Which MOST CLOSELY identifies the position argued by Newton Minow?

Answer:

Explanation:

There are some simple rules to follow when using punctuation.

Rule 1: Use a comma between two long independent clauses when conjunctions such as and, or, but, for, nor connect them.

Rule 2: If the clauses are both short, you may omit the comma.

Rule 3: If you have only one clause (one subject and verb pair), you won’t usually need a comma in front of the conjunction.

Now, lets see what statements in your question need commas.

Does statement 1 need a comma? ❌

It doesn't need a comma, because of rule 3.

Does statement 2 need a comma? ✔

It needs a comma, because giant and impersonal both modify corporation.

Does statement 3 need a comma? ❌

It doesn't need a comma, because hot and new both modify movie, common sense says a comma is awkward in this situation.

Does statement 4 need a comma? ❌

It flows well, without the need for a comma.

I'm always happy to help :)

Answer:

It is C in USATESTPREP

--VS

Explanation:

Answer: It makes it clear that Jimmy considers Angeline to be a threat to him.

Explanation: Jimmy is frantic and nervous because of Angeline; this is shown through his body language and his “search for escape”.

Answer:

answer is gonna be D

Explanation:

Answer: B

Explanation:

the correct answer is B:The slight movement is causing the entire tree to move.

Answer:

The best answer would be "Each time he had pulled a twig he had communicated a slight agitation to the tree — an imperceptible agitation, so far as he was concerned, but an agitation sufficient to bring about the disaster".

Explanation:

The second sentence is the best option because it sounds like a summary of the passage. Based on this passage, it is possible to state that it is a cold environment with no high winds, something that contributes to the fact that someone is under a tree with a bonfire. The person gets to pull out a twig from the tree, maybe to maintain the bonfire burning on. However, the person did not expect to make the tree agitate that much for dropping down all the snow accumulated in all boughs, which get to fall off one after the other, creating a huge snow landslide on the person and on the bonfire. Therefore, that movement put out the bonfire and replaced the flames with a lot of snow and ice, that is, an almost imperceptible movement becomes responsible for a disaster.

Answer:

C. Parents' behavior at their kids' games needs to change.

Explanation:

The passage is about how parents aren't behaving well at their kids' games, and how the parents need to remember that coaches are volunteers and only trying to help the players develop their skills, etc.

Final answer:

The question requires a citation and paraphrase of an author's first reason for their position, which entails restating their point in different wording while preserving the original meaning.

Explanation:

The question asks us to both cite and paraphrase the author's first reason in support of her position. Paraphrasing involves restating information using different words, primarily to clarify the original text or to simplify complex ideas. For instance, in an argumentative research essay, student Lily Tran supports her argument with evidence, using both quotes and paraphrases. Lily Tran's approach illustrates the effective use of researched evidence, exhibiting her ability to synthesize information from various sources and relate it to her thesis.

To cite and paraphrase the author's first reason, follow this example: if the author's first point is that evidence can help strengthen an argument, the paraphrased statement might be 'Substantiating claims with research-based facts contributes to the credibility of an argument'. This restatement maintains the original meaning without copying the author's exact wording. Noticing how Tran uses quotations and paraphrases can inspire similar analytical and writing strategies.

Final answer:

Ineffective nonverbal communication occurs when nonverbal cues do not align with verbal messages or are inappropriate for the situation or culture. Nonverbal communication can be effective but must be congruent with verbal communication to avoid confusion or ineffectiveness.

Explanation:

An example of ineffective nonverbal communication might be when nonverbal cues do not align with verbal communication or when the nonverbal message is unclear or inappropriate to the cultural context. For instance, while some gestures like raising a hand to get a server's attention are considered polite and effective in certain cultures, this can be seen as rude or aggressive in others. Moreover, if a person's facial expression or body stance contradicts what they are saying, this can lead to confusing or ineffective communication.

Research suggests that 55% of in-person communication is derived from nonverbal cues such as facial expressions, body stance, and tone of voice. Therefore, it is crucial for nonverbal communication to be congruent with verbal messages for it to be considered effective. Otherwise, a nonverbal cue such as a lack of eye contact, inconsistent facial expressions, or a closed body stance can hinder the communication process.

Answer:

Because they wanted to "lock in" the political deals that made ratification of the Constitution possible.

Answer:

C. Indian.

Explanation:

I think the right answer is Indian.

Answer:

Simple predicate - "delivered packages and mail"

Simple subject - "Frank", "School".

Explanation:

The sentence “Frank delivered packages and mail to the school every day”. This sentence contains both simple predicate and simple subject. The simple predicate here is ‘delivered packages and mail’. Simple subject here is ‘frank’ and ‘school’. This is because Frank and school is an example of simple noun and it forms the simple subject. The simple predicate here is delivered packages and mail because it does not gives the complete information of the entire scenario.

Answer:

It was important for doctors at Ellis Island to spot people with contagious diseases. If immigrants had a serious illness that could not be treated, they were not permitted and had to go home.

Explanation:

Answer:Sample Response: It was important for doctors at Ellis Island to spot people with contagious diseases. If immigrants had a serious illness that could not be treated, they were not permitted and had to go home.

Explanation:Pls mark me as brainliest need award

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Sarcasm is the use of irony to mock others, so B is the correct answer. Al says something that is known to be not true in order to mock Ted.

A would be exaggeration or hyperbole

Not sure what C would be

D would be irony

Option C is an example of sarcasm. Sarcasm is a form of verbal irony where words are meant to convey a meaning that is different from their literal interpretation.

Option C is an example of sarcasm. When Dana says 'It didn't turn out well' in reference to the charred cake layer, she is using sarcasm to express the opposite of what she really means. Sarcasm is a form of verbal irony where words are meant to convey a meaning that is different from their literal interpretation.

https://brainly.com/question/7694886

#SPJ2

Answer:

D. Exposition

Explanation: Its right

Rising action is the part which introduces the reader to the main characters, setting, and also the conflict in a story. Thus, the correct option will be A.

The rising action is the second of all the six essential plot elements in a story, which comes right after the opening of a story or the introductory part, otherwise known as the exposition of the story.

Rising action is usually made up of a series of events that lay down breadcrumbs, ask the questions, and also set the roadblocks and conflicts that must be overcome.

The rising action typically begins after the story's exposition or the introduction of the setting, characters, and conflict. Rising action may span several scenes or chapters.

Therefore, the correct option will be A.

Learn more about Rising action here:

https://brainly.com/question/2180986

#SPJ7

Answer:

I found all of this just for you!

Explanation:

"Two (2) is asking you to explain how the era the person lived in contributed to their experiences. Experiences usually work their ways into authors stories. And you have to use points of the memoirs that back your claims up.

Three (3) asks you to show the similarities and differences between "Barrio Boy" and "A Cub Pilot". Like the first question, you're being asked to explain how the author's experiences affect their writing. I'm sure somewhere in the stories, there are certain things that show why and how authors write the way they do and why they write the things that they do.

For question four (4); ask yourself this - what is the conflict of either "To Kill A Mockingbird" or "A Separate Peace"? When you figure out the conflict, figure out how it "drives the plot" or keeps the story going (that's the best way I can explain it). How do the characters in the story try to resolve the plot? What does this resolution suggest that the overall theme of the story is about?

I hope my answer clears up any confusion you may have had. Note that I won't give you the answers. I'm just going to give you rewritten (and somewhat more detailed versions) of the questions so that you can find the answers on your own."

Answer:

"It was a good enough lesson, but learned the hard way. Yet about the hardest part of it was that for months I so often had to hear a phrase which I conceived a particular distaste for. It was, 'Oh, Ben, if you love me, back her!'"

Explanation:

The author's point of view refers to the perspective or angle from which the author develops the story, there are three types of point of view: First person, second person, and third person.

The First-person point of view is when the narrator, who is also a character of the story, describes the events, characters, and their inner thoughts through their viewpoint, which is usually highly subjective. We can identify this perspective because it uses first-person pronouns such as "I,"  "me," "my," and "mine" and "We," "us," "our" and "ours".

Excerpt number 4, then, is the one that most clearly develops the point of view because it uses the pronoun “I” several times, which is an indication that the narrative is told from the first-person point of view.

Answer:

He is above deck and is not put into chains.

Answer: he was above in the deck and he was not put into chains.

Explanation:

Considering that Equiano was a young boy he had the possibility of being allowed to be on the deck of the ship. As a result he was not put into chains and he spent less time in the crowded rooms with the other slaves in terrible conditions. On the deck, the ship crew also taught him different navigational tools.

Answer:

Oats’ story, where are you going, where have you been? written in 1966, was inspired by the story of a serial-killer named Charles Schmid whose story was featured on Life Magazine.

The story shows the 1960s American era when the morale and social convictions were being challenged. At that time, feminism and sexual freedom was still a Conflicting topic in America.

The villain character in the story is a serial killer who hunts adolescent girls. In the story, a female character at her adolescent age suffers for having sexual feelings for boys.

Answer: proctor is going to the gallows because he ripped up the paper that showed evidence of his confession. Yes, he is taking the truth to the grave to keep his name.

Explanation:

Answer:

your answer would be C. DYING

Explanation:

we can tell bc of certain words like twiggy bushes, dead, brown, lifeless and sluggish

hope this helps!<333

Dying connotations do many of the words in the excerpt have in common. Hence option C is correct.

Any given word or phrase contains a connotation in addition to its denotation, which is its explicit or literal meaning. A connotation is a generally accepted cultural or emotional relationship.

Regarding its pleasant or unpleasant emotional link, a connotation is typically classified as either positive or negative.For instance, a stubborn person might be described as strong-willed or pig-headed; despite the fact that both of these adjectives mean the same thing in the literal sense (stubborn), strong-willed connotes admiration for the strength of someone's will  whereas pig-headed connotes frustration when dealing with someone

The word "connotation" has a variety of various meanings. These might include contrasting a word's or phrase's basic, literal meaning with what that word or phrase actually means.

To know more about Connotations :

https://brainly.com/question/16701112

#SPJ7.

The statements that best summarizes why some Native Americans allied with either side of the war is - Native Americans typically used trade relations to their advantage when playing one side off against the other, but the vast majority supported the French.

The Native Americans who lived in those territories were not consulted in this decision; in fact, the majority of them had chosen to support the British in order to prevent future white settlement.

The specifics that lend credence to the idea that Native Americans in 16th-century New England lived in an environment with those circumstances. To support that claim, we contend that during the colonial era, white Europeans mixed their customs and culture with those of native Indians.

The coexistence of these different religious systems led to numerous clashes between white Europeans and Native American Indian tribes. Native Americans did not try to adopt or oppose these alien traditions.

Therefore, option A is correct.

To learn more about Native Americans, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28870628

#SPJ6

Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was,

Which of the following statements best summarizes why some Native Americans allied with either side of the war?

a. In general, Native American played one side against the other to their own advantage, but a majority sided with the French due to positive trade relations between them.

b. The majority of eastern native tribes sided with the French due to their sense of loyalty and dependence on these Europeans.

c. Many Native Americans sided with the English because they saw the tactical advantage of allying with the greater presence of British settlers than the few French.

d. There was a relatively even split between Native American groups who chose to fight; this was based more on geographical location and proximity to certain European settlements.

Answer:

A. Prepositional

Explanation:

I got it correct on the edmentum/plato post test! I hope you have a great day!

The phrase 'Distracted by her father's snoring,' in the provided sentence is a participial phrase, which functions similarly to an adjective by providing additional details about the subject, Alisha.

In the sentence provided, 'Distracted by her father's snoring,' the underlined phrase is a participial phrase. A participial phrase typically begins with a present or past participle and functions to provide additional information about the subject, often acting as an adjective. In this case, 'Distracted by her father's snoring' describes the subject, Alisha, providing the reason for her action—to study in the kitchen.

To further illustrate, consider this similar example: 'Already exhausted by the second quarter, we were no match for the division champions.' Here, the participial phrase 'Already exhausted by the second quarter' adds a description to 'we,' much like how 'Distracted by her father’s snoring' adds a description to 'Alisha' in the original sentence.

Answer:

In a simple answer, you are wanting option C, "The Crisis, No. 1".

Explanation:

We know it's not option D OR A , because both are written at a later date. The Rights of Man was written in 1791, and The Age of Reason wasn't written until 1794, while battle of Trenton was in December of 1776,

This leaves us with only two options left, B and C.

If we then look at the very reason for the Revolutionary War, we know that it was in order to gain independence of Britian. The Crisis, No. 1 (written in December of 1776, same year and month as the Battle of Trenton)  is all about how the best thing Americans do is  fight for their independence from Great Britain. While Common Sense is about advocating independence.

Due to this information, we can easily see why Answer C is the correct answer!

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

A. Defy their teachers in every way

Explanation:

In the dissent, Black resolves to summon the students to fight the court decision, which he finds inappropriate and oppressive. To make this fight promising, Black urges all the students in the country to tease the system, to argue their teachers in every way possible, and not to let any argument go unnoticed. He calls on students to challenge teachers without fear of repression, but with the courage and grandeur of those who are struggling to be valued.

In the dissent, Black argues that students all over the nation will defy their teachers in every way in response to the Court's decision. The correct option is A.

In the dissent, Black argues that students all over the nation will defy their teachers in every way in response to the Court's decision. Black believed that the Court's ruling in the Brown v. Board of Education case was a mistake and that it would only lead to more conflicts and unrest among students and teachers.

He predicted that students would refuse to follow the integrated school system and would rebel against the authority of their teachers.

Learn more about dissent here:

https://brainly.com/question/32799234

#SPJ3

Answer:

1. Grandpa gave Martin the medicine bag.

2. The friends were brought by Cheryl to meet Grandpa after he came to stay with them.

3. The bus was taken by Grandpa to get to Martin's family.

Explanation:

The sentences have been revised by changing the active voice to passive voice and vice versa. For example, 'Martin is given the medicine bag by Grandpa' has been altered to 'Grandpa gives Martin the medicine bag' and so forth for the remaining sentences.

Let's revise the sentences by changing the active voice to the passive voice, and the passive voice to the active voice:

https://brainly.com/question/33855196

#SPJ3

Here is the passage to the question.

Read the passage from Animal Farm. On the third Sunday after Snowball's expulsion, the animals were somewhat surprised to hear Napoleon announce that the windmill was to be built after all. He did not give any reason for having changed his mind, but merely warned the animals that this extra task would mean very hard work, it might even be necessary to reduce their rations. The plans, however, had all been prepared, down to the last detail. A special committee of pigs had been at work upon them for the past three weeks. The building of the windmill, with various other improvements, was expected to take two years. That evening Squealer explained privately to the other animals that Napoleon had never in reality been opposed to the windmill. On the contrary, it was he who had advocated it in the beginning, and the plan which Snowball had drawn on the floor of the incubator shed had actually been stolen from among Napoleon's papers. The windmill was, in fact, Napoleon's own creation. Why, then, asked somebody, had he spoken so strongly against it? Here Squealer looked very sly. That, he said, was Comrade Napoleon's cunning. He had seemed to oppose the windmill, simply as a maneuver to get rid of Snowball, who was a dangerous character and a bad influence. Now that Snowball was out of the way, the plan could go forward without his interference. This, said Squealer, was something called tactics. He repeated a number of times, "Tactics, comrades, tactics!" skipping round and whisking his tail with a merry laugh. The animals were not certain what the word meant, but Squealer spoke so persuasively, and the three dogs who happened to be with him growled so threateningly, that they accepted his explanation without further questions.

Answer:

The answers are B) Napoleon talks to the animals through Squealer and the D) Squealer uses glittering generalities to describe Napoleon’s tactics.

Explanation:

Propaganda is information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause or point of view.  The passage above is typically partially biased or misleading. Options A, C, and E should, therefore, be discarded because there are not biased words. The reason why Napoleon chose Squealer was that he is biased. Squealer uses the word tactics to praise Napoleon, and he tells the animals that he was actually the one who designed the windmill even when other animals know that he once opposed the building of the windmill.

In Animal Farm chapter 7 describe the struggle of various animals in order to repair the windmill in days of cold winter season. They did not have enough food in January, which they try to hide from the human farmers around them, lest animal farm be seen as failing.

Correct options are B and D.

Propaganda is considered as the data that is used to promote a political cause or point of view, especially if it is biassed or deceptive. The passage above is partially prejudiced.

Explanation of Incorrect options:-

Hence, correct options are B and D.

To know more about Animal Farm, refer to the link:-

https://brainly.com/question/541405

Answer:

Ok hello I love this question and the answer is option a

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

Why I believe the answer is C because if we try to collerate the sentence witht the hive of the story: We find that it has similar connections just like how Red Velvet do with talent and skills.

merci de m'avoir laissé répondre, au revoir. Baisers!

Answer:

C. The speaker reflects on the experiences shared with Jesse at the

pond to inspire others to make the most of each day.

Explanation:

Answer:

"Do I look poor to you?!"

Explanation:

Explanation: ima just take all my stuff that i defentily paid for

Answer:

D. Admiring

Explanation:

The answer is D because the poet is admiring the fish(s) by talking about their fins, etc.