Answer:
Gradually, the investment required by the war and the lack of resources were devastating the South. Hoping for European support in the war, the Confederate authorities, instead of exporting cotton and enjoying profits, canceled sales, thinking that they could force, for example, the entry of England at his side against the Union troops. But the English had a year of stock of the product and the French refused to help the southerners without English support. Besides, Lincoln prohibited the entry and exit of southern states, making it difficult for goods to arrive. Those goods were needed for both the population of the South and the troops.
Looking at each other without weapons, clothes, and on the verge of starvation, the departure from military service was intense (about one-third of the southern troops left the battlefield in 1863). Some Southern masters gathered slaves to form their army.
About ________ percent of U.S. senators and U.S. representatives serving in Congress are women.
which nation suffered the fewest casualties in ww1
Final answer:
The United States had the fewest casualties during World War I, totaling 116,000, which was significantly less than the millions of casualties suffered by European nations.
Explanation:
The nation that suffered the fewest casualties in World War I was the United States. With 116,000 Americans losing their lives in the conflict, this was but a fraction compared to the Allied Powers and Central Powers who suffered millions of casualties. For instance, France had over six million casualties, and Germany had over seven million. Despite such losses, citizens in countries uninvolved in the conflict, including those in the U.S. before its involvement, were reluctant to join the war due to the horrific toll it was taking.
What did the United States hope to achieve with the Manhattan Project?
A. A way to detect Japanese aircraft carriers
B. The creation of an atomic weapon
C. A method to defeat kamikaze pilots
D. A system to detect U-boats in the Atlantic
The American-led endeavor to create a working atomic weapon during World War II was known as the Manhattan Project.
Thus, the correct option is B.
What was the Manhattan Project?
The first nuclear weapons were created as a result of the Manhattan Project's research and development efforts during World War II. With the help of the United Kingdom and Canada, it was spearheaded by the United States.
The first atomic bomb was created by the Manhattan Project. Concurrently, various research avenues were pursued.
At Oak Ridge in Tennessee, techniques for separating fissionable uranium-235 from uranium-238 were investigated using both electromagnetic and fusion technologies.
The American-led endeavor to create a working atomic weapon during World War II was known as the Manhattan Project.
Peter Lax, a 94-year-old math prodigy and retired professor at New York University, who was a 19-year-old corporal assigned to Los Alamos at the time of the Trinity test, is one of them.
Theoretical physicist Robert Oppenheimer was an American. Oppenheimer oversaw the research and development of an atomic weapon while serving as the head of the Los Alamos Laboratory during the Manhattan Project. As the "father of the atomic bomb," he is well-known.
Learn more about Manhattan Project, here
https://brainly.com/question/1129537
#SPJ5
The hindu deity who was the teacher of the world was (1 point)
What are the food administration the war industries board and the railroad administration example of?
They're all examples of Government Agencies created to help support the country during war.
Food Administration was a government agency responsible for controlling food reserves for U.S. and Allies' troops.
The War Industry Board, as mentioned before, "was created to coordinate the purchase of war supplies."
The U.S. Railroad Administration was a national railroad system in the US, which was created to improve railroads in the US. During war, the U.S. became a large provider of munitions, and the railroad system at the time couldn't handle the demand the war created. Thus, the investment in the national railroad system was made.
Which claim is arguable ? A. There are more democrats than republicans in Congress B. The United States has 50 states C. The constitution divides powers between the federal government and state government D. Senators should not have term limits
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Option A. There are more democrats than republicans in Congress contains facts that can be confirmed and it not arguable
Option B. The United States has 50 states contains facts that can be confirmed and it not arguable
Option C. The constitution divides powers between the federal government and state government contains facts that can be confirmed and it not arguable
Option D. Senators should not have term limits is a claim that is arguable because it has been stated in the law that a senator can't use more than two tenure. For them to have more than two tenure, there has to be a debate.
The answer is SENATORS SHOULD NOT HAVE TERM LIMITS.
a ruler who was not well liked but who brought prosperity to china
The correct answer is Empress Wu. I just took the test and got it correct.
Answer:
the correct answer is wu
Explanation:
How did the supreme court interpret the indian removal act?
a. tribes could choose to remain on their lands.
b. tribes had no right to any land in the new territories.
c. tribes had to abide by the decisions of the united states.
d. tribes would receive rent from farmers using their land?
The interpretation of the Indian Removal Act by the Supreme Court, as exemplified in Worcester v. Georgia, is: a. Tribes could choose to remain on their lands.
What is Indian removal act?The Indian Removal Act was a law made by the United States Congress in 1830. It allowed Native American tribes to be moved from their original lands to a specific area called Indian Territory that was located to the west of the Mississippi River.
Worcester vGeorgia was a court case that took place in the past. Georgia's highest court decided that the Indian Removal Act did not allow the government to forcefully move Native American tribes from their original lands.
Hence option A is correct.
Read more about indian removal act here:
https://brainly.com/question/714974
#SPJ6
The United States government puts high tariffs on a certain product that is imported from other countries. What effect does this have in the Unite? U.S. producers have to compete more with the imported product. High tariffs create a greater demand for the imported product. The product costs more in the U.S. that on the world market. The product costs less in the U.S. that on the world market.
Answer:
The product costs less in the U.S. that on the world market.
Explanation:
Which part of the government, according to the constitution, should be made up of two representatives per state?
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State. [U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 3, clause 1]
During the summer of 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia established equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives. Called the “Great Compromise” or the “Connecticut Compromise,” the unique plan for congressional representation resolved the most controversial aspect of the drafting of the Constitution.
In the weeks before the Constitution’s framers agreed to the compromise, the delegates from the states with large populations argued that each state’s representation in the Senate should correspond to the size of the state. Large-state delegates promoted James Madison’s Virginia Plan, the document that was the basis for several of the clauses in the Constitution. Under this plan, the Senate and the House would base their membership on the same proportional “right of suffrage.” That is, the number of senators in each state would be determined by its population of free citizens and slaves. Large states, then, stood to gain the most seats in the Senate. As justification for this advantage, delegates noted that their states contributed more of the nation’s financial and defensive resources than small states, and therefore, required a greater say in government.
Small-state delegates hoped to protect states’ rights within a confederate system of government. Fearing the effects of majority rule, they demanded equal representation in Congress, as was practiced under the Articles of Confederation and assumed in William Paterson’s New Jersey Plan. In fact, some framers threatened to withdraw from the convention if a proportional representation measure passed.
Other delegates sought a compromise between large-state and small-state interests. As early as 1776, Connecticut’s Roger Sherman had suggested that Congress represent the people as well as the states. During the 1787 convention, Sherman proposed that House representation be based on the population, while in the Senate, the states would be equally represented. Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate except in matters concerning money. The convention’s grand committee reported his motion, with some modifications, to the delegates early in July. Madison led the debates against Franklin’s measure, believing it an injustice to the majority of Americans, while some small-state delegates were reluctant even to support proportional representation in the House. On July 16, delegates narrowly adopted the mixed representation plan giving states equal votes in the Senate within a federal system of government.
Once delegates established equal representation in the Senate, they needed to determine how many senators would represent each state. State constitutions offered some guidance. Several states designated one senator per county or district, while in Delaware there were three senators for each of the three counties. Convention delegates did not refer to the state precedents in debate, however. Instead, they seemed to take a common-sense approach in deciding the number of senators.
According to constitutional commentator Joseph Story (1779-1845), few, if any, delegates considered one senator per state sufficient representation. Lone senators might leave their state unrepresented in times of illness or absence, and would have no colleague to consult with on state issues. Additional senators, moreover, would increase the size of the Senate, making it a more knowledgeable body, and better able to counter the influence of the House. On the other hand, a very large Senate would soon lose its distinctive membership and purpose, and actually decrease its ability to check the lower house or to allow senators to take personal responsibility for their actions.
Given these considerations, delegates had a limited choice regarding the number of senators. During the convention, they briefly discussed the advantages of two seats versus three. Gouverneur Morris stated that three senators per state were necessary to form an acceptable quorum, while other delegates thought a third senator would be too costly. On July 23, delegates filled in the blank in the proposal offered by Morris and Rufus King: “That the representation in the second branch consist of _____ members from each State, who shall vote per capita.” Only Pennsylvania voted in favor of three senators. When the question turned to two, Maryland alone voted against the measure, not because of the number, but because Martin disagreed with per capita voting, which gave each senator, rather than each state, one vote.
Which of the following was a consequence of Mexican independence?
A. A dictatorship emerged due to heavy reliance on Spain for trade.
B. A power struggle and civil war resulted in dictatorship.
C. Colombian superiority in trade resulted in economic depression.
D. The U.S. took Mexico as a colony, making it give up autonomy.
The correct answer is B) A power struggle and civil war resulted in a dictatorship.
A consequence of the Mexican Independence was a power struggle and civil war resulted in a dictatorship.
After gaining independence from Spain, General Agustin De Iturbide became the first emperor of Mexico. De Iturbide led the “Insurgentes Forces” to victory and proclaimed the Mexican Independence with the “Plan de Iguala” in 1821. Finally, on August 27, 1821, he signed the “Treaty of Cordoba” and Spain recognized the Independence of the First Mexican Empire.
Why did the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion?
The states were not ready to give up all of their independence.
The states believed the Articles of Confederation were adequate.
Each state was looking out for its personal interests and needs.
Each state was certain that cooperation would lead to mutiny.
The great compromise and the three-fifth compromise involve so much debate and discussion because each state was looking out for its personal interest and needs.
The great compromise addresses the issues of representation
The great compromise is also referred to as the Connecticut compromise, Sherman compromise or the great compromise of 1787. It’s an agreement that was made between small and large states as to the number of representatives that each state would have under the US constitution, including the legislature.
The agreement was made in 1787. This compromise was the outcome of the debate among the small and large state delegates as to the number of representatives that should come from each state. As a result of the heated debate, two-chamber congress was created.
The house of representatives was also created and its creation was determined by each states population. The great compromise agreement maintained the bicameral legislature. However, the senators to represent each state at the uppers were changed to two.
The three-fifth compromise sought for more electoral power to the southern states.
At the 1787 constitutional convention, an agreement was reached by state delegates. This agreement is known as the three-fifth compromise. Based on the compromise, for the purpose of taxation and representation, American slaves would be counted as three-fifth of a person.
The three-fifth agreement gave more electoral power to southern states. However, this would not have been the case if the population of slaves were out rightly ignored.
LEARN MORE:
Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise https://brainly.com/question/5339742KEYWORDS:
three-fifth compromisethe great compromisedelegatesamerican slavessouthern stateselectoral powerThe Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion as Each state was looking out for its personal interests and needs.(c)
Further Explanations:
Both the Comprises were presented in the Constitutional Convention of the United States held in 1787 and were centering at the representation of each State in Congress.
“Great compromise” was a compound representative plan that integrated the states through a constitutional convention. The principal motive of the promise was to substitute the “Article of Confederation”. The minor states feared that this would lead to unrestricted dominance of the big states.They emphasized on equal representation of each State. The Compromise created a bicameral legislature in which representation for “House of Representatives”was based on the populace and two Senators from each State.
“Three-Fifths Compromise” was the pronouncement presented in the convention conferring to which it was discussed that the slaves should be counted or not. In the case of tax policy and representation purposes, it was argued whether slaves should be counted in the populace figures or not as they were not measured as the citizens of the nation. The compromise stated that three out of each five slaves will be counted while determining a state's populace and how many seats will receive in the “House of Representatives”.The conclusion was that three out of each five slaves were reckoned a third more seat was granted to Southern States in the Congress.
Learn More
1. How did Alexander Hamilton and James madison view the constitution?https://brainly.com/question/1320793
2. the differences in the economic development of the mid-Atlantic, New England, and southern colonies can best be attributed to the?https://brainly.com/question/10776092
3. what was the main reason joseph Stalin created collective farms? soviet farms were old-fashioned and inefficient. collective farms would create many new jobs. farmland could be turned into industrial land. wasteful crop surpluses would be eliminated? https://brainly.com/question/381562
Answer Details:
Grade: High school
Subject: US History
Chapter: Great compromise
Keywords: Constitutional Convention, United States, Three-Fifths Compromise, tax , bicameral legislature, resident, Southern States, Great compromise, Article of Confederation, Congress,House of Representatives,
What factors contributed to american industrial preeminence in 1947?
During the renaissance period, much surgery and dentistry was performed by
During the Renaissance, and even during the Middle Ages, barbers were known to provide medical skills to wealthy, elite and ruling families of Europe. This seems unusual in contemporary periods; however, barbers were skilled with a sharp blade, making him a good candidate for surgery. Examples of their medical care outside of the ruling classes can be seen in the knightly jousting tournaments, where barbers were expected to care for those injured during the tournament games.
what is a difference between communism and socialism
The fordney-mccumber and hawley-smoot tariff laws had the long-term effect of
Why was the kansas-nebraska act so controversial? because it overturned a policy on slavery already in place, northerners felt betrayed?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was controversial because it overruled the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and allowed the legality of slavery to be decided by popular sovereignty, which many Northerners saw as a betrayal. This led to violence in Kansas.
Explanation:The Kansas-Nebraska Act was indeed controversial, primarily because it essentially negated the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had served to manage the delicate balance of power between North and South in the United States. The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed the settlers of a state to decide whether slavery would be legal in their new state, a concept known as popular sovereignty.
This resulted in a large number of pro-slavery settlers moving to Kansas from Missouri, leading to widespread violence known as 'Bleeding Kansas'. The fact that this new act resulted in a change of a longstanding policy regarding slavery, northerners saw it as a betrayal by the Southern politicians, making it further controversial.
Learn more about Kansas-Nebraska Act here:https://brainly.com/question/29363153
#SPJ6
The occurrence of Kristallnacht, or the Night of Broken Glass, in Germany in 1938 showed that the Nazi government
A.)fully supported violence against Jews.
B.)needed more support to hold onto power.
C.)had recovered from its economic problems.
D.)could not prevent violence against Jews.
The correct answer is A.)fully supported violence against Jews.
The Kristallnacht also called “The Night of Broken Glass” was a night that anti-Semitic people attacked and vandalized homes, businesses and synagogues. The Nazi Party supported violence against Jews, they passed anti-semitic laws before this event would happen and helped to burn down some workship places. More than a thousand synagogues were burned down, at least 96 people were killed.
How were the aztecs able to overcome the problems associated with tenochtitlán's island location?
What is one way in which southern and northern societies differed in the 1800s?
The Nothern and the Southern societies differ in many ways but the most likely way where they differ from each other was agriculture and industrialization.
What Was the Difference?In the 1800s the northern and southern societies are different in the form of development. Where in that time North become Industrialised but on the other hand south stay as an agriculturalist society.
Due to development in the North societies, slavery is almost prohibited but in the south still slavery in the practice. Due to development North was become a more powerful economy but other hand south still survived.
In the Industrialised economy north was practicing in the manufacturing area or practiced some innovation, on the other hand south focused on farming.
So there were many areas where the south and the north societies are different from each other in the 1800s.
To learn more about What Was the Difference follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/11519954
#SPJ5
What are three meanings of the word church in christian usage? what is the church's role in the father's plan to save us?
Which speaker is expressing a viewpoint that is most consistent with the principles of laissez-faire economics?
whose needs did the populist party most clearly represent
The answer is: Farmers
At that time, the populist party was formed to protect the farmers whose at that time were being taken advantage of by suppliers and distributors of agricultural products. The party advocated mainly for a decrease in taxes for various type of crops in order to increase the farmers' income.
What’s the goal MLK speech
Final answer:
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'I Have a Dream' speech aimed to address racial injustice and envision a society based on equality and harmony. It was a pivotal moment during the 1963 March on Washington and emphasized the necessity for civil rights legislation and economic opportunity for African Americans.
Explanation:
The goal of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, famously known as the "I Have a Dream" address, was to call for an end to racial injustice and to articulate a visionary future of racial harmony and equality in the United States. King's powerful rhetoric and use of repeated refrains such as "I have a dream" highlighted the deep-seated inequalities and the urgent need for change, capturing the hearts of many and galvanizing support for the civil rights movement. This speech was a defining moment during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom and had a profound impact on American society.
Why was the attack on pearl harbor so successful apush?
A single-party state is one in which
multiple political parties are allowed.
only one political party is allowed.
only one opposition party is allowed.
no political parties are allowed.
A dominant-party system, sometimes known as a one-party system, is a situation in politics when a single political party consistently outperforms rival candidates in elections.
Thus, Option B is correct.
What characteristics distinguish a one-party system?A one-party system is a style of governance in which a single political party rules the nation; as a result, only one political party exists and the formation of additional political parties is prohibited.
In certain nations, there are numerous political parties, but only one is permitted by law to hold power.
For more information about One party system refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/12074935
#SPJ5
Sir launcelot's nobles advise him to go to war. who has invaded and laid waste to his lands
Answer:
The correct answer is King Arthur of Britain.
Explanation:
"Lancelot, the Knight of the Cart" - attributed to Chrétien de Troyes, is a 12th-century poem that relates how Lancelot, one of the Round Table Knights, plans and gets to abduct King Arthur's queen Guinevere. In retaliation, The British King goes after her invading Lancelot's domains. Eventually, Lancelot gives the queen back and offers the king four horses loaded with riches and his shield to be placed in Saint Stephen's Cathedral in a special place so that everyone could see it.
The passage of that law marked a turning point in the civil rights movement?
When john proctor was first introduced was he happy?
Answer:
Explanation:
When John Proctor was first introduced he was not happy because Abigal was harassing him to be with her since she believed that john but it turned up that john never liked her at all and so john had a lot of guilt. liked her when he doesn't. He also held a lot of guilt.
What were the three reasons W.E.B DuBois suggests that motivated African Americans to leave the south during the Great Migration?
According to W.E.B. DuBois, African Americans were motivated to leave the South during the Great Migration due to better economic opportunities, escaping segregation and racial violence, and the prospect of improved living conditions in the North.
The Great Migration was a significant period in American history when African Americans moved from the rural South to urban areas in the North. According to W.E.B. DuBois, there were three main reasons that motivated African Americans to leave the South:
Economic opportunities: Many African Americans sought better employment prospects. The industrialization of Northern cities offered higher wages and relatively well-paid jobs compared to the limited and often exploitative jobs available in the South.Escape from segregation and racial violence: The pervasive Jim Crow laws in the South enforced strict racial segregation and discrimination. African Americans moved North to escape this legalized racial oppression and the threat of violence.Better living conditions: The North offered not only better job opportunities but also the prospect of improved living conditions. This included better schools, housing, and public services, along with a social environment where African Americans could pursue a higher quality of life.These factors together contributed to a mass movement that reshaped the demographic and cultural landscape of the United States.