Enslaved people were transported to Pensacola and New Orleans from states like Virginia, Maryland, the Carolinas, Tennessee, and Kentucky either by ship or overland. New Orleans housed the largest US slave market, fostering economic prosperity for white traders while resulting in immense suffering for the enslaved. The slave trade, amplified by the rise of the cotton industry, was a significant part of the Southern economy.
Explanation:Enslaved people were transported to the slave markets of Pensacola and New Orleans from states like Virginia, Maryland, the Carolinas, Tennessee, and Kentucky. One significant route of transport was by ship, especially engendering the heinous journey known as the 'Second Middle Passage'. Many of the enslaved were also forced to trek overland to their destinations.
These enslaved people were often captured and chained together for the duration of the journey to the coast. New Orleans had the largest slave market in the US, and the slave trade constituted a key part of the economy, offering many economic opportunities for white men who sold the enslaved, as well as those who served as middlemen or those who owned warehouses and pens where the slaves were held. Slave auctions happened daily in many southern states.
The booming cotton trade and the growth of slavery increased the value of enslaved individuals, making the domestic slave trade a vital part of the South's economy. It's important to remember that this trade resulted in the brutal separation of families and immense suffering for the enslaved people.
Learn more about Slave Trade here:https://brainly.com/question/33138321
#SPJ12
Final answer:
Slaves were forcibly moved to slave markets in Pensacola and New Orleans from states like Virginia, Maryland, and the Carolinas, often by overland coffles or by waterways including the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers. New Orleans was the United States' largest slave market. The domestic slave trade was integral to the southern economy, greatly profiting White slaveholders while disrupting and separating enslaved families.
Explanation:
Slaves were transported to slave markets in Pensacola and New Orleans from various states, including but not limited to Virginia, Maryland, the Carolinas, Tennessee, and Kentucky. These individuals were uprooted from the East and West and forced to make a distressing voyage to work in the Mississippi Valley. The domestic slave trade played a crucial role in the economies of the South, with White individuals reaping financial benefits off the backs of the enslaved. Notably, New Orleans held the title of the largest slave market in the United States. Enslaved people were often transported overland in coffles or by waterways such as the Mississippi River. The voyage was harrowing, and the selling of enslaved persons resulted in significant profits for White slaveholders and merchants.
Enslaved African Americans faced the second middle passage as they were shipped from upper states like Virginia—which specialized in breeding slaves for the market—to the Lower South. Slave auctions were a daily occurrence throughout the South, with trading hubs like New Orleans and Natchez, Mississippi, facilitating this grim commerce. White slaveholders systematically traded enslaved individuals, disrupting families, and selling them to regions experiencing a boom in cotton and sugar production.
The slaves would be prepared for transport, which included chaining them together, an adding hardship to the already horrific journey they were forced to endure. Families were routinely separated, and White enslavers made calculated decisions based on the potential for profit over the preservation of kinship ties among the enslaved.
North Korea, China, and Cuba are modem examples of governments that legally or practically permit only one political party
In single-party states, other parties and their points of view are prohibited or discouraged.
Write a short paragraph discussing a country's motivation for creating a single-party government. Why would a country want to
limit the number of parties in its system?
Answer:
A country would want to limit the number of party in its system because it's easier to control these parties and there is a lesser chance of the dictator being overthrown. people who disagree won't have the power to do overthrow the leader.
Explanation:
Which activist organized a grape boycott?
O
A. Rosa Parks
O
O
O
B. Cesar Chavez
C. Malcolm X
D. Elijah Muhammad
The American Activist that organised a grape boycott is known as Cesar Chavez, hence the correct option is B. Cesar Chavez,
What is mearn by the term boycott?A boycott simply means to refuse, or to reject, it is a verb, most activist boycott to show concern or to call the attention of concerned parties to an issue that is at stake.
Learn more about boycott here:https://brainly.com/question/17327888
#SPJ5
Cesar Chavez, activist organized a grape boycott. Thus, option (b) is correct.
Who is Cesar Chavez?Cesar Chavez was born on the March 31, 1927, and died on the April 23, 1993. Librado Chávez, Juana Estrada Chavez are the parents of Cesar Chavez. He was a labor leader and civil rights activist.
Chavez was a labour activist and a co-founder of the United Farm Workers of America (UFW), an organization that was established in 1962 to protect the rights of farmworkers, many of whom were Mexican Americans and were subjected to exploitation and discrimination in the agricultural sector.
As a result, the significance of the Cesar Chavez, activist organized a grape boycott are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on Cesar Chavez, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18369390
#SPJ5
How did the Immigration Act of 1965 change U.S. immigration policy?
A.
Instead of being judged on their criminal records, people simply paid a fee to immigrate.
B.
Instead of filling government-enforced quotas, people were judged on their skills and education.
C.
Instead of passing a health exam, people were judged on merit and determination.
D.
Instead of passing a U.S. history exam, people were sponsored by family members who already lived here.
Now, instead of filling government-enforced quotas, people were judged on their skills and education as the U.S. immigration policy changed because of the Immigration Act of 1965.
How did the Immigration Act of 1965 changed the U.S. immigration policy?The Immigration Act of 1965 brought an end to the National Origins Formula, which was the basis of U.S. immigration policy. The act withdrew the discrimination faced against the Asians, Europeans and other groups of immigrants. It is also called Hart-Celler Act.
As the result, the qualified and skilled workers were encouraged to immigrate. The Immigration Act of 1965 changed U.S. immigration policy as because now, instead of filling government-enforced quotas, people were judged on their skills and education.
Therefore, option b is the way Immigration Act of 1965 change U.S. immigration policy.
Learn more about Immigration Act of 1965:
https://brainly.com/question/8056897
Research about the cause and effect of the passage 19th amendment to the US constitution and explain to your reader why it is important to celebrate the 100th anniversary of women surface.
do it 2 or 3 pages.
90 pointss
Answer:
The 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted American women the right to vote, a right known as women's suffrage, and was ratified on August 18, 1920, ending almost a century of protest. ... Anthony and other activists, raised public awareness and lobbied the government to grant voting rights to women.
Explanation:
The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the individual right to keep and bear arms.It was ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights.
In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home,while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing upon this right.
The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Sir William Blackstone described this right as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense and resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state. Any labels of rights as auxiliary must be viewed in the context of the inherent purpose of a Bill of Rights, which is to empower a group with the ability to achieve a mutually desired outcome, and not to necessarily enumerate or rank the importance of rights. Thus all rights enumerated in a Constitution are thus auxiliary in the eyes of Sir William Blackstone because all rights are only as good as the extent they are exercised in fact.
While both James Monroe and John Adams supported the Constitution being ratified, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by state militias, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] a militia." He argued that state militias "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms," and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition".
By January 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut ratified the Constitution without insisting upon amendments. Several amendments were proposed, but were not adopted at the time the Constitution was ratified. For example, the Pennsylvania convention debated fifteen amendments, one of which concerned the right of the people to be armed, another with the militia. The Massachusetts convention also ratified the Constitution with an attached list of proposed amendments. In the end, the ratification convention was so evenly divided between those for and against the Constitution that the federalists agreed to the Bill of Rights to assure ratification.
In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendments [sic] means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government."
In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia."
In the twenty-first century, the amendment has been subjected to renewed academic inquiry and judicial interest. In Heller, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held the amendment protects an individual's right to keep a gun for self-defense. This was the first time the Court had ruled that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to own a gun.
In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court clarified that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Second Amendment against state and local governments. In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare."
The debate between various organizations regarding gun control and gun rights continues.
The 19th Amendment, ratified in 1920, granted women the right to vote in the US. It was driven by the hard-fought activism of women's rights activists, and its effect has been significant in propelling societal and political developments aimed at achieving gender equality. The celebration of its 100th anniversary acknowledges this profound impact and the continued struggle for full gender equality.
Explanation:The 19th Amendment to the US Constitution, ratified in 1920, granted women the right to vote. It marked a significant turning point in US history by effectively doubling the size of the electorate and paving the way for greater political and social developments related to gender equality.
The passage of the 19th Amendment was driven by the vigorous activism and advocacy of women's rights activists, such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. They argued against the prevailing societal and political norms that restricted the rights and roles of women to the private domain. The cause of the amendment was a long-fought struggle for equal rights.
The effect of the passage of the 19th Amendment has been profound. It not only allowed women to participate in the political process, but also ignited changes in societal norms and behaviors, empowering women to thrive in previously male-dominated arenas.
Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment is important because it reminds citizens of the advancements in democracy and equality that have been achieved, and the work that remains to ensure full gender equality. The celebrations reaffirm the value of the right to vote, reminding us of a time when this right was not extended to all citizens, and encouraging continued involvement in civic life.
Learn more about 19th Amendment here:https://brainly.com/question/34692551
#SPJ12
2. Why is the story of Prometheus an example of a myth?
Question- Why is the story of Prometheus an example of a myth?
Answer- The reason why the story of Prometheus is an example of a myth is because, in Greek mythology, Prometheus, possibly meaning "forethought" is a Titan, culture hero, and trickster figure who is credited with the creation of humanity from clay, and who defies the gods by stealing fire and giving it to humanity as civilization.
The story of Prometheus is an example of a myth because it consists of supernatural elements that convey societal beliefs and values from ancient Greece outside of chronological time. It represents the shift from mythos (myth) to logos (reason), blending mythological storytelling with a transition toward rational thought. Studying such myths can provide insights into societal and cultural values and transitions in thought patterns.
Explanation:Prometheus as a Myth
The story of Prometheus is an example of a myth because it is a well-known story from ancient Greece that encapsulates their society's values, beliefs, and teachings outside of chronological time. Myths such as the Prometheus story are characterized by their supernatural elements and mythological storytelling, which typically involve gods, heroes, and fantastic beings. As is typical in myths, these stories often aim to explain natural phenomena or the origins of humans and the universe - they are creation/origin myths.
The Prometheus myth tells of a powerful titan who defies the gods by stealing fire from heaven and giving it to mankind. In this myth, humans shift from the realm of religious answers to questions about purpose and meaning, moving towards more naturalistic and logical answers. This movement, described in Greek as a move from mythos (myth) to logos (reason), signifies the narrative transition from supernatural to rational and scientific thought.
From an anthropological perspective, studying myths like that of Prometheus provides insights into the society and culture it originated from. It reflects the transition from mythological thinking to rational thinking in ancient societies, helping us understand the progression of thought and knowledge.
Learn more about Myth of Prometheus here:https://brainly.com/question/28659965
#SPJ12
Which action by Caesar Augustus gave the Romans control over certain trade routes?
O the creation of the navy
the restoration of the Senate
the construction of the Pantheon
O the establishment of the mail service
Answer:the navy
Explanation:
Answer:
a the navy
Explanation:
edge 2020
The last Roman emperor who was able to unite the empire was
Diocletian
Constantine
Severus
Caesar Augustus
Answer:
Constantine
Explanation:
Answer:
Constantine
Explanation:
What was the name of Disney Walt brother and how many years apart were they?
Answer:
Roy O. Disney and 8 year difference.
Explanation:
Final answer:
Walt Disney's brother was named Roy O. Disney, and they were eight years apart, with Roy being the elder. Roy played a significant role in managing the business side of the Disney empire.
Explanation:
The name of Walt Disney's brother was Roy O. Disney. Roy was an important business partner in Walt's endeavors, helping to finance and manage the business aspects of the Disney empire. Walt Disney was born on December 5, 1901, and his brother Roy was born on June 24, 1893. This means they were eight years apart in age. Roy played a crucial role in the company, even leading the organization after Walt's death in 1966 until 1971. Despite being less known than his younger brother, Roy's contributions were key to the success of the Disney brand.
Who took control of France in a coup d'etat in 1799?
a. Marie Antoinette
b. Maximilien Robespierre
C. Thomas Edison
d. Napoleon Bonaparte
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
D. Napoleon Bonaparte
How did the space shuttle program begin?
A) After the Challenger disaster
B) flight of the Columbia
C) as a result of the Gemini program
Answer:
the answer is B.
Answer:
B) Flight of the Columbia
Explanation:
The civil rights movement inspired the women's movement by
A. making reproductive rights education more accessible.
B. drawing attention to group discrimination.
C. highlighting Martin Luther King Jr.'s calls for gender equality.
D. Offering models of non-violent protest.
Answer:
B. Drawing attention to group discrimination
Which social policy issue did the No Child Left Behind Act address?
O
A. Unequal opportunity despite overall prosperity
O
B. Declining achievement in public schools
O
C. Widespread poverty due to the Great Depression
D. A costly and unfair health care system
Answer:
B. Declining achievement in public school.
Which term is defined as the opening of the Constitution?
Answer:
The Preamble to the Constitution opens the document. It addresses the topics the writers planned to cover.
People in the Middle Ages were members of one of these three classes:
A. serf, monarchy, clergy
B. noble, clergy, merchants
C. serf, noble, clergy
Answer:
i believe it is C
Explanation:
the merchants were not yet a class and the nobles were a class separate from the monarchs in a way all monarchs were nobles not all nobles were monarchs hope this helps.
what role do trade organizations play in trade?
Answer:
Pretty much they just settle disputes that might come about.
Explanation:
Trade organizations are forums of governments to negotiate trade agreements. And if a dispute of some sort appears, the trade organizations are able to settle it by having the papers ect. Hope I helped! Have a great day! :)
Answer:It is an organization for trade opening. It is a forum for governments to negotiate trade agreements. It is a place for them to settle trade disputes. It operates a system of trade rules.
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT true about the Watergate break-in?
A. Former CIA agents broke in to the Democratic Party's headquarters at Watergate.
B. A link between the CIA agents and the White House are reported by 2 journalists.
C. The Senate and the Attorney General decided not to investigate further.
D. Nixon proclaimed his innocence and said the issue involved National Security.
Explanation:
it is d Nixon proclaimed his innocence and said the issue involved National security.
Answer:
C.) The Senate and the Attorney General decided not to investigate further.
Explanation:
This statement is very far from true actually.
After the the break-in occurred, Congress immediately became skeptical after president Nixon was reported to have connections with the agents.
They even involved the Supreme court when Nixon refused to hand over tapes involved with the incident, proclaiming that his executive privilege allowed him to keep the tapes confidential. This is what created the U.S v. Nixon supreme court landmark case.
This case shows us the limitations of executive privilege.
Why do you think that the text uses the word BOLDLY to describe this action of Truman's?
Final answer:
The word 'boldly' describes Truman's actions to emphasize the decisiveness and courage involved in defining moments of his presidency, such as his military strategies and his handling of critical wartime decisions.
Explanation:
The text uses the word boldly to describe President Truman's action to underline the decisiveness and courage involved in his decision-making, particularly in the context of major events such as dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and the handling of the Korean War. This descriptor emphasizes the resoluteness and potential risk-taking... Truman was aware of the immense power, as evidenced by indicating the bomb had 'more power than 20,000 tons of T.N.T.' The term boldly also serves to communicate to the readers that Truman's decisions, including seizing private steel mills during a labor strike or relieving General MacArthur of his command, were undertaken with a strong conviction and were instrumental in defining his presidency.
In the wider historical context, these actions by Truman addressed save American lives, showcasing the United States technological superiority, as well as the broader strategy of containing the spread of communism during the Cold War era. Moreover, the use of the term reflects how Truman's decisions were framed by historical narratives of strength and leadership during a period of significant global tension.
What are some of ancient Asias contributions?
HURRY!!!!!!! 5 mins
Answer and Explanation:
There are numerous inventions that we take for granted nowadays that are all thanks to the Ancient Asian communities. Just a few out of many are:
- Silk, ink, irrigation canals, kites, fireworks, gunpowder (from Chinese)
- Writing (from Sumerians)
- Glass, oars, purple dye (from Phoenicians)
- Soap (from Babylonians)
- Maps (from Mesopotamians)
Hope this helps!
Which percentage of Japanese people claimed Shintoism as
their religion?
O 83.9%
O 71.4%
O 7.8%
O 2%
Answer:
83.9%
Explanation:
If you find Shintoism in the "Religion" column of the graph, the corresponding percentage is 83.9%.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
. Applying How did Chinese silk production fit the definition
of a monopoly?
Answer:
Hey my name is gabe
U KiNdA CuTe NoT GoNnA LiE.......
U look younger than 15 so yea
Im 13 turning 14 feb 14 in 3 months
describe the relationship between industrialization and imperialism
As imperialism is a direct effect of industrialization, it must come with all the negative effects if industrialization. Though improvements such as irrigation systems and roads were developed, the famine, disease, and war due to Western Imperialism far outweighed the positive effects of industrializing.
What can differences in literacy rates indicate?
A) Countries with higher literacy rates usually have stronger militaries.
B) Countries with lower literacy rates usually lack of natural resources.
C) Countries with lower literacy rates usually have more stable governments.
D) Countries with higher literacy rates usually have a higher standard of living.
2 Polnts
How can banks afford to pay interest on their customers' savings account
deposits?
A. They charge high fees to their checking account customers and
transfer that money to their savings account customers.
O
B. They loan out the money in their customers' accounts and charge
a higher interest rate on the loans.
C. They take overnight loans from the Federal Reserve Bank and
speculate on the currency exchange market.
O
D. They invest their customers' deposits in government-insured
bonds and low-risk stocks.
Answer:
B) They loan out the money in their customers' accounts and charge a higher interest rate on the loans.
Explanation:
The reason you recieve money for putting money in a checking or savings account is because the bank needs money to loan to other customers. Because the customer recieving the loan pays the bank interest in return, the bank can afford to share some of the money gained in interest with customers to encourage them to keep money in the bank.
Banks afford to pay interest on savings by loaning out those funds to borrowers at a higher interest rate, thereby making a profit. They rely on the fractional reserve banking system, which allows them to lend most of the deposits while maintaining a fraction in reserves.
Banks can afford to pay interest on their customers' savings account deposits primarily because they loan out the money to borrowers. Banks charge these borrowers a higher interest rate for the loan than the interest they pay on savings accounts. This allows banks to make a profit, which is the difference between the interest they earn from loans and the interest they pay to depositors.
In addition to earning money from loans, banks may also engage in other financial activities such as investing in government securities or the commercial paper market. The fractional reserve banking system allows banks to keep only a small fraction of the total deposits as reserves and lend out the majority of it. This system capitalizes on the fact that not all depositors will withdraw their funds at the same time.
Therefore, the correct answer to how banks can afford to pay interest on their customers' savings account deposits is option B: They loan out the money in their customers' accounts and charge a higher interest rate on the loans.
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first federal act passed with the intent of outlawing monopolistic
business practices and prohibiting the establishment of
I think its something like enterprises
Answer:
Trusts
Explanation:
Roosevelt used the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 to attack the robber barons’ monopolies. This was the first act designed to outlaw monopolistic business practices. It also regulated the establishment of trusts. A trust is a commercial alliance between businesses. Roosevelt supported business trusts that benefited the public good, but thought trusts intended solely for profit violated the public interest.
What was the effect of Thomas Jefferson being elected?
Answer:
The major effect was the separation of church and state.
What 3 countries were part of the Axis powers?
Answer:
Germany, Italy, and Japan.
Explanation:
These countries were working together as allies. After signing the Tripartite Pact in 1940 they were officially called the Axis Powers.
Each Axis had a leader. In German you have, Adolf Hitler. In Italy you have, Benito Mussolini. Finally, you have Emperor Hirohito in Japan.
PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME
1.) How would you recommend improving the executive branch of the federal government in the United States? Why?
2.) How would you recommend improving the legislative branch of the American federal government? Why?
Answer:
1: My recommendation to fix the executive branch would be to get rid of the Electoral College system as a whole and improve voting access. If we are going to recognize our country as a Democracy, then we should have the power to elect our president and it should be left to raw counting instead of constituents.co
2: My recommendation to improve the legislative branch of the government would be to make Congress as bipartisan as possible in order to achieve things. The fact that we were in a government shutdown is sad because of the fact that Congress couldn't agree on the budget and the fact that party divides cause social issues as well as economic.
Explanation:
There are many ways we can improve government. Some are complicated, some are difficult, and some are simple.
As we confront today’s increased social and political tensions, and as we continue to work toward a better government, three fundamental lessons for career and political leaders can help us build a better future. The people of this nation, and leaders in both the executive and the legislative branches of government, can work together to better government by embracing age-old truths and keeping civics lessons in mind.
Congress is the governing body of the United States. It is made up of two chambers: the Senate (Senate) and the House (House). Congress is held in session at the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C.
To learn more about the government, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ2
Which conclusion about sorghum farming is supported
by the information presented in the map?
O Sorghum is farmed only in areas where the original
Bantu migrated
O Sorghum farming is only practiced in the original
Bantu homeland areas.
an
O Sorghum is farmed only by Bantus who migrated to
the coast.
O Sorghum farming likely spread with the Bantu
migration
Answer:d sorghum farming is likely spread with the Bantu migration
Explanation:
Do not really have one, just got the question right
Answer:
D) Sorghum farming likely spread with the Bantu migration.
Explanation:
BLAH BLAH BLAH everyone came here for the answer
A group that was part of the Free-Soil Party was made up of
anti-abolitionists.
Republicans.
O antislavery Whigs
Southern Democrats.
Republicans
Hope this helps you !!!!!
PS
Explanation : The Free Soil Party was a short-lived coalition political party in the United States active from 1848 to 1854, when it merged into the Republican Party. The party was largely focused on the single issue of opposing the expansion of slavery into the western territories of the United States.
Answer:
REPUBLICANS
Explanation:
Yes
Explain the difference between a progressive tax and a regressive tax ... cite one example of each, and explain why the example fits into that category of tax.
Answer:
Regressive taxes are when higher income people pay a smaller percent of income than the lower income people (state and city sales taxes). Progressive taxes are when higher income people pay a greater percent of their income compared to lower income people (federal income taxes).
Explanation:
Regressive taxes, such as state and local sales taxes, are levied when those with higher incomes pay a smaller percentage of their income than those with lower incomes.
Thus, Progressive taxes (federal income taxes) are levied when those with higher incomes pay a larger percentage of their income than those with lower incomes.
Regressive taxes are those that take a bigger percentage of income from low-income people or households than they do from people or households with higher incomes. In other words, the tax burden rises disproportionately when income declines.
The tax rate falls as income rises in a regressive tax system. As a result, people with lower incomes pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes than people with higher incomes do.
Thus, Regressive taxes, such as state and local sales taxes, are levied when those with higher incomes pay a smaller percentage of their income than those with lower incomes.
Learn more about Progressive tax, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30104586
#SPJ3