3

Answer:

30%

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we want to setup the equation

[tex]y = a - (a\times x)[/tex]

where y is the discounted price, a is the normal price and x is the percent off. so now we wanna plug in known values and solve for percent off.

[tex]45.49 = 64.99 - (64.99x)[/tex]

through algebra,

[tex] - 19.5 = - (64.99x)[/tex]

[tex] \frac{ - 19.5}{ - 64.99} = x[/tex]

[tex]x = .3000...[/tex]

so in percentage that is 30%

Answer:

The slope intercept  of the given line equation AB is [tex]y  = \frac{1}{2}  ( x)- \frac{5}{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Here,the two given point s are A ( -9,-2) and B (1,3).

Now, the slope m of the line AB  =  [tex]= \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 -x_1}[/tex]

[tex]\implies m = \frac{3 - (-2)}{1 - (-9)}  = \frac{3+2}{1+9}  = \frac{5}{10}  = \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

or, the slope of line AB = 1/2

Now, the POINT SLOPE FORM of any equation with point (x0,y0) and slope m is given as :

y - y0 = m (x -x0)

So, the line equation of AB is given as :

[tex]y - 3 = \frac{1}{2}  ( x-1)\\\implies y  =3 +  \frac{1}{2}  ( x-1)\\or, y  = \frac{1}{2}  ( x)- \frac{5}{2}[/tex]

SLOPE INTERCEPT form is y = mx + c

Hence, the slope intercept  of the given line equation AB is [tex]y  = \frac{1}{2}  ( x)- \frac{5}{2}[/tex]

Answer:

-87= 1 + 8x

-88= 8x

x= -11

Basically bring over the one to the other side of the equation and solve for x by dividing.

Answer:

x=811/238, y=36/119. (811/238, 36/119).

Step-by-step explanation:

4x+(x-y/8)=17

2y+x-(5y+2/4)=2

-----------------------

4x+x-y/8=17

5x-y/8=17

40x-y=136

y=40x-136

------------------

2y+x-5y-2/4=2

2y-5y+x-1/2=2

-3y+x=2+1/2

-3y+x=4/2+1/2

-3y+x=5/2

-3(40x-136)+x=5/2

-120x+408+x=5/2

-119x=5/2-408

-119x=5/2-816/2

-119x=-811/2

119x=811/2

x=(811/2)/119

x=(811/2)(1/119)=811/238

y=40(811/238)-136

y=16220/119-136

y=36/119

x=811/238, y=36/119.

Answer:mark is 7. Mike is 4

Step-by-step explanation:x+y=11. Y=2x-10 thus substituting for y in equation1 we have x+2x-10=11. 3x-10=11. 3x=11+10. 3x=21. X=21/3. X=7. Mike =(2×7)-10=14-10=4

Step-by-step explanation:

Mark's age is x

so Mike's age is

[tex]2x - 10[/tex]

and we know that the sum of their ages is eleven so:

2x+x- 10 = 11

3x-10=11/+10

3x=21/÷3

x=7

Mark is 7 years old and

Mike is 4 years old.

Answer:

24 for 5 is higher because you have to divide 24 by 5 and if you do that it gives you $4.8, while 5 for 24 gives you a unit rate of $0.20.