Which describes a result of California's rapid population growth during the mid-1800s?

Party organization encompasses the officials and members who govern the operations and strategy of political parties, with national party committees being the central authorities in the U.S. Party structures at state and local levels adapt to their specific political environments and provide support through various party-building activities.

Party organization refers to the collective of officials, activists, and members responsible for the structure and operations of political parties. In the United States, the Democratic and Republican national party committees serve as the central authorities of the two major American parties. These organizations play a crucial role in establishing the administration, devising rules, and steering the parties' collective goals and activities.

At the state and local level, party organizations are shaped by the political environment in which they are situated. The organizational structure of political parties includes the machinery, procedures, and rituals employed by party leaders to operate effectively within electoral and governing contexts. Through their structures, they create connections between leaders and followers, ensuring a constant base of support.

Party organizations maintain permanent offices to support their constituencies, concentrating on party-building activities like voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives. They also provide candidate support services, such as collecting polling data and running advertising campaigns. National party committees stand at the apex of the organizational hierarchy of American political parties, setting the overall direction and strategies.

The reason that the committee of the public safety was given such broad powers by the French revolutionaries because of the fact that they wanted defend the France from dangers such as those threats that they might or likely receive in which is why the French revolutionaries gives such broad powers.

Globalization is a trend toward a higher degree of connection  between people, businesses, and governments around the world.

The movement toward globalization has existed for many years, but recent improvements in technology have increased  the pace of this change..

Answer:

Silk Road, also called Silk Route, ancient trade route, linking China with the West, that carried goods and ideas between the two great civilizations of Rome and China. Silk went westward, and wools, gold, and silver went east. China also received Nestorian Christianity and Buddhism (from India) via the Silk Road.

Answer:

Daniel Morgan (1736-1802) was an American patriot, soldier and politician from Virginia, who became a key player in the entire American Revolution. With the use of his military knowledge, and experience, and engaged with Benedict Arnold´s expedition, Morgan became very important in the debilitation of the British advances to try to curb the rebellion. His main tactic, acknowledging the strength of the British, was simple, but very effective; he used guerrilla-like tactics: small numbers, light of weapons, small hits against columns of the British military without head-on confrontations, capturing of weapons, people and supplies, and thus managed to help in the defeat of Britain´s main leader, General Burgoyne. The reason for these tacticts was that Morgan acknowledged the superiority of the British military, and understood that the best way to defeat them was not in a frontal attack, but in smaller, less-predictable, and total dishonorable, ways. One major thing he did was to get rid of the Indian guides who helped the British gain the upper hand on the Continental Army.

1. Bourgeoisie are the middle class.

These are people who during older times lived in cities and were not just farmers or the working class but rather people like merchants or service providers. Originally, the concept wasn’t pejorative since Burger meant resident of a city, but it got a negative connotation when various revolutions started rising.

2. Creole is a person of European ancestry who was born in the Americas. 

This term mostly revolves around the Caribbean area where numerous European settlers mixed with locals. The children born were creoles and they developed their own language which was a mixture of the two and eventually they became the majority.

3. Manumission is the practice of emancipating slaves.

It was a formal way to say that a slave had been freed by their masters and was a free man or a free woman. It was an important word during older times when slavery was allowed before it was abolished in the United States. In Europe, it was abolished even earlier.

4. Mestizo is a person of mixed European and indigenous descent.

These were people who were usually children of European settlers and local native americans and the term is mostly connected to the Spanish colonies where white Spaniards mixed with local Natives in the Latin American area of the Americas.

5. Mulatto is a person of European and African descent. 

These people were born mostly through miscegenation where white people had children with black slaves. Since the practice was forbidden, any resulting children were treated as completely black and were born into slavery regardless of the fact that they were part white.

6. Proleteriat are the working class. 

This word is heavily used in Marxist critique because it is the word used for the working class which is the majority of the population of every country in the world. It is believed by many that the Bourgeoisie is exploiting the Proleteriat for its own benefit and the proletariat needs to be freed.

7. Sepoys are indian troops.

These were soldiers from India during the British occupation and colonization of India and they were famous for the Sepoy Rebellion agains the British India Company after which the Maharaja took the top position as one of the locals but the rule was actually done by the British crown.

8. Suffrage is voting rights. 

Suffrage is the concept of having voting rights. At first the voting rights belonged to only a smaller privileged group that had them, even in ancient Greece, but as time went by and people modernized their societies voting rights were extended and in democratic societies today suffrage is usually universal

9. Zaibatsu were powerful industrial families in Japan. 

They came into existence following the Meiji restoration when the crown took back rule over Japan and wealthy entrepreneurs started opening more and more companies. They used to have huge power over certain regions of Japan but they lost their power following world war 2.

Answer:

The answer is A. The colonists could criticize the government as long as they were speaking the truth.

Explanation:

The Southerners supported Kansas-Nebraska Act because they thought that granting popular Sovereignty would allow slavery in the territories.

Further Explanation:  

The Kansas-Nebraska act was the bill which that was tabled 1854 and asked for ‘Popular Sovereignty” which allowed settlers of the territories to decide if the slavery would be given access and would be allowed within the new borders of the State or not. This bill overturned the Missouri compromise under which there was a use of Latitude as a boundary between free and slave territory. There were allot of conflicts that took place between the ones who supported this bill and ones who opposed it. This conflict led to violence which is known as ‘Bleeding Kansas’ which is considered in a way as start of American Civil War. The North wing of the US Parliament opposed this bill yet it was passed with the support of all the southerners and some northern wings. This outraged many northerners which gave rise to Republican Party which was considered as Anti-Slave party. This gave rise to ‘Kansas Bleeding’ as there was clear confrontation between anti-slavery and pro slavery states. The question of the matter was that will Kansas Enter United States as Slave State or Free State. On the other hand, The Southerners supported Kansas-Nebraska Act because they thought that granting popular Sovereignty would allow slavery in the territories.

Learn more:

1. What did china agree to do once the treaty of Nanjing was signed? https://brainly.com/question/175568

2. A challenge that Italy faced after unification was? https://brainly.com/question/1906934

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Kansas-Nebraska Act

Keywords:

Kansas Nebraska Act, United States, Kansas, Bleeding Kansas, Slave, Free State, Slave State, Republican Party, Territory, Borders.

Southerners supported the Kansas-Nebraska Act in the hope that it would allow the spread of slavery through popular sovereignty. This overturned the Missouri Compromise, which had previously prohibited slavery in these territories.

Southerners supported the Kansas-Nebraska Act because they believed it had the potential to allow the spread of slavery. This Act was controversial because it gave the people in the territories the power through popular sovereignty to determine whether they would allow slavery within their borders, effectively setting aside the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which had prohibited slavery north of latitude 36°30'. The correct answer to your question is therefore option C: they thought that granting popular sovereignty would allow slavery.

https://brainly.com/question/29363153

#SPJ6

Answer:

Slaves from West Africa were generally sold in African and European countries, while slaves from East Africa were generally sold in Persia and Mesopotamia.

Explanation:

The early trading of slaves in West and East Africa have in common were neither slaves traded in the American countries.  

Option A is the correct answer.

Slavery is the scenario practiced in the times of ancient history where one individual was owned by another individual.

The slaves of the western part of Africa were traded in the countries of Africa and Europe whereas the slaves that belonged to Eastern Africa were traded in the countries of Persia and Mesopotamia.

Therefore, the trading of slaves in both parts of Africa did not have any connection with American countries.

Learn more about the slavery in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/9331183

#SPJ2

L is right answer hope this helps :)

Answer:

it is D

Explanation:

It met for about six weeks and sought to repair the fraying relationship between Britain and colonies while asserting the rights of colonists. The Second Continental Congress convened in 1775 in response to the breakout of hostilities in Massachusetts.

Answer:

freed slaves followed the march of Cherman's army through Georgia

Answer choices are :

A)it pushed the US to join the war on the side of the Central Powers  

B) it made the US suspend its trade embargo with Germany

C) it was another reason for the US to join the war on the sides of the Allies  

D) it helped the US decide to halt trade with Mexico

Correct answer choice is :

C) It was another reason for the US to join the war on the sides of the Allies

Explanation:

The Zimmermann Telegram was a confidential diplomatic note declared from the German Foreign Office in January 1917 that offered a military agreement among Germany and Mexico in the event that the United States started World War I against Germany. The telegram was intercepted and decoded by British intelligence. The disclosure of the contents infuriated Americans, particularly after German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmermann openly revealed the telegram was confirmed on March 3 and helped make support for the United States announcement of war on Germany in April.

Answer:

The Correct Answer is the French, American, and Glorious revolutions were caused by an absolute authority.

Explanation:

The Glorious Revolution was the several events that took place from 1688 to 1689 which was ended with the deportation of King James II and the assenting to the throne of William and Mary. It has also seen as the development of the Constitution and especially of the role of parliament.

while the French revolution was started in 1789 and wanted to change everything Economy, Government, Religion and social structure.

And, the people of the United States wanted liberty from the British but king George the third didn't want to get them free from the British rule, so he was kept fighting.

Option D) The French, American, and Glorious revolutions were reactions to absolute authority, challenging monarchy and colonial rule for democratic governance.

1. French Revolution: The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was largely a response to the absolute monarchy of King Louis XVI and the social, economic, and political injustices that prevailed in France at the time. The monarchy's absolute authority, coupled with widespread poverty, inequality, and lack of representation, fueled discontent among the French populace. This discontent eventually erupted into a revolution aimed at overthrowing the monarchy, establishing a republic, and promoting ideals such as liberty, equality, and fraternity.

2. American Revolution: The American Revolution, which occurred between 1765 and 1783, was a reaction to British colonial rule and perceived abuses of power by the British government. Colonists in North America resented British policies such as taxation without representation, strict control over trade, and the quartering of British troops in their homes. These grievances led to widespread resistance and eventually to armed conflict between the American colonists and the British forces. The revolution resulted in the independence of the thirteen American colonies and the formation of the United States of America.

3. Glorious Revolution: The Glorious Revolution, also known as the Revolution of 1688, took place in England and involved the overthrow of King James II by a union of English Parliamentarians with the Dutch stadtholder William III of Orange-Nassau. King James II's attempts to establish absolute rule and promote Catholicism in a predominantly Protestant nation alienated many of his subjects and led to his deposition. The Glorious Revolution resulted in the establishment of constitutional monarchy in England, limiting the powers of the monarch and affirming the supremacy of Parliament.

In all three cases, the revolutions were sparked by grievances against absolute authority, whether it be the absolute monarchy in France, British colonial rule in America, or King James II's attempts to establish absolute rule in England.

I believe the answer is unstable.

One hundred years after Haiti gained independence, its government could be best described as unstable and inneficient.

In 1803, Jean Jacques Dessalines defeated the French troops in the Battle of Vertierres and in 1804 declared the independence of the country, which he called Haiti, and proclaimed himself emperor.

Dessalines led a despotic government. The white settlers were expelled and exterminated, and Dessalines executed most of the approximately 10,000 whites who remained on the island. He was murdered in turn by a mulatto revolt, on October 17, 1806, initiating a secular tradition of confrontations between the majority of purely black race and the mulatto minority, which has usually been identified with the middle class and the economic elites.

At the beginning of the 20th century, the country was in a state of almost permanent insurrection. In 1915, US President Woodrow Wilson invaded Haiti to counteract the influence of the German Empire, restore order after the death of President Vilbrun Guillaume Sam into the hands of a furious people, and defend the interests of the American investment bank Kuhn, Loeb & Co. Haiti remained almost permanently occupied by the United States between 1915 and 1934, a period during which Haitian governments managed to clean up public finances, create an army and build schools and roads.

it would be the jury